SGT Private RallyPoint Member 3612847 <div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>Soldier has never been married to this individual but has had a child with him. She is currently in the same unit but not the same platoon. Is this against the regulation AR 600-35 Fraternization? Or somewhere in another regulation? <br />Just curious, because it doesn&#39;t seem that this would be authorized to maybe not have a direct relationship together but having a child together and being in the same unit would go hand in hand, due to possible issues between the individuals and possibly causing issues at work with other individuals. Soldier has a child with another soldier of the same rank, same unit, not the same platoon. Is this okay? 2018-05-09T10:32:01-04:00 SGT Private RallyPoint Member 3612847 <div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>Soldier has never been married to this individual but has had a child with him. She is currently in the same unit but not the same platoon. Is this against the regulation AR 600-35 Fraternization? Or somewhere in another regulation? <br />Just curious, because it doesn&#39;t seem that this would be authorized to maybe not have a direct relationship together but having a child together and being in the same unit would go hand in hand, due to possible issues between the individuals and possibly causing issues at work with other individuals. Soldier has a child with another soldier of the same rank, same unit, not the same platoon. Is this okay? 2018-05-09T10:32:01-04:00 2018-05-09T10:32:01-04:00 SFC Private RallyPoint Member 3612920 <div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>No. Why would this be an issue? Adults who work together are allowed to date each other. Married couples work together all the time Response by SFC Private RallyPoint Member made May 9 at 2018 10:54 AM 2018-05-09T10:54:44-04:00 2018-05-09T10:54:44-04:00 SSG Private RallyPoint Member 3612934 <div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>They clearly didn&#39;t use the best judgement, but based off of my understanding of the regulation, no. They&#39;re not violating any ARs or UCMJ Articles. If one of them were to get promoted, one of them may have to be moved to another company though because that&#39;s where you can start to tread in those waters. Response by SSG Private RallyPoint Member made May 9 at 2018 10:59 AM 2018-05-09T10:59:08-04:00 2018-05-09T10:59:08-04:00 SSG Robert Perrotto 3613077 <div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>nope - as long as neither is direct leadership of the other - and define unit - is it the same company or is it the same battalion? if its the same company - then when the first gets promoted to NCO - I would move to another company - not because they are not mature or professional, but the appearance of preferred treatment might have some Soldiers who want to cause trouble file complaints and cause unnecessary grief and drama. if its the same battalion - then absolutely no issue about it and if someone said something about to me I would reply not your business Response by SSG Robert Perrotto made May 9 at 2018 11:45 AM 2018-05-09T11:45:20-04:00 2018-05-09T11:45:20-04:00 CW3 Susan Burkholder 3613098 <div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>Often you can find better explanations in the &quot;preface&quot; section of any regulation and also in the first chapter than in all the legalease of the regulation itself. <br />First note: you say AR 600-35. Did you perhaps mean DA Pamphlet 600-35? <br />Second note:: I only have access to DA Pamphlet 600-35 which is a draft version. Apparently it has not been finalized. It still gives good advice. <br /><br />&quot;The custom regarding fraternization has always been primarily directed at officer-enlisted relationships&quot;. So, in your example it would not apply as they are the same rank.<br /><br />Reading further, it states that it is difficult to predict which relationships ... Can create adverse affects. And the bottom line being that the key is whether they can maintain a professional relationship during duty hours. Response by CW3 Susan Burkholder made May 9 at 2018 11:53 AM 2018-05-09T11:53:41-04:00 2018-05-09T11:53:41-04:00 CSM Darieus ZaGara 3613413 <div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>There is nothing wrong with this situation unless they let it become an issue. I have had husband and wife in the same unit and never had a problem. I recommend you do not look for problems where they do not exist.<br /><br />Thank you for your service. Response by CSM Darieus ZaGara made May 9 at 2018 1:36 PM 2018-05-09T13:36:32-04:00 2018-05-09T13:36:32-04:00 CPT Don Kemp 3613550 <div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>I&#39;m guessing prosecution for fornication would not be good for unit morale. Response by CPT Don Kemp made May 9 at 2018 2:48 PM 2018-05-09T14:48:27-04:00 2018-05-09T14:48:27-04:00 SSG Brian G. 3613673 <div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>No, it does not. As they are the same rank, different platoons it is not an issue because even if one of them was promoted neither would be in the others chain of command. It was not the best in thinking but these things happen. <br /><br />We had a situation similar to this in my unit, in that case there was a rank disparity but they were in separate platoons within the same company. Not a problem. They were married and had a child together. Response by SSG Brian G. made May 9 at 2018 3:42 PM 2018-05-09T15:42:21-04:00 2018-05-09T15:42:21-04:00 SGM Bill Frazer 3614379 <div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>NO it is ok- 1st off, She has a child- is the Sm supporting this child?. If they are in the same unit- then what happens during deployments- real screws up a Family plan. Read the reg- frat is not authorized in same unit- and they would be in the same Company- ergo Same unit! Response by SGM Bill Frazer made May 9 at 2018 8:39 PM 2018-05-09T20:39:06-04:00 2018-05-09T20:39:06-04:00 CW3 Private RallyPoint Member 3614811 <div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>Relationships are tricky sometimes. As of what you said, they don’t violate any UCMJ. That doesn’t mean that things can’t get complicated and involve UCMJ, but as a few others have already confirmed there is no violation here. Response by CW3 Private RallyPoint Member made May 10 at 2018 12:08 AM 2018-05-10T00:08:39-04:00 2018-05-10T00:08:39-04:00 CW4 Private RallyPoint Member 3622281 <div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>I am not really seeing the issue in this situation. The only place I know of fraternization being discussed is AR 600-20. DA PAM 600-35 is no more than scenarios to help chains of command understand 600-20. It is not regulatory and merely tries to clarify 600-20. Not knowing the background of the situation it appears you may need looking for an issue where on does not currently exist. Response by CW4 Private RallyPoint Member made May 12 at 2018 1:58 PM 2018-05-12T13:58:48-04:00 2018-05-12T13:58:48-04:00 2018-05-09T10:32:01-04:00