MSG Martinis Butler 32814 <div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>If someone who out ranks you tells you to execute and perform a task should that lower enlisted Soldier ask &quot;why&quot;? Should you stop and explain? If we were deployed and being fired upon and that leader says &quot;get down&quot; are you going to need to explain &quot;why&quot; then? 2014-01-04T22:29:23-05:00 MSG Martinis Butler 32814

<div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>If someone who out ranks you tells you to execute and perform a task should that lower enlisted Soldier ask &quot;why&quot;? Should you stop and explain? If we were deployed and being fired upon and that leader says &quot;get down&quot; are you going to need to explain &quot;why&quot; then?

2014-01-04T22:29:23-05:00 2014-01-04T22:29:23-05:00 SFC James Baber 32817

<div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>&lt;p&gt;SFC B,&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;You have to look at each situation differently, combat and garrison are entirely 2 different environments, while it is expected for a subordinate to do what is told in a perfect world, we all know that there are SMs out there that need to be spoon fed sometimes, or that want to question everything that comes down to them. As an NCO and leader it is our responsibility to ensure that they do understand what is required for the task to prevent any safety or incorrect operations taking place in the end, and sometimes you will have to deal with the occasional smart ass that just wants to try and push the envelope, a good senior NCO also knows how to handle that type of situation as well for the benefit of all involved ;).&lt;/p&gt;

2014-01-04T22:33:19-05:00 2014-01-04T22:33:19-05:00 Capt Private RallyPoint Member 32818

<div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>I had a boss tell me once that you get two &quot;But, sir...&quot;s before you simply shut up and color.&amp;nbsp; I don&#39;t think you get any of those under fire, but it seems appropriate in garrison.&amp;nbsp; &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;As far as &quot;Get down!,&quot; that seems to be more of a safety issue and only an idiot would ignore it.&amp;nbsp; Darwin says you won&#39;t have to deal with that problem very often.&lt;br&gt;

2014-01-04T22:34:23-05:00 2014-01-04T22:34:23-05:00 SSG Robert Burns 32831

<div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>Last time I checked, we gave orders not suggestions.  ;-)  <div>If you want to talk to me about it after the fact, that's cool.</div>

2014-01-04T22:44:09-05:00 2014-01-04T22:44:09-05:00 SFC Michael Hasbun 32857

<div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>In garrison (read: not actively engaged in combat), I actually encourage my people to understand the &quot;why&#39;. That&#39;s how we learn. When you educate your people, not only do you give them a deeper understanding, but you can also grant them a sense of ownership in the mission.&lt;div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;I can just tell you &quot;you have to head-space and time the M2 before firing it&quot; and just leave it at that, but once you understand WHY you have to do it, suddenly it&#39;s a lot more important to learn.&lt;/div&gt;

2014-01-04T23:01:54-05:00 2014-01-04T23:01:54-05:00 Capt Private RallyPoint Member 32862

<div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>I think there is a time and a place for everything. Hopefully your leader has the trust of his subordinates, so that when he gives an order, his subordinates trust him enough so they dont have to ask why.<div><br></div><div> I agree though, sometimes you have to explain the why. Like why do we wear brown or black socks? Do we have a contract with the brown and black sock company or is it because white socks can be seen further by our enemy or that they dont blend in with the terrain making it an anomaly within the environment making it easier to spot.</div><div><br></div><div>If its just "because I said so" is that reason enough? or is that a lack of leadership?</div>

2014-01-04T23:03:23-05:00 2014-01-04T23:03:23-05:00 CW2 Private RallyPoint Member 32867

<div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>I explain ALL THE TIME if given the chance. Sometimes, if in a hurry, I&#39;ll say &quot;just do it because I SAID SO&quot;.&lt;div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;But every leadership book I have read tells you that you SHOULD explain, if you can. It leads to more people following you willingly. People are much more likely to do a job if they know WHY.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;It&#39;s just human nature.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;Everyone uses the argument &quot;well what about if you are under fire in combat&quot;. I have found that by telling people what I said above, they ALWAYS follow me when I tell them &quot;because I said so&quot; mainly because they realize that I would explain IF I had time.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;I also, in my in briefs talking to my Soldiers, tell them that I will ALWAYS explain &quot;why&quot; if I can, but if I tell you to do it, do it.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;I never have issues.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;I don&#39;t usually tell people to punt/just color.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;I also, in a decade of being an NCO, have NEVER made a Soldier do pushups, and never ONCE had a Soldier disrespect me or not do what I ask.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;I have a slightly differently leadership style than many.&lt;/div&gt;

2014-01-04T23:05:48-05:00 2014-01-04T23:05:48-05:00 LTC Private RallyPoint Member 32874

<div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>&lt;div&gt;I don&#39;t always see asking &quot;why&quot; as questioning authority.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;Soldiers deserve to be given a &quot;purpose&quot; for every &quot;task&quot;. &amp;nbsp;They don&#39;t need the purpose so the feel important but so they can most effectively accomplish the mission. &amp;nbsp;A Soldier who knows how his task fits in to the higher units mission not only has a sense of purpose but a guiding direction that leads to the desired end state.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;If the Soldier is digging a hole for a fighting position he will dig it differently if he knows how the fighting position fits in to the sector and much differently &amp;nbsp;if he knows the hole is for a pipe. &amp;nbsp;Also when the Soldier understands task and purpose they may know a better way to do things and recommend it as a new course of action. &amp;nbsp;Too often I have seen Soldiers who were not given a purpose for their task waste a lot of time and effort because they didn&#39;t have an understanding of the desired end state.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;If Leaders want Soldiers who are ready to execute tasks as soon as an order is given, ensure leaders are prepared to give a purpose with each task.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;All this said, Soldiers must be respectful and there is a time and place for everything. &amp;nbsp;If you tell a troop to take point or kick in a door, he had better do it.&lt;/div&gt;

2014-01-04T23:09:28-05:00 2014-01-04T23:09:28-05:00 1SG Private RallyPoint Member 32882

