Posted on Apr 9, 2015
Should failing to complete 25D Re-Class reflect negatively on the Soldier that attempted it?
13.4K
15
6
0
0
0
As with most schools in the Army, failing to successfully complete them earns one a 1059 that reflects negatively on their record. A few schools, SFAS and RASP for example, carry no negative consequence for failing to succeed. With Cyber Defense being such an important skill set and the MOS being open to ALL MOS's for re-class regardless of IN/OUT call, should failing to successfully complete this course come with a negative consequences?
The 25D Re-Class course is EXTREMELY challenging. It is not a “check the block” and you will succeed course. Only those with the appropriate mindset and aptitude will likely succeed. What are your thoughts?
The 25D Re-Class course is EXTREMELY challenging. It is not a “check the block” and you will succeed course. Only those with the appropriate mindset and aptitude will likely succeed. What are your thoughts?
Posted in these groups: 
25D: Cyber Network Defender
25D: Cyber Network Defender
Posted >1 y ago
Responses: 5
3
3
0
Now that I have successfully completed the 25D course, I believe that failing to graduate should not be a negative on the Soldier's record. I agree with some others that adding a more stringent selection and assessing process would be beneficial.
(3)
(0)
2
2
0
The big difference in the example is that SFAS and RASP aren't really schools in the traditional sense. They are both selection processes to be admitted to schools. With that being said, I tend to agree that it shouldn't reflect negatively, especially on a school that is for a brand-new MOS and doesn't really have a baseline.
(2)
(0)
Read This Next
Continue with Facebook 
Continue with Google