SSgt M. Har1668789<div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>Is America "Ready" For Two Women On A Presidential ticket?2016-06-27T19:41:45-04:00SSgt M. Har1668789<div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>Is America "Ready" For Two Women On A Presidential ticket?2016-06-27T19:41:45-04:002016-06-27T19:41:45-04:00SGM Mikel Dawson1668842<div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>America is ready for a honest, intelligent, reliable person running for office, be it men or women. To vote for a a woman just because it's a she is no excuse.Response by SGM Mikel Dawson made Jun 27 at 2016 8:10 PM2016-06-27T20:10:37-04:002016-06-27T20:10:37-04:00Capt Private RallyPoint Member1668844<div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>They are betting that calling us sexist will win the election.Response by Capt Private RallyPoint Member made Jun 27 at 2016 8:11 PM2016-06-27T20:11:07-04:002016-06-27T20:11:07-04:001SG Private RallyPoint Member1668846<div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>Seems to be the Year of the Woman. Recognition by expansion of their potential roles in the Military and now very likely an all female ticket in Washington.Response by 1SG Private RallyPoint Member made Jun 27 at 2016 8:12 PM2016-06-27T20:12:19-04:002016-06-27T20:12:19-04:00SPC Private RallyPoint Member1668898<div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>2 women? Yes. 2 evil psychotic witches? NoResponse by SPC Private RallyPoint Member made Jun 27 at 2016 8:33 PM2016-06-27T20:33:25-04:002016-06-27T20:33:25-04:00SSG Private RallyPoint Member1668909<div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>Clinton has a very serious problem with Liberals, not your typical Democrat run of the mill corporatism with some concession to women's and LGBT rights, but real liberalism which demands that the banks are regulated in such a way as to reduce risk for Americans consumers, that trade agreements benefit American workers and not just American capital, and that we preserve and defend Nature as this is the only planet available to us for the time being. <br /><br />Warren has some credibility with liberals when it comes to regulating the banks, on fighting bad trade deals for American workers and on climate change. I'm not sure it will be enough, however it was a smart move on Clinton part to bring her on board. With a real liberal like Warren as her VP, Clinton will now likely focus on appearing moderate by reversing course again on the TPP and Bank deregulation. I believe that will be a mistake as she is placing far more stock in Warrens liberal credentials, than they are worth. From a liberal perspective at least, Clinton is a neo-conservative who belongs in the Republican party. <br /><br />Now she only needs to convince Wall Street that she is their best option, money will flow like rivers and the contest will be over.Response by SSG Private RallyPoint Member made Jun 27 at 2016 8:36 PM2016-06-27T20:36:48-04:002016-06-27T20:36:48-04:00Sgt Private RallyPoint Member1668936<div class="images-v2-count-0"></div><a class="dark-link bold-link" role="profile-hover" data-qtip-container="body" data-id="499162" data-source-page-controller="question_response_contents" href="/profiles/499162-ssgt-m-har">SSgt M. Har</a> Absolutely, if it is the right two women.Response by Sgt Private RallyPoint Member made Jun 27 at 2016 8:47 PM2016-06-27T20:47:52-04:002016-06-27T20:47:52-04:00CPT Jack Durish1669092<div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>The real question is America ready for these two women: Hillary and Elizabeth. Just asking the question infers that America is the land of rubes who can't accept a woman in positions of authority. Why are we still having this discussion in a land where women are freer, more liberated, better able to pursue their dreams and seek the limits of their gifts, than America? Sadly, we have chosen the worst black American to be the first black American President. Now we have the prospect of electing the worst woman in America to be the first female American President. There is something seriously wrong with our judgement, don't you think?Response by CPT Jack Durish made Jun 27 at 2016 9:49 PM2016-06-27T21:49:57-04:002016-06-27T21:49:57-04:00SPC(P) Private RallyPoint Member1669111<div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>I could care less what gender the next President is, I care more about WHO they are... And I sure hope to God we chose the right candidate....Response by SPC(P) Private RallyPoint Member made Jun 27 at 2016 9:54 PM2016-06-27T21:54:42-04:002016-06-27T21:54:42-04:00Cpl Justin Goolsby1669186<div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>And who might those women