Posted on Aug 5, 2016
I am a big fan of the Olympics. Which is more important, total medal count or number of gold medals?
769
0
4
0
0
0
Posted >1 y ago
Responses: 4
Total Golds are #1. "If you're not first, you're last..." to quote Ricky Bobby; but seriously, we should be #1 in Golds and Overall, most of our Silvers will be due to a 1-2 sweep of the top part of the podium.
(0)
(0)
Remember, not all Nations compete in every event, therefore it is hard to go "like for like." But for a relatively way use a Gold (3), Silver (2), Bronze (1) point system. So a Nation taking 3 golds would have 9 points, vs a Nation taking 8 bronze or 4 silver.
This allows Nations who are not the "best" at any one thing (lots of 2nd/3rd) to end up being "overall best" while still allowing Nations who are the "best" to end up being "overall best" but not relying on a singular event.
This allows Nations who are not the "best" at any one thing (lots of 2nd/3rd) to end up being "overall best" while still allowing Nations who are the "best" to end up being "overall best" but not relying on a singular event.
(0)
(0)
The national pride, individual performance and dedication to fair and equitable competition is most important with total medal count somewhat lower on the consideration list.
(0)
(0)
Read This Next