Posted on May 14, 2016
MSG Military To Military (M2 M) Ncoic
5.85K
28
14
9
9
0
http://www.nytimes.com/2014/03/21/us/general-sinclair-is-sentenced.html?smid=fb-share

"General Sinclair pleaded guilty to adultery, soliciting explicit pictures from female officers, disobeying a commander, possessing pornography in a combat zone and misusing his government credit card."

I know of great leaders who are QMP'd for lesser offenses. I have witnessed, during a my military career, a trail of GOs receiving reduced punishments for committing the same offenses as the SMs for whom they have written GOMORs and/or invoked UCMJ. Is this one of the root causes of toxic leadership? How is this fair?
Edited >1 y ago
Avatar feed
Responses: 11
SGT David A. 'Cowboy' Groth
4
4
0
A person of lesser rank would have been raked over the coals for this. I know rank has it's privledges, but the general should receive the same punishment as lower ranks do.
(4)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
SGT James Belcher
3
3
0
Total BS ! If this had been an NCO or a junior officer this would have resulted in jail time.
(3)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
LTC Tom Jones
3
3
0
GO pulls some really stupid &*%^& and, perceptually, gets a slap on the wrist. Not good for morale or for public relations either within the force or the community; community as in the Nation is watching. Closer look reveals that the plaintiff (the female Captain) lied about a key element of the case against him strongly inhibiting the prosecution's ability to elicit a harsher verdict. His de facto "forced or strongly encouraged" retirement at two pay grades below highest rank held is not an insignificant punishment nor is the shame and embarrassment accompanying the entire procedure. The fact that his general demeanor in positions of authority was so openly and consistently suggestive/sexually aggressive toward women also is a huge problem especially at a time when political correctness and inclusiveness is engineering a force structure in which "boys and girls together" is becoming a "fox-hole" reality. Suspect we are going to need more lawyers in the future.
(3)
Comment
(0)
SGT Eliyahu Rooff
SGT Eliyahu Rooff
>1 y
JAG can only prosecute based upon the strength of the admissible evidence available; not on what they'd like to be able to prove or what the public wants them to prove. When they have a weak case (newspaper op-ed pieces and social media postings aren't admissible evidence), they often have to settle for an outcome like this in which they don't get what they want, but the defendant doesn't walk away scott-free.
(3)
Reply
(0)
LTC Tom Jones
LTC Tom Jones
>1 y
This gets right to the heart of the issue. I hope everyone following the original post reads SGT Rooff's very clear and concise response.
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small

Join nearly 2 million former and current members of the US military, just like you.

close