State Department did nothing to protect Clinton emails after hack; Does this fall under of the category of dereliction of duty? https://www.rallypoint.com/answers/state-department-did-nothing-to-protect-clinton-emails-after-hack-does-this-fall-under-of-the-category-of-dereliction-of-duty <div class="images-v2-count-0"></div> <div class="pta-link-card answers-template-image type-default"> <div class="pta-link-card-picture"> <img src="https://d26horl2n8pviu.cloudfront.net/link_data_pictures/images/000/020/483/qrc/DEM_202016_20Clinton?1443052199"> </div> <div class="pta-link-card-content"> <p class="pta-link-card-title"> <a target="blank" href="http://www.mcclatchydc.com/news/politics-government/election/article31628900.html">State Department did nothing to protect Clinton emails after hack</a> </p> <p class="pta-link-card-description">Despite a hack two years ago that publicly exposed Hillary Clinton’s emails, the State Department took no action to shore up the security of the former secretary of state’s private computer server.</p> </div> <div class="clearfix"></div> </div> Fri, 21 Aug 2015 15:13:49 -0400 State Department did nothing to protect Clinton emails after hack; Does this fall under of the category of dereliction of duty? https://www.rallypoint.com/answers/state-department-did-nothing-to-protect-clinton-emails-after-hack-does-this-fall-under-of-the-category-of-dereliction-of-duty <div class="images-v2-count-0"></div> <div class="pta-link-card answers-template-image type-default"> <div class="pta-link-card-picture"> <img src="https://d26horl2n8pviu.cloudfront.net/link_data_pictures/images/000/020/483/qrc/DEM_202016_20Clinton?1443052199"> </div> <div class="pta-link-card-content"> <p class="pta-link-card-title"> <a target="blank" href="http://www.mcclatchydc.com/news/politics-government/election/article31628900.html">State Department did nothing to protect Clinton emails after hack</a> </p> <p class="pta-link-card-description">Despite a hack two years ago that publicly exposed Hillary Clinton’s emails, the State Department took no action to shore up the security of the former secretary of state’s private computer server.</p> </div> <div class="clearfix"></div> </div> SSgt Alex Robinson Fri, 21 Aug 2015 15:13:49 -0400 2015-08-21T15:13:49-04:00 Response by LCDR Private RallyPoint Member made Aug 21 at 2015 3:17 PM https://www.rallypoint.com/answers/state-department-did-nothing-to-protect-clinton-emails-after-hack-does-this-fall-under-of-the-category-of-dereliction-of-duty?n=908718&urlhash=908718 <div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>Well... no. Because it shouldn't have been the State Department's responsibility for her private server. Now, that said, her private server shouldn't have had any government emails on it, the basis of the investigation already going on. LCDR Private RallyPoint Member Fri, 21 Aug 2015 15:17:52 -0400 2015-08-21T15:17:52-04:00 Response by Capt Seid Waddell made Aug 21 at 2015 3:29 PM https://www.rallypoint.com/answers/state-department-did-nothing-to-protect-clinton-emails-after-hack-does-this-fall-under-of-the-category-of-dereliction-of-duty?n=908757&urlhash=908757 <div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>A fish rots from the head. Capt Seid Waddell Fri, 21 Aug 2015 15:29:10 -0400 2015-08-21T15:29:10-04:00 Response by CPT Private RallyPoint Member made Aug 21 at 2015 3:29 PM https://www.rallypoint.com/answers/state-department-did-nothing-to-protect-clinton-emails-after-hack-does-this-fall-under-of-the-category-of-dereliction-of-duty?n=908758&urlhash=908758 <div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>No!! SHE screwed up, and hopefully will pay for it. CPT Private RallyPoint Member Fri, 21 Aug 2015 15:29:33 -0400 2015-08-21T15:29:33-04:00 Response by COL Jean (John) F. B. made Aug 21 at 2015 3:38 PM https://www.rallypoint.com/answers/state-department-did-nothing-to-protect-clinton-emails-after-hack-does-this-fall-under-of-the-category-of-dereliction-of-duty?n=908784&urlhash=908784 <div class="images-v2-count-0"></div><a class="dark-link bold-link" role="profile-hover" data-qtip-container="body" data-id="628831" data-source-page-controller="question_response_contents" href="/profiles/628831-ssgt-alex-robinson">SSgt Alex Robinson</a> - Absolutely. As soon as they suspected there was a security issue, they should have acted to ensure security was established to preclude further chance of unauthorized disclosure. Those who failed to do so were derelict in their duties and should be punished. COL Jean (John) F. B. Fri, 21 Aug 2015 15:38:05 -0400 2015-08-21T15:38:05-04:00 2015-08-21T15:13:49-04:00