Dzhokhar Tsarnaev : Guilty or NOT Guilty

SGT Private RallyPoint Member — Mon, 30 Mar 2015 15:45:06 -0400

As the Prosecution Rests on the case, the story of the 8 year old boy that died is heard. The Jury sits quietly, wiping away tears while listening and seeing the autopsy photos. "Nields said he removed small nails, metal pellets, fragments of wood and black plastic from the boy's wounds. He also displayed the blood-stained, shredded clothing that Martin was wearing when the bomb exploded."

How do you think the argument of the defense will play and do you believe the Jury in the penalty phase will find him:

Guilty which means they will give him the death penalty.
Not Guilty which means they will not give him the death penalty.

I can't change my answers to the survey or I would.

Remember... This was just an innocent kid with no self control, that looked up to his brother and was just following his lead. He never thought about the consequences of his actions. He wasn't aware. (WTFE) You get where I am going here with all this BS.

Response by SPC Donald Tribble made Mar 30 at 2015 4:14 PM

SPC Donald Tribble — Mon, 30 Mar 2015 16:14:43 -0400

Looking up to his brother or not, how in the ever loving name of all things good on this world does blowing up ANYONE come across as an okay thing to do? Either this adult is so far gone he's a sociopath or he was okay with it. I believe the latter and he should be held accountable for what he did to the fullest extent of the law.

Response by CSM Michael J. Uhlig made Mar 30 at 2015 4:19 PM

CSM Michael J. Uhlig — Mon, 30 Mar 2015 16:19:54 -0400

Jury verdict: GUILTY

Because: he is.

Response by CW5 Private RallyPoint Member made Mar 30 at 2015 5:44 PM

CW5 Private RallyPoint Member — Mon, 30 Mar 2015 17:44:03 -0400

Guilty as sin, SGT Private RallyPoint Member. Any other verdict will be a travesty of justice. He's on video and in still photos "doing the deed."