Posted on May 9, 2015
1px xxx
Suspended Profile
42.8K
85
35
Comments have been disabled
Responses: 19
1px xxx
Suspended Profile
I think that because of the low amount of Soldiers selected for promotion to MSG, there will be significantly fewer Soldiers selected for promotion to SFC. While this is to be expected due to the drawdown within the Army, I think there are a couple things that will result from this;

1-With selection criteria becoming more stringent, only the best will get selected thereby building a better Army in the long run.

2-There will be more people retiring, getting chaptered out, and ETS'ing earlier than initially planned.

Is there anything else I'm missing? I think these are the biggest outcomes, but there may be something else I hadn't thought about.
SFC Boots Attaway
SFC Boots Attaway
9 y
I think more of the higher enlisted promotions will be political and not who is best qualified with the lower number of promotions. If I am correct it will be a big blow to the Army as we will lose a lot of good men and women.
SFC Bde Fire Support Nco
Trend wise, the year they only picked up 2 13F's for MSG the SFC list of promotions was a big fat 0. Granted the next year they selected around 380 for SFC. This year out of a pool of close to 300 13F's considered for MS only 29 were selected. Barely a dent so, only speaking for MOS, but promotions to SFC may be slim. The MOS, positions available, QSP's and QMP's are the factors that determine who and how many are picked up now.
1px xxx
Suspended Profile
9 y
I'm willing to bet that based on SFC numbers from last year and the recently released MSG list, the SFC board and subsequent list from later this summer will be even smaller than expected.

I think the biggest impact is going to see the results for QSP/QMP.
SFC Fire Support Specialist
SFC (Join to see)
9 y
29 is better than two tho!!! Even though only 29 were selected, maybe that will allow for 29 to be selected for SFC. And that beats zero any day of the week
SMA Ray Chandler
SMA Ray Chandler
9 y
As announced by the CSA recently we will go down to 450K on Active duty by the end of FY 17. Since there will be less spaces there will be less faces to promote. This is inevitable when you do a drawn down.
1SG Cameron M. Wesson
Team,

First, the quasi low promotions is tertarially a result of the drawdown. I know because I m tracking Total Army Analysis, TAA in AR 71-11, as a Force Manager. Right now the Army is trying to determine what they need to "look like" in FY 18-22... This year has been whose than last year due to where the force structure should be... So it doesn't make sense to promote to any MOS/grade until the Army determines what the future force is going to look like.

I didn't realize this in 92/93 after Desert Shield/Desert Storm... And it was much more drastic during that time.

I recommend patients for the next two FYs... As it took until 95 to rebound after that reorganization.

If you don't believe... As someone else who lived and saw it.
SMA Ray Chandler
SMA Ray Chandler
9 y
I lived that dream
1SG Cameron M. Wesson
1SG Cameron M. Wesson
9 y
SMA Ray Chandler of that I have no doubt. As the sergeant major of the army I'm sure you saw more than your fair share of challenges with regards to the next evolution of the army and the "wringing of the hands". What I now see in Force Management amazes me that we are still able to field and equip the force we do! It is through sheer tenacity and "not surrendering" that makes it so!

I believe you and I have a mutual friend JD Garrett
SMA Ray Chandler
SMA Ray Chandler
9 y
We do amazing things to man the force. Yes I knew him well. Thanks
SFC Eric Williams
SFC Eric Williams
>1 y
Great advise 1SG Wesson....

Join nearly 2 million former and current members of the US military, just like you.

close