SGM Private RallyPoint Member7494921<div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>I was assigned to the J-3 for a CJTF and was required to contribute to USN/USMC "FITREPS, Chief EVALS" etc. usually for E-6, 7, 8's. I consulted with that service's Sr NCO's for wording that would genuinely reflect the service member's performance in my view. As an Army E-9, I was familiar with our bullet point lingo that would reflect their actual end of cycle or tour performance. Has anyone experienced language in their NCOER/FITREP's that was outside of their scope or didn't make sense to their report?How would you recommend writing an evaluation of someone from another branch to use wording that would best reflects their performance?2022-01-25T04:27:58-05:00SGM Private RallyPoint Member7494921<div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>I was assigned to the J-3 for a CJTF and was required to contribute to USN/USMC "FITREPS, Chief EVALS" etc. usually for E-6, 7, 8's. I consulted with that service's Sr NCO's for wording that would genuinely reflect the service member's performance in my view. As an Army E-9, I was familiar with our bullet point lingo that would reflect their actual end of cycle or tour performance. Has anyone experienced language in their NCOER/FITREP's that was outside of their scope or didn't make sense to their report?How would you recommend writing an evaluation of someone from another branch to use wording that would best reflects their performance?2022-01-25T04:27:58-05:002022-01-25T04:27:58-05:00COL John McClellan7495296<div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>Certainly, talking to that services senior NCO in a joint environment was a good idea SGM! Perhaps also check-in with J1 Evaluations Branch on "how to" for your CJTF.Response by COL John McClellan made Jan 25 at 2022 9:59 AM2022-01-25T09:59:30-05:002022-01-25T09:59:30-05:00SP5 Private RallyPoint Member7497547<div class="images-v2-count-0"></div><a class="dark-link bold-link" role="profile-hover" data-qtip-container="body" data-id="8858" data-source-page-controller="question_response_contents" href="/profiles/8858-11z-infantry-senior-sergeant">SGM Private RallyPoint Member</a> Having written evals for employees from other areas of my discipline, I found that direct sentence structure which addressed the "what", "how", and "how well" worked to avoid confusion from the parent organizations. General avoidance of acronyms was also useful. Just my 2 cents.Response by SP5 Private RallyPoint Member made Jan 26 at 2022 1:00 PM2022-01-26T13:00:37-05:002022-01-26T13:00:37-05:00SSgt Private RallyPoint Member7499079<div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>For Marine fitreps there is a little more information needed to fully help. Are you being designated as a Trusted Assistant, RS, or RO. MCO P1610.7 is not very direct and leaves a lot of room for personal interpretation when evaluating the leadership traits, and more often than not it becomes a game of maintaining the average for the RS. if you are providing input i would suggest giving honest evaluations of the graded leadership traits and abilities. Being a joint command the Section I will have a few required statements. if you would like i can send a copy of my last section I, which is the only written out section of the Marine Fitrep.Response by SSgt Private RallyPoint Member made Jan 27 at 2022 9:44 AM2022-01-27T09:44:59-05:002022-01-27T09:44:59-05:00MCPO Cort Jensen7503006<div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>I have been retired 20 years now, things have changed drastically BUT, I am betting if you contact the Master Chief Petty Officer of the Navy’s Office he/she would be happy to give you guidance. There are/were several Navy publications just for that purpose.<br /><br />Very Respectful Submitted<br />Master Chief Hospital Corpsman (Fleet Marine Force/Surface Warfare) Cort Jensen USN-RetResponse by MCPO Cort Jensen made Jan 29 at 2022 4:29 PM2022-01-29T16:29:29-05:002022-01-29T16:29:29-05:002022-01-25T04:27:58-05:00