SSgt David Tedrow1290251<div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>I ask this question coming from the Marine Corps. It seems the Answers section is 75% or more from Army asking questions that always seemed easy in the Marine Corps concerning orders, schools and boards. If it is this hard to understand maybe some changes need to be made.Is the Army and it's orders, MOS assignments, leadership requirements and all other things Army really hard to understand and figure out ?2016-02-09T11:37:55-05:00SSgt David Tedrow1290251<div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>I ask this question coming from the Marine Corps. It seems the Answers section is 75% or more from Army asking questions that always seemed easy in the Marine Corps concerning orders, schools and boards. If it is this hard to understand maybe some changes need to be made.Is the Army and it's orders, MOS assignments, leadership requirements and all other things Army really hard to understand and figure out ?2016-02-09T11:37:55-05:002016-02-09T11:37:55-05:00LTC John Shaw1290260<div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>The Army has ten times more people and they don't want to make it too easy.Response by LTC John Shaw made Feb 9 at 2016 11:41 AM2016-02-09T11:41:11-05:002016-02-09T11:41:11-05:00LTC Paul Labrador1290275<div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>The issue isn't whether it's easy to understand (because it IS easy and straightforward for the most part). It's whether or not the process was ever explained in the first place.<br /><br />But as LTC Shaw stated, the Army is much bigger than the Corps is, and much more diverse. That alone lends to a level of complexity that the Corps doesn't have to deal with.Response by LTC Paul Labrador made Feb 9 at 2016 11:46 AM2016-02-09T11:46:47-05:002016-02-09T11:46:47-05:00SSG Private RallyPoint Member1290283<div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>I would say that as a whole, no it is not hard. But there are constant changes when it comes to promotions and to some regulations. If the leaders are not properly pushing down new information and updates then the soldiers will not know. So it is not so much that we need a change but more so that leaders need to ensure that every soldier is made aware of any and all changes that occur within the ARMY and that goes for every branch of the military.Response by SSG Private RallyPoint Member made Feb 9 at 2016 11:50 AM2016-02-09T11:50:41-05:002016-02-09T11:50:41-05:00SGT Ben Keen1290309<div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>I think <a class="dark-link bold-link" role="profile-hover" data-qtip-container="body" data-id="104666" data-source-page-controller="question_response_contents" href="/profiles/104666-66h-medical-surgical-nurse">LTC Paul Labrador</a> hit it right on the head. The process of things is not that hard to understand but the lack of understanding makes it difficult. I would agree too that the Army in general has been going through a lot of changes the past 5 - 10 years. We are the largest branch so when changes go out, they do not always reach the line in a timely manner. I think it is also a good thing to see a lot of the questions we are seeing here on RallyPoint. We speak of this lack of understanding and lack of speed, yet through RallyPoint and the awesome collective experience of all the members regardless of branch, we are working towards ensuring the future leaders will be able to gain a faster understanding of the changes and be able to put them into practice faster.Response by SGT Ben Keen made Feb 9 at 2016 11:59 AM2016-02-09T11:59:16-05:002016-02-09T11:59:16-05:00Sgt Aaron Kennedy, MS1290330<div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>I "think" it's a product of Quantity, since the Army as a whole is just larger. Combine that with components (Active, Reserve, and Guard). Our (Marines) systems are "simple" in comparison to everyone else's. We just have less to deal with. Not as many people. Not as many locations. Not as many Fields/MOS. We were so streamlined it was almost comical. Comparing us to any other any of the other Services just gets wonky.Response by Sgt Aaron Kennedy, MS made Feb 9 at 2016 12:04 PM2016-02-09T12:04:49-05:002016-02-09T12:04:49-05:00MSG Brad Sand1290458<div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>No, it is not that hard to figure out. Now getting it to work, is a different question.Response by MSG Brad Sand made Feb 9 at 2016 12:50 PM2016-02-09T12:50:14-05:002016-02-09T12:50:14-05:00SFC Michael Hasbun1290984<div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>If people read the regulations/publications? No.Response by SFC Michael Hasbun made Feb 9 at 2016 3:42 PM2016-02-09T15:42:10-05:002016-02-09T15:42:10-05:00MAJ Private RallyPoint Member1291331<div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>I dont fully agree that the issue is about the Army being larger than the Marines, I would only agree if there was no leadership chain. I am a dual vet Marine and now Army, and the Marines in my opinion just do a better job at teaching and getting the word out than the Army has. It starts with all my shoe laces being left over right.Response by MAJ Private RallyPoint Member made Feb 9 at 2016 6:37 PM2016-02-09T18:37:27-05:002016-02-09T18:37:27-05:00MSG Private RallyPoint Member1291468<div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>In my opinion, it's not that hard to figure it out. That's not to say that there isn't a lot of grey area and that may be where some of the questions are coming from. There are also a ton of MILPER messages and ALARACTs that Soldiers never see.<br /><br />However, some of the questions on here seem to stem from people either being too lazy to look it up themselves or someone never teaching them how to research it. I mean, questions like "If someone fails an APFT should they be flagged?" should be easily researched as it's black and white in the regulation.<br /><br />I think Soldiers should be taught to research some of the questions they ask early on. Generally, if you teach them how to research and where to look it will result in a better leader.Response by MSG Private RallyPoint Member made Feb 9 at 2016 7:47 PM2016-02-09T19:47:12-05:002016-02-09T19:47:12-05:00SFC Private RallyPoint Member1291508<div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>I try to explain it as: if you combined the people, missions, and MOS's and unit structures of the Marines, Navy, and Air Force, you would get something that resembles the Army. The part of the Army that most resembles the Marines is our BCT's, which are pretty straightforward. But, we also have the medical command, Aviation, Schools, Communication ranging from radios to satellite to Space Command, several Special Operations units with a broad array of missions, boats, divers, contracting agents, prime power production, Air Defense, etc. There has to be a uniform set of guidance for all these different units. <br />As for the questions, a lot of them come from Reserve Component which has significantly different operating rules from the Active Component.Response by SFC Private RallyPoint Member made Feb 9 at 2016 7:58 PM2016-02-09T19:58:33-05:002016-02-09T19:58:33-05:00Capt Mark Strobl1292065<div class="images-v2-count-0"></div><a class="dark-link bold-link" role="profile-hover" data-qtip-container="body" data-id="183673" data-source-page-controller="question_response_contents" href="/profiles/183673-ssgt-david-tedrow">SSgt David Tedrow</a> - I'd have to say that this is simply reflective of the composition of RP's members --mostly Army. I'd bet there are proportionately as many Marines asking career-related questions.Response by Capt Mark Strobl made Feb 10 at 2016 1:27 AM2016-02-10T01:27:28-05:002016-02-10T01:27:28-05:00SPC Christopher Morehouse1293416<div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>It's the Army. If it aight broke, fix it till it is.Response by SPC Christopher Morehouse made Feb 10 at 2016 3:24 PM2016-02-10T15:24:33-05:002016-02-10T15:24:33-05:002016-02-09T11:37:55-05:00