<div class="images-v2-count-0"></div><p>SFC Butler,</p><p> </p><p>It is a peeve of mine when Soldiers ask why. A lot of people have already responded with " it depends on the situation". I disagree; I do not believe there is ever a time for why. If you don't understand the job/mission I just gave you. Then pull me off line say SGT I don't understand I need clarification. You ask me why in front of a group I just gave instructions to I am going to give you the little kid answer. Because I told you to.</p><p> </p><p>I may be reading into your question a little but I see that as one of the issues of younger Soldiers. They are not asking "why" for clarification they are asking "why" because they don't think they should not have to do the thing they were just told to do.</p><p> </p><p>Lastly I do not see a difference between " why" in garrison and "why" down range. The same kid that questions every order they are given in garrison is the same kid that is going to question them down range. That is one of the things a bout the military we do things to build habit, to make it a reflex. </p><p> </p><p>If you hesitate in preparation for battle you will hesitate in battle. Garrison is where we prep for battle.</p>

2014-01-04T23:15:37-05:00 2014-01-04T23:15:37-05:00 SFC Jim Neel 32914

<div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>Sometimes explanations lend themselves to maximum situational awareness for the junior enlisted Soldier/subordinate. We have to be ready to convey information and knowledge with everything that we do. A leader that isn't willing to share knowledge with their Soldiers is doing them a disservice, and is also assuming that in a combat environment that they will always be there to lead.<br><br>In instances where there is a short-lead time the leader must be able to convey information in an explicit and concise manner. Sometimes that takes practice, and we learn best by repetition. Using TLPs, even in the most mundane circumstances, for the most minor taskings will give leaders practice. Another aspect is positive habit transfer (setting the example). If junior enlisted Soldiers see TLPs being used to convey information, when they assume leadership positions they will use them too.<br><br>I think sometimes the question "why" is asked because it is a natural response to not having enough information.<br>

2014-01-05T00:06:40-05:00 2014-01-05T00:06:40-05:00 LCpl Mark Lefler 32953

<div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>If the moment isnt an emergency or a moment when it just has to happen, if someone asks politely why not explain it. Explaining something helps them do the job better because they then understand the context in which something is happening.

2014-01-05T02:22:03-05:00 2014-01-05T02:22:03-05:00 MSG Martinis Butler 33039

<div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>I must truly say I am blown away by the informative feedback that I received from this question I honestly didn't see the answers being shifted in the direction that it was. Don't get me wrong explaining to your Soldier is always a plus when done tactfully and for the right reasons, at the appropriate time. Just looking at the majority of the ranks that responded I assumed that many of you grew up under leadership where asking the "why" question was either second guessing your leadership or Soldiers wanting to show their rebellion and that was a NO-GO. Its great to know that we do have leadership out there that strongly believe in changing with this forever changing military force, because if you don't you can either find yourself getting left behind or in trouble because you wanted to be stuck and stubborn in your old ways.

2014-01-05T08:45:06-05:00 2014-01-05T08:45:06-05:00 LTC Jason Bartlett 33050

<div class="images-v2-count-0"></div><div><br></div><div><br /><div style="text-align:start;">The Charge of the Light Brigade</div><br /><div style="text-align:start;">Alfred, Lord Tennyson</div><br /><p style="text-align:-webkit-center;"></p>1.<p>Half a league, half a league,<br><img src="http://poetry.eserver.org/space.gif"> Half a league onward,<br>All in the valley of Death<br><img src="http://poetry.eserver.org/space.gif"> Rode the six hundred.<br>"Forward, the Light Brigade!<br>"Charge for the guns!" he said:<br>Into the valley of Death<br><img src="http://poetry.eserver.org/space.gif"> Rode the six hundred.</p><br /><p></p>2.<p>"Forward, the Light Brigade!"<br>Was there a man dismay'd?<br>Not tho' the soldier knew<br><img src="http://poetry.eserver.org/space.gif"> Someone had blunder'd:<br>Theirs not to make reply,<br>Theirs not to reason why,<br>Theirs but to do and die:<br>Into the valley of Death<br><img src="http://poetry.eserver.org/space.gif"> Rode the six hundred.</p><br /><p></p>3.<p>Cannon to right of them,<br>Cannon to left of them,<br>Cannon in front of them<br><img src="http://poetry.eserver.org/space.gif"> Volley'd and thunder'd;<br>Storm'd at with shot and shell,<br>Boldly they rode and well,<br>Into the jaws of Death,<br>Into the mouth of Hell<br><img src="http://poetry.eserver.org/space.gif"> Rode the six hundred.</p><br /><p></p>4.<p>Flash'd all their sabres bare,<br>Flash'd as they turn'd in air,<br>Sabring the gunners there,<br>Charging an army, while<br><img src="http://poetry.eserver.org/space.gif"> All the world wonder'd:<br>Plunged in the battery-smoke<br>Right thro' the line they broke;<br>Cossack and Russian<br>Reel'd from the sabre stroke<br><img src="http://poetry.eserver.org/space.gif"> Shatter'd and sunder'd.<br>Then they rode back, but not<br><img src="http://poetry.eserver.org/space.gif"> Not the six hundred.</p><br /><p></p>5.<p>Cannon to right of them,<br>Cannon to left of them,<br>Cannon behind them<br><img src="http://poetry.eserver.org/space.gif"> Volley'd and thunder'd;<br>Storm'd at with shot and shell,<br>While horse and hero fell,<br>They that had fought so well<br>Came thro' the jaws of Death<br>Back from the mouth of Hell,<br>All that was left of them,<br><img src="http://poetry.eserver.org/space.gif"> Left of six hundred.</p><br /><p></p>6.<p>When can their glory fade?<br>O the wild charge they made!<br><img src="http://poetry.eserver.org/space.gif"> All the world wondered.<br>Honor the charge they made,<br>Honor the Light Brigade,<br><img src="http://poetry.eserver.org/space.gif"> Noble six hundred.</p><br /><br><p></p><br /></div>

