Posted on Apr 3, 2014
1SG First Sergeant
2.6K
30
0
This is a duplicate discussion and the contents have been merged with the original discussion. Click below to see more on this topic...
SGM Matthew Quick
As long as your rater/senior rater agree with it (by digitally signing it), why do some feel it's 'taboo' to write your own evaluation?<br><br>Here's some (hypothetical) reasoning:<br><br>Rater takes criticism personally - When we sit down to discuss my evaluation, I point out misspellings or grammatical inaccuracies; I don't want this held against me during a promotion board, but my senior rater takes this personally and gets upset.<br><br>It's worked this far, why change it? - I've been promoted on a previous centralized promotion board (or two) and I've read all the promotion board AARs to keep myself current on what's being looked at as higher importance.<br><br>Too Busy - My rater is too busy or I don't want to be a burden. &nbsp;I think it's my career and I feel a certain obligation to 'write it up' for my senior rater for review it and provide all necessary documentation to justify the quantifiable ratings.<br><br>Not an articulate writer - I'm a much better writer than my senior rater. &nbsp;I have a degree in English and my senior rater doesn't have a degree. &nbsp;I'm not looking to use fancy words, just words that appear on an educated level greater than high school.<br>

Join nearly 2 million former and current members of the US military, just like you.

close