SGT Greg Knytych8806860<div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>I have seen many posts on Facebook in the Oldschool 95B page talking about the Army either eliminating the MP Corps or eliminating Garrison Law Enforcement from the mission.<br />I've heard this rumor before, even when I was still in 35+ years ago. I do believe base law enforcement duties stateside will become more and more commonly handled by DOD Police allowing more personnel assigned to units to handle the changing and evolving wartime mission. There's been criticism about "civilian" police enforcing the laws on base, but the DOD Police aren't civilian. They work under the same authority and enforce all military regulations and policies as the MPs do. They also have the same responsibility to the UCMJ as any military member. I see no issues here. What do you say?What are your thoughts on the Army eliminating the MP Corps?2024-07-07T20:03:25-04:00SGT Greg Knytych8806860<div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>I have seen many posts on Facebook in the Oldschool 95B page talking about the Army either eliminating the MP Corps or eliminating Garrison Law Enforcement from the mission.<br />I've heard this rumor before, even when I was still in 35+ years ago. I do believe base law enforcement duties stateside will become more and more commonly handled by DOD Police allowing more personnel assigned to units to handle the changing and evolving wartime mission. There's been criticism about "civilian" police enforcing the laws on base, but the DOD Police aren't civilian. They work under the same authority and enforce all military regulations and policies as the MPs do. They also have the same responsibility to the UCMJ as any military member. I see no issues here. What do you say?What are your thoughts on the Army eliminating the MP Corps?2024-07-07T20:03:25-04:002024-07-07T20:03:25-04:00SGM Bill Frazer8807417<div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>The 1st time you get a parcel of POWs, and you have to sit on them because there is no MPs to turn them over to and no POW camps, they will change their tune pretty damn quick!Response by SGM Bill Frazer made Jul 8 at 2024 12:26 PM2024-07-08T12:26:00-04:002024-07-08T12:26:00-04:00LTC Jason Mackay8807452<div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>Having commanded a Garrison, I can tell you DoD Police do not have the same responsibility to UCMJ as military members. Head on down to your local CPAC and the Union for that area and tell me what you find. There is some pros and cons to realigning the law enforcement mission from Garrison and creating a larger DoD contingent to take it on. The largest argument I can think of is if there is a law enforcement mission in a deployed environment, the MPs need to at least rotate through LE assignments so they can do it down range. Experience in patrol and investigation are essential. Only one way to get it…Response by LTC Jason Mackay made Jul 8 at 2024 1:04 PM2024-07-08T13:04:58-04:002024-07-08T13:04:58-04:00MSG Thomas Currie8807651<div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>This is an issue that has many threads tangled in the knot.<br /><br />DOD Police are not really a one-for-one tradeoff with MPs for garrison law enforcement. Just one of the considerations with DOD Police is the fact that they are civilian employees with union contracts and complex rules. Also, they work for the Garrison Commander, not the Tenant unit commander even when that tenant thinks they own the whole post. <br /><br />Another consideration is the simple fact that they are not seen as "one of our own" by soldiers and they don't see soldiers as one of their own either.<br /><br />Using MPs for garrison law enforcement in CONUS today is sometimes little more than busy work to give the MP unit something to do.<br /><br />MPs have a variety of wartime missions -- many of which simply don't get practiced very well in peacetime, even during exercises. Any thoughts about eliminating the MP Corps would need to include plans to meet those wartime missions. You don't need to look very far back in US military history to see instances of how bad things can get when those missions are not included in planning and staffing. <br /><br />I remain aghast that we failed to re-learn the lessons and failed to re-establish the Constabulary Corps.Response by MSG Thomas Currie made Jul 8 at 2024 6:04 PM2024-07-08T18:04:47-04:002024-07-08T18:04:47-04:00MSgt Steven Holt, NRP, CCEMT-P8807751<div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>A few years ago, the AF in it's infinite stupidity...uh, I mean wisdom....thought eliminating the Security Forces AFSC and replacing them with DoD contract police would be a great "cost saving" measure. That proved to be a COLOSSAL failure when it came time for extra base/post patrols, increased security checks at sensitive asset (ie: WSU, critical infrastructure, etc), and sending troops downrange to secure airfields in Afghanistan and Iraq. The union(s) that control the DoD police units basically to the AF to go fornicate themselves as those functions were not part of their contract. Oddly, the 3P0X1 AFSC made a miraculous reemergence.Response by MSgt Steven Holt, NRP, CCEMT-P made Jul 8 at 2024 7:23 PM2024-07-08T19:23:31-04:002024-07-08T19:23:31-04:00SGT Anthony Tipton8809358<div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>MP Corps is great experience if someone is wanting to continue in law enforcement after service ends. MP's are more respected than DOD officers.Response by SGT Anthony Tipton made Jul 