LTC Jason Bartlett 10598 <div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>I think most miss the intent of the APFT in the first place, however I think it would be interesting to read what people think about having one standard APFT across the services. Just to be clear If I had my way I would have separate standards for different MOS's so this question would not be relevant :) Should there be one APFT standard for all services ? 2013-11-23T23:02:22-05:00 LTC Jason Bartlett 10598 <div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>I think most miss the intent of the APFT in the first place, however I think it would be interesting to read what people think about having one standard APFT across the services. Just to be clear If I had my way I would have separate standards for different MOS's so this question would not be relevant :) Should there be one APFT standard for all services ? 2013-11-23T23:02:22-05:00 2013-11-23T23:02:22-05:00 SGT(P) Private RallyPoint Member 10605 <div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>Sir, I don't think services or MOSes.....Each have a different mission.  I do think APFTs are important.  What is the intent of the APFT?  Is it to show your command your Physical Fitness Level? Response by SGT(P) Private RallyPoint Member made Nov 23 at 2013 11:08 PM 2013-11-23T23:08:45-05:00 2013-11-23T23:08:45-05:00 SGM Matthew Quick 10607 <div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>Wouldn't think the Air Force, Navy, Marines and Coast Guard would want an ARMY Physical Fitness Test (APFT)  :)<br><br>Furthermore, can't think the benefit of standardizing a cross-service physical fitness test.  We are separate services for a reason. Response by SGM Matthew Quick made Nov 23 at 2013 11:11 PM 2013-11-23T23:11:27-05:00 2013-11-23T23:11:27-05:00 SSgt Private RallyPoint Member 10612 <div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>It wouldn't have bothered me.   I loved being active in sports, weightlifting and long distance running.  Response by SSgt Private RallyPoint Member made Nov 23 at 2013 11:16 PM 2013-11-23T23:16:07-05:00 2013-11-23T23:16:07-05:00 CSM Mike Maynard 10629 <div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>If the purpose of a Physical Fitness Assessment is to determine capability/capacity, then there should be one standard. Not separate standards for gender or age.<div><br></div><div>I should have to have a certain level of strength, agility and stamina no matter my age or sex.</div><div><br></div><div>Until each service comes up with a unilateral standard, talking about unilateral standards across services is a bridge too far.</div> Response by CSM Mike Maynard made Nov 23 at 2013 11:36 PM 2013-11-23T23:36:42-05:00 2013-11-23T23:36:42-05:00 CW3(P) Private RallyPoint Member 10647 <div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>It would be interesting to see, but I don't think it would happen. All of the services have their standards for a reason. Response by CW3(P) Private RallyPoint Member made Nov 24 at 2013 12:03 AM 2013-11-24T00:03:44-05:00 2013-11-24T00:03:44-05:00 LTC Jason Bartlett 27954 <div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>Just think it is a little silly to have 5 different test, and we could just have one. Not sure it would hurt anyone.  Response by LTC Jason Bartlett made Dec 27 at 2013 2:24 PM 2013-12-27T14:24:44-05:00 2013-12-27T14:24:44-05:00 SGT Larry Woolard 58608 <div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>It amazes me you all are still having this conversation.Same problem when I left almost 20 yrs now.APFT Sir and all other interested parties has changed standards that really seemed to punish those in certain age groups and made it tougher on others.Dilemma is this,when I was in the standards in 80 were stout for and 17 to 21 year old category had to kick but to score a 300 it took work.When I got out in 95 at age 33 the standard was tougher for me at 33 than it was when I joined and the standards changed dramatically for the worse as far as I can tell.This is one of the items that contributing to the minimal standard attitude you Officers and NCO's are seeing so prevalent now.Change the mindset to achieve the goals at hand.<br> Response by SGT Larry Woolard made Feb 16 at 2014 9:17 PM 2014-02-16T21:17:07-05:00 2014-02-16T21:17:07-05:00 CMDCM Gene Treants 181160 <div class="images-v2-count-0"></div><a class="dark-link bold-link" role="profile-hover" data-qtip-container="body" data-id="38633" data-source-page-controller="question_response_contents" href="/profiles/38633-ltc-jason-bartlett">LTC Jason Bartlett</a> NO Sir! There is no good reason I can think of for Seals and Rangers to have the same standards as Shipboard Sailors or Air FOrce personnel. Right now gender and age are factors in consideration for many tests and Navy gives a choice of swimming or running. <br /><br />With the wide diversity of standards required in each service, I can foresee a military wide standard. Response by CMDCM Gene Treants made Jul 18 at 2014 4:41 PM 2014-07-18T16:41:40-04:00 2014-07-18T16:41:40-04:00 MSG Brad Sand 181200 <div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>No. Each service has a different mission and needs different things from their people. Response by MSG Brad Sand made Jul 18 at 2014 5:25 PM 2014-07-18T17:25:02-04:00 2014-07-18T17:25:02-04:00 MAJ Private RallyPoint Member 477051 <div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>If we are using the PT standards to determine your ability to preform then their should be one minimum standard regardless of age or gender. When discussing the separate services that minimum standard can and probably should be a little different. In the Army you should have a minimum APFT standard so that each Soldier meets that minimum standard. If you have differing minimums based on age and gender then what is the purpose of the APFT? Response by MAJ Private RallyPoint Member made Feb 15 at 2015 1:02 AM 2015-02-15T01:02:06-05:00 2015-02-15T01:02:06-05:00 Capt Richard I P. 477274 <div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>No. Response by Capt Richard I P. made Feb 15 at 2015 4:51 AM 2015-02-15T04:51:41-05:00 2015-02-15T04:51:41-05:00 COL Charles Williams 521774 <div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>That is a good one, as we struggle with the what is right for the Army. I think it makes sense, but I also think the Branches should have fitness tests that are derived from what that particular branch requires... to include by MOS. Response by COL Charles Williams made Mar 9 at 2015 10:33 PM 2015-03-09T22:33:49-04:00 2015-03-09T22:33:49-04:00 MAJ Private RallyPoint Member 522623 <div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>Different services have different missions and different needs. Why would a submariner need to run as fast as a green beret? A single standard is not only a ridiculous idea it is very dangerous as well. Response by MAJ Private RallyPoint Member made Mar 10 at 2015 12:08 PM 2015-03-10T12:08:03-04:00 2015-03-10T12:08:03-04:00 CPT Private RallyPoint Member 579886 <div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>Oh God no! On one extreme you have the fittest force in the U.S. military, the USMC, and on the other end you have the USAF. Would you separate pay for the different MOSs too? It's only fair since, for instance, Infantry Soldiers would have to work harder than finance. Response by CPT Private RallyPoint Member made Apr 8 at 2015 4:41 PM 2015-04-08T16:41:19-04:00 2015-04-08T16:41:19-04:00 2013-11-23T23:02:22-05:00