SSG Private RallyPoint Member2684489<div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>Can female cut male standard hair cuts high and tights?Can a female have a high and tight?2017-06-28T08:19:07-04:00SSG Private RallyPoint Member2684489<div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>Can female cut male standard hair cuts high and tights?Can a female have a high and tight?2017-06-28T08:19:07-04:002017-06-28T08:19:07-04:00MSG Brad Sand2684503<div class="images-v2-count-0"></div><br />They can, but I think it goes against any standard reading of the regulation, at least for the Army.Response by MSG Brad Sand made Jun 28 at 2017 8:28 AM2017-06-28T08:28:34-04:002017-06-28T08:28:34-04:00MAJ Private RallyPoint Member2684609<div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>Yes, just don't be offended when people mistake you as a male.Response by MAJ Private RallyPoint Member made Jun 28 at 2017 9:21 AM2017-06-28T09:21:42-04:002017-06-28T09:21:42-04:00Sgt Sean Voudren2685079<div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>It is considered an "eccentric" hair style for femalesResponse by Sgt Sean Voudren made Jun 28 at 2017 12:12 PM2017-06-28T12:12:09-04:002017-06-28T12:12:09-04:001stSgt Private RallyPoint Member2685701<div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>Can she? Sure. Should she? That's a different question altogether. The word 'can' denotes ability or permission, while 'should' is more qualitative. The high and tight is a decidedly masculine style, while long hair pulled tight in a bun is feminine. Therefore doing so may be construed as eccentric and against regulations. If there is no policy barring women servicemembers from getting a high and tight the decision is up to the individual. It must be noted, as Cpt Glover stated, that such a choice will erode the intrinsic femininity of the woman getting the cut.<br />In our day and time, gender and sexuality is being blurred, even with DOD policies buying into the social agenda known as the 'new sexual revolution' in which any and all ideas of sexuality and gender are being given a green light. Therefore it would not be surprising for appearance standards succumb to the politically correct pressure to accommodate every perceived identity in an effort to avoid offending a protected microscopic minority that is not even represented among our ranks.Response by 1stSgt Private RallyPoint Member made Jun 28 at 2017 3:24 PM2017-06-28T15:24:39-04:002017-06-28T15:24:39-04:00MSgt Mark Bucher2686107<div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>Good question, I tend to think not, sorta radish if you'd ask meResponse by MSgt Mark Bucher made Jun 28 at 2017 5:52 PM2017-06-28T17:52:07-04:002017-06-28T17:52:07-04:002017-06-28T08:19:07-04:00