2014-01-05T09:45:22-05:00 2014-01-05T09:45:22-05:00 SFC Private RallyPoint Member 33535

<div class="images-v2-count-0"></div><p>SFC Butler:</p><p> </p><p>AS I've told my Soldiers on past occasions, sometimes a reason is okay, but sometimes task just require you to execute-no questions asked.  And when those moments come that they get confused with which is which, I can guarantee a look in their general direction should answer the question.</p>

2014-01-06T06:52:30-05:00 2014-01-06T06:52:30-05:00 WO1 Private RallyPoint Member 34088

<div class="images-v2-count-0"></div> <br /><br /><p style="margin:0in 0in 10pt;" class="MsoNormal">An occasional “WHY” isn’t as bad as many may attempt to make<br />it. “Leadership is influencing people by providing purpose, direction, and<br />motivation while operating to accomplish the mission and improving the organization.”<br />This may involve answering the WHYs out there.  </p><br /><br />

2014-01-07T07:10:51-05:00 2014-01-07T07:10:51-05:00 1SG Private RallyPoint Member 34298

<div class="images-v2-count-0"></div><p>If a soldier is asking you why, 99% of the time, it's because you didn't provide PURPOSE, direction, and motivation. If you constantly explain why and give proper purpose, then that one time in the firefight when you have to be abrupt, they will trust you. </p><p> </p><p>disclaimer: there is always that 1% of Soldiers that are just trying to get under your skin, hopefully you have identified these people before hand and can discriminate a legit "why" (maybe you forgot to give purpose) and someone trying to get in the way of the mission.</p>

2014-01-07T14:10:47-05:00 2014-01-07T14:10:47-05:00 TSgt Private RallyPoint Member 36230

<div class="images-v2-count-0"></div><p>There's a big difference between questioning for clarification and questioning authority. Whenever it is possible I welcome the chance to explain why. Obviously there are situations when you don't have time to explain, but in those cases I make sure to tell my troops that I will explain it later, but right now it just NEEDS to get done. And I always make sure I follow up after the fact to give the explanation I promised. I think it's important to educate your subordinates whenever possible, and explaining the "why" behind tasks or orders is part of that.</p><p><br></p><p>Now questioning just for the sake of questioning authority - well that's a different story. I've got ZERO time or tolerance for that crap!</p>

2014-01-11T09:02:16-05:00 2014-01-11T09:02:16-05:00 SPC Christopher Morehouse 36260

<div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>I think this is a case where context is key.  Like you said, if you're taking fire and your squad leader tells you to go left, you probably shouldn't be like "well gee Sarg, why do you want me to go over there?"  But if your back at Fort Anywhere USA and your squad leader tells you to fill your kevlar with Jell-O and take it over to your platoon leader, then perhaps you might ask what the hell for?  <br><br>I bet it can get frustrating for an NCO when some of his soldiers question some things, but from my experience some times it might have value.  Like if your telling them how to load a connex or something, and the soldier asks why you are having him do it a particular way, it might be a good opportunity for that soldier to learn something.  Or, GASP, he might know of a better way to do it.  <br><br>I would be very weary of any leader who answers this question in absolutes.  <br>

2014-01-11T11:03:16-05:00 2014-01-11T11:03:16-05:00 SFC Michael Hasbun 44589

<div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>In combat, clearly that is not the best time for discussion. In garrison however, they shouldn't have to ask why, because you should already have told them. You have two options as an NCO you can either; <div><br></div><div>A) Train them to do a task, which will train them to do that and nothing more.</div><div><br></div><div>or</div><div><br></div><div>B) Teach them what, how and why they are doing an action, so that as they mature, they can later teach subordinates of their own. </div><div><br></div><div>As an NCO, I would hope you'd always go for option B. We are here to train future leaders, not brain dead automatons..<br><br>There's a time and place for everything, but in Garrison, nothing is so important you can't do your job, which is to properly train and mentor your people.</div>

2014-01-26T14:19:46-05:00 2014-01-26T14:19:46-05:00 GySgt Private RallyPoint Member 44602

<div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>There is a time, place, and method for asking the question "why"?  For the Corps, we really emphasize on do or die, instant obedience to orders so the question of "why?" does not come up that often.  <div><br></div><div>As a team player who loves pushing small unit leadership, my goal when giving orders to my NCO's is to receive the response "aye aye Staff Sergeant" because I have given the order in a certain manner and with enough information for them to receive it, understand it, and comply.  </div><div><br></div><div>This isn't always the case and the question "why?" does come up but only when it's the right time and place, and the Marines do it with tact.  </div><div><br></div><div>I don't want mindless Marines, I want smart Marines, and in order to have that, they need the knowledge and understanding.</div>

2014-01-26T14:56:21-05:00 2014-01-26T14:56:21-05:00 MSG Martinis Butler 50017

<div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>I've come to realize that its ok to ask questions when unsure, but I also believe theres a time and a place for everything. Many leaders are saying its ok to ask their leader Why. I believe if we allow it one time than we are opening up the flood gates for much more questions. I was always told by my leaders just move out and execute. You don't question your parents when they tell you to do something so why question your military family authority, that are just as important as your immediate family.

2014-02-03T06:17:38-05:00 2014-02-03T06:17:38-05:00 SSG Private RallyPoint Member 50024

<div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>Soldiers should damn near be programmed to execute order (except of course illegal ones). Just like the original post I believe is indicating, if they question orders in garrison, they will be use to it and question orders in combat.  This of course goes hand in hand with lead by example and being a standard bearer for your Soldiers

2014-02-03T07:03:11-05:00 2014-02-03T07:03:11-05:00 SFC Private RallyPoint Member 50025

<div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>Leadership is providing purpose, direction and motivation in order to accomplish a task. Leaders nowadays feel like they must explain themselves to everyone and subordinates think they're entitled to an explanation. Well, there is a chain of command for a reason and the Army is not a corporation where you can challenge authority. We are all expendable wether we like it or not and that's what makes us so successful.  We cross train at every level and issue orders in order to meet the commanders' intent and execute missions accordingly, wether you are taking a hilltop or policing up a highway you signed the dotted line to join the ARMY, a military organization. This is not a politically correct, charity/welfare civilian organization . 

