Do you agree with Rand Paul's summary on the lack of charges against Hillary Clinton? Is there a double standard because she is a Clinton?

LTC Private RallyPoint Member — Sun, 10 Jul 2016 13:56:37 -0400

https://randpaul.com/l/hillary-fbi

https://youtu.be/7NtVrHEEvt8

Response by PO1 John Miller made Jul 10 at 2016 1:59 PM

PO1 John Miller — Sun, 10 Jul 2016 13:59:55 -0400

If one doesn't think Hillary did anything wrong, they have no business being in a leadership position let alone in the US military.

Response by LTC Private RallyPoint Member made Jul 10 at 2016 2:32 PM

LTC Private RallyPoint Member — Sun, 10 Jul 2016 14:32:06 -0400

No charges, time to get over it and worry about your own repugnant candidate instead of more partisan Benghazi bullshit.

Response by SGT Private RallyPoint Member made Jul 10 at 2016 3:34 PM

SGT Private RallyPoint Member — Sun, 10 Jul 2016 15:34:40 -0400

There is an obvious double standard and congress is just as guilty by exempting themselves from the laws they pass and hold us accountable to. I watched the 5+ hour long congressional hearing with the FBI director and it did not change a thing. Nothing was revealed that could have justified her not being charged.

Response by Capt Seid Waddell made Jul 10 at 2016 4:14 PM

Capt Seid Waddell — Sun, 10 Jul 2016 16:14:23 -0400

He is right. This administration is too corrupt to punish clear violations of the law by their own.

Response by SSG Jeff Carlisle-Tierno made Jul 10 at 2016 4:29 PM

SSG Jeff Carlisle-Tierno — Sun, 10 Jul 2016 16:29:46 -0400

Were people really expecting she wouldn't be protected? She's favored by this administration, has been employed by this administration, and will be protected by this administration. The problem is that we haven't demanded accountability in the past for equally corrupt doings of previous administrations, and this is the end result.

Response by Sgt Tom Cunnally made Jul 10 at 2016 4:31 PM

Sgt Tom Cunnally — Sun, 10 Jul 2016 16:31:19 -0400

Absolutely I have said several times Hillary and Bill Clinton are both judged by a higher standard than the rest of us. But who knows one of these days all the lies that Hillary is spewing out may catch up with her. She has a 2nd State Dept Review to be worried about & the Republicans are preparing to request an investigation by the FBI for her lying before congress. Comey has agree to look into this issue.

Response by MCPO Roger Collins made Jul 10 at 2016 4:33 PM

MCPO Roger Collins — Sun, 10 Jul 2016 16:33:25 -0400

Just heard this AM, not verified by other reports yet, but Hillary did not testify under oath with the FBI and no visual, voice or written information could be taken. Anyone getting the feeling she knew that when she said she was 100% sure she would not be indicted?

Response by SSG Roger Ayscue made Jul 10 at 2016 5:10 PM

SSG Roger Ayscue — Sun, 10 Jul 2016 17:10:07 -0400

Ya think!

Response by MSG Stan Hutchison made Jul 10 at 2016 5:47 PM

MSG Stan Hutchison — Sun, 10 Jul 2016 17:47:00 -0400

Your choice of options show the bias of the thread.

Response by CPT Jack Durish made Jul 10 at 2016 6:11 PM

CPT Jack Durish — Sun, 10 Jul 2016 18:11:48 -0400

I wouldn't call it a "double standard". I prefer to think that for Hillary there is No Standard.

Response by SGT Dana Williams made Jul 10 at 2016 6:33 PM

SGT Dana Williams — Sun, 10 Jul 2016 18:33:47 -0400

Agreed! Anyone else would be trying to post bail!

Response by SSG Jeremy Sharp made Jul 10 at 2016 6:41 PM

SSG Jeremy Sharp — Sun, 10 Jul 2016 18:41:40 -0400

The culpable mental state of mind to commit an act of treason or disclose confidential information
is not relevant, negligently is just as dangerous and demeaning as knowingly with regard to the safety of the nation. If she was any other Jane Q. Public she would have 100+ indictment charges and defending herself in court rather than running for presidential nomination, ridiculous!

Response by SFC Everett Oliver made Jul 10 at 2016 7:07 PM

SFC Everett Oliver — Sun, 10 Jul 2016 19:07:46 -0400

I do not always agree with Rand Paul, but in this case he is dead on target. I spent over 4 years working out of a building where you had to move TS material aside to set down a cup of coffee. Where would I be today had I been extremely careless?

Response by Capt Jeff S. made Jul 10 at 2016 8:58 PM

Capt Jeff S. — Sun, 10 Jul 2016 20:58:58 -0400

The double standard couldn't be any more evident. But I would add that it isn't just limited to the Clinton's. Had Obama been white, he would have been impeached long ago. White guilt and the desire for political correctness got Obama elected, and are the only reason this treasonous fraud hasn't been impeached yet. Nobody wants to start a race war. But there is a race war going on and our own gov't is orchestrating it.

This Administration opened our borders and is allowing our country to be infiltrated by illegals who have no respect for our laws, and we continue to import terrorist refugees that we can't screen against the popular will of the people. The purpose of this is to change the demographic from white to brown, and from Christian to Muslim. The Obama Administration facilitated the infiltrated by Muslims of our Dept of Homeland Security by appointing Muslims to key positions requiring access to classified information at the highest levels. This is hands down the most corrupt and incompetent Administration this country has ever had, and it refuses to enforce the laws it is tasked to enforce. They obfuscate investigation into their wrongdoing, and then conclude that there is insufficient evidence to proceed with charges and recommend that no actions need to be taken.

By all rights, Hillary is a criminal that shouldn't be allowed to run for office because of the SERIOUS substantiated allegations against her. She rightly should be in jail right now for the breaches of Information Security and destruction of subpoena'd evidence that occurred on her watch, AND she has blood on her hands! WTFO?!!

Response by Erica Hoffman made Jul 10 at 2016 9:32 PM

Erica Hoffman — Sun, 10 Jul 2016 21:32:00 -0400

Gen Patreaus went to jail and he leaked way less classified information.

Response by SSG(P) Private RallyPoint Member made Jul 11 at 2016 12:30 PM

SSG(P) Private RallyPoint Member — Mon, 11 Jul 2016 12:30:25 -0400

All you have to do is research cases where Servicemembers have mishandled classified information, either intentionally or unintentionally, and see what the punishments were. You will then have your answer.

Response by CPT Pedro Meza made Jul 12 at 2016 12:49 PM

CPT Pedro Meza — Tue, 12 Jul 2016 12:49:09 -0400

I say it is partisan on both sides, and Rand Paul is playing games, because he might have been one of those that corresponded with Hillary by emails too, therefore did not correct her. I notice that there is no list that show the name of the people that corresponded with Hillary. It looks more like Congress playing CYA. Release all the names..