Do you agree with the decision to rename Mt. McKinley?

2015-08-31T12:10:13-04:00

http://apnews.myway.com/article/20150831/us--obama-2eb886721f.html

My Way News - Alaska-bound, Obama makes waves by renaming Mount McKinley

Alaska-bound, Obama makes waves by renaming Mount McKinley

Response by SCPO David Lockwood made Aug 31 at 2015 12:12 PM

2015-08-31T12:12:19-04:00

In my opinion it should've never been named Mt McKinley. It should've been named as the local tribes had called Denali!

Response by SGT David T. made Aug 31 at 2015 12:13 PM

2015-08-31T12:13:30-04:00

Makes no difference to me.

Response by CSM David Heidke made Aug 31 at 2015 12:14 PM

2015-08-31T12:14:39-04:00

It was Probably Denali before any white guy ever set foot in Alaska.

If that's what they wanted, then that's what it's name should be.

Response by Capt Seid Waddell made Aug 31 at 2015 12:15 PM

2015-08-31T12:15:39-04:00

No, and I don't believe the POTUS has the authority to rename the mountain that was named by an act of Congress.

Response by LTC Kevin B. made Aug 31 at 2015 12:16 PM

2015-08-31T12:16:08-04:00

Power down to the locals. If that's what they wanted it to be called, I don't have any problem with renaming it.

Response by SGT Ben Keen made Aug 31 at 2015 12:43 PM

2015-08-31T12:43:36-04:00

I've said it once and I'll say it again, aren't there bigger issues to consume the POTUS and his limited time?

Response by SFC Stephen King made Aug 31 at 2015 12:49 PM

2015-08-31T12:49:42-04:00

Rename a Mountain. Got it.
http://thehill.com/policy/energy-environment/252288-obama-to-rename-nations-highest-mountain

Obama renames nation’s highest mountain

President Obama is renaming Alaska’s Mount McKinley to Denali.

Response by LCDR Private RallyPoint Member made Aug 31 at 2015 12:50 PM

2015-08-31T12:50:29-04:00

Done under a different motivation, at a different time, and through the correct channels (IDK, maybe the state legislature?)...I might be "for" this. As it stands, this is just another attempt to inflame tensions for political gain.

Response by LCDR Private RallyPoint Member made Aug 31 at 2015 1:32 PM

2015-08-31T13:32:18-04:00

I am torn on this. If he was renaming it to something new I absolutely would be against it.

In one way the intent is to honor the natives of the region by reverting to their own name for the mountain. I support this. The problem however, is that it has been known as Mt McKinley for so long that it will not be changed immediately, or maybe ever, in maps, records, etc. And then of course the seeming "slam" against Ohio. Now really, I don't think that part is as important as being made out, but I also understand the frustration.

Response by SFC Stephen King made Aug 31 at 2015 1:37 PM

2015-08-31T13:37:35-04:00

I do agree with the decision. I do however think more important things are or should be on the agenda.

Response by SSgt Private RallyPoint Member made Aug 31 at 2015 1:42 PM

2015-08-31T13:42:09-04:00

Yes, it had a name long before it was renamed. Not only that but this is what the people from Alaska want it to be named. This doesn't bother me and no one should be offended.

Response by MSgt Curtis Ellis made Aug 31 at 2015 1:43 PM

2015-08-31T13:43:46-04:00

Seems like a waste of time to rename something back to its original name from a name that was never "officially" approved to begin with... Our government... Gotta love it...

Response by Sgt Kelli Mays made Aug 31 at 2015 2:28 PM

2015-08-31T14:28:11-04:00

First of all does he even have the right to do this? Second of all what does this have to do with global warming and third what is the purpose of doing this?
Denali was the name given to this mountain by the native Indian tribe of Athabasca who were native to Canada and Southwest United States.
Just exactly what is he trying to prove?

When the Russian owned this territory, they gave it a name...after the US took over, the US gave it a name...

Why can't obarfma just leave things alone? WHY is obarfma ALL of the Suddenly wanting to reach out and show concern and befriend the ALASKAN natives? What's he really up to?

Response by SFC Mark Merino made Aug 31 at 2015 2:54 PM

2015-08-31T14:54:37-04:00

No big deal. It has always been Denali for those living in Alaska.

Response by PO1 Glenn Boucher made Aug 31 at 2015 3:12 PM

2015-08-31T15:12:04-04:00

I just wonder why all of a sudden decide to change the name of a mountain? Yes I know it was changed from the original Denali to McKinley for whatever reasons they had back when they did it.
I think for years to come many people will still call it Mt. McKinley. In the end I think its just another useless move of putting a check mark in the books as something accomplished.

Response by COL Mikel J. Burroughs made Aug 31 at 2015 4:05 PM

2015-08-31T16:05:41-04:00

SSgt Alex Robinson Why? That is the real question - he is just making people mad with some of the stupid decisions that he is making. If he has a staff that is supposed to be vetting these decisions then he needs to fire them! Just my opinion! Quit changing historical sites!

Response by MCPO Roger Collins made Aug 31 at 2015 4:06 PM

2015-08-31T16:06:54-04:00

Seems to be a lot of money being spent to boost a flagging legacy. Can you imagine how many travel documents, school books and other printed and media sources will be effected? What a display of Narcissism.

