MAJ Private RallyPoint Member 275731 <div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>What would you change, why, what is your best solution or replacement? Can be just a pet peeve or irritant or something you think is detrimental to productivity, etc. If you can change one rule or regulation for your branch of service... 2014-10-13T01:47:42-04:00 MAJ Private RallyPoint Member 275731 <div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>What would you change, why, what is your best solution or replacement? Can be just a pet peeve or irritant or something you think is detrimental to productivity, etc. If you can change one rule or regulation for your branch of service... 2014-10-13T01:47:42-04:00 2014-10-13T01:47:42-04:00 PO3 Shaun Taylor 275733 <div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>I would change the physical requirements so that they matched the marines... I think that's self explanatory as to why. Response by PO3 Shaun Taylor made Oct 13 at 2014 1:51 AM 2014-10-13T01:51:20-04:00 2014-10-13T01:51:20-04:00 MSgt Private RallyPoint Member 275735 <div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>Get rid of the ABU and adopt Multicam. Response by MSgt Private RallyPoint Member made Oct 13 at 2014 1:52 AM 2014-10-13T01:52:57-04:00 2014-10-13T01:52:57-04:00 SSgt Private RallyPoint Member 275737 <div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>I would bring back the 1505s and the Vietnam-era fatigues. (Cotton) Response by SSgt Private RallyPoint Member made Oct 13 at 2014 1:56 AM 2014-10-13T01:56:58-04:00 2014-10-13T01:56:58-04:00 SGT Alejandro Sarandrea 1774870 <div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>All 74D would be certified EOD. Response by SGT Alejandro Sarandrea made Aug 3 at 2016 12:59 PM 2016-08-03T12:59:22-04:00 2016-08-03T12:59:22-04:00 SSG Private RallyPoint Member 2746552 <div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>They should have a higher standard for combat arms personnel. It should be the same for both male and female. I know that physiologically we&#39;re built differently, but that shouldn&#39;t mean that not everyone has to meet the standard. Personnel in combat arms need to meet mission requirements period. Whether it rucking 70lbs or more, carrying 240s, 249s, mortar tubes, javelins, comms equipment or anything else. Response by SSG Private RallyPoint Member made Jul 19 at 2017 4:13 PM 2017-07-19T16:13:39-04:00 2017-07-19T16:13:39-04:00 SFC Michael Hasbun 2747229 <div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>Leaders should not have to prove that a Soldier/Sailor/Airman shouldn&#39;t be promoted with years of paperwork, videotapes, recordings, etc... The onus should be on the individual to prove, beyond a shadow of a doubt that they ARE ready to be promoted. Just staying out of trouble shouldn&#39;t be good enough... Response by SFC Michael Hasbun made Jul 19 at 2017 7:58 PM 2017-07-19T19:58:07-04:00 2017-07-19T19:58:07-04:00 Cpl John Barker 2747289 <div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>Either get rid of our Raider Battalions or better integrate them into SOCOM. We lose the best of our grunts to Raiders, who are perpetually on their OFP, yet as they don&#39;t have perminant slots the majority of their instructors are PMC&#39;s and a lot of guys end up going back to the grunts after a few years with shitty &quot;I&#39;m better than you&quot; attitudes Response by Cpl John Barker made Jul 19 at 2017 8:22 PM 2017-07-19T20:22:01-04:00 2017-07-19T20:22:01-04:00 SSG Karl Fowler 2747330 <div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>let certain mos. be exempt from the mandatory retirement at 60 yrs of age Response by SSG Karl Fowler made Jul 19 at 2017 8:37 PM 2017-07-19T20:37:12-04:00 2017-07-19T20:37:12-04:00 SrA Private RallyPoint Member 2867174 <div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>The physical fitness test needs an overhaul. I&#39;m not exactly sure how but I&#39;m sure it can be brainstormed. The PT test does nothing to determine true physical fitness. As long as you can pound out a decent performance in a minute, it doesn&#39;t matter what you do the rest of your year and I see way too many out of shape Airmen who skate by on their PT. Response by SrA Private RallyPoint Member made Aug 25 at 2017 6:08 PM 2017-08-25T18:08:50-04:00 2017-08-25T18:08:50-04:00 2014-10-13T01:47:42-04:00