Posted on Apr 28, 2017
MSG Instructor/Writer
1.54K
2
3
1
1
0
I was in part exited to see that the Army was moving to an "Improved" evaluation system for NCOs. But after carefully seeing how it has turned my old unit into a bunch of selfish individuals, I wonder what is happening in larger units. We changed the motto Army of One because it hinted selfishness but it seems as if we are moving back to that direction. What does the NCO community thinks?
Posted in these groups: 1efa5058 NCOER
Avatar feed
Responses: 3
SSG(P) Casualty Operations Ncoic
1
1
0
Edited >1 y ago
I too was excited to see a change in the NCOER system. However, the last NCOER that I did for a SGT changed that opinion. The new form for Sergeants E-5 only has "Met Standard" and "Did Not Meet Standard" as rating qualifiers. The last NCOER I did for a Sergeant E-5 truly earned "Did Not Meet Standard" for 3 of the 5 blocks on the form. Long story short, I was "convinced" to tone down the bullets I wrote and make the evaluation more favorable, since it was that NCO's first evaluation. I tried defending the "Did Not Meet Standard" blocks but was told that I would have to have court of law grade evidence to prove those bullets, I had to delete them. I guess my word and assessment as a NCO doesn't count for much anymore. So the eval got sugar-coated and another NCO who, in my opinion would do better in the civilian world, will be moving up to lead Soldiers. My gripe with the form is that the old form allowed a NCO to receive a "Needs Improvement" or "Needs Much Improvement" check block. That makes the evaluation more specific and granular. Now it's either a GO or NO-GO, and thus far, "NO-GOs" are a "NO-GO" because they will heavily affect the rated NCO's career negatively. And we all know that we are not allowed to hurt people's feelings, much less their careers, via an honest evaluation.
(1)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
MSG Inspector General
0
0
0
This is a clear case of going to IG. If the NCO'S counseling packet shows that he was given ample opportunities for improvement, then the rating is what it is. The rater is evaluating based on performance, the senior rater based on potential. If the Rater and Senior rater disagree, oh well! You should have go to IG and seek support.
(0)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
MSG Inspector General
0
0
0
I personally think that we needed this change 10 years ago. Most of the NCOS who don't like the idea, are those who know that with the new system they will have to actually work, and that the 1/1 is no longer a guarantee. No more over inflated NCOERs, no more excellence for "did done well"! Time to be a professional, and get to work. Separate yourself from your peers with actions.
(0)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small

Join nearly 2 million former and current members of the US military, just like you.

close