Posted on Aug 17, 2016
CPT David Gowel
21.3K
192
75
15
15
0
E1ebe77d
Should active duty leaders be held responsible by their raters if they don't ensure their troops are prepared for success as civilians? I'm sure some military leaders limit civilian job search activities because they want their troops to focus on their current mission. However, many military leaders aren't qualified to help their troops get a job they haven't held themselves. What do you think?
Avatar feed
Responses: 65
SGM Mikel Dawson
18
18
0
You can lead a horse to water, but you can't make him drink.
No, a leader shouldn't be held accountable for how ex-service members do on the outside. Going civilian is a different mind set where many of the attitudes and military ways don't work as well with some civilian employers. The "leadership" can put the information forward to service members leaving, make it available to them, but it doesn't mean they will be successful.
(18)
Comment
(0)
1LT Engineer Officer
1LT (Join to see)
>1 y
Second that statement. Thats just one more item of the many many items in the Army that command teams are blamed for and accountability is relieved from the individual.
(1)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
SSG Program Control Manager
16
16
0
Active duty leaders should be evaluated on how prepared their units are to engage and destroy our adversaries or support others who are engaging and destroying our adversaries, while taking minimal casualties.

That said, there are other activities which should be helping troops prepare for the civilian world. The education center, career counselors, ACAP, and others should be helping soldiers prepare for civilian life.
(16)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
LTC Stephen C.
11
11
0
Edited >1 y ago
It's an absurd notion, CPT David Gowel.
MAJ (Join to see)
(11)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small

Join nearly 2 million former and current members of the US military, just like you.

close