This sheriff referred to Gun Free Zones as 'Killing Fields' and asserted the right to self-defense. Your thoughts?

CPO Andy Carrillo, MS — Sat, 03 Oct 2015 22:33:32 -0400

Fox News host Bill O’Reilly went off teleprompter Thursday evening to deliver a strong 15-word message to President Barack Obama: “You’re not going to change the Second Amendment. I have a right to protect myself.”
Where do you believe that the right and duty to self-protection should fall--in the individual or the state?

http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2015/10/02/an-impassioned-sheriff-clarke-proposes-law-that-can-be-changed-to-reduce-deaths-from-gun-violence/

An Impassioned Sheriff Clarke Proposes Law That ‘Can Be Changed’ to Reduce Deaths From Gun...

Milwaukee County Sheriff David Clarke appeared on the Fox News Channel Friday evening and offered host Megyn Kelly a solution aimed at reducing deaths caused by gun violence. Clarke's suggestion came in response to a question Kelly posed to her other guest, Obama 2012 national field director Jeremy...

Response by TSgt Private RallyPoint Member made Oct 3 at 2015 10:52 PM

TSgt Private RallyPoint Member — Sat, 03 Oct 2015 22:52:26 -0400

Ok, Chief, I'll bite. Your last statement says it all. It absolutely is an individuals right and responsibility. The state (law enforcement) will arrive just in time to draw the chalk outline around your remains and start the clean-up process.

The District of Columbia Court of Appeals has ruled (Warren v. District of Columbia, 1991 https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case= [login to see] 125174344&hl=en&as_sdt=6&as_vis=1&oi=scholarr ) the police, and by extension the state, have "no legal obligation to provide protection or services individuals except under specific assignments"

In Gonzales v. Castle Rock, the US Supreme Court held the "police did not have a constitutional duty to protect a person from harm"

Response by SSgt David Tedrow made Oct 3 at 2015 10:53 PM

SSgt David Tedrow — Sat, 03 Oct 2015 22:53:18 -0400

I totally agree with this Sheriff.

Response by MSgt Curtis Ellis made Oct 3 at 2015 11:00 PM

MSgt Curtis Ellis — Sat, 03 Oct 2015 23:00:17 -0400

I totally agree... People should be allowed to play a stronger physical role in their own safety and protection in these so called "gun-free zones" if the reasonable assumption and expectation of protection cannot be met or guaranteed by state/city/county owned "good weapons" protecting these areas; otherwise, these zones only serve to become a congregating place for people to unwillingly be slaughtered with no way to defend themselves against a gunman breaking the rules. The Sheriff is on point.

Response by Cpl James Waycasie made Oct 3 at 2015 11:04 PM

Cpl James Waycasie — Sat, 03 Oct 2015 23:04:08 -0400

When you think about it, shooters have been targeting gun free zones a lot. Instead of wanting to ban guns they should be informing people on safety and proper use. An armed population is not where you want to go shooting at people.

Response by Capt Seid Waddell made Oct 4 at 2015 2:20 AM

Capt Seid Waddell — Sun, 04 Oct 2015 02:20:43 -0400

How many mass shootings have taken place outside of gun-free zones?

Response by SPC Carl K. made Oct 4 at 2015 3:00 AM

SPC Carl K. — Sun, 04 Oct 2015 03:00:51 -0400

That is essentially what advertised gun-free zones are! They are soft targets.

Response by Sgt Private RallyPoint Member made Jun 22 at 2016 8:52 PM

Sgt Private RallyPoint Member — Wed, 22 Jun 2016 20:52:38 -0400

The Sheriff isn't wrong. The LE can't be everywhere and takes time for them to respond. The perpetrator won't wait to be caught - I know I wouldn't want to be.

Response by Capt Ray S. O. made Feb 21 at 2018 1:38 PM

Capt Ray S. O. — Wed, 21 Feb 2018 13:38:50 -0500

I conceal carry - permit in wallet.

Response by SGM Bill Frazer made Feb 21 at 2018 2:23 PM

SGM Bill Frazer — Wed, 21 Feb 2018 14:23:41 -0500

Gee you put up a sign that says "Gun Free" and just how many deranged, upset, P.O'd armed folks with vengeance on their mind did you stop? I mean the fact that what they are planning/bent on during is illegal, and the Feds are suppose to add 7 mandatory years to your conviction for using a gun- hasn't stoped an of these folks yet has it.

Response by SPC Jay Peltier made Feb 21 at 2018 3:11 PM

SPC Jay Peltier — Wed, 21 Feb 2018 15:11:58 -0500

OK, I guess I will become the punching bag for a while...

You guys are missing one important point about GUN FREE ZONES...

They are GUN FREE ZONES, not because they want to keep criminals out, they are gun free zones because they want to keep MORONS that want to tote an AR15 around to show off their 2nd amendment rights from ACCIDENTALLY BLOWING AWAY A 6 YEAR OLD!!!!!!!! (it's a safety thing people)

It's a safety law to cut down on accidental discharges. It's to stop law abiding citizens from killing our kids by means of accidental discharge, not criminals!!!!

And to be clear, more mass shootings are perpetrated OUTSIDE OF GUN FREE ZONES, than within.

Response by SPC Jay Peltier made Mar 15 at 2018 2:43 PM

SPC Jay Peltier — Thu, 15 Mar 2018 14:43:46 -0400

HEY silly uninformed easily mislead people...., THIS IS WHY WE HAVE GUN FREE ZONES... To stop people from carrying a weapon when they are not supposed to. TO PREVENT THESE TYPES OF ACCIDENTS!!!!!!!!!!!!

http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/mother-class-kept-going-after-teacher-fired-gun-injuring-3/ar-BBKcd2H?li=BBmkt5R&ocid=ientp

ar-BBKcd2H

Response by SSG Edward Tilton made Mar 16 at 2018 9:47 PM

SSG Edward Tilton — Fri, 16 Mar 2018 21:47:42 -0400

I don't know you, why would I want you around my grandchildren armed. Once upon a time we had an Assault Weapons Ban. It was not repealed, it expired. It could be brought back without any Constitutional Amendment as long as it is identical. It details the weapons and accessories banned, turn in procedure. penalties for violation and it has been to court.

Response by SSG Jessica Bautista made Mar 16 at 2018 11:50 PM

SSG Jessica Bautista — Fri, 16 Mar 2018 23:50:48 -0400

Repeal the Dickey Amendment and we'll talk.

Response by MSgt Michael Bischoff made Mar 18 at 2018 3:46 PM

MSgt Michael Bischoff — Sun, 18 Mar 2018 15:46:45 -0400

Has this toad even read the gun free zone. The act prevents “unauthorized” weapons not weapons.
The school had armed guard in Florida. Everybody is a hero saying if I was there I would have acted because a I carry my courage on me all the time. Courage was those teachers who protected the children not those who say if I was there bullshit.
Guns were invented to kill and nothing else!

The Gun-Free School Zones Act (GFSZA) is an act of the U.S. Congress prohibiting any unauthorized individual from knowingly possessing a loaded or unsecured firearm at a place that the individual knows, or has reasonable cause to believe, is a school zone as defined by 18 U.S.C. § 921(a)(25). The law applies to public, private, and parochial elementary schools and high schools, and to non-private property within 1000 feet of them. It provides that the states and their political subdivisions may issue licenses that exempt the licensed individuals from the prohibition.

Response by SSG Edward Tilton made Mar 18 at 2018 5:14 PM

SSG Edward Tilton — Sun, 18 Mar 2018 17:14:21 -0400

How bad can the place where you live be if you have to bring a gun to church