Here's a simple question to ascertain how informed & in what direction my military is going. Who would make a better CinC, Trump or Clinton?

Col Rebecca Lorraine - I can appreciate your low key honesty. I think it's flawed, but I haven't seen you attack people for disagreeing. I don't personally understand how you can believe someone with her track record could possibly be a good CIC unless you agree with leadership passing their failures onto others and careless handling of information that you or I never even dreamed of doing for fear of not just what would happen to us, but the damage it would do to our country. I can only surmise that either I know things you do not, or you know things I do not. I'll give the benefit of the doubt and assume it's one of those two.

I totally agree with you that she will not be good. I just happen to be of the opinion that the White House is no place for a Trump personality that has offended Hispanics,(20% American pop) African Americans or people of color (13% American pop) and women (52% American pop). You can't really insult everyone in your party by calling them names my 5-year-old grandson uses in Kindergarten and truly believe all these people will just think you are special and respect you as a human being. You can't imitate an individual with cerebral palsy because you didn't like his opinion of you. I could go on with the negatives, but I can find no positives in his potential as the top dog controlling our money, military and borders. I don't believe my opinion is flawed, but there you go, it's my opinion based on a 30-year career as a student of human behavior. Plus I have that women's intuition which says he would be an epic disaster. I won't attack you personally, cause that is immature. I just believe in civil discussions. None of us have any real factual information. We have soundbites and media exposes. It is a reality TV show and theatrics. I'm bummed.

Col Rebecca Lorraine - Fair enough, I believe most of his "offense" are edited quote mines taken out of context. Yet even with most of it taken out of context, you're right, he does offend people. I guess our difference is I care less about offense and think careless handling of information would be more destructive. But now I understand the thought process. Sorry for having seemed so confused and thank you for the clarification.

Col Rebecca Lorraine - That's not maturity, that's just noting that she's been a part of the crap for a long time. First Lady means what?? Sec of State was a COMPLETE failure. Those are NOT resume points.

Best answer so far.

And those who do their homework are going to find themselves choosing the lesser of the evils. That said, it should be obvious from a legal perspective, that upon investigation into their backgrounds, one is qualified to run for office, and the other is qualified to go to prison.

GySgt John Olson - Did you miss the words "Only Hope"?