SFC Private RallyPoint Member3937984<div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>How do you refer to your new(ish) Soldiers? I've always said "junior." I asked on another forum, but I thought I would ask here as well. "Lower" seems derogatory and doesn't run parallel with the other titles (junior/senior officer, junior/senior NCO, ?lower?/senior enlisted).Do you say "junior enlisted" or "lower enlisted"?2018-09-05T04:33:28-04:00SFC Private RallyPoint Member3937984<div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>How do you refer to your new(ish) Soldiers? I've always said "junior." I asked on another forum, but I thought I would ask here as well. "Lower" seems derogatory and doesn't run parallel with the other titles (junior/senior officer, junior/senior NCO, ?lower?/senior enlisted).Do you say "junior enlisted" or "lower enlisted"?2018-09-05T04:33:28-04:002018-09-05T04:33:28-04:00SFC Joe S. Davis Jr., MSM, DSL3938044<div class="images-v2-count-0"></div><a class="dark-link bold-link" role="profile-hover" data-qtip-container="body" data-id="1574586" data-source-page-controller="question_response_contents" href="/profiles/1574586-35f-enlisted-intelligence-analyst">SFC Private RallyPoint Member</a> good read/share, I always called them by their rank as stipulated in AR-600-20. You can never go wrong with the regulation.<br />Response by SFC Joe S. Davis Jr., MSM, DSL made Sep 5 at 2018 5:46 AM2018-09-05T05:46:10-04:002018-09-05T05:46:10-04:00SGT David A. 'Cowboy' Groth3938047<div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>Always heard it called lower ranks.Response by SGT David A. 'Cowboy' Groth made Sep 5 at 2018 5:47 AM2018-09-05T05:47:39-04:002018-09-05T05:47:39-04:00CAPT Kevin B.3938753<div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>I always said Junior which is a better descriptor as the dictionary goes. BTW we call them the Senior Enlisted Leader, not the Upper Enlisted Leader.Response by CAPT Kevin B. made Sep 5 at 2018 10:23 AM2018-09-05T10:23:20-04:002018-09-05T10:23:20-04:00SrA John Monette3939827<div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>what if you outrank someone who has more time in service? They would not necessarily be "junior". and I agree, "lower" can have a derogatory connotation. as SFC Davis points out, you can't go wrong addressing them by their rank.Response by SrA John Monette made Sep 5 at 2018 5:42 PM2018-09-05T17:42:02-04:002018-09-05T17:42:02-04:00LtCol Robert Quinter3953287<div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>I always referred to my people by their rank. If I was referring to a group, I would say "all my Privates through Lance Corporals" or whatever was the appropriate group. People work hard to achieve whatever rank they are assigned, I should at least take the tie to identify them by that rank. Even the newest Private had to earn the right to be a Private instead of a recruit.Response by LtCol Robert Quinter made Sep 10 at 2018 7:23 PM2018-09-10T19:23:31-04:002018-09-10T19:23:31-04:00Maj John Bell3953468<div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>I don't know if it is a Marine thing, or just a me thing.<br />Pvt-LCpl, collectively Junior Marines<br />Cpl-Sgt, collectively NCO's<br />SSgt-SgtMaj, collectively Staff NCO's<br /><br />2ndLt-Capt, collectively Company Grade<br />Maj-Col, Field Grade<br />BGen-Gen, Flag<br /><br />Don't like the term lower enlisted.Response by Maj John Bell made Sep 10 at 2018 8:21 PM2018-09-10T20:21:12-04:002018-09-10T20:21:12-04:00SFC Michael Hasbun7494034<div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>Once you make SFC, your title is now "Senior NCO". So it makes sense to use the term "junior" for grouping the preceeding ranks.Response by SFC Michael Hasbun made Jan 24 at 2022 3:20 PM2022-01-24T15:20:27-05:002022-01-24T15:20:27-05:00CW5 Mark Smith7535128<div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>How about "Soldier"?Response by CW5 Mark Smith made Feb 19 at 2022 5:00 PM2022-02-19T17:00:29-05:002022-02-19T17:00:29-05:00MSG Thomas Currie8351353<div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>I think the rest of the English-speaking world has a much simpler solution: the entire military consists of Commissioned Officers, Non-Commissioned Officers, and Other Ranks.<br /><br />Only the US military (and those smaller countries that follow in our image) tries to shoehorn Warrant Officers in as a completely separate category or as some strange kind of not-quite-commissioned Officers (the rest of the world correctly considers them Non-Commissioned Officers).<br /><br />Occasionally there might be some reason to subdivide one of those categories, such as Junior and Senior Officers (which is often vague) or Junior and Senior NCOs (also ambiguous!); but I don't recall ever seeing a situation where there was a good reason to subdivide enlisted who aren't NCOs.<br /><br />If a term really is essential, I suppose Junior Enlisted would be most logical as it follows the pattern we use when subdividing Officers or NCOs, but if some soldiers are "Junior Enlisted" then doesn't that mean that some other soldiers must be "Senior Enlisted" - if so, who are they?Response by MSG Thomas Currie made Jun 30 at 2023 3:08 PM2023-06-30T15:08:42-04:002023-06-30T15:08:42-04:00SSG Bill McCoy8351689<div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>Rank works best; but as for junior vs lower it's semantics. Doesn't matter. If someone is offended by "lower enlisted," well ... it's the world we live in now.Response by SSG Bill McCoy made Jun 30 at 2023 8:39 PM2023-06-30T20:39:46-04:002023-06-30T20:39:46-04:00PFC Private RallyPoint Member8448421<div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>Apologies if I'm out of line for putting in my thoughts on a question directed at leadership as a junior enlisted, but I usually see "junior enlisted" go over better than anything else. One notable exception was with a couple of senior NCOs who skipped the "junior" and "senior" designation, referring to only "enlisted" and "NCOs", which didn't seem to ruffle any feathers.Response by PFC Private RallyPoint Member made Aug 30 at 2023 7:38 PM2023-08-30T19:38:19-04:002023-08-30T19:38:19-04:002018-09-05T04:33:28-04:00