Posted on Mar 1, 2016
MSG Wally Carmichael
727K
19.1K
2.74K
1.2K
1.2K
3
"(Unit Name withheld) BCT ordered to remove combat patches during training at Fort NoMatter so the ones without them don't get ‪‎hurt feelings‬.

Reason? "The unit just returned from Afghanistan and almost everyone has a patch but the large influx of new soldiers are E1 and E2s that have never deployed and they are saying they are left out because they don't have a patch."
Avatar feed
See Results
Responses: 1628
Votes
  • Newest
  • Oldest
  • Votes
MSG Micheal P Floyd Jr
0
0
0
.... no, the Unit Patch is just that "The Unit Patch". All Insignias and Patches are earned, just as Rank is earned. Now if policy dictates that combat patches be removed, well, an Order is an Order, no matter how wrong it may be. Rank acquired in combat shouldn't be worn, because others didn't acquire said Rank in combat - unless "Stupid is, what Stupid does..." So in order to keep others from feeling bad about not having what others have earned, one should reassign each to noncombat Units in order to NOT hurt their delicate feelings.
(0)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
MSgt George M.
0
0
0
(0)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
SGM Special Forces Senior Sergeant
0
0
0
Maybe we should just get rid of all rank and awards and patches as well? I sure do have hurt feelings that I have Stripes instead of Stars on my chest, but whatever, I'll just self-identify as a 4* General from now on.
(0)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
SSG Charlie Davis
0
0
0
What is this, Little kids soccer where everyone gets a trophy so no one has their feelings hurt - everybody wins? Don't tell me this is the way they're heading? I'd sure like to know who the 2% was on this matter. . . .
(0)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
COL Military Police
0
0
0
Should we remove all medals from the uniform to be sensitive to those who do not have any or just a few? I don't have a combat patch. I respect those who do. No matter if they came under fire or just served in a theater. The combat patch, like medals earned tell a little bit about the soldier wearing them.
(0)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
SFC Jim Ruether
0
0
0
Namby Pamby whiners and snot nosed short timers must have looked up from their coloring books to ask this question? What is wrong with a little envy now and then? Why not tell these insecure newbies they will get their opportunity to earn their Combat Patches in their carrers later on.
(0)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
SGT Donald G Smith
0
0
0
I did not serve in combat, but those who did deserve to wear their combat patches they earned that right. What in the world has happened to the Army? When I was in we were not issued feelings! If and when these E1 & E2's serve in combat they can then wear their patches. Although I pray they never have to.
(0)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
SFC Human Resources Specialist
0
0
0
The fact that this is even an issue is absolutely asinine. You feel left out? Volunteer for a MOB. You don't want to deploy? No patch for you. It's the Army, a force specifically made to defend our country by battling those that would attempt to steal from us, whether figuratively, emotionally, or literally. It's what we do. If your only concern is feeling 'left out' because you don't have the same thing that someone else has (because they actually DID something for it) then you should probably look at yourself and realize just how selfish you are.

The Army isn't a hand-out.

