CW5 Private RallyPoint Member 2058000 <div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>A while back, a fellow Warrant Officer posted a question asking if we should hold people accountable in cases of disrespect towards the President. We saw very few cases of this during the last 8 years.<br />In my last 4 duty stations covering Pres. Obama&#39;s time in office I have noticed a right-leaning Army and wonder if we will see more Article 88 prosecutions under our new CIC. Do you think that we will see more UCMJ for Contempt Towards Officials (Article 88) in today's divided country under a Trump administration? 2016-11-10T09:12:13-05:00 CW5 Private RallyPoint Member 2058000 <div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>A while back, a fellow Warrant Officer posted a question asking if we should hold people accountable in cases of disrespect towards the President. We saw very few cases of this during the last 8 years.<br />In my last 4 duty stations covering Pres. Obama&#39;s time in office I have noticed a right-leaning Army and wonder if we will see more Article 88 prosecutions under our new CIC. Do you think that we will see more UCMJ for Contempt Towards Officials (Article 88) in today's divided country under a Trump administration? 2016-11-10T09:12:13-05:00 2016-11-10T09:12:13-05:00 Sgt Aaron Kennedy, MS 2058013 <div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>Likely more of an &quot;informal&quot; issue than anything formal. This is more of a behind closed doors issue than anything anyone wants escalated to CM. Even standard &quot;disrespect&quot; is normally dealt with personally rather than creating a paper-trail. Response by Sgt Aaron Kennedy, MS made Nov 10 at 2016 9:17 AM 2016-11-10T09:17:25-05:00 2016-11-10T09:17:25-05:00 PO2 Robert Aitchison 2058029 <div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>Honestly I think simple disrespect towards the President will be the least of our worries. If Trump follows through on his campaign promises I think you&#39;ll see service members (both officers and enlisted) refusing orders (they view as unlawful) at an alarming rate and it could even get to the point where we see an attempted coup or even a second civil war. Response by PO2 Robert Aitchison made Nov 10 at 2016 9:20 AM 2016-11-10T09:20:40-05:00 2016-11-10T09:20:40-05:00 SFC George Smith 2058067 <div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>this time ... yes... <br />because the troops are not the same as they were when Jimmy &quot;Peanut&quot; Carter and Bill Clinton was in office <br />They have little to No trust in the &quot;CIC&quot; based on the information being circulated... and they are not willing to give him a chance to prove him self... Response by SFC George Smith made Nov 10 at 2016 9:29 AM 2016-11-10T09:29:01-05:00 2016-11-10T09:29:01-05:00 SGM Erik Marquez 2058218 <div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>In 28 years I never saw or heard first hand a charge of, nor conviction for Art 88 Response by SGM Erik Marquez made Nov 10 at 2016 10:08 AM 2016-11-10T10:08:39-05:00 2016-11-10T10:08:39-05:00 PO1 Steven Kuhn 2058220 <div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>/We live in a time where our freedom of speech and expression has been misrepresented into &quot;freedom to live in the world of our choosing&quot;. That being said, while I disagreed with the actions of the current CIC, I did respect the office. Freedom of speech is important, but as active duty military we have a responsibility to follow orders and preserve the chain of command. Response by PO1 Steven Kuhn made Nov 10 at 2016 10:09 AM 2016-11-10T10:09:10-05:00 2016-11-10T10:09:10-05:00 PO3 Leroy Leftwich 2058615 <div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>When I was active duty the UCMJ was to be adhered to period. My opinion was not important to the mission. Following orders was. It amazes me that this is a question on this site. now to qualify, if ask my opinion. I gave it with the understanding my orders were paramount. And when off duty, the UCMJ wasn&#39;t. Response by PO3 Leroy Leftwich made Nov 10 at 2016 11:19 AM 2016-11-10T11:19:51-05:00 2016-11-10T11:19:51-05:00 PO3 Leroy Leftwich 2058616 <div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>When I was active duty the UCMJ was to be adhered to period. My opinion was not important to the mission. Following orders was. It amazes me that this is a question on this site. now to qualify, if ask my opinion. I gave it with the understanding my orders were paramount. And when off duty, the UCMJ wasn&#39;t. Response by PO3 Leroy Leftwich made Nov 10 at 2016 11:19 AM 2016-11-10T11:19:51-05:00 2016-11-10T11:19:51-05:00 Maj Private RallyPoint Member 2059082 <div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>I certainly hope not. I think there may have been more issues with comments about Obama but who knows. Response by Maj Private RallyPoint Member made Nov 10 at 2016 12:53 PM 2016-11-10T12:53:47-05:00 2016-11-10T12:53:47-05:00 MSgt Richard Randall 2059113 <div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>The question made me chuckle. I heard quite a few folks of the commissioned persuasion speak rather ill of “Jimmah” in the late 70s… especially after the Desert One debacle. Response by MSgt Richard Randall made Nov 10 at 2016 12:58 PM 2016-11-10T12:58:21-05:00 2016-11-10T12:58:21-05:00 SFC Marcus Belt 2061901 <div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>Most of the situations I have personally witnessed regarding disrespect towards President Obama mostly had to do with omitting the &quot;President&quot; before his surname, which, if I&#39;m not going to allow a junior Soldier to address me by last name only, I have to correct addressing the President in that way.<br /><br />Regarding actual disrespect, I believe that leaders have done a good job of parsing the difference between disrespect and protected speech under the First Amendment. Oh yes, Constitutional protections still apply to service members. <br /><br />It is my right as a citizen (and a voter!) to say: &quot;I disagree with the President&#39;s policy on X.&quot; That is reasonable and protected.<br /><br />I cannot say: &quot;The President is [insert perjorative]!&quot; Disrespect.<br /><br />President-Elect Trump will be the fifth Commander-in-Chief under whom I&#39;ve served, and generally, professionals remain professional. Response by SFC Marcus Belt made Nov 11 at 2016 8:15 AM 2016-11-11T08:15:30-05:00 2016-11-11T08:15:30-05:00 SGT John Wesley 2064898 <div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>I have to chuckle here... I&#39;ve read the comments and have to remind some that only a short while ago you were condemning President Obama. In fact, you only called him Obama. So let&#39;s not point fingers at our liberal members. <br /><br />I served under 2 Conservatives and a liberal, and never did I question the validity of any of them. I took an oath, and like most of us, stuck to it on good faith. I hope that these fine service members of this generation will do the same. Response by SGT John Wesley made Nov 11 at 2016 10:48 PM 2016-11-11T22:48:08-05:00 2016-11-11T22:48:08-05:00 SFC Stephen King 2178740 <div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>Great question time will determine. Response by SFC Stephen King made Dec 21 at 2016 4:20 PM 2016-12-21T16:20:23-05:00 2016-12-21T16:20:23-05:00 CPT Larry Hudson 2837386 <div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>A military that has relinquished discipline is nothing more than an armed mob. UCMJ must be upheld and prosecuted when violations occur. Response by CPT Larry Hudson made Aug 16 at 2017 9:12 AM 2017-08-16T09:12:56-04:00 2017-08-16T09:12:56-04:00 2016-11-10T09:12:13-05:00