SFC Collin McMillion 489870 <div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>Since Russia and/or China automatically vetos every resolution that the US summits without reading or even considering it, why don't we just summit a resolution saying we support ISIS, Putin, the South Sea's conflicts, etc........they will automatically veto it because we summited it, and "BINGO", we win!!! 2015-02-21T14:54:54-05:00 SFC Collin McMillion 489870

<div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>Since Russia and/or China automatically vetos every resolution that the US summits without reading or even considering it, why don't we just summit a resolution saying we support ISIS, Putin, the South Sea's conflicts, etc........they will automatically veto it because we summited it, and "BINGO", we win!!!

2015-02-21T14:54:54-05:00 2015-02-21T14:54:54-05:00 CW5 Private RallyPoint Member 489973

<div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>Gee, <a class="dark-link bold-link" role="profile-hover" data-qtip-container="body" data-id="63998" data-source-page-controller="question_response_contents" href="/profiles/63998-sfc-collin-mcmillion">SFC Collin McMillion</a>, I don't' think it's an automatic veto. Granted, we are often on different sides of issues with China and Russia, but I think they might (might) be with us on things like ISIS. Russia is a Syrian ally, but it's hard to defend the brutal murders that have been carried out by ISIS.<br /><br />Terrorist organizations can "get away" with being openly brutal to influence their target audiences. It's more difficult for nation states to behave that way without some sort of repercussion.<br /><br />With all that said, you do present an interesting idea.

2015-02-21T15:53:17-05:00 2015-02-21T15:53:17-05:00 2015-02-21T14:54:54-05:00