10 at 2024 9:47 AM2024-07-10T09:47:58-04:002024-07-10T09:47:58-04:00MSG Bennie Davis8812971<div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>During my time in the National Guard, I was once a 13B. Our state needed 31Bs for deployments but didn't have enough in the state to fill all the missions. So to be able to fill everything that NGB had sent down, they retrained a whole BN at Ft. Leonard Wood, MO to complete these garrison missions. This was during '04 - '05 when the 25th MP BDE and the 25th INF BDE was in Afghanistan. Also units were deployed to replace AD units in Germany that were deployed to Afghanistan. After that deployment we had a 2 yr down time before our next deployment to Iraq in '07 - '08. The MP Corp has been around since Sep 1941 but has seen engagements since WW I, so in my opinion the MP Corp is here to stay. Either it be in garrison or in other duties!!Response by MSG Bennie Davis made Jul 13 at 2024 10:58 PM2024-07-13T22:58:46-04:002024-07-13T22:58:46-04:00LCDR Private RallyPoint Member8830809<div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>The navy does things like this on occasion, too. "We can save money by eliminating/merging this rating!!!"<br /><br />Eventually, we re-introduce the rating. I'm still waiting for someone to have the common sense to split the LS ratings back into AK/SK. At that point, I can retire, since clear heads will have finally returned.Response by LCDR Private RallyPoint Member made Aug 1 at 2024 1:26 AM2024-08-01T01:26:03-04:002024-08-01T01:26:03-04:00SPC Richard White8858507<div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>A very stupid ideaResponse by SPC Richard White made Aug 31 at 2024 11:25 PM2024-08-31T23:25:01-04:002024-08-31T23:25:01-04:001LT Tony Chiavacci8860321<div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>Been over 35 years since my ETS buy we fulfilled a role in central America no other type of unit could have. Back then in some 3rd world countries they are willing to accept MPs vs infantry because they saw them as less of a threat even though our MTOE was heavier than a light infantry unit. If this still holds true, I don't see how they can be eliminated. Not to mention the POW and battlefield traffic ops.Response by 1LT Tony Chiavacci made Sep 3 at 2024 9:09 AM2024-09-03T09:09:11-04:002024-09-03T09:09:11-04:00MSG Thomas Currie8899875<div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>Let me pose a completely different possibility.<br />Suppose we completely restructure the MP Corps, replacing it with a properly organized and properly equipped Constabulary Corps.<br /><br />Yes I realize this proposal is just 20 years late -- we should have seen the coming need after Gulf War I, and even the completely deaf dumb and blind should have seen it in the aftermath of Afghanistan and Gulf War II when we spent decades trying to use random combat arms units as Constabulary.Response by MSG Thomas Currie made Nov 4 at 2024 1:31 PM2024-11-04T13:31:06-05:002024-11-04T13:31:06-05:00COL Private RallyPoint Member8907612<div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>Sounds like a bad "rumor".Response by COL Private RallyPoint Member made Nov 20 at 2024 8:53 AM2024-11-20T08:53:16-05:002024-11-20T08:53:16-05:00MSgt Neil Greenfield8909015<div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>The USCG has seven different roles, including:<br />Maritime Law Enforcement: The Maritime Law Enforcement mission program protects America's maritime borders, defends the Nation's maritime sovereignty, facilitates legitimate use of the waterways, and suppresses violations of U.S. Federal law on, under, and over the seas to include illegal migration and Transnational Organized Crime.<br /><br />The Army also has the United States Army Criminal Investigation Division (CID), which I always thought was part of the MP Corp, but I suppose it isn’t really. <br />Why not transform the MP Corp into something like what the USCG does in the area of law enforcement, including what MP’s do during war time?Response by MSgt Neil Greenfield made Nov 22 at 2024 3:42 PM2024-11-22T15:42:16-05:002024-11-22T15:42:16-05:00SP5 Donna Barr8909439<div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>I think we all know what it's like to deal with VA contractors.Response by SP5 Donna Barr made Nov 23 at 2024 11:48 AM2024-11-23T11:48:44-05:002024-11-23T11:48:44-05:00COL David Turk8909483<div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>Unless things have changed over the last twenty years, military police are not just post police officers, they have a combat mission, which ranges from glorified infantry to rear area security. Then there the conflict resolution part.Response by COL David Turk made Nov 23 at 2024 1:20 PM2024-11-23T13:20:34-05:002024-11-23T13:20:34-05:00SSG Brian G.8909501<div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>Personally I think it is stupid, reckless and an invitation for problems. This smacks of political maneuvering and some pencil pushing number cruncher selling this as a great idea because it means that they are delegating these functions to non war fighters and shifting military personnel over to different areas.Response by SSG Brian G. made Nov 23 at 2024 1:51 PM2024-11-23T13:51:41-05:002024-11-23T13:51:41-05:00SPC Matt Ovaska8911710<div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>In basic, I was told to escort an prisoner to the brig. He sat across from me in the back of a 3/4 ton. They handed me a 45 and said, If he escapes I would serve out his sentence. I put a round in the chamber, turned the safety