Posted on Jul 2, 2015
LTC Stephen F.
8.73K
108
85
6
6
0
A triple in Montana has applied to be married [I prefer triple to "thruple"]. I think triple is the appropriate term for a group of 3 and expect a quadruple will be the correct term for four people who want to get married.
I expect the radical groups who loosely consider themselves LDS will be thrilled as well as traditional Muslims.
It will be interesting to see the legal maneuvers over the next few months as more and more people want to get in the limelight either because of actual desires or because they want their 5 minutes of fame.
[Update 7/3/2015] I hope that sanity will prevail in this land and that common sense will be common once again. May God bless America and hopefully His people will learn to rely on Him not be blown about by the winds of popular opinion or the edicts of the courts.

http://nypost.com/2015/07/02/montana-thruple-applies-for-wedding-license/
Posted in these groups: C92a59d8 FamilyRings Marriage
Edited 9 y ago
Avatar feed
Responses: 28
PO1 John Miller
10
10
0
Don't care, doesn't affect my life or my marriage...

As a Libertarian I believe that if it makes you happy and doesn't negatively impact my life, it's none of my business.
(10)
Comment
(0)
PO1 John Miller
PO1 John Miller
>1 y
SPC Johnny Velazquez, PhD, the way I look at it is like this: those bakeries are a public business and cannot discriminate.

BUT, churches are just that, a church and are/should be protected under freedom of religion and separation of Church and State and should not be gone after.
(0)
Reply
(0)
SPC Johnny Velazquez, PhD
SPC Johnny Velazquez, PhD
>1 y
PO1 John Miller - My question. Why are they targeting bakeries owned by Christians? I saw a video of a reporter with a hidden camera. He visited about 7 Muslim bakeries, and asked that the they bake a cake celebrating his same sex wedding. They all refused. The video was made public, but nothing from the courts. Muslim bakers are in fact discriminating. Why are they exempt from prosecution, and not Christians? Look. We all served in order to protect the rights of every citizen. If they want to get married, fine, but why force everyone to accept it? Take Canada for example. Ministers are continually jailed, and fined for preaching the gospel, and against this behavior. Mark my word, it'll happen her as well. Good civil discussion, PO1 Miller. I'm enjoying it. Blessings.
(1)
Reply
(0)
PO1 John Miller
PO1 John Miller
>1 y
SPC Johnny Velazquez, PhD, I agree that all bakeries should be targeted, not just Christian-owned ones. But you and I both know that's not on the Liberal agenda. Didn't you know that it's okay to sue/discriminate against Christians because our feelings don't matter?
(2)
Reply
(0)
SPC Johnny Velazquez, PhD
SPC Johnny Velazquez, PhD
>1 y
PO1 John Miller - You nailed it. Couldn't have said it better. Great comment. Blessings.
(2)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
SN Greg Wright
6
6
0
Hey if a person wants to subject themselves to the hell of more than one spouse....go for it, heh.

I personally don't even want one, but them doing it isn't going to hurt me any.
(6)
Comment
(0)
CPT Pedro Meza
CPT Pedro Meza
>1 y
SN Greg Wright, you are younger and wiser then I, because I was a repeat Offender.
(1)
Reply
(0)
LTC Stephen F.
LTC Stephen F.
>1 y
Well as a repeat offender CPT Pedro Meza was the sentence for your subsequent offenses increased each time? :-)
Would community service help for repeat offenders oh wait that might lead to more offenses :-)
(0)
Reply
(0)
SPC Johnny Velazquez, PhD
SPC Johnny Velazquez, PhD
>1 y
I kicked the habit in 84. Haven't had one of those sugary things, since then. Now, when it comes to Mexican, I'm as guilty as the next one. Can't help it! :)
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
SGT Infantryman (Airborne)
5
5
0
95c3b403
LTC Stephen F., I wouldn't want to be the man that you have to turn into, to be a Polygamist. I'm not really for subservient wives. Who would tell me what to wear, think, say, how to get there, how to drive, and those things that make a marriage successful.
(5)
Comment
(0)
MSgt Manuel Diaz
MSgt Manuel Diaz
>1 y
Well why not marry a woman and a man and a beast of your choice whether purity or not...what else ... an extraterrestrial
(0)
Reply
(0)
SGT Infantryman (Airborne)
SGT (Join to see)
>1 y
MSgt Manuel Diaz, To each his own, but not for me.
(0)
Reply
(0)
MSgt Manuel Diaz
MSgt Manuel Diaz
>1 y
Well I recon I'd rather have more women then one queer man to sleep with
(0)
Reply
(0)
SGT Infantryman (Airborne)
SGT (Join to see)
>1 y
MSgt Manuel Diaz, Although RP believes in Freedom of Speech, your comment is unacceptable. Please refrain from attacking a persons personal life, beliefs, and their lifestyle. Thanks.
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small

Join nearly 2 million former and current members of the US military, just like you.

close