Regardless of impact on the outcome, is there evidence that Russia attempted to interfere with the election (or is it fake news)?

MAJ Bryan Zeski — Thu, 16 Feb 2017 16:16:41 -0500

Response by SGT David A. 'Cowboy' Groth made Feb 16 at 2017 4:19 PM

SGT David A. 'Cowboy' Groth — Thu, 16 Feb 2017 16:19:26 -0500

I'm going with fake news. I have that feeling in my bones.

Response by SGT David A. 'Cowboy' Groth made Feb 16 at 2017 4:19 PM

SGT David A. 'Cowboy' Groth — Thu, 16 Feb 2017 16:19:26 -0500

I'm going with fake news. I have that feeling in my bones.

Response by LTC Private RallyPoint Member made Feb 16 at 2017 4:20 PM

LTC Private RallyPoint Member — Thu, 16 Feb 2017 16:20:33 -0500

I honestly don't know if this will ever be clarified...you will have those who believe there was Russian interference, then you will have those who will claim the fake news aspect...but as far as actual proof...not likely.

Response by SMSgt Roger Horton made Feb 16 at 2017 4:21 PM

SMSgt Roger Horton — Thu, 16 Feb 2017 16:21:23 -0500

Fake news. Russia would rather have hilliary than Trump as President.

Response by Capt Private RallyPoint Member made Feb 16 at 2017 4:35 PM

Capt Private RallyPoint Member — Thu, 16 Feb 2017 16:35:28 -0500

What is the interference of which you speak? Did the have an effect on the outcome? - unlikely. Did they expose some truths that hurt Hillary? - surely.

Response by Cpl Joshua Caldwell made Feb 16 at 2017 4:39 PM

Cpl Joshua Caldwell — Thu, 16 Feb 2017 16:39:20 -0500

The only hack was into emails that exposed the true nature of HRC, it is not clear that the Russians had anything to do with that, but lets pretend that they did. What they exposed was her criminal and immoral activity, and that of the DNC.

Response by Maj Marty Hogan made Feb 16 at 2017 4:40 PM

Maj Marty Hogan — Thu, 16 Feb 2017 16:40:18 -0500

I thought Saturday Night Live and CNN agreed it was factual

Response by Maj John Bell made Feb 16 at 2017 4:40 PM

Maj John Bell — Thu, 16 Feb 2017 16:40:45 -0500

I think your survey needs a third answer. Non-news. In my opinion it should be as much of a surprise that they attempted to shape the news, as me stating that water is wet. It would be news if we could show that they were directly fiddling with the numbers (hacked the voting Machines, bribed electors, paid for votes, etc. etc.). If so, I think we should castrate them economically and employ third party bad guys to pee in their borscht.

Response by SFC Chad Sowash made Feb 16 at 2017 4:45 PM

SFC Chad Sowash — Thu, 16 Feb 2017 16:45:53 -0500

If Russia was made up why did Flynn get the axe? Putin's cyber-factions (Cozy Bear and Fancy Bear) have used specific methods to gain information in the past. There's something to this and I'm interested in seeing what comes out of the rabbit hole.

Response by SSgt Private RallyPoint Member made Feb 16 at 2017 4:46 PM

SSgt Private RallyPoint Member — Thu, 16 Feb 2017 16:46:40 -0500

Hi, Major Zeski.

Could Russia hack our IS infrastructure? Sure. Did they? Probably. Did they do it to sway the election? I doubt it. The effort involved would outweigh the gain. It's more likely that people are looking for a reason why President Trump won a presidency that everyone assumed was already Hillary's, and settled on our decades-old foe.

Response by MCPO Roger Collins made Feb 16 at 2017 5:02 PM

MCPO Roger Collins — Thu, 16 Feb 2017 17:02:42 -0500

The Intel Report would be more believable had they not recorded a conversation between a civilian and Russian diplomat and illegally given them to the media. Again, as with the FBI, destroyed their credibility. Why can't the rest of us see transcripts without the MSM filter?

Response by PO2 Robert Aitchison made Feb 16 at 2017 5:15 PM

PO2 Robert Aitchison — Thu, 16 Feb 2017 17:15:58 -0500

From everything I've heard there is broad consensus among our intelligence agencies that Russia did in fact interfere with our election. Unlike the President I choose to believe those experts.