off, and told him, "I'm not going to serve out your sentence.Response by SPC Matt Ovaska made Nov 28 at 2024 8:57 AM2024-11-28T08:57:42-05:002024-11-28T08:57:42-05:00SGM Bobby Langford Sr8922740<div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>I was Military Police for thirty-years, as I also served in Correction, attended Military Security as well as Special Operation and I also served with DOD Police, they are just as qualify as military police and that free up Military Police to participate in field training, preparing them for the Battlefields condition.Response by SGM Bobby Langford Sr made Dec 24 at 2024 3:04 PM2024-12-24T15:04:01-05:002024-12-24T15:04:01-05:00MSG Frank Kapaun8923403<div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>MPs = Mop Pushers….Response by MSG Frank Kapaun made Dec 26 at 2024 1:18 PM2024-12-26T13:18:51-05:002024-12-26T13:18:51-05:00PO1 Todd B.8923643<div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>I don't see how they could remove military police units. One huge problem would come in combat zones. It is the MP units that deal with prisoners of war and others. They are also responsible for flow of military traffic and checkpoints for that traffic. Who do they think they will use in the next war? Civilian DoD employees in a combat zone? Yea good luck with that.Response by PO1 Todd B. made Dec 26 at 2024 11:14 PM2024-12-26T23:14:35-05:002024-12-26T23:14:35-05:00LtCol Paul Bowen8924091<div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>Military Police throughout the Armed Services have a primary COMBAT SERVICE SUPPORT MISSION.<br /><br />That involves training in tactical communications, tactical operational planning and deployment. Heavy Weapons Training. They setup and run POW and Displaced Persons Compounds IAW GENEVA CONVENTIONS, UCMJ, MILITARY COMMISSIONS, CONGRESSIONAL OVERSIGHT, and the SCOTUS.<br /><br />The MP MISSION needs advocacy from an MP CENTRIC COMMAND STRUCTURE.<br /><br />This is not a RENT-A-COP MISSION. <br /><br />This decentralization effort is stupid and shortsighted.Response by LtCol Paul Bowen made Dec 28 at 2024 12:40 AM2024-12-28T00:40:59-05:002024-12-28T00:40:59-05:00SPC James Fitzpatrick8924188<div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>As a former enlisted man, I HATE MPs! But someone has to do this kind of duty, so it's unlikely to ever happen. Remember, MPs don't just persecute poor, innocent soldiers. They also serve as traffic cops, provide rear-area security, and guard POWs.Response by SPC James Fitzpatrick made Dec 28 at 2024 9:37 AM2024-12-28T09:37:54-05:002024-12-28T09:37:54-05:001SG Mark Colomb8924201<div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>The gross dereliction will come to fruition in about ten years when there are no peacekeepers on the battlefield or in garrison.<br /><br />Leadership has decided the only two sets of eyes and ears for the Commander, MP and Cav Scout are obsolete.<br /><br />May God save us from the imbeciles.Response by 1SG Mark Colomb made Dec 28 at 2024 9:57 AM2024-12-28T09:57:02-05:002024-12-28T09:57:02-05:00TSgt Curt Pozgay8924249<div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>Or, they can do what they did to us in the Air Guard. They made us (USAF Security Police) attend a 2 week Peace Officers course with the Sheriff’s Department. Which indemnified us on the civilian side of the house for civilian incidents, and to enforce the UCMJ on the military side of the house.Response by TSgt Curt Pozgay made Dec 28 at 2024 12:53 PM2024-12-28T12:53:16-05:002024-12-28T12:53:16-05:00PO1 Kevin Dougherty8924522<div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>MPs are not a thing we have in the USCG, but my impression from a couple MP types I have met is that they possess certain skills that regular combat troops lack which prove valuable in a deployed and less than friendly environment.Response by PO1 Kevin Dougherty made Dec 29 at 2024 12:30 AM2024-12-29T00:30:44-05:002024-12-29T00:30:44-05:00SPC William Wells8924528<div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>I think that it was a bad decision. I was a 95B10 and you need people that are of the troops to police the troops. These Dod are just rent a cops.Response by SPC William Wells made Dec 29 at 2024 3:24 AM2024-12-29T03:24:42-05:002024-12-29T03:24:42-05:00SFC Eric Harmon8924664<div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>It is completely ridiculous. More and more of the Army is being contracted out. That may semi-work in a garrison environment, it is completely unworkable in a war time theater. This is the work of lobbyists trying to get contracts for donors. We saw this ridiculous BS in both Iraq and Afghanistan, jobs that should have been handled in house were contracted out to companies like Haliburton. Follow the money trail.Response by SFC Eric Harmon made Dec 29 at 2024 2:34 PM2024-12-29T14:34:27-05:002024-12-29T14:34:27-05:00SGT Elder Franklin Jones8984795<div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>DOD Police will protect the Troops and installations for their paychecks and overtime Military Police will protect the same based on honor, espirit de corps, soldiering and most of all with their lives OF THE TROOPS AND FOR THE TROOPS!!! Garrison Law Enforcement should be handled by MP’s, MPI, and CID civilian and government departments should be used in a secondary role or for ground and air transportation to permanent correctional facilitiesResponse by SGT Elder Franklin Jones made May 28 at 2025 1:57 PM2025-05-28T13:57:20-04:002025-05-28T13:57:20-04:002024-07-07T20:03:25-04:00