Should schools have armed staff?

SPC Private RallyPoint Member — Mon, 30 May 2016 05:25:54 -0400

Response by SPC Nathan Barnes made May 30 at 2016 6:02 AM

SPC Nathan Barnes — Mon, 30 May 2016 06:02:47 -0400

i say yes, to keep our children safe, but i do think they should have extensive training on all aspects of the subject. no loose canons

Response by SPC Chris Astin made May 30 at 2016 6:59 AM

SPC Chris Astin — Mon, 30 May 2016 06:59:32 -0400

Yes they should -PFC Astin

Response by SPC Terry Martin made May 30 at 2016 7:23 AM

SPC Terry Martin — Mon, 30 May 2016 07:23:58 -0400

YES! "Gun FREE Zones" do NOT work!

Response by LTC Tom Jones made May 30 at 2016 7:57 AM

LTC Tom Jones — Mon, 30 May 2016 07:57:43 -0400

After 22 years Active Duty, i spent 26 years in the classroom split nearly equally between two high schools. I was privileged to to work with some truly extraordinary young men and women over those years but I can honestly say that there were more than a couple of times that my easy access to a weapon would not have been a good idea.

Response by SPC Alden Wayne Dumas made May 30 at 2016 10:04 AM

SPC Alden Wayne Dumas — Mon, 30 May 2016 10:04:58 -0400

All Americas should have the means to protect themselves, the 2nd is supposed to protect that right ..

Response by Capt Seid Waddell made May 30 at 2016 10:34 AM

Capt Seid Waddell — Mon, 30 May 2016 10:34:14 -0400

It is better to have a gun and not need it than to need a gun and not have it.

Response by SSgt Private RallyPoint Member made May 30 at 2016 10:53 AM

SSgt Private RallyPoint Member — Mon, 30 May 2016 10:53:27 -0400

Gun free zones have been proven to not work. Having a trained staff (not neccesarily teachers, but dedicated security) who have access to a weapon would make a harder target. I would feel safer sending a child to a school with armed security than to a school without. I personally grew up on a school campus in the Philippines that had armed security. I never felt threatened and I was never attacked on campus.

Response by Sgt Aaron Kennedy, MS made May 30 at 2016 11:06 AM

Sgt Aaron Kennedy, MS — Mon, 30 May 2016 11:06:13 -0400

Many do. We call them a "Resource Officer."

The question is really whether the ratio should be higher and the response time should be better if "something" happens.

Response by Cpl Private RallyPoint Member made May 30 at 2016 12:02 PM

Cpl Private RallyPoint Member — Mon, 30 May 2016 12:02:26 -0400

Most of our schools do have armed staff. School Resource Officers unfortunately there is usually one for multiple schools and they spend most of their time at the High Schools.

Response by MSG Private RallyPoint Member made May 30 at 2016 1:15 PM

MSG Private RallyPoint Member — Mon, 30 May 2016 13:15:49 -0400

We are well informed of the consequences of not having them so, let's give the other side a try.

Response by CPT Private RallyPoint Member made May 30 at 2016 1:59 PM

CPT Private RallyPoint Member — Mon, 30 May 2016 13:59:58 -0400

I agree with other posters; most schools do have a School Resource Officer who is a sworn (therefore armed) law enforcement officer. I also agree that what needs to be taken into consideration is how many SROs for each school. Giving this a quick thought, I think each school needs an SRO and then there should also be roving SROs, who move between schools in a given district, able to provide quick backup to the stationed SRO should something happen. That way you can have double the SROs on scene while the cavalry is on its way.

Response by Cpl Justin Goolsby made May 30 at 2016 4:02 PM

Cpl Justin Goolsby — Mon, 30 May 2016 16:02:04 -0400

As it was said, it's better to have it and never need it, than never have it when you need it.

As long as the people who are armed are trained in their use. Personally, I don't care who was armed as long as they are responsible in their use. I don't care if it's the teachers, principal, or resource officers.

One caveat to add though. I believe they should be concealed carried certified. This way the students shouldn't know who is armed. We wouldn't want ill intent students using the teacher's firearms against them.

Response by SGT Shawn Schweinberg made May 30 at 2016 4:40 PM

SGT Shawn Schweinberg — Mon, 30 May 2016 16:40:54 -0400

I hate to say this. It goes against my view point. But the safety of our children are important. So yes we need armed guards posted at locations like schools.

Response by LTC Tom Jones made May 30 at 2016 9:40 PM

LTC Tom Jones — Mon, 30 May 2016 21:40:07 -0400

https://youtu.be/H9766DFuvIQ

Put a weapon in this beleaguered lady's hand and expect a positive outcome? We need a better solution. I stand with the minority; "No."

Chicago Classroom Bullies Teacher

VIDEO: Chicago Classroom Bullies Teacher http://hatchitz.com/?p=359 A video filmed in 2011 at the Chicago Vocational Career Academy has surfaced this week an...

Response by SPC George Rudenko made May 31 at 2016 2:28 AM

SPC George Rudenko — Tue, 31 May 2016 02:28:09 -0400

I would never say all school should have, or all schools shouldn't have. It is up to each jurisdiction.

Response by 1SG Charles Hunter made May 31 at 2016 10:53 AM

1SG Charles Hunter — Tue, 31 May 2016 10:53:03 -0400

A frightening prospect. OK Corral reprise?

Response by LTC Paul Labrador made May 31 at 2016 11:05 AM

LTC Paul Labrador — Tue, 31 May 2016 11:05:00 -0400

Both HS's I went to had full time Police Resource Officers on premises. I think that is a good compromise if you don't get the warm fuzzy from allowing teachers to be armed.

Response by SPC Private RallyPoint Member made May 31 at 2016 2:57 PM

SPC Private RallyPoint Member — Tue, 31 May 2016 14:57:56 -0400

I say yes, however, there needs to be training for those faculty members before they are allowed to arm themselves at work. Firearm safety, marksman, psych evals, etc.

Option two: place two or three National Guard Infantry guys on the grounds, armed and ready to go. I know my high school had 6 of them posted up after the "blood week" we had (5 shooting threats and two attempted bomb plantings)

Response by TSgt Jackie Jones made Jun 4 at 2016 12:09 AM

TSgt Jackie Jones — Sat, 04 Jun 2016 00:09:35 -0400

And armed students. We have air marshalls. Why not school marshalls?

Response by PO1 Craig Alley made Jul 7 at 2016 1:41 PM

PO1 Craig Alley — Thu, 07 Jul 2016 13:41:32 -0400

They should be and the job should go to Retired Military Enlisted Law Enforcement.

Response by SGT Jamarl Jones made Feb 26 at 2018 10:56 PM

SGT Jamarl Jones — Mon, 26 Feb 2018 22:56:52 -0500

We shouldn't have government schools at all. They are just ridiculous pseudo-gulags at this point, and primarily just pump out incompetent mouthbreathers who are barely qualified to work the deep-fryer at the local burger joint.

Response by LTC John Griscom made Mar 20 at 2018 1:06 PM

LTC John Griscom — Tue, 20 Mar 2018 13:06:44 -0400

The school system in my city has School Resource Officers (SRO) who are part of the Police Department and specially trained for that position,