From 2009-2013, Hillary Clinton sent emails containing classified government information from a private server. So why wasn't she indicted? ?

2016-07-16T13:25:07-04:00

Response by Sgt Tom Cunnally made Jul 16 at 2016 1:27 PM

2016-07-16T13:27:45-04:00

She will never be indicted for anything because our laws do not apply to the Clintons. Sad fact but we may as well accept it and move on. And what pissed off most of us is she knows she can get away with just about anything and never be held accountable.

This subject is now starting to filter down to us common folks and we don't like it and will not vote for her in November.

Response by SGT David A. 'Cowboy' Groth made Jul 16 at 2016 1:31 PM

2016-07-16T13:31:51-04:00

Money talks, bs walks.

Response by PO1 Brian Austin made Jul 16 at 2016 1:36 PM

2016-07-16T13:36:22-04:00

She was simply "careless". And she's too big to jail.

Response by MSgt Michael Bischoff made Jul 16 at 2016 1:47 PM

2016-07-16T13:47:54-04:00

What a dead horse question!!
No matter how it is asked its still, the same.

Response by MSG John Hundahl made Jul 16 at 2016 2:01 PM

2016-07-16T14:01:03-04:00

Hillary was not indicted because she is the Democratic Party's nominee for the Presidency. Simple. Guilty as hell but beyond any punishment. To be held accountable has become, in this country, only for the "Little Guy"!

Response by SPC(P) Patrick Westbrook made Jul 16 at 2016 2:18 PM

2016-07-16T14:18:14-04:00

Ultimately it's because she's the 1%, she's made so many friends she can kill people and not had to deal with the consequences. Oh wait ...already has happened numerous times.

Now I ask myself how this different than gen Petraeus? He admitted to it and wa removed. She kept the same story going, slightly changing it and even after there are tons of emails that shouldn't have been posted she still feigned ignorance and got off. That should tell everyone how much power she has. I don't look forward to what may or may not happen if she's our next president...then again, I don't see why people want that job anyway, too much stress.

Response by SSG Private RallyPoint Member made Jul 16 at 2016 2:40 PM

2016-07-16T14:40:30-04:00

Two reasons really.

First, if you have political influence and can afford the best lawyers... the lines that you have to cross to be prosecuted are substantially different than what it take to prosecute you or me. The less political and socioeconomic power you have, the more likely you are to be locked up. It has always been that way.

http://www.units.miamioh.edu/psybersite/stereo/crime.shtml

Second, Given that Clinton is politically connected and wealthy enough to afford the best lawyers... there really wasn't enough evidence available to convict her. More than enough to convict you or me, not enough to convict someone half as powerful as Clinton.

P324 Spring 1998 -- SES & Crime

The perception of the average criminal that many Americans hold,is someone who is male, a minority and a member of a low socioeconomic class. Peopledevelop this stereotype of criminals by examining those that are currently incarcerated(Ruby & Bringham, 1996). However the image of the criminal population one sees in ournations jails and prisons is distorted by the shape of the criminal justice systemitself. That is, in the United States...

Response by Cpl Private RallyPoint Member made Jul 16 at 2016 3:29 PM

2016-07-16T15:29:41-04:00

Hypocrisy along with ideological complicity!

Response by SGT Amy Tribou made Jul 16 at 2016 4:56 PM

2016-07-16T16:56:33-04:00

Comey and Lynch let her off because they just got a new delivery of body bags at the Clinton Foundation, and if we learned anything about how the Clinton's operate. They like the idea of converting oxygen into carbondioxide.

Response by SPC Kirk Gilles made Jul 16 at 2016 8:43 PM

2016-07-16T20:43:36-04:00

The (D) has something to do with it.