Response by LCDR Private RallyPoint Member made Aug 31 at 2015 6:02 PM

2015-08-31T18:02:51-04:00

Very interesting article that sheds a little light. This really had nothing at all to do with Obama.

http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/2015/08/31/denali-versus-mount-mckinley-backstory-ohio-alaska/71482302/

The tortured Denali vs. McKinley backstory

The backstorybehind the decision to officially rename North America’s tallest mountain is the latest testament of the painfully slow sausage making that happens in the hallowed halls ofthe nation's Capitol.

Response by SSG Private RallyPoint Member made Aug 31 at 2015 7:11 PM

2015-08-31T19:11:12-04:00

No, I don't but he can do so even if unpopular. Since he's at it, he should also rename the USS Arizona, and name it USS Obama, as it is going down in history and taking many bodies with them. Kind of fitting if you ask me.

Response by CW4 Guy Butler made Aug 31 at 2015 7:44 PM

2015-08-31T19:44:45-04:00

So... He makes people in Alaska happy just before his trip, and annoys Ohio. Being from Pennsylvania, not seeing a downside.

Response by MAJ Ken Landgren made Aug 31 at 2015 8:03 PM

2015-08-31T20:03:58-04:00

Is this really helping our nation. What if a group of people say changing the past is really not helping the present? What then? More violence?

Response by TSgt Kenneth Ellis made Sep 1 at 2015 2:40 AM

2015-09-01T02:40:37-04:00

I know it was not a executive order from Obama. But I heard John Kasich say that they have been Trying to do this for decades. So the question is why now. So an Obama over reach.

Response by PO1 William "Chip" Nagel made Sep 1 at 2015 3:49 AM

2015-09-01T03:49:20-04:00

People in Ohio are in a Tither I am sure both Republican and Democrat but there is Plenty of Other stuff named for the 8 Presidents from Ohio. One less thing is no biggy. All the Folks both Republican and Democrat in Alaska Love it and the Native American Community Love it. I understand why the Gold Prospector that named it, named it what he did. Sucking up to President McKinley Both of them were interested in going from a Silver Standard to a Gold Standard for our Money. Like everything else Politics as Usual.

Response by MSG Scott Swank made Sep 1 at 2015 8:42 AM

2015-09-01T08:42:38-04:00

America's greatness lies within her heritage and I believe the current administration is ruining what our country was built on, our reputation and it is trying to divide us rather than Unite The States of America. Leave MT McKinley alone!!!

Response by PFC Robert Falk made Sep 1 at 2015 9:52 AM

2015-09-01T09:52:25-04:00

He needs to keep his hands out of alot of things.

Response by PO1 William "Chip" Nagel made Sep 1 at 2015 4:29 PM

2015-09-01T16:29:00-04:00

Gov Huckabee seems to think this is just another example of Executive Authority Run Amok.

Huckabee: Denali Naming Shows Obama 'Doesn’t Think That There Are Any Limits'

Former Arkansas Gov. Mike Huckabee is outraged by President Obama’s decision to restore the original name of the country’s highest peak, Denali, after years of campaigning by Alaskans in

Response by SSgt David Tedrow made Sep 2 at 2015 2:51 AM

2015-09-02T02:51:12-04:00

I agree with the name change. The locals have called it Denali si that is what it is known by to them anyway.

Response by SSG Alleria Stanley made Sep 2 at 2015 7:37 AM

2015-09-02T07:37:23-04:00

The whole hubbub is political.

It's political from the White House because the President is taking the opportunity to rename/restore the mountain for easy popular approval, especially with the locals whom he's visiting. *

It's political for the opponents of it because... well, you need to oppose things and this can be played for the hard core opposition who follows such things. **

It's political way-back-when because instead of the local name, it was named in honor of a President who... never went and presumably could have cared less.

Much of being President is about politics. It's not merely being C-in-C, or governing, but it's about standing up, making speeches, and drawing attention to X or less attention to Y. Whether you're a Democrat, Republican, Saint President Bush, Satan Worshipper President Bush, or similiar name associations with our current leader. It's what you DO. You build political capital this way.

* The President doesn't name places. That's the Secretary of the Interior. However, the SecInt is not the most highly visible position in the government (can you name the current one?). With the President making a rare trip to Alaska, and the huge microphone that comes with the Presidential Seal on a podium, it makes sense for President Obama to announce it. Further, much like a commander is in charge of or responsible for all that happens under the executive branch.

** Is this deserving an oppositional full-court press? No, and it's not getting that. However, in all political sides, there are those who listen occasionally and those who are hard-core devotees. The opposition here is for the latter... "See? We're opposed to yet another example of ...."

Response by CPT Private RallyPoint Member made Sep 2 at 2015 8:15 AM

2015-09-02T08:15:49-04:00

SSgt Alex Robinson I think if the people of the state of Alaska wanted to change the name of this mountain they should have taken care of it internally. If they're happy, I'm happy. What bothers me is that it seems to appear that it was mandated. I'm not sure why it would have taken an Executive order to accomplish this. Regarding why this happened it seems there is a trend with this Administration to accomplish as many "firsts" as possible.

Response by SFC Private RallyPoint Member made Sep 2 at 2015 8:37 AM

2015-09-02T08:37:04-04:00

He just renamed it, it's name. All pr.

Response by SGT Kristin Wiley made Sep 2 at 2015 9:34 AM

2015-09-02T09:34:21-04:00

It seems like a political move to increase the President's standing with the Alaskan natives. I really believe there are much important things to worry about then the name of a mountain. Personally, it never should have been named Mt. McKinley in the first place, it's not even near Ohio!

Response by SSG Private RallyPoint Member made Sep 2 at 2015 11:00 AM

2015-09-02T11:00:58-04:00