be.... I'm sorry, but someone's genitals shouldn't determine their competency for the Presidency. I have zero issue with 1 woman being in the White House or 2. What I do have an issue with is the asinine belief that "it's about time we had a female in the White House". That literally has zero bearing on whether or not you are qualified for the position. We could have an election where every single candidate is a woman. I'm not voting for someone because they are a woman, I'm voting for them because I think they'd be suitable in Office.Response by Cpl Justin Goolsby made Jun 27 at 2016 10:11 PM2016-06-27T22:11:53-04:002016-06-27T22:11:53-04:00PO1 John Miller1669395<div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>And if us white Christian male Libertarians don't vote for them, we're automatically sexist, just like we were racist 8 years ago when we didn't vote for Obama.Response by PO1 John Miller made Jun 27 at 2016 11:31 PM2016-06-27T23:31:44-04:002016-06-27T23:31:44-04:00LTC Private RallyPoint Member1669396<div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>Kelly Ayotte and Condoleezza Rice? Dust off Colin Powell and give Rand Paul something important to do while they are at it...I would quit my job and campaign for them.Response by LTC Private RallyPoint Member made Jun 27 at 2016 11:32 PM2016-06-27T23:32:56-04:002016-06-27T23:32:56-04:00Lt Col Private RallyPoint Member1669686<div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>Personally, I think it's a non-issue. Just need them to do their job.Response by Lt Col Private RallyPoint Member made Jun 28 at 2016 6:51 AM2016-06-28T06:51:43-04:002016-06-28T06:51:43-04:00MCPO Joseph Wright1670084<div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>No.Response by MCPO Joseph Wright made Jun 28 at 2016 9:36 AM2016-06-28T09:36:39-04:002016-06-28T09:36:39-04:00SSG Private RallyPoint Member1670338<div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>I have no problem with a woman or a two women presidential ticket, as long as one of them is not Hillary the crook Clinton.Response by SSG Private RallyPoint Member made Jun 28 at 2016 10:44 AM2016-06-28T10:44:50-04:002016-06-28T10:44:50-04:00COL Jean (John) F. B.1670641<div class="images-v2-count-0"></div><a class="dark-link bold-link" role="profile-hover" data-qtip-container="body" data-id="499162" data-source-page-controller="question_response_contents" href="/profiles/499162-ssgt-m-har">SSgt M. Har</a> Does it matter anymore? I thought our increasingly liberal/progressive country did not recognize the differences in the sexes anymore. What's to say that Hillary or Elizabeth won't wake up tomorrow and declare that she is a man. Regardless who Trump picks as his running mate, that person should declare that "she" is female (if she is not) and watch the liberal press go crazy.<br /><br />One thing for sure... America is not ready for Hillary or Elizabeth, separately or together.Response by COL Jean (John) F. B. made Jun 28 at 2016 11:51 AM2016-06-28T11:51:52-04:002016-06-28T11:51:52-04:00SPC Sheila Lewis1670666<div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>I wish there had been more balanced choices.Response by SPC Sheila Lewis made Jun 28 at 2016 11:57 AM2016-06-28T11:57:32-04:002016-06-28T11:57:32-04:00SPC Anna Larson1670785<div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>It depends on the women involved. I don't have a problem voting for a woman for president if she's qualified and as long as she's not the one currently running.Response by SPC Anna Larson made Jun 28 at 2016 12:25 PM2016-06-28T12:25:50-04:002016-06-28T12:25:50-04:00SPC Douglas Boekhout1670969<div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>I wouldn't mind a woman as president, just NOT Hillary Clinton. She is a pathological liar, she is a criminal, she frauds money from organizations, well, you get the picture. She is the most dangerous person EVER to become President of these United States of America.Response by SPC Douglas Boekhout made Jun 28 at 2016 1:10 PM2016-06-28T13:10:45-04:002016-06-28T13:10:45-04:00CW3 Private RallyPoint Member1671218<div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>There are plenty of women I'd like to see in the West Wing and East Wing. Hillary Clinton and Elizabeth Warren are most decidedly NOT on that list.Response by CW3 Private RallyPoint Member made Jun 28 at 2016 2:14 PM2016-06-28T14:14:17-04:002016-06-28T14:14:17-04:00SFC Ian Lumgair1674964<div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>I don't think it matter. Character and integrity should be judgment not what they have in there underpants!!!Response by SFC Ian Lumgair made Jun 29 at 2016 2:53 PM2016-06-29T14:53:52-04:002016-06-29T14:53:52-04:002016-06-27T19:41:45-04:00