Posted on Jul 9, 2015
Do we give our personnel the proper amount of authority to make decisions in their jobs?
14.5K
84
32
8
8
0
As we execute our assigned duties, we often have to make decisions for situations that are not clearly delineated in the regulations. As we know, there are times there are 'gray' areas. Especially during contingencies, but often during day-to-day operations, decisions are needed. Based on the guidance of leadership, decisions are upchanneled, but does this need to happen as often as it does? Thoughts?
Edited >1 y ago
Posted >1 y ago
Responses: 19
Theoretically, yes. In reality it depends on the unit leaders and how much trust you place in them. I have work with micro managers and leadership deficiency in units, both are devastating to personnel. Sometimes it is best to let the lower level leaders amaze you, while knowing you will get in their business if they are not performing adequately. Also, ensure they know what is expected. Not everything needs to be upchanneled, only what is required by Reg and/or policy. A young leader can amaze when given flexibility.
(7)
(0)
I wanted the lowest persons to have ownership of their work and we minimized micromanagement.
(5)
(0)
Lt Col (Join to see) there is no way I could have managed to keep everything in order as a Brigade Commander without delegating critical tasks to others on the staff. I was blessed to have a DCO that was very sharp (successful business executive) and we worked very well as a team. I gave him full authority to execute on my behalf and he always kept me in the loop or bounced critical decisions off me that only I had the authority to approve. I was blessed with a great AGR staff and Miltech leadership that I felt comfortable giving authority to on a regular basis. The command team of Commander and CSM was spot on and the CSM knew that I supported his decision and authority with all enlisted ranks throughout the Brigade footprint. The key was solid communications up/down and laterally; and the understanding that certain items I had to approve and be involved in no matter what. I also knew the strengths and weaknesses of each of these key leaders and their positions. I made it a habit to learn and understand what made this tick. This made giving out authority a much easier and beneficial task. Ultimately, I would be held accountable for every decision made on my behalf, but I was confident in the team. It was a great working relationship for over four (4) years. I was very lucky to have such great Leaders/Operators within my command.
This was my second Brigade Command. I learned from all the mistakes I made in the first - and "Yes" we all make mistakes, but learn from them! That's another part of Leadership - growing based on experience (good, bad, or ugly).
This was my second Brigade Command. I learned from all the mistakes I made in the first - and "Yes" we all make mistakes, but learn from them! That's another part of Leadership - growing based on experience (good, bad, or ugly).
(5)
(0)
Lt Col (Join to see)
Sounds like an excellent environment to work in, and I would have been right at home in your command Sir! Thanks!
(1)
(0)
COL Mikel J. Burroughs
MSgt Mike Mikulski I was very fortunate, but like I said I learned from my mistakes in the previous commands at the Battalion Level and Brigade Level. You can never get it perfect, that's what makes being a leader so enjoyable. It's fluid and it never looks the same the next day you wake up. There is always a new challenge and something that will need your attention. I really believe in utilizing NCOs they way there were supposed to be, that's why I converted over to the "dark side" when I was SSG/E-6. Didn't like the way the current leadership was conducting business. Wanted to change things up! NCOs are the very core and heart of the military institution! Our job is to help them get the most out it! At least that's the way I felt and operated!
(4)
(0)
Read This Next