Posted on Dec 16, 2014
SFC Michael Jackson, MBA
1
1
0
Reflective
PT outfits were designed to be reflective in the interest of safety. When I was in the Army, I complied and enforced the standards. However, I couldn't help but wonder why we putting belts on when our jackets were reflective. From the naked eye, it seemed ridiculous. What are your thoughts on this?
Avatar feed
Responses: 4
SGT(P) Human Intelligence Collector
2
2
0
I don't mind wearing them for PT, however I have never understood the mindset that soldiers should wear a PT belt when inside a gym or when mowing grass. I figure if a car makes it to either of those places, your reflective belt isn't going to be the magical thing that stops it.
(2)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
MSgt Command Equipment Manager
2
2
0
I think the use of reflective belts are over used, but at the same time, we always hear about runners or bicyclists getting hit by vehicles. If your pt top is already reflective, I find there not to be a need for a belt across the torso. I would understand if they were to wear them around the waist in the case of the tops being removed for some reason. I don't see the need for the double duty though.
(2)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
SFC Stephen P.
0
0
0
I've never known anyone to get hit by a car while doing PT.

I would very much like to see a statistical comparison of the rates of injury with and without the belts.

If there are no statistics, that would indicate that the policies are to promote the appearance of safety rather than to create safety.
(0)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small

Join nearly 2 million former and current members of the US military, just like you.

close