Posted on Aug 5, 2016
Was it wrong for Mr. Khan to bring his deceased son's legacy into the political arena? If so why?
7.6K
29
31
6
6
0
Politics
Election 2016
Legacy
Posted >1 y ago
Responses: 16
4
4
0
2
2
0
No it is not wrong for a parent to use a child's legacy, what is wrong is for anyone to use this family as a pawn for their advancement. No one in either party gave two shits about this family until Trump made his immigration and comments against Islam. The DNC used this family for votes, nothing more or less.
(2)
(0)
2
2
0
It might help to compare the mother who spoke at the GOP convention to the father who spoke at the DNC convention. In the former case, the mother complained of Hillary's complicity in the death of her son. In the latter, Trump was not complicit. In the former case, Hillary has a commercial interest to protect in her associations with Middle Eastern potentates who have "contributed" millions to Hillary's family "charity" in exchange for favors to be announced. In the later case Mr Kahn had commercial interests to protect inasmuch as Trump's call for closer vetting of Muslim immigrants would discourage his clientele. Now you decide. Was it wrong?
(2)
(0)
SGM Barry Kindred
SP5 Christine Conley - Nice try. Wrong. He never labeled all Muslims as terrorists. False statement.
(0)
(0)
SGM Barry Kindred
Nope. Calls a spade a spade. Misquoted hyperventilation of using the words the PC police have banished from our lexicon.
That's all.
The media hype crap is old.
What does Hillary do?
Panders
That's all.
The media hype crap is old.
What does Hillary do?
Panders
(1)
(0)
PO3 Sherry Thornburg
SP5 Christine Conley - that really has nothing to do with the situation under discussion. And you will have to show me where he called ALL Muslims terrorists. (You might actually be able to as he has a bad habit of talking without thinking through.) But, it is not against the constitution to talk without thinking.
(1)
(0)
Read This Next
Continue with Facebook 
Continue with Google