2014-02-03T07:13:11-05:00 2014-02-03T07:13:11-05:00 SFC Private RallyPoint Member 50029

<div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>&lt;p&gt;I think it is a rare occasion when the question &quot;why&quot; is meant to question your authority. I&#39;ve found over the years that as long as I&#39;m providing Purpose, Direction, and Motivation that the majority of the time my Soldiers have not needed to ask me why. It&#39;s the times that a task is spit out and the intent or purpose is lacking that I&#39;ve heard the &quot;why&quot;, and sometimes I just think it&#39;s the younger generation hungry for knowledge asking &quot;why&quot;. Either way like stated previously, there is a time to tell them to simply move out and draw fire and there is a time to explain the task and purpose so that they understand the intent and are motivated to accomplish the task.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;

2014-02-03T07:27:31-05:00 2014-02-03T07:27:31-05:00 PO3 Private RallyPoint Member 50032

<div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>Sometimes, though, you have "leaders" who are not good or effective leaders. "Leaders" who got their rank simply because they passed a test. "Leaders" who abuse that power to direct a subordinate to do something that makes NO SENSE, or is degrading. Yes, these kinds of "leaders" are few and far between, but I think an effective leader should be able to answer the question of WHY even if it's a time sensitive task and you aren't able to answer right then. Your junior servicemembers will follow your lead, and in turn they will learn how to become an effective leader, when it's their turn, if you took the time to train and teach them, rather than throwing around rank as a way to get what you want. "Respect the rank, not the person" is a fact. I may respect your rank because I'm required to, but if you're a crappy leader who doesn't bother train or teach me and simply orders me around because your rank says you can, we've got bigger issues that me asking the question WHY.

2014-02-03T07:42:34-05:00 2014-02-03T07:42:34-05:00 CSM Allen Dahl 50094

<div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>This is where being an engaged leader will pay-off. You need to know your Soldiers, some will ask "why?" just to be obstinate or express a lack of motivation. Other Soldiers may actually be looking for your intent, to better understand what you are asking of them in order to perform well. I always try include my intent and my end state for a task. (Task, Purpose, End State) This will convey to Soldiers that you have sound reasoning for your orders so that when you don't have time to explain they will understand that you do things for a reason. If the Soldier is just being insubordinate; then by all means apply counseling and corrective actions. In combat, under fire, I have never had anyone ask me why, they just moved out. I always made a point to talk thru actions later though, assuaging any lingering "why" issues.

2014-02-03T10:30:16-05:00 2014-02-03T10:30:16-05:00 SFC Jason Porter 50100

<div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>Include a task and purpose. You cannot go wrong with that. Never say because I said so. You open up doors for the breaded why questions.

2014-02-03T10:38:43-05:00 2014-02-03T10:38:43-05:00 SFC Private RallyPoint Member 50102

<div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>When I was stationed in Fort Hood, TX my Battalion XO was filling in for the Commander and he gave us a speech prior to us deploying.&amp;nbsp; He said if your leaders give you an order, I urge you to ask them &quot;why?&quot;&amp;nbsp; Leaders, when your soldiers ask you why, tell them.&amp;nbsp; Explain to them the reasons behind the decision because that little omission will likely help them become more motivated to execute the quicker.&amp;nbsp; As leaders, if we issue an order it&#39;s on us to ensure our subordinates understand it.&amp;nbsp; I&#39;d much rather my guys/girls question why I&#39;m giving an order rather than saying &quot;roger&quot; and screwing it up.&amp;nbsp; Yes, there will be times where time is a huge factor and you cannot explain, but as a good leader, one should always find a time to explain things to your subordinates.&amp;nbsp; It keeps the line of communication open and trust that your guys/girls will respect you a lot more for this.

2014-02-03T10:40:15-05:00 2014-02-03T10:40:15-05:00 SSG Ralph Watkins 50119

<div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>Part of a proper mission brief given by the mission leader should also explain the reason the mission is being done.  A good leader will include subordinate leaders in the planning process for their input &amp; also their own development.  I usually ended my briefs with any questions &amp;/or concerns &amp; I have had regular enlisted bring up great questions &amp; pertinent ideas that were used in the mission.  My rule was no griping about the mission or it's execution unless you could produce a better alternative.  I would also tell my superiors if they tasked to plan &amp; execute a mission that it was totally mine.  I would review my plans with them prior to the mission &amp; it worked out well.

2014-02-03T10:57:59-05:00 2014-02-03T10:57:59-05:00 SFC Private RallyPoint Member 50126

<div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>SFC Butler,<div>A junior enlisted should not be asking you "why" directly unless that soldier is questioning whether or not it is a lawful or unlawful order or you are in a training environment and even then it should be done with TACT.  If none of those apply, that soldier needs to ask his or her first line leadership after they have performed the task given.  </div><div><br></div><div>On the other hand, I do believe it is okay if one of your junior NCO's ask you "why" as long as its with TACT and not directly in front of junior enlisted so it doesn't appear too them in any way as if you are being challenged.</div><div><br></div><div>As I was coming up through the ranks E1 - E4, all in an infantry unit, I was never to directly approach my PSG about anything unless it was an emergency.  Also, if I was told to do something by him, all that came out of my mouth was YES SGT and that was the end of it.  If I didn't like it or thought it was wrong, I would take that to my squad leader or gripe amongst other junior enlisted but never would I dare to blatantly questions him.  <br><br /></div><div><br></div><div>Finally, I believe the issue is with that soldiers first line leadership as they are responsible for making sure that soldier knows and clearly understands common military customs and courtesies.</div><div><br></div><div><br></div>

2014-02-03T11:04:17-05:00 2014-02-03T11:04:17-05:00 SFC Private RallyPoint Member 50140

<div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>Honestly the way I look at it is FIRST execute the order (as long as it is not illegal, etc, etc.) and then ask why.  I have never had a problem explaining to a Soldier why and sometimes it is just as simple as because the post CSM is walking through and we want him to believe that this is how we always "live".  Ask me after or even while we are executing the order and I will share the why but individual discipline requires you to first execute.  Explaining the how and often times the why is how we build the next generation of leaders but before we can build leaders we must first build discipline.  "To Lead, One Must Follow." — Lao Tzu, 604-531 B. C.

