Innovation as National Power

CPT Alex Gallo — Wed, 26 Apr 2023 09:14:17 -0400

There is hard power, soft power, and even smart power. But what is also needed to meet the challenge of China is innovation and entrepreneurship as a form of national power.

The strategic challenge of the Chinese Communist Party has been a wake-up call for politicians and the public alike. In fact, the newly formed Select Committee on the Chinese Communist Party in Congress has begun to wrestle with the challenge of strategic competition – to include, just last week, conducting a wargame with committee members to open their eyes to the acute issues we face as a nation and Western society. Such a wargame with the representatives of the people in Congress is both practical and needed because, to date, the exact nature of the challenge from China has been abstract within the public dialogue.

But what is missing from these wargames, and our national-level conversation in general, is a dialogue on national power. That is to say, how should we organize as a nation and what are the technologies and resources required to meet the challenge from China? Without such a conversation around national power, we are at risk of addressing the challenge from the Chinese Communist Party through limited means – even as it holds the potential to be existential in nature to American and Western values, principles, norms, and laws.

The debate over national power is not new. It has long been how political scientists investigate and assess statecraft. Much has been written over the years about hard power – a form of national power that was described in John Hillen’s 2016 War on the Rocks article as “the power to threaten or use coercive force.” A foil to hard power is, of course, soft power – a term coined by Harvard’s Joseph Nye in his 1990 book, Bound to Lead. Nye makes a distinction between hard and soft power and even suggests that soft power could be used in lieu of hard power. Hillen further suggests that “power that is ‘soft’ is seductive — promising more sophistication, less cost, a more refined and nuanced tool, more flexibility, and less intractability.” Nye’s rejoinder to the limits of soft power has been to suggest smart power – “a power that combines hard power, which relies on coercion, and soft power, which relies on attraction.”

The problem with the heuristic of hard, soft, and even smart power is it assumes much of national power resides in or is directly related to the institutions of the state. Such a mental model fails to recognize the power of a country’s populace.

Indeed, the American public is an untapped form of national power.

Harnessing the collective energy of Americans to work on public challenges is “innovation power.”

Without capturing the innovative and entrepreneurial energy of Americans to directly work on government problems, the United States will continue to experience what Steve Blank, a Silicon Valley entrepreneur, and Pete Newell, retired Army Colonel and former commander of the Rapid Equipping Force, describe as the “Red Queen problem.”

The Red Queen problem is a reference to Lewis Carroll’s Through the Looking Glass from the Alice and Wonderland series in which the Red Queen says to Alice: “Now, here, you see, it takes all the running you can do, to keep in the same place.”

Hard, soft, and smart power are subject to the Red Queen problem because they are largely focused on the capabilities and capacities of the state. What these forms of national power fail to contemplate is how to disruptively get ahead of the strategic competitor by leveraging the whole of American society.

Innovation as a form of national power would allow us to focus our strategic investments on the people – at all ages and all walks of life – so they can engage in a new form of national service – call it a modern “civilian innovation corps.”

We, as a country, can do this and more – but only if we recognize our citizenry as a unique form of national power.

“Innovation power” will not only allow us to out-compete China. It will give our children the future they both need and deserve.

A power that is truly powerful.

Alex Gallo is the author of “Vetspective,” a RallyPoint series that discusses national security, foreign policy, politics, and society. Alex also serves as the Executive Director of the Common Mission Project, a 501c3, that delivers an innovation and entrepreneurship program, Hacking for Defense®, which brings together the government, universities, and the private sector to solve the strategic challenges. He is also a fellow with George Mason University’s National Security Institute, an adjunct professor in the Security Studies Program at Georgetown University, and a US Army Veteran. Follow him on Twitter at @AlexGalloCMP.

Response by CWO4 Terrence Clark made Apr 26 at 2023 10:23 AM

CWO4 Terrence Clark — Wed, 26 Apr 2023 10:23:01 -0400

Another descriptive position paper, CPT. CPT Alex Gallo Thank you. Very interested in progress of this new Select Committee. Hopefully it is rapid. Not really interested in paying for my breakfast burrito with renimbi.

Response by CPT Private RallyPoint Member made Apr 27 at 2023 1:47 AM

CPT Private RallyPoint Member — Thu, 27 Apr 2023 01:47:05 -0400

Ground Zero

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UO-8CMdeSHA

Animated timeline shows how Silicon Valley became a $2.8 trillion neighborhood

Silicon Valley is a name that is synonymous with the technology industry, but when and how did this small area of California become the center of the tech wo...

Response by MAJ Ken Landgren made Apr 30 at 2023 11:00 PM

MAJ Ken Landgren — Sun, 30 Apr 2023 23:00:49 -0400

The US is quite innovative. However, countries will try and will copy much of our innovations and often make the products cheaper than the US can. This applies to military hardware as well. US high tech corporations that invest in plants overseas will facilitate the transfer of the technology to the host country. It is just a natural process as the host country will understand how to build or create things.

Response by SGT Ruben Lozada made May 2 at 2023 2:57 PM

SGT Ruben Lozada — Tue, 02 May 2023 14:57:55 -0400

Good afternoon CPT Alex Gallo. Excellent post. Thank You for sharing this.

Response by SGT Private RallyPoint Member made May 3 at 2023 6:32 PM

SGT Private RallyPoint Member — Wed, 03 May 2023 18:32:44 -0400

CPT Alex Gallo thanks for the share.

Response by LCDR Private RallyPoint Member made May 9 at 2023 6:46 PM

LCDR Private RallyPoint Member — Tue, 09 May 2023 18:46:28 -0400

The first step to defeating the Chinese Communist Party is for all Americans, especially American businesses, to recognize the CCP as an enemy to freedom. We can’t even ban TikTok which collects data and pushes propaganda from the CCP. The fact that we do not recognize Taiwan as a country is catering to the CCP.