Posted on Aug 4, 2016
How do today's leaders see the use of body counts in conflicts/wars?
3.09K
13
13
2
2
0
Leaders from the past used body count as a method to measure the success of wars or conflicts. In other words, it was used as a method to keep score of who was winning the war. Do you think this method still reliable or not?.
In my opinion this is an obsolete method to measure the success of a war but many other people think the opposite. What are your opinions about it?
In my opinion this is an obsolete method to measure the success of a war but many other people think the opposite. What are your opinions about it?
Warfare
Conflict
Posted >1 y ago
Responses: 9
Suspended Profile
SSG William Almeyda - Perhaps a better question would be how to measure success in war?
While body counts in the form of severed anatomical parts . . . foreskins, scalps, ears, etc . . . have an exceedingly long history . . . in modern times they have increasingly lost favor among more enlightened civilian and political leadership . . . in major part because of apparent widespread fabrication of numbers absent physical verification . . . in part because contrary to the purpose of justifying public perception of allied deaths grossly disproportionate numbers make it seem as though enemy forces are unconscionably mismatched . . . in part due to apparent inclusion of civilian deaths . . . and in part because body counts only appeared to be potentially relevant in wars of attrition where today's enemies appear to care less how many of their troops are dessimated by superior technonogy. Perhaps other measures may be adopted . . . e.g. amount of land captured and held . . . overall reduction in enemy contacts and/or attacks . . . decrements in indigenous support for the enemy . . . decrements in economic, equipment, supply, and personnel levels . . . captured intelligence data . . . surrender or concessions at the bargaining table. Warmest Regards, Sandy :)
1 Samuel 18:25-27New International Version (NIV)
25 Saul replied, “Say to David, ‘The king wants no other price for the bride than a hundred Philistine foreskins, to take revenge on his enemies.’” Saul’s plan was to have David fall by the hands of the Philistines. 26 When the attendants told David these things, he was pleased to become the king’s son-in-law. So before the allotted time elapsed, 27 David took his men with him and went out and killed two hundred Philistines and brought back their foreskins. They counted out the full number to the king so that David might become the king’s son-in-law. Then Saul gave him his daughter Michal in marriage.
CH (CPT) Heather Davis SMSgt Minister Gerald A. "Doc" Thomas LCDR Rabbah Rona Matlow LTC Stephen C. COL Keith Nightingale
While body counts in the form of severed anatomical parts . . . foreskins, scalps, ears, etc . . . have an exceedingly long history . . . in modern times they have increasingly lost favor among more enlightened civilian and political leadership . . . in major part because of apparent widespread fabrication of numbers absent physical verification . . . in part because contrary to the purpose of justifying public perception of allied deaths grossly disproportionate numbers make it seem as though enemy forces are unconscionably mismatched . . . in part due to apparent inclusion of civilian deaths . . . and in part because body counts only appeared to be potentially relevant in wars of attrition where today's enemies appear to care less how many of their troops are dessimated by superior technonogy. Perhaps other measures may be adopted . . . e.g. amount of land captured and held . . . overall reduction in enemy contacts and/or attacks . . . decrements in indigenous support for the enemy . . . decrements in economic, equipment, supply, and personnel levels . . . captured intelligence data . . . surrender or concessions at the bargaining table. Warmest Regards, Sandy :)
1 Samuel 18:25-27New International Version (NIV)
25 Saul replied, “Say to David, ‘The king wants no other price for the bride than a hundred Philistine foreskins, to take revenge on his enemies.’” Saul’s plan was to have David fall by the hands of the Philistines. 26 When the attendants told David these things, he was pleased to become the king’s son-in-law. So before the allotted time elapsed, 27 David took his men with him and went out and killed two hundred Philistines and brought back their foreskins. They counted out the full number to the king so that David might become the king’s son-in-law. Then Saul gave him his daughter Michal in marriage.
CH (CPT) Heather Davis SMSgt Minister Gerald A. "Doc" Thomas LCDR Rabbah Rona Matlow LTC Stephen C. COL Keith Nightingale
1
1
0
Body counts in and of themselves, are not a valuable statistic, in my opinion, SSG William Almeyda. However, with regard to what is going on in the world today with the continued and escalating terrorist attacks and killings, I think that General James Mattis, USMC Retired, said it best, "Find the enemy that wants to end this experiment (in American democracy) and kill every one of them until they’re so sick of the killing that they leave us and our freedoms intact." The number is not so important as breaking the spirit of those that continue to attack us because at this point in time, I see terrorist activities escalating at a rapid pace. Whatever that number is in terms of body count is the number to be met, and based on the statistics available (numbers vary), the number of people that wish to destroy our way of life is daunting.
He also said, "No war is over until the enemy says it’s over. We may think it over, we may declare it over, but in fact, the enemy gets a vote." LTC Stephen F. 1LT Sandy Annala
He also said, "No war is over until the enemy says it’s over. We may think it over, we may declare it over, but in fact, the enemy gets a vote." LTC Stephen F. 1LT Sandy Annala
(1)
(0)
LTC Paul Labrador
People claim you cannot kill yourselves out of an insurgency. That is actually false. You can. The Romans did it all the time. The issue is that you have to be willing to kill every living thing that opposes you. The Romans were willing to take it that far because they saw each and every insurgency as an existential threat to Rome, and didn't care if they were though of as the "bad guys". We are not wiling to take it that far.
(1)
(0)
1
1
0
IMO the body count of the innocent, and the body count of intended targets is the main focus in todays military. In the past, military concerns were strike first then clean up and access damage. Currently we work closer along the lines of precision and accountability to ensure we hit our targets and minimalize the loss of innocent bystanders.
(1)
(0)
Read This Next
Continue with Facebook 
Continue with Google
The sad part is that most of the wars we've engaged in after WWII have no metrics of success, just metrics of failure, death and destruction... Other than perhaps Desert Storm and the Balkans, we haven't really "won" any of them, so metrics of victory are not relevant.