2014-02-03T11:24:54-05:00 2014-02-03T11:24:54-05:00 SFC Private RallyPoint Member 50141

<div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>Let me start off by saying that judging by the amount of responses to this issue, I think it's pretty much been beat to death. However, I do see a lot of responses about always explaining the purpose of why an SM is being told to do something and this is where our opinions divide. I tend to agree more with some of the retirees and older NCO's that talk about "the old ways". I was brought up this way also and it is how I lead. It's not just because I swore an oath to do as I was told by "the officers appointed over me" but, it is also how I was raised as a child. My grandfather taught me at a young age saying "They used to have a sign over the door to the head that read (I know it sounds stupid, but do it anyways)". This is simply how I was brought up to respect my elders and later in life to perform as a soldier. There are different leadership styles and I guess you could say I use an autocratic or authoritarian style. I'll explain tasks that may need extra information for clarity purposes, but I will not explain to soldiers "why" just because they don't like the task they have received. 

2014-02-03T11:25:40-05:00 2014-02-03T11:25:40-05:00 SGT Private RallyPoint Member 50206

<div class="images-v2-count-0"></div><div>EDIT: double commented the same thing.... good ole barracks internet!</div>

2014-02-03T13:10:26-05:00 2014-02-03T13:10:26-05:00 1SG Michael Minton 50210

<div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>Im not a big "why" person! It can get my short temper going if done the wrong way, place or time.  However, there is a time and place where i have no problem with it! During the planning phase of a task or mission, if one of the individuals has suggestions, concerns, questions or need to understand, i want to hear what they are thinking. that way i have the "time" to evaluate and answer their ideals or concerns. and in some cases they may have a better ideal that i will ask them questions i may have. if it still accomplishes the task or mission in the same or less amout of time, goals and standards are met, i may let them go with their ideal to accomplish the goal, because then they have a vested interest in making sure it is accomplished to standards. They also gain leadership and knowledge....However, that is during the planning phase or a Q&amp;A session. In 9/10 instances after that, weather it be garrison or war zone, im not very receptive to why questions, they have been looked at or this task/mission will go as planned. now if they are just asking why to general orders, i take that as disrespect and questioning authority. Bottom line, there is a time and place to voice your concerns. and if there is not that opportunity, strap up and move on with your orders.

2014-02-03T13:14:29-05:00 2014-02-03T13:14:29-05:00 SGT Private RallyPoint Member 50214

<div class="images-v2-count-0"></div><div>I will explain every time I'm asked a question if time permits. Having said that...<br><br /></div><div><br></div><div>WHY? alone, is basically saying "WTF for?" in nicer terms! Why is not a sufficient question it has no context, its a crutch question when you dont feel like actually verbalizing a legitimate one and it does not promote the education of soldiers to learn how to properly and precisely convey their thoughts.<br><br /></div><div><br></div>There are many different ways to use the term Why.  Why are we doing this so close to the road? Why dont we wait until after lunch so we are not in a rush? Why dont we bring PT belts just in case? Why are we taking the truck with the least amount of fuel?  Most of these are not disrespectful they convey knowledge of the situation being discussed and most are offering possible better alternatives or seeking to understand a certain aspect of the command. In this case I would explain what needed explaining.<div><br></div><div>A simple WHY? Is so vague it shows no thought into the process and in most cases is disrespectful and conveys dislike for the idea or command. It also challenges the command as a whole and does not specify exactly what extra info you are looking for to process this command in your head and complete the mission. Not to mention 99% of the time "Why?" is never followed or proceeded by Sergeant or Sir and usually never said at Parade Rest or Attention.</div><div><br></div><div>As soldiers we are charged with having a solution to things that we find unsatisfactory. If I say that the promotion system is broken, then I should provide a solution along with my complaint more insight into why i feel it is broken and what to do to fix it.  Why ( in a slightly different way) is the same concept. When asking why provide more insight into the reason you are asking, dont just simply state "why" its rude and challenging. Offer a solution or statement as to why you believe that doing that order is not the best course of action. Most of all be specific, provide context( im going to beat this horse)! </div><div><br></div><div>Even though I consider why by itself to be rude and testy I will still answer any doubt the soldier may have after they provide more context and assume the front leaning rest! Just a tool for teaching that conveying your message can be extremely important in our line of work. While they may not have meant to challenge authority they did not properly convey that therefore they pay for it and hopefully learn to approach it differently in the future. There is a difference between challenging authority and legitimately questioning a course of action tone and the ability to convey your message could be the determining factor in which one you are practicing.</div><div><br></div><div>I too will use your combat scenario to emphasis the importance of conveying your message. </div><div>You are behind cover and you ask a private where the enemy fire is coming from. He responds over there and kinda panicky points over the wall you are behind.  Being able to convey exactly what you mean can be a life saver. North of that red barn about 300m out i saw muzzle flashes and a few guys with AKs, is way more accurate than over there with a half ass point of the finger.  I use every moment I can to train my soldiers in relevant task. Even the smallest thing like attitude and accurately conveying what you mean can matter in the heat of battle. Every mistake is just another opportunity to train correctly.</div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>When i was lower enlisted I found it much easier to be understood when I stayed away from the word why and phrased things like so <br><br /></div><div><br></div><div>"SGT, I dont mind at all doing this, but if we could wait till it warmed up i believe we could do a better job at it. In the mean time we could change the tires on 123 that's in the bay, since we have to do it by COB anyway. By the time we are finished with that it will be warm enough to wash the mud off the trucks and we dont have to worry about anyone slipping on the ice"<br><br /></div><div><br></div><div>This type of discussion always took place away from others also, so as not to make my peers think I was trying to show I knew more than the SGT.</div><div><br></div><div>Tact is an E4 and belows best friend!</div>

