CW2 Private RallyPoint Member 105903 <div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>I find that most Warrant Officers are forgotten about until their Commanders see that a pacing item has been down for more than 48 hours. I feel that including us in OPD would make us more effective both as Leaders and as Technicians/Pilots. Showing that we are a part of the team makes us want to better that team. I am not speaking for the entire Corps, these are just my thoughts. Should Warrant Officers be included into Brigade, Battalion, and Company Officer Professional Development programs? 2014-04-19T10:40:11-04:00 CW2 Private RallyPoint Member 105903 <div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>I find that most Warrant Officers are forgotten about until their Commanders see that a pacing item has been down for more than 48 hours. I feel that including us in OPD would make us more effective both as Leaders and as Technicians/Pilots. Showing that we are a part of the team makes us want to better that team. I am not speaking for the entire Corps, these are just my thoughts. Should Warrant Officers be included into Brigade, Battalion, and Company Officer Professional Development programs? 2014-04-19T10:40:11-04:00 2014-04-19T10:40:11-04:00 CW3 Private RallyPoint Member 105943 <div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>Ryan,<div>In my Squadron, I attend our OPDs. With that said a lot of whats talk about doesn't really pertain to Warrants. Where it benefits me is it gives me insight of the thought process of O-grades.</div> Response by CW3 Private RallyPoint Member made Apr 19 at 2014 12:10 PM 2014-04-19T12:10:04-04:00 2014-04-19T12:10:04-04:00 CW2 Private RallyPoint Member 106059 <div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>Ryan, I also attend the OPDs in my unit and same as above, they usually don't pertain to Warrants too much.  Yes, we are becoming more and more pulled in the direction of officers rather than Technicians, but they usually talk about officer history and PL type tasks.   Response by CW2 Private RallyPoint Member made Apr 19 at 2014 2:50 PM 2014-04-19T14:50:16-04:00 2014-04-19T14:50:16-04:00 CW2 Private RallyPoint Member 106163 <div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>Many of us that are recent graduates (techs) have been tasked with PL positions and even XO positions in lieu of our battalion duties as technicians. It's rather taxing but keeps us busy.  Response by CW2 Private RallyPoint Member made Apr 19 at 2014 5:03 PM 2014-04-19T17:03:38-04:00 2014-04-19T17:03:38-04:00 CPT Gurinder (Gene) Rana 3346681 <div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>CWOs should be included on the TDAs and on MTOEs as Company-Grade officer fills; most are treated in this manner already. Battalions should be equipped with a CW3 level S4 and a CW2 grade officer as Battalion Training Manager. Brigades should have a CW4 logistician and a CW3 Training Manager or S3 Air (Trng). Response by CPT Gurinder (Gene) Rana made Feb 12 at 2018 11:28 AM 2018-02-12T11:28:23-05:00 2018-02-12T11:28:23-05:00 CW3 Kevin Storm 4013522 <div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>OPD can have its good and bad traits, you could learn a bunch of nothing that is designed for regular officers. How many of us want to track S-1 procedures? I know I didn&#39;t. If it is something where there is a WO slice to it, then I think it makes both sides of the coin better prepared. Response by CW3 Kevin Storm made Oct 2 at 2018 2:20 PM 2018-10-02T14:20:47-04:00 2018-10-02T14:20:47-04:00 2014-04-19T10:40:11-04:00