The grass might actually be greener, but that's because of the blood and tears shed by those who crossed the fence to get there.
(0)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
CSM Joseph Antone
0
0
0
No, the patch should stay. I was never deployed to a combat theater, and I never felt any less as a soldier. My goal was to stay read at all times to deploy, and I did until I had to retired.
(0)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
MAJ Alan Montgomery
0
0
0
Since when is being in the military about accommodation. If having patches, awards, decorations is what drives you you're no PATRIOT, just another want to be
(0)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
SFC Fred Youngs
0
0
0
I Enlisted in 1974 and damned near everyone had Combat Patch except us Newbies. Did it bother me hell No. I Retired in 1998 and because of where is was Stationed and Position I missed going to Granada, Panama, Desert Storm. So I never wore a Patch on my Right Sleeve. Yes, but only because I did not want anyone thinking this guy hid out when just the other way I was Constantly going to my Superiors and for reason on reason or another I was told No you are needed right here. Did I cry or whine about it. No I saluted said yes Sir and went about my Job. Then in 2006 I was Ordered to Active Duty I still do not have a Combat Patch (Badge) Does it bother me sometimes do I whine about it No. What in the Hell is our Army coming to Sergeants need to Man-Up and start control of our Troops and quit this BS. Sensitivity be Damned suck it up March on.
(0)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
SP5 Joel McDargh
0
0
0
What the hell is this all about? Now the military has to cater to a bunch of candy asses because they feel they should have right to wear a combat patch they never earned? Sounds a bit like stolen valor before they got the valor. The military is not built on the pricipal that all get a trophy for participation. It's built on merit, duty, and honor. Taking away from those men and women who have made the sacrifice and earned the right to wear a combat patch and/or ribbons to prevent hurtbutt feelings for those who haven't made the connect is total BS. It dishonors sacrifices made. If the candies can't handle it then put their whiny asses out.
(0)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
PO2 Michael Henry
0
0
0
Hell NO! That patch is part of your uniform and just because a wet behind the ears E-1 or E-2 doesn't have one, isn't my problem. Let alone if they are sensitive to it. It's the military, sensitivity was left on the front door step, the second you left for basic. I was on a carrier and deployed during OEF/OIF in which we provided air support for both. Due to requirements we weren't awarded either campaign badge. Oh well, I don't have a combat patch, ribbon or medal saying I was shot at, doesn't make me less than them. We rescued the Iranian Fishermen in 2010, we dealt with Iran's BS for several days afterwards. We were harrassed by Iran during every strait crossing. I lost sleep as a Fire Controlman, because I worked nights, but that's part of the job. If they want it, go earn it.
(0)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
SSG Charlie Carlson
0
0
0
Edited 8 y ago
A combat patch shows veteran status and experience these E-2's and E-3's do not have. If you serve in combat and endure that experience you earn the right above anyone who never experienced combat to wear that badge of honor. I think combat veterans should be treated exactly as military retirees with the same privileges and even retired pay for the highest rank they held before they ETS'ed. Why should a retiree who never deployed be treated better than me or others like me who served in combat? There are many who never deployed to combat because of MOS or timing but they still have respect for those that did go to combat. For those whiners See form provided by SFC Thomas Livingston. He is on point.
(0)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
SSG Infantryman
0
0
0
Absolutely not, they need to suck it up. The problem new soldiers is they think we have to care about their feelings and the answer is no we don't. When Im smoking, sorry performing corrective training on a joe the last think I am thinking about is how he feels. One of the reasons I joined the Army is because you earn your keep. Put in the work and you get what you deserves in most cases and thats spoken from a non-deployed Soldiers.
(0)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
LTC Jeff Shearer
0
0
0
absolutely not! if you get your feelings hurt because you have not seen the ugly side of life, stay in, get into the infantry, the Rangers, SF. You'll get you a little patch.
(0)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
MAJ Operations Officer (S3)
0
0
0
I think that everyone knows this unit and the BCT CDR... First of all, this policy is often taken out of context. The reason was to achieve cohesiveness in a field environment, not the garrison environment. Having been a part of a different particular unit that does just this, I never felt stepped on or marginalized because I wasn't wearing my velcro patch on my right shoulder. The heart of this policy is it's not about you or what you did; it's who you are now and what you bring to the team. Having moved to a new unit, all I wear to the field is my unit patch and IR flag. It's not about catering to people who whine because they don't have your bling; it's about emphasizing the current team and not basking in your past successes and accomplishments.
(0)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
SSgt Thomas Hirschey
0
0
0
Hell no, if they want one then they need to earn one. It gives them a goal in life. They need to leave the sensitivities at the damn door. This coming from a Marine!
(0)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
SPC Intelligence Analyst
0
0
0
Holy shit. As a junior soldier I greatly appreciate seeing those around. I also might have a tad bit more respect for those with them than those without.
(0)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
CW4 Head Of Household
0
0
0
They will get over feeling left out, I did look up to Soldiers that wore them until I deployed. I realized it is not the patch that means anything but the story underneath the patch. I could have worn a few different ones but never chose to wear one.
Last deployment with a brigade I seen a Maj that was so grossly overweight that it was a good thing he had ACU's on instead of BDU style blouse otherwise the buttons would have popped off. Never left Bagram and came out with a patch and a BSM. I have all the respect in the world for those that actually did the door kicking, the cooks that ran gun truck missions in Iraq, the troops on RCP's and all those that stood in the line of fire or went looking for it. Those in CSS units should be good with just overseas bar.
(0)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small

Join nearly 2 million former and current members of the US military, just like you.