2014-02-03T13:19:04-05:00 2014-02-03T13:19:04-05:00 SSG Andrew Dydasco 50224

<div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>I'm a "Why?" Soldier, but for the right reason.  I believe there is a good way and a bad way to ask why.  The difference is the intent behind the question.  The bad "Why?" is when the Soldier automatically has a distaste for the order, and is in search for a reason to complain about it or get out of doing it.  The good "Why?", the one I ask often, is to understand the intent of the order, so that I can take initiative if it leads elsewhere.  <br><br>For example: NCO asks me to find a dispatch book for a vehicle.  If I ask why and he/she explains that it needs to be dispatched, I can not only execute the order of finding the book, but also begin the next implied task of PMCSing, QA/QCing, and ultimately dispatching the vehicle without going to the NCO after completing every single little task.  This saves time for both parties.<br><br>My "Why?" is just to try and understand the big picture of the order.  The attitude you have when you ask "Why?" is everything; and I think nine times out of ten, if you ask the question with a good attitude and the NCO knows you're only asking so you can make things easier on both you and him/her and get the job done faster, you shouldn't receive any backlash.  Unless of course, the reason for the task really is none of your business.<br><br>Just my two cents, SFC.

2014-02-03T13:34:12-05:00 2014-02-03T13:34:12-05:00 SPC Private RallyPoint Member 50230

<div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>I enlisted with the knowledge that in some instances I would have to follow orders with unquestioning obeidence. I believe that an explanation should be given but if I'm not afforded one I will follow the order regardless. I understand that sometimes someone might be under pressure or a time restraint and they may not have a moment to go into an explanation on why they're tasking me to do something so with that in mind I'm not going to demand a reason. I'm in charge of a detail I always try to tell the other soldiers why they need to do this or that but if time doesn't permit an explanation I expect them to comply.

2014-02-03T13:39:48-05:00 2014-02-03T13:39:48-05:00 1SG Johnny Carter 50496

<div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>This is a great question!! I remember when my PLT SGT came to me and told me to doing a task, it was a crazy task and I asked why and he said do push ups and do as your told. So I used to think damn why the heck are we doing this. As leaders we all question why at times and as stated before it is human nature. We have to understand that the Army is changing everyday. Skiers don't question to be disrespectful, they have to understand what it is they are doing and for what cause. We as leaders need to understand this and give our Soldiers all the info they want to accomplish all mission successfully. They deserve that much from us and it send a positive attitude. If we explain why and what the affects are they will understand and doing it to the best of their abilities!! Army's changed for the better and we have to be great leaders to develop our future!

2014-02-03T19:35:53-05:00 2014-02-03T19:35:53-05:00 SFC Private RallyPoint Member 50541

<div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>I think it comes down to this: if I tell my soldier to do something, and in the process of executing the task he asks me why we do it (or do it a certain way, etc.), I see that as a soldier trying to grow, and trying to be a sponge...which is what we all want! If I give PVT Smith a task, and he shrugs and asks "why?" that's a different story. I think your original question is a loaded one. Context is everything with a soldier asking "why" to us. 

2014-02-03T20:34:30-05:00 2014-02-03T20:34:30-05:00 LTC David S. Chang, ChFC®, CLU® 51419

<div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>I think it is first important to know and understand the relationship between the two. If it is done in good faith and good intentions, yes. But I have seen that it was done to create doubt and done out of disrespect. The reason following orders is important is because on the battlefield when there is the fog of war, we don't have time to explain everything, we have to just do it and understand that our superiors may know things we don't know. We may hate it and it may suck, but hesitation can be the difference between a won or lost battle

2014-02-04T21:12:55-05:00 2014-02-04T21:12:55-05:00 Cpl Ray Fernandez 52323

<div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>Simple solution, as long as the order isn't anything illegal why would I question it? Just because it's something that probably should be done by someone else doesn't mean I can't do it. If you act like you're too good to do a job, what reason should those under you have to obey your orders when you ask them to do something?<br>

2014-02-06T00:42:43-05:00 2014-02-06T00:42:43-05:00 SSG Private RallyPoint Member 52325

<div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>I think the manner in which an order is questioned also plays into how I react to a soldier questioning it. An order being met with "Why?!" or "What?!" is much more likely to receive a "Just do it!" or "Because I said so!". I myself question the orders given to me sometimes so I know where they're coming from, but as long as the questioning is articulated so that I know the soldier is probably just wanting details on the desired end result, it's all good in my book.

2014-02-06T00:53:56-05:00 2014-02-06T00:53:56-05:00 MAJ John Drake 52326

<div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>I'm a simpleton.  Is it a legal order? Does it require you do something illegal, immoral or in conflict with the Army Values or previous orders given by your immediate chain of command?  Soldiers have the DUTY not to follow illegal orders. That being said, it doesn't mean you can't be punished for not initially following it. If the order is legal, and it passes the above test, it should be your duty to perform it....within reason. (The Reasonable Man approach).  As for the "Why".  Only if there is time to give purpose to the task.  Sometimes there is not, even when you are not in combat.

