What reg or memo states that a 91F can’t be an armorer?

SPC Private RallyPoint Member — Tue, 06 Oct 2020 17:21:05 -0400

91F being an armor? I know there’s some reg or memo stating a 91F can’t be a armor but what ref or memo is it? I can’t find it anywhere?

Response by SSG Steven Borders made Oct 6 at 2020 5:38 PM

SSG Steven Borders — Tue, 06 Oct 2020 17:38:22 -0400

Why can't a 91F be an armorer? What would give you that inclination that you can't be?

Response by SGT Joseph Gunderson made Oct 6 at 2020 8:24 PM

SGT Joseph Gunderson — Tue, 06 Oct 2020 20:24:07 -0400

There's no such restriction. Anyone, regardless of MOS, can serve as an armorer so long as they pass the course and go through the proper process with the local security office.

Response by SGT Eric Davis made Oct 6 at 2020 11:27 PM

SGT Eric Davis — Tue, 06 Oct 2020 23:27:26 -0400

Any MOS can be most unit like the supply people to be the armorer but any MOS can hold that title.

Response by SFC Private RallyPoint Member made Oct 7 at 2020 8:55 AM

SFC Private RallyPoint Member — Wed, 07 Oct 2020 08:55:14 -0400

A 91F can be unit armorer, it's an MOS immaterial position, but the position of unit armorer doesn't allow a 91F to work on the weapons they're trained and qualified to work on. They would be limited to the echelon of maintenance of the position.

Response by SFC Michael Hasbun made Sep 2 at 2021 6:02 PM

SFC Michael Hasbun — Thu, 02 Sep 2021 18:02:39 -0400