Are there a lot of grey areas regarding fraternization in Article 134 UCMJ, Art 92?

SGT Vince Albert Dickson — Thu, 25 Feb 2016 17:12:38 -0500

Response by Liz Hodges Flores made Feb 25 at 2016 5:28 PM

Liz Hodges Flores — Thu, 25 Feb 2016 17:28:05 -0500

OUR MILITARY HAS BLEMISHES BECAUSE OF OUR GOVERNMENT OF USING US LIKE PUPPETS PAWNS FOR THE RICH !!!!-!!!!-!!!!

Response by SSG Warren Swan made Feb 25 at 2016 6:31 PM

SSG Warren Swan — Thu, 25 Feb 2016 18:31:24 -0500

I agree with JP4 on this. What makes it suck is the vagueness of it, but depending on the rank of the interpreter of the reg, it's either much more "clear" or twice as "cloudy". I say that meaning I could read the reg and it's crystal clear to me. MAJ reads it and "based upon his expert level of knowledge, his time in command, and his college degree", he's the one who's right.

Response by CWO2 Jesse Bier made Feb 26 at 2016 10:02 AM

CWO2 Jesse Bier — Fri, 26 Feb 2016 10:02:44 -0500

There is no ambiguity when it comes to this. Persons with rank must be in those positions as teachers, mentors, and leaders. They must foster trust and respect with troops. That means not banging your troops. Lead from the front and Weed out the 10%.