2014-02-06T00:56:45-05:00 2014-02-06T00:56:45-05:00 SSG Gerhard S. 53087

<div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>Clearly, there are different styles of Leadership that are best utilized based on the situation and immediacy of the task.  Some forms are better used for more mundane tasks, while others require more immediate, and unquestioned action.  <br><br>In non-emergent situations, a good leader builds on his team by developing a sense of service, by ensuring their team understands their purpose, and are proficient in their field of responsibility.  This is why the concept of Commander's intent is so important.  It first empowers the individual to act in the absence of direct orders, or to adjust tactics in the face of uncertainty or adversity.  I have found that by developing the members of one's team, by ensuring they fully understand the mission of the team, of the next higher unit, and their responsibilities toward the accomplishment of the overall mission, the question "why" is rarely invoked.  <br><br>This concept of pushing responsibility down to developed, and proficient service members not only gives them confidence to make decisions, but empowers them to take and to collaborate for positive action. This empowers the competent members of our teams, the opportunity to solve, and resolve issues with solutions we as top-down leaders may have never even considered.  There is risk to this concept, but the payoff, if accomplished, can be incredibly beneficial.  See the book.  "Turn the Ship Around" by Cpt. David Marquet. USN<br><br>Regarding the immediacy required in a combat situation one would hope that through a thorough understanding of SOP's at all levels, through the competent repetition of immediate action drills should leave NO question as to "why" such an order is given.<br>

2014-02-07T09:20:37-05:00 2014-02-07T09:20:37-05:00 1SG Henry Yates 54026

<div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>After reading some of the responses below as one who am now in the Retirement ranks, it's soothing to see that many have really addressed the question open minded without direct assumption of a challenge to authority.  NCO's we advise our Officers, mentor and develop NCOs and Soldiers without labeling them "Soldier"/ "Non-Soldier" according to personal perception, bias, or belief.  We diligently look for potential in every action for a since of sincerity as Soldiers define their direction.  We get them on point with Mission and Command Goals and those who aren't interested in Mission and Command goals, they clearly define themselves after opportunities to correct their misdirection.  Authority is law based and defined by regulation in the Department of Defense and broken down by our Branches of Service even further in regulation by our Branches of Service.  Some regulation refers us to DOD regulation only and DOD forms that aren't open for Branch interpretation.  In similar fashion, our Branch administers regulation and policy that is not open for further interpretation by subordinate elements.  <br><br>Make no mistake, no rank or self proclaimed authority of a person in uniform with any rank will stand above regulation or law.  NCO's, we enforce regulation, law and advise our Officers, mentor and develop NCOs and Soldiers in compliance with law and regulation.  This discussion brings my mind to times in the military where I  faced a misconceived authority of someone, versus authority back by law and regulation.  (Lawful order versus unlawful orders, lawful directives versus unlawful directives.)  As a Non-Commissioned Officer and Leader in cases of blatant unlawful orders or directives, law and regulation challenge that authority.  You're the vessel to stand in it's foundation or its establishment with fortitude against the grain of the misconceived.  Just as you stand in that general authority, any service member in the ranks who are perceived as questioning authority, their motive for standing to question should at least be acknowledge with your self check to see if you are the misconceived authority; with humility before you steam up to admonishment.  In any rank you hold, you may be enforcing or face correction and you'd really appreciate your superior acknowledging your concern versus preemptive assumption that you disrespectfully challenge.  We all sharpen each other on this team.  The time you are the misconceived with your superior because you misunderstood law and regulation, you'd appreciate that person mentoring you, versus labeling you a piece of the puzzle that can't fit.  Be that mentor for your subordinates and deal with true disrespect by definition versus perception or assumption.  In the end law and regulation should always win; then we all win.<br>

2014-02-08T21:50:19-05:00 2014-02-08T21:50:19-05:00 LTC Paul Labrador 54043

<div class="images-v2-count-0"></div><p>I think it really depends on the situation and the troopie in question.  Baron Von Stueben once said that the difference between American soldiers and European soldiers was that you had to explain to Americans why you were doing something.  And he meant that as a good thing.  A soldiers who knows the intent and purpose of whatever they are doing is someone who is able to exercise initiative at a crucial moment to decisive purpose.  It also gives them an opportunity to see the big picture and buy in to the overall end state.  I try to give the "why" as much as I can.  Granted there are always times when we can't do that and it simply boils down to "just do it".  Of course, if the soldier is just being purposefully disrespectful, then that is a whole 'nother situation altogether.</p>

2014-02-08T22:36:15-05:00 2014-02-08T22:36:15-05:00 SSG (ret) William Martin 54047

<div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>SFC Butler, I can not guage the reason to question authority which can be reasonable depending on the situation for all incidents.  There are times to ask and there are times not to ask.  My soldiers no when I need something 5 minutes ago and when its an emergency.  Also, some leader confusing asking questions and questing one's authority.  If I tell me soldiers to do something and it is obvious I do not have the authority to give them that order I may welcome them question my authority for it may save my career.  On the other hand, if I told my soldier to sweep and mop the floor and he told me all I do is sit at a desk while he works in the motorpool that is a different situation.  I like to be given purpose, direction and motivation which enhanses my leader's own leadership ability.  I like to do the same with my own soldiers.  I hope I have responded correctly to your question.

2014-02-08T22:42:28-05:00 2014-02-08T22:42:28-05:00 1SG Lawrence Ellison 54569

<div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>The Army of yesterday is gone. The days of blindly following orders has been replaced with smarter more free thinking and self-reliant soldiers. Today's leader has a challenge, understand their soldiers and more importantly learn how to communicate using various types of communication techniques - not a one size fits all. When time permits, leaders should explain the importance of whatever it is they want the soldier to do. Establishing a connection to the mission, helps them relate and in the leaders absence, they can accomplish the mission as expected. This approach leads to and reinforces trust in the leaders ability to lead therefore, at a time when things cannot be explained, they will have enough trust to follow without question.  <br>

2014-02-09T20:26:52-05:00 2014-02-09T20:26:52-05:00 SSG(P) Private RallyPoint Member 58248

