"US Coast Guard chief: We are 'not even in the same league as Russia' in the Arctic"

2015-07-13T11:39:36-04:00

From: Business Insider
--
The US is lagging far behind other nations, especially Russia, when it comes to planning for the Arctic region as ice melts.

"We're not even in the same league as Russia right now," Newsweek quotes Coast Guard Commandant Paul F. Zukunft as saying. "We're not playing in this game at all."

The Arctic is stocked with valuable oil, gas, mineral, and fishery reserves. The US estimates that a significant proportion of the planet's untapped resources — including about 15% of the world's remaining oil, up to 30% of its natural-gas deposits, and about 20% of its liquefied natural gas — is stored in the regions seabed.

The US has only two heavy diesel icebreakers and one medium icebreaker, among the main measures of Arctic capability. While not a direct military tool, these vessels play a multifaceted role in any nation's Arctic strategy. The vessels allow a range of other merchant, survey, and military vessels to ply through the Arctic ice safely and in a year-round manner.

In comparison, Russia has six nuclear-powered icebreakers already in service. The Russians also have at least a dozen other diesel icebreakers in service. In 2017, Moscow is expecting the delivery of another new nuclear-powered vessel.

Of the US' two heavy icebreakers, only one, the Polar Star, is in functional condition, according to NPR. Its sister vessel, the Polar Sea, has been languishing at port for years after a major breakdown. The Coast Guard also has a medium icebreaker, the USCG Healy, but the service branch is petitioning to acquire more assets for its fleet.

"The Polar Sea had a major engine breakdown in 2010, had to be towed into its home port of Seattle, and it's basically been ... just rusting in the docks in Seattle," Shiva Polefka, of the Center for American Progress, told NPR.

This forces the US to rely upon a single heavy icebreaker in the Arctic as the region takes on unprecedented levels of economic and geopolitical significance. The US also deploys its icebreakers to the Antarctic, placing strain on its current fleet.

Shipping throughout the Arctic will also become critically important. A proposed Russian Northern Sea Route could eventually rival the Suez Canal in economic importance. The route would connect shipping from Europe to Asia in 35 days, as opposed to the 48-day journey via the Suez Canal.

Without the needed investment, the US will most likely continue to trail Russia as the Arctic becomes a pivotal geopolitical region.

In addition the disparity in icebreaker strength, Moscow has undertaken a construction blitz across the Arctic to establish military superiority in the region. Russia is constructing 10 Arctic search-and-rescue stations, 16 deepwater ports, 13 airfields, and 10 air-defense radar stations across its Arctic coast.

Simultaneously, Moscow has created Joint Strategic Command North (JSCN) from components of the Northern Fleet in order to maintain a permanent military presence in the region. This command will most likely become a fifth Russian military district.

http://www.businessinsider.com/us-not-even-in-the-same-league-as-russia-in-arctic-2015-7#ixzz3fmopdAeg

Response by SSG Izzy Abbass made Jul 13 at 2015 11:44 AM

2015-07-13T11:44:10-04:00

Russia planted a flag on the sea floor of the arctic circle as well

Response by SSgt Private RallyPoint Member made Jul 13 at 2015 12:15 PM

2015-07-13T12:15:37-04:00

I hope this is not a backdoor Climate Change discussion.

Response by SCPO Private RallyPoint Member made Jul 13 at 2015 2:50 PM

2015-07-13T14:50:30-04:00

Yes, this true. However, our commandant has putting together a comprehensive plan, in concert with the U.S. Navy, to dramatically change that imbalance over the next decade. One of my latest CG magazines has an extensive article about this very issue. Good timing, RP.

Response by CPO Jon Campbell made Jul 13 at 2015 4:53 PM

2015-07-13T16:53:58-04:00

The title should read "U S Coast Guard Commandant:..."not 'chief' although a chief was probably the source for the Commandant.

Response by PO1 Don Mac Intyre made Jul 14 at 2015 6:13 PM

2015-07-14T18:13:38-04:00

Well if the Arctic is melting we won't need ice breakers now will we?

Response by CWO4 Josh Henley made Jul 15 at 2015 5:59 PM

2015-07-15T17:59:15-04:00

Who's fault is that? The admiralty... We had tried and true ice breakers multiple... lol, and they were scrapped due to budget constraints... The two polars are DIW and the scientific Healy is a mess because of politics ... how do I know... I inspected them for seaworthiness and wrote a report on the lack of... bet you never saw that...

Response by PO3 Sonny Simms made Jul 15 at 2015 9:03 PM

2015-07-15T21:03:50-04:00

What do you expect? Army has lost 40,000 men, Navy ships are being neglected and I am sure the Air Force and Marines are suffering also. Our monies are going to countries that hate and want to destroy us. There is no money for the services no matter what the consequences.

Response by SGT Rick Ash made Sep 14 at 2015 5:16 PM

2015-09-14T17:16:57-04:00

Russia has a strong President and hundreds of brilliant military leaders. If you recall, Obama fired over 200 of our top Generals over the past several years. His handlers (including George Soros) have him carrying out THEIR orders like a meat puppet. Failing to see the strategic importance of the Arctic, especially as a secondary Suez Canal, was on purpose, not just another severe failure on the part of Obama. We are sca-rewed.