Are the bulkheads still 17” thick on today’s ships as they were in WWII? https://www.rallypoint.com/answers/are-the-bulkheads-still-17-thick-on-today-s-ships-as-they-were-in-wwii <div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>I was watching a documentary about WWII and the different ships and they said the bulkheads were 17” thick. I took out a tape measure to show him what that looked like and he made the comment, that was thicker than our house walls. So he and I just wanted to know if modern day ships are that thick? Sat, 08 May 2021 04:46:57 -0400 Are the bulkheads still 17” thick on today’s ships as they were in WWII? https://www.rallypoint.com/answers/are-the-bulkheads-still-17-thick-on-today-s-ships-as-they-were-in-wwii <div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>I was watching a documentary about WWII and the different ships and they said the bulkheads were 17” thick. I took out a tape measure to show him what that looked like and he made the comment, that was thicker than our house walls. So he and I just wanted to know if modern day ships are that thick? PFC James (LURCH) Janota Sat, 08 May 2021 04:46:57 -0400 2021-05-08T04:46:57-04:00 Response by SFC Casey O'Mally made May 8 at 2021 1:13 PM https://www.rallypoint.com/answers/are-the-bulkheads-still-17-thick-on-today-s-ships-as-they-were-in-wwii?n=6960195&urlhash=6960195 <div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>I don&#39;t know. But I would guess that this type of specification would go danger close to OPSEC violations. Not the type of thing to discuss on an open forum (even if it probably *is* unclassified).<br /><br />Not in the Navy, not sure how &quot;public&quot; that info is. Just looking at it from an adversary POV. SFC Casey O'Mally Sat, 08 May 2021 13:13:23 -0400 2021-05-08T13:13:23-04:00 Response by MAJ Ken Landgren made May 8 at 2021 2:21 PM https://www.rallypoint.com/answers/are-the-bulkheads-still-17-thick-on-today-s-ships-as-they-were-in-wwii?n=6960341&urlhash=6960341 <div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>Would you like to read a narrative of how important the US Navy was in our quest to defeat Japan? MAJ Ken Landgren Sat, 08 May 2021 14:21:25 -0400 2021-05-08T14:21:25-04:00 Response by LTC Jason Mackay made May 8 at 2021 2:23 PM https://www.rallypoint.com/answers/are-the-bulkheads-still-17-thick-on-today-s-ships-as-they-were-in-wwii?n=6960343&urlhash=6960343 <div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>Would say this specification is not the same as many US Navy vessels have aluminum hulls. Open source information. LTC Jason Mackay Sat, 08 May 2021 14:23:13 -0400 2021-05-08T14:23:13-04:00 Response by SSgt Christophe Murphy made May 8 at 2021 3:02 PM https://www.rallypoint.com/answers/are-the-bulkheads-still-17-thick-on-today-s-ships-as-they-were-in-wwii?n=6960389&urlhash=6960389 <div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>Ships in general aren&#39;t as large or bulky as they were in WWII. That has a lot to do with materials used, weapons used, and naval tactics as a whole. If you compare something like the USS Alabama to a modern littoral you can see how tech has evolved. We don&#39;t use 16 inch guns anymore so ships don&#39;t need to be so large to support that weapon system. SSgt Christophe Murphy Sat, 08 May 2021 15:02:20 -0400 2021-05-08T15:02:20-04:00 Response by Maj John Bell made May 8 at 2021 3:59 PM https://www.rallypoint.com/answers/are-the-bulkheads-still-17-thick-on-today-s-ships-as-they-were-in-wwii?n=6960443&urlhash=6960443 <div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>You are probably referring to the armor plates that make up the hull, particularly at or near the water line. Bulkheads are something entirely different.<br /><br />A bulkhead is essentially any wall that divides two or more compartments. They can be steel or aluminum, thick or thin. A powder magazine may have vented blast walls of case hardened steel in excess of 16 inches thick. <br /><br />Officer&#39;s country, above the waterline, the compartment walls will normally be made of stiffened sheet metal less than 1/8&quot; thick.<br /><br />It is all about the contents of the compartment and the stability/seakeeping ability of the hull form Maj John Bell Sat, 08 May 2021 15:59:55 -0400 2021-05-08T15:59:55-04:00 Response by CWO3 Private RallyPoint Member made May 8 at 2021 4:40 PM https://www.rallypoint.com/answers/are-the-bulkheads-still-17-thick-on-today-s-ships-as-they-were-in-wwii?n=6960517&urlhash=6960517 <div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>That&#39;s how we had 50,000 ton battleships. CWO3 Private RallyPoint Member Sat, 08 May 2021 16:40:39 -0400 2021-05-08T16:40:39-04:00 Response by SGT Private RallyPoint Member made May 8 at 2021 5:48 PM https://www.rallypoint.com/answers/are-the-bulkheads-still-17-thick-on-today-s-ships-as-they-were-in-wwii?n=6960662&urlhash=6960662 <div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>Not today ISIS. SGT Private RallyPoint Member Sat, 08 May 2021 17:48:55 -0400 2021-05-08T17:48:55-04:00 2021-05-08T04:46:57-04:00