LTJG Private RallyPoint Member3135643<div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>The UCMJ (Federal Regulations) has been around for a long time with articles added and taken away. Do you think articles of the UCMJ should be added or deleted? What would they be and what do you propose?If you were able to change one UCMJ article (Federal Regulation) what would it be?2017-12-01T09:35:46-05:00LTJG Private RallyPoint Member3135643<div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>The UCMJ (Federal Regulations) has been around for a long time with articles added and taken away. Do you think articles of the UCMJ should be added or deleted? What would they be and what do you propose?If you were able to change one UCMJ article (Federal Regulation) what would it be?2017-12-01T09:35:46-05:002017-12-01T09:35:46-05:00Capt Gregory Prickett3135729<div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>The articles of the UCMJ are enacted by Congress in Title 10, United States Code, just like every other federal law. If you want something changed in the UCMJ, Congress has to change it. The UCMJ was last amended by Congress in 2016.Response by Capt Gregory Prickett made Dec 1 at 2017 10:03 AM2017-12-01T10:03:24-05:002017-12-01T10:03:24-05:00LT Brad McInnis3135822<div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>They work pretty well. Hypothetical questions like this are like a@@holes, and they really do nothing to help you qualify in your warfare area. Focus on things that will keep you and your sailors safe. And DAMMIT! You have me agreeing with <a class="dark-link bold-link" role="profile-hover" data-qtip-container="body" data-id="342609" data-source-page-controller="question_response_contents" href="/profiles/342609-capt-gregory-prickett">Capt Gregory Prickett</a> today, now all I need is frogs falling out of the sky.....Response by LT Brad McInnis made Dec 1 at 2017 10:25 AM2017-12-01T10:25:58-05:002017-12-01T10:25:58-05:00Capt Gregory Prickett3135871<div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>Article 52 needs to be changed, to require unanimous verdicts.Response by Capt Gregory Prickett made Dec 1 at 2017 10:42 AM2017-12-01T10:42:36-05:002017-12-01T10:42:36-05:00SCPO Jason McLaughlin3135914<div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>I've always thought Article 125 is judicial overreach. What two consenting adults do in private is not the military's business. It is also vague in that "unnatural carnal copulation with another person" is very subjective.Response by SCPO Jason McLaughlin made Dec 1 at 2017 10:57 AM2017-12-01T10:57:10-05:002017-12-01T10:57:10-05:00SPC Private RallyPoint Member3136118<div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>The one on consensual sodomy was already changed, so... Nothing I can think of.Response by SPC Private RallyPoint Member made Dec 1 at 2017 12:11 PM2017-12-01T12:11:53-05:002017-12-01T12:11:53-05:00SCPO William Akin3145863<div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>I think we should add an article banning/outlawing political correctness....<br />Punishment would be flogging for first offenders.. Keel hauling for repeat offenders..Response by SCPO William Akin made Dec 5 at 2017 9:49 AM2017-12-05T09:49:21-05:002017-12-05T09:49:21-05:002017-12-01T09:35:46-05:00