Should General Milley Recuse Himself as Convening Authority in the Bergdahl Case?

2015-06-06T18:29:13-04:00

Is politics as at play? Does anyone care?

I personally think things should continue as it was started. GEN Milley is strong, independent leader; he would not be swayed by political pressure (unlaw command influence).

Bowe Bergdahl’s lawyers want top Army general off his desertion case, citing politics

The soldier's defense team contends that their is a conflict of interest in Gen. Mark A. Milley overseeing Bergdahl's case while waiting to be confirmed as the next chief of staff of the Army.

Response by Sgt Aaron Kennedy, MS made Jun 6 at 2015 9:33 PM

2015-06-06T21:33:53-04:00

No one is immune from the "potential" of politics, or worse the perception of politics.

That said, recusing himself is not about protecting Bergdahl, it's about protecting the General.

I mention it in the other thread, but we to ensure that there are absolutely no arguments when this case is completed. If Bergdahl walks, it is because the prosecution failed to make a case. If he hangs, it is because their case was solid. Simple as that.

I realize that this is an emotional issue for all, and many have already decided what the outcome should be, however, keep in mind just because it should be one way doesn't mean it will end up that way. The prosecution may not have their ducks in a line, and that may taint their case.

That in turn may put the General into a position as follows; Half the Senate will blame him for the outcome of the case, effectively ending his career, regardless of the outcome. Depending on said outcome, the new incoming President may withhold nomination of him.

We shouldn't put our troops (regardless of rank) into positions where they are doomed to fail. This is a case where the General will placed into a position, where that is extremely likely.