Response by SSG Trevor S. made Feb 16 at 2017 5:21 PM

SSG Trevor S. — Thu, 16 Feb 2017 17:21:58 -0500

Would you accept it if the evidence pointed to Russians actually hacking election systems, but only to remove Democrat vote rigging glitches like vote switching glitches?

Response by SGT David A. 'Cowboy' Groth made Feb 16 at 2017 5:26 PM

SGT David A. 'Cowboy' Groth — Thu, 16 Feb 2017 17:26:59 -0500

Dems. had to have a scapegoat.

Response by SSgt Christopher Brose made Feb 16 at 2017 5:32 PM

SSgt Christopher Brose — Thu, 16 Feb 2017 17:32:20 -0500

It is really two different questions IMO. Did Russians hack the DNC? Probably. Did they influence the election? Doubtful.

If the Russians influenced the election, how did they accomplish it? Hacking the DNC isn't an answer, because that just demonstrates the DNC was compromised, and if it was the Russians who hacked it, then the Russians had the information. But that doesn't explain how the election was influenced. There have been no credible claims that voting machines or voting systems were hacked, so the only other theory is that voters were influenced by some other means in large enough numbers to sway the outcome of the election.

Presumably, that means Wikileaks. The problem there is that the Wikileaks people say they got the information from an insider, not from the Russians. If that is true, then the entire theory of Russian manipulation of our election falls apart.

Response by SFC Jim Ruether made Feb 16 at 2017 6:05 PM

SFC Jim Ruether — Thu, 16 Feb 2017 18:05:56 -0500

James Mattis said there is credible evidence to indicate that Russia tried to interfere!

Response by MAJ James Woods made Feb 16 at 2017 6:32 PM

MAJ James Woods — Thu, 16 Feb 2017 18:32:54 -0500

Not sure why it is so hard to believe that Russia could have influenced our election process through information operations to spread disinformation. Hell I'm willing to believe US Intelligence sources. Then again, there are plenty of American based organizations that most likely did the same thing. I will say any influence wasn't key to why Democrats lost; not even in the top 5 reasons.

What is fake news is this continued statement that his 306 electoral vote victory is one of the largest margin of victories in election history; it didn't even crack the top 50 percentile.

Response by SFC George Smith made Feb 16 at 2017 7:21 PM

SFC George Smith — Thu, 16 Feb 2017 19:21:20 -0500

To quote a Career Criminal Politician... "at this Point... What Difference does it make "

Response by Cpl Private RallyPoint Member made Feb 16 at 2017 9:18 PM

Cpl Private RallyPoint Member — Thu, 16 Feb 2017 21:18:51 -0500

I'm sure they tried to influence the election, just like our government was interfering in several other foreign elections, e.g., Israel's. That said, I think the liberal media with the rino never-trumpers blew it out of proportion to delegitimize the Trump election to stir up anti-trump support.

Response by LTC Stephen B. made Feb 17 at 2017 4:31 PM

LTC Stephen B. — Fri, 17 Feb 2017 16:31:46 -0500

http://100percentfedup.com/oops-media-forgot-ted-kennedy-asked-russia-to-intervene-in-election-help-defeat-ronald-reagan/

OOPS! Media Forgot Ted Kennedy Asked Russia To Intervene In Election, Help Defeat Ronald Reagan »...

In 1991 a reporter for the London Times found a very interesting memorandum composed in 1983by Victor Chebrikov, the top man in the KGB. The memo was addressed to Yuri Andropov, the top man in the USSR. The subject: Sen. Edward Kennedy The memorandum reads in part: “On 9-10 May of this year,Sen. Edward Kennedy’s

Response by LtCol Robert Quinter made Feb 23 at 2017 9:21 PM

LtCol Robert Quinter — Thu, 23 Feb 2017 21:21:01 -0500

I've got to go with those who are calling "no news". I cannot think of an election in my life where someone wasn't trying to influence the outcome. Soviets, Great Britain, Cuba, the Germans, just as we have done. Similar to the Putin's boat cruising off the East Coast, one of the first briefings I had when I checked into an Air Station in N. Carolina in 1968 was that telephone and radio security was a primary concern because of the Soviet trawler off the coast monitoring all our our calls and transmissions. It's all news depending upon the political point you want to make.