Posted on Mar 12, 2014
SSG Career Counselor
24.4K
34
15
3
3
0
<p>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; I started my service on the line with the 1-505th. I've held all positions within a line PLT from Squad Leader down, and during my 5 years there our focus was mainly Direct Action (DA) and Airfield seizure. We trained non stop on the battle drills, and very little on Reconnaissance.</p><p>Now I'm with what used to be a RSTA, but it seems that we're working toward becoming LRS. Here all we train is Recon. Setting up HIDE and SERV sites, collecting intel and not doing all the Infantry things that I was rised on. </p><p>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; My question lies in the training aspect of both elements. As a door kicker i never thought about recon because i was never around it, but as a Recon TL i cant help but think we should do more Infantry based tasks on top of LRS. I understand that DA is no longer my main objective and I understand that we need to focus on reconnaissance, but we are still Infantry. We still need to know the basics of what it means to be Infantry. What happens to these men when they go to a line unit and have no idea how to conduct battle drill 6, or battle drill 1? </p><p>Should we be training full spectrum Infantrymen or specialized Infantrymen?&nbsp;</p>
Posted in these groups: Infantry Center (Army)
Avatar feed
Responses: 11
1SG(P) First Sergeant
6
6
0
DA has never been your "main objective".&nbsp; The Infantry doesn't conduct DA.&nbsp; I have no doubt that some one may have expressed to you that what you were doing was DA.&nbsp; But they were wrong.&nbsp; You may have supported another unit conducting DA.&nbsp; But DA per se isn't an Infantry mission.&nbsp; The skill sets required to conduct DA are often found in the Infantry.&nbsp; But Battle Drills 1 &amp; 6 don't define DA.&nbsp; You can't find DA in FM 3-21.8 because it isn't an Infantry mission.&nbsp; However, you can find it in JP 3-05 which defines DA as, "short-duration strikes and other small-scale offensive actions conducted as SO in hostile, denied, or diplomatically sensitive environments, and which employ specialized military capabilities to seize, destroy, capture, exploit, recover, or damage designated targets. DA differs from conventional offensive actions in the level of diplomatic or political risk, the operational techniques employed, and the degree of discriminate and precise use of force to achieve specific objectives. In the conduct of these operations, SOF may employ raids, ambushes, or other direct assault tactics (including close-quarters combat); emplace mines and other munitions; conduct standoff attacks by fire from air, ground, or maritime platforms; provide terminal guidance for precision-guided munitions; conduct independent sabotage; conduct anti-ship operations, as well as shipboarding and seizure (e.g., maritime interception operations)"&nbsp; Furthermore, many people even in SOF think they're doing DA when they aren't or when they should be concentrating on something else.<br><br>That said, most soldiers would consider assignment to an OCONUS airborne reconnaissance unit to be a tremendous experience.&nbsp; Most soldiers don't get to do that.&nbsp; If it doesn't appeal to you, there are other opportunities.<br>
(6)
Comment
(0)
SSG Career Counselor
SSG (Join to see)
>1 y
SFC Callan,
I apologize for the incorrect use of the term. I was unaware of the exact definition, Thank you. I always learn something new on here. I love my job, and I was in no way saying that I want to do normal infantry things. I was simply wondering if I should include a little more basic Infantry skill training. The LRS mission that we're focusing on is great, and it's taking me a little while to get into the full swing of things. I would never give up this Opportunity. Again thank you for the correction.
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
MAJ Jim Woods
5
5
0
The current LRS missions are similar to the LRRP and SOG units of the VN era. The concept of LRS at a Division level came about around 1978 when the Ranger Bn's (Pre-Regiment) took most of the LRS assets and left the Divisions without LRS capability.

In 1978, while with the 9th US Infantry Division G-3 shop, I wrote several conceptual papers for the CG on the need for a LRS capability with the High Technology Light Infantry Division. I was surprised that it took so long to bring them on board. LRS, LRRP, and the Alphabet SOG units in VN were all great leadership challenges. I was always amazed at how we could continue getting good NCO's and Officers to serve with them. Some of the best combat leaders came out of those programs. Consider yourself privileged to be in a position that included men such as Bob Howard, Charlie Beckwith, David Hackworth, and George Pacerelli.

As SFC Gates stated, read the books about such men. Read how they developed the tactics and prospected men for unit positions. They had no high tech equipment and were frequently out of radio, artillery, and helo support but Charlie Miked in the traditions of elite units.
(5)
Comment
(0)
SGT Craig Northacker
SGT Craig Northacker
>1 y
What are your thoughts on the play between Blue Light and delta?
(0)
Reply
(0)
MAJ Jim Woods
MAJ Jim Woods
>1 y
Blue Light was an interim program in the late 70's early 80's that I think was run by one of the Bragg Groups? It was designed to respond to National Emergencies/Hostage Situations/and even had a nuclear response mission. They did get their panties in a twist when Delta came on line because they took the Blue Light missions away. They didn't like each other very much for awhile.
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
1SG Brigade Security Manager
5
5
0
RECON all the way!
(5)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small

Join nearly 2 million former and current members of the US military, just like you.

close