<div class="images-v2-count-0"></div><p>It's all about trust and confidence in the leader.</p><p><br></p><p>If a leader is trusted, and the subordinates know that the leader would not give unnecessary or dangerous orders, there will not be a question of "why?"</p><p><br></p><p>As General Patton said, “Don't tell people how to do things, tell them what to do and let them surprise you with their results.”     </p><p><br></p><p>When your troops understand what the end result is supposed to be, it gives them the creativity to get their piece of the job done.  As someone who has always worked smart and not hard, the job tends to get done quicker and better than when it is micro-managed by higher-ups.</p><p><br></p><p>Confidence in a leader is derived from the leader showing his Soldiers that s/he expects things to get done when expected, to the expected standard.  However, the leader should also convey his/her humanity, compassion, and understanding of their subordinates' situations.  When the Soldiers see that the leader properly balances the two sides of effective leadership, their confidence rises.  When their confidence rises, so does their morale and trust in the leader.  </p><p><br></p><p>Subordinates who question their leader's orders or intentions behind the orders are showing a lack of confidence in that leader.  That tracks back to the leader's style of leadership.  You can have Soldiers who do what you say because they fear you, or you can have Soldiers who do what you say because they trust you.  I tend towards the latter rather than the former.  Leadership is and always will be the fine art of striking the proper balances.  That being said, it's not for everyone.</p>

2014-02-16T00:49:53-05:00 2014-02-16T00:49:53-05:00 MSG Martinis Butler 66100

<div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>Would leaders be more offended if their Soldies were to not only ask them why but tell them that another leader is not delegating that order to their Soldiers so why should they be doing it? Or they tell you " my old leader or unit didnt do it that way so why are they doing it?

2014-02-27T17:37:28-05:00 2014-02-27T17:37:28-05:00 MSG Martinis Butler 67607

<div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>Leaders are not busy 24/7 that they do not have the time to answer questions or explain certain things to the Soldiers. I strongly believe like most of the individuals that leaders should explain to their Soldiers or workers what the mission is and why it is being done in a certain manner. If that Soldier or worker messes up on the tasking that leaders quick to be engaged as to discipline or scold that young Soldier as to why he or she shouldn't have done the particular task in that order so why not explain and ensure they do it right the first time. On the other hand I believe theres a time and a place for everything. If an order is given you should move out and execute unless it is a safety issue. If we have people always asking the Why question for every little thing when is the mission going to get accomplished?

2014-03-02T03:06:13-05:00 2014-03-02T03:06:13-05:00 MSG Martinis Butler 67608

<div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>I've seen times where the "WHY" turns into "WHO" said we should do this and then "WHERE" is this this person while I'm doing this and then "WHAT" is this suppose to accomplish when its all done. This could very well roll over into a disastrous snow ball when its all said and done. In many cases I've witnessed the end result to this type of questioning go south and not a healthy conversation at the end of the day.

2014-03-02T03:31:42-05:00 2014-03-02T03:31:42-05:00 SGT Private RallyPoint Member 78063

<div class="images-v2-count-0"></div><p>SFC,</p><br /><p> </p><br /><p>I believe you are taking the situation to the extreme. I would imagine in a forward environment you have the leadership clout to be able have your men jump at a moments notice. But i would like to ask, in a garrison environment how would you expect your young Soldiers to develop by only knowing how to "do" something and not understanding how it impacts the unit and the big picture?</p>

2014-03-18T06:54:45-04:00 2014-03-18T06:54:45-04:00 MSG Private RallyPoint Member 78065

<div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>Depending on the task.  Some Soldiers will go above and beyond what's required if that Soldier knows the "why" behind it.  If knowing is half the battle, we as leaders should incorporate the "why" into what we are delegating or directing.  Now if it's a mundane task or some type of corrective action/training then situation dictates.<br>

2014-03-18T06:59:48-04:00 2014-03-18T06:59:48-04:00 SGT Bryon Sergent 79089

<div class="images-v2-count-0"></div><p>Well  SFC Butler, I ask my squadleader WHY alot. It isn't that I am questioning his authority as much as I am looking for the end game. If you say that we are in a fire fight and to get down then there is no WHY. If you say take the hill is it part of the mission, is it that we are flanking, is it that there is better cover there? The why just helps to get to the end of the statement and how I think you want it done as a team leader. .</p><p>If it is like one of my former team mates that just though I was an old guy, new to the unit, that got put in his team leader slot that he has been trying to get and is questioning my authority? I took it to my squadleader and then to the PLT Sergeant. once we went out on training mission and he seen I had my act together, he quit asking why. I try and get all the info that I can as to keep my joe's as informed as I can, if they ask why then I have the knoweldge to tell them, if I dont then I go back and ask the why I missed and then keep them up to date. </p><p>I think it goes back to the NCO creed where it says "I will communicate with my soldiers and never leave them uninformed."</p><p>This is my take and really questioning wether or not I am on the right track. Not quoting the creed to you as I think you know and stand by it. If I am off track then please help me to understand, as I want to be a good NCO.</p>

2014-03-19T11:26:58-04:00 2014-03-19T11:26:58-04:00 SSG James Flynn 79119

<div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>If leadership gives the mission correctly, there would be no excuse for the "why". For instance, if you tell the Soldiers that we are going to the field and need to dispatch the vehicles, there is no doubt why it needs to happen. However, many Soldiers are coming to my unit and they want to question why all the time. It gets frustrating when we as leaders give clear instructions and still get asked why. I understand that some Soldiers do this to be funny, but if noone puts a stop to it, they will continue. Those are the ones we need to set straight or the pattern continues. As a young Soldier, whenever I was told to do something it was always "Hooah" and I would execute.

2014-03-19T12:05:45-04:00 2014-03-19T12:05:45-04:00 SSG Private RallyPoint Member 79131

<div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>it should be junior enlisted and not lower enlisted to be politically correct. as a NCO it better to explain why and how to do it. soldiers will not question your authority if you provide them direction and purpose.

2014-03-19T12:15:51-04:00 2014-03-19T12:15:51-04:00 2014-01-04T22:29:23-05:00