Posted on Jul 7, 2016
Is your support of HRC more important than the Law and some would say your Oath of Military Service?
3.22K
36
38
4
4
0
Posted in these groups: 
Hillary Clinton
Election 2016
Hillary Clinton Election 2016
Posted >1 y ago
Responses: 13
9
9
0
OK Rant Time. For months I have had to read from some that I still consider friends and from others not so much about how no one can say HRC sent or received classified material that was classified at the time. Well the FBI report is out. The lying skank sent and received 104 emails that where classified at the time as Top Secret or above. She Lied! She also said she turned over ALL work related material. She LIED. The FBI says there are over 3000 emails that are work related that she did not turn over. Another law broken. She said she did it so she only had to use one device. LIE. The FBI says multiple devices where used. This one isnt a law but is sure shows what kind of person she is. And after all this KNOWING she broke the law the fix is in and she is above the law. She put fellow brothers and sisters in the military in harms way for her convenience and now some of you are going to over look that. How do you look at yourselves in the mirror. I'm not a Trump fan but at least he didn't walk the fence for Treason. This lying skank did and should be in jail!!!
(9)
(0)
Sgt Kelli Mays
PO2 Mark Saffell let's not forget she/her lawyers/staff destroyed thousands and thousands of emails which we'll never know if they were classified or not...and she had one staff member change the classification of the email to Non classified...he testified to this...then they wiped the severs clean...not just the ONE server she claimed all along she had, but the other THREE servers she conventiently FORGET to tell everyone about...therefore making it impossible to check on the destroyed emails and impossible to check on whether her servers were ever hacked.
(0)
(0)
2
2
0
2
2
0
Not sure how supporting either low life candidate would be more important than the law or my oath of service. The choices are a lying millionaire or a lying billionaire. Yes Hillary should be in prison for what she did, you'd have a hard time fining someone on RP that would argue the opposite, but Trump's policies are, unconstitutional (closing/monitoring mosques), unlawful (torture/going after terrorists' families, which would be war crimes) or just logistically impossible (barring Muslims from entering the country/the wall plan). Based on those examples, supporting Trump would be just as bad simply based on the "support and defend the constitution" part of our oath enlistment.
this election year is one where someone would be justified to advocate in not voting at all based on our major party choices
this election year is one where someone would be justified to advocate in not voting at all based on our major party choices
(2)
(0)
TSgt (Join to see)
CPT Jack Durish - None. But large part of his platform is counter to what we, as service members are have sworn to uphold.
Both these candidates are dumpster fires. Neither embody the oath they would take as President..."I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States."
Both these candidates are dumpster fires. Neither embody the oath they would take as President..."I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States."
(1)
(0)
CPT Jack Durish
TSgt (Join to see) - So you equate opposing political statements with demonstrated malfeasance? Think about that when it comes time to vote. It's obvious that the decision against indicting Hillary is a political choice of a corrupt Administration. Voting to make Hillary President is our choice. If We the People abandon the Rule of Law as this Administration has, what hope is there for America? And no, I'm no great fan of Trump. I'm still hoping against hope that both parties will awaken from their stupor and offer us some real choices. But I can never vote for a person who not only has little regard for the law, but also will have even less now that she knows she can get away with breaking any law she wants with impunity.
(2)
(0)
SFC Everett Oliver
Trump makes statements and then explains them further as people get exited, A temporary ban on Muslims or people coming from Muslim controlled countries makes sense, If we cannot vet them why let them in? I hadn't heard anything about closing Mosques but there is a precedence for interfering with the practices of a religion. (Think multiple wives).
If HRC is elected she will change the USA into something we won't recognize, and she will be there for 8 years. If Trump is elected he will keep the integrity of the Supreme Court and if he is as bad as some think we can replace him in 4 years...
If HRC is elected she will change the USA into something we won't recognize, and she will be there for 8 years. If Trump is elected he will keep the integrity of the Supreme Court and if he is as bad as some think we can replace him in 4 years...
(1)
(0)
MSG Brad Sand
TSgt (Join to see)
In truth, I am not a fan of either party and would love to have on person out there who I wanted to support. With that said, the one thing that seemed strange to me when Trump was starting to actually look like he was going to win Republican nomination was how he was being presented by the Establishment media? There was a disconnect between a successful New York businessman and the racist bigot he had suddenly become? When I went to listen to what he actually said...wow, he is right? Not sure why people think opposing ILLEGAL immigration means you are opposed to immigration. I think most people in the military realize we have been war for the last decade or so with Radical Islam...not a war we started either...but at war none the less? Did Liberals think it was wrong for FDR to limit the immigration of the Japaneses, Germans or Italians coming to America in the 1940s? Why not? Well, because we were at war with them and they should not be able to come here until we were able to properly determine who they are? I think your other points, when you hear them in there entirety, actually make sense too? Many things I disagree with that he has said BUT when I am able to go around the media lies, much less so.
In truth, I am not a fan of either party and would love to have on person out there who I wanted to support. With that said, the one thing that seemed strange to me when Trump was starting to actually look like he was going to win Republican nomination was how he was being presented by the Establishment media? There was a disconnect between a successful New York businessman and the racist bigot he had suddenly become? When I went to listen to what he actually said...wow, he is right? Not sure why people think opposing ILLEGAL immigration means you are opposed to immigration. I think most people in the military realize we have been war for the last decade or so with Radical Islam...not a war we started either...but at war none the less? Did Liberals think it was wrong for FDR to limit the immigration of the Japaneses, Germans or Italians coming to America in the 1940s? Why not? Well, because we were at war with them and they should not be able to come here until we were able to properly determine who they are? I think your other points, when you hear them in there entirety, actually make sense too? Many things I disagree with that he has said BUT when I am able to go around the media lies, much less so.
(1)
(0)
Read This Next
Continue with Facebook 
Continue with Google