What suggestions do you have for renaming DoD installations honoring Confederate officers?

2021-09-08T16:42:36-04:00

Doesn't matter if you agree with this move or not - it's been directed and it's happening. What are your suggestions for renaming the following bases?

- Fort Bragg
- Fort Rucker
- Fort Benning
- Fort Gordon
- Fort Hood
- Fort Polk
- Fort A.P. Hill
- Fort Belvoir
- Fort Lee
- Fort Pickett

Response by SSG Robert Mark Odom made Sep 8 at 2021 4:46 PM

2021-09-08T16:46:28-04:00

Excellent question! I'll get back to you.

Response by SGT Private RallyPoint Member made Sep 8 at 2021 4:54 PM

2021-09-08T16:54:39-04:00

SSG Carlos Madden Fort Polk... Fort Swamp...

Response by SSgt Ray Stone made Sep 8 at 2021 4:56 PM

2021-09-08T16:56:51-04:00

Fort Traitor

Response by CW4 Guy Butler made Sep 8 at 2021 5:07 PM

2021-09-08T17:07:39-04:00

Fort Lee is an easy one - Fort Nathanael Greene, for the first Quartermaster General of the Army; appointed 1778 by George Washington.

Response by SSG Edward Tilton made Sep 8 at 2021 5:14 PM

2021-09-08T17:14:47-04:00

Amazing, more Americans know the traitors than the heros
Fort Bragg to Fort Matthew RidgewayXVIII Airborne Corps Normandy
Cmdr UN Forces Korea after MacArthur was sent packing
Fort Lee to Ft George Custer, defeated Confederate Cavalry at Hanover Pa. during the Battle of Gettysburg.
There are plenty

Response by SFC Jake Middaugh made Sep 8 at 2021 5:32 PM

2021-09-08T17:32:27-04:00

It's humorous to me about how the big Army (and the left side) always tries to change the names of something we've always had & used....
Like the now politically correct term of "DFAC or dining facility".
And yet - we still, and probably will always call it the "Chow Hall"!!!
To me, Ft Bragg has a special place in my heart, soul & memory - and it will always be Bragg, no matter how many different politically-correct left side terms they decide to rename it!

Response by SFC Kenneth Hunnell made Sep 8 at 2021 6:01 PM

2021-09-08T18:01:28-04:00

How about assigning them a number, if you give them a name of any northern person, you can always find a reason they shouldn't be used

Response by LTC Kevin B. made Sep 8 at 2021 6:02 PM

2021-09-08T18:02:57-04:00

I think they should name them after Medal of Honor recipients.

Response by SSG Edward Tilton made Sep 8 at 2021 6:18 PM

2021-09-08T18:18:45-04:00

Fort Matthew Ridgeway
Commanded XVIII Abn Corps Normandy
Commanded UN Forces Korea

Response by SSG William Jones made Sep 8 at 2021 6:33 PM

2021-09-08T18:33:27-04:00

I respectfully decline to offer a suggestion. Jake Middaugh and Charles Hayden are SPOT ON‼️

Response by SPC Private RallyPoint Member made Sep 8 at 2021 6:36 PM

2021-09-08T18:36:35-04:00

Fort Hood to Fort Benavidez in honor of MSG Raul P. "Roy" Benavidez.

As for the others, I could see them being renamed to any of the following due to being Presidents who served in the Army or militia or being a famous general. Alternatively I would recommend Medal of Honor recipients of the State where the Fort is.

Presidents
- General of the Armies George Washington
- General of the Army Dwight D. Eisenhower
- General of the Army (Union) Ulysses S. Grant
- Major General Andrew Jackson
- Major General William H. Harrison
- Major General James A. Garfield
- Major General Zachary Taylor
- Brigadier General Franklin Pierce
- Brigadier General Andrew Johnson
- Brigadier General Chester A. Arthur
- Brevet Brigadier General Benjamin Harrison
- Colonel Thomas Jefferson
- Colonel James Madison
- Colonel Theodore Roosevelt
- Colonel Harry S. Truman
- Major James Monroe
- Major Millard Fillmore
- Brevet Major William McKinley
- Captain Ronald Reagan
- Captain Abraham Lincoln
- Captain John Tyler
- Private James Buchanan

Generals
- General of the Armies Pershing
- General of the Army Bradly
- General of the Army MacArthur
- General of the Army Marshall
- General of the Army (Union) Sherman
- General of the Army (Union) Sheridan
- General Patton
- General Powell
- General Schwarzkopf

Response by Lt Col Jim Coe made Sep 8 at 2021 7:10 PM

2021-09-08T19:10:04-04:00

SPC Private RallyPoint Member has a great list. Wouldn’t object to any of his suggestions. I’ll add a few of my own
Ft Bragg to Ft Pope. Pope was a union general

Ft Lee to Ft Ann Dunwoody. GEN Dunwoody was the first Army female O-10 and a great logistician.
Ft Hood to Ft George Patton. GEN Patton was one of the greatest Armor commanders ever.
Ft Rucker to Ft H H Arnold. Gen Hap Arnold is widely regarded As the father of modern military aviation. Served As first commander of Army Air Force.

Response by Cpl Vic Burk made Sep 8 at 2021 7:24 PM

2021-09-08T19:24:50-04:00

I have a suggestion, leave well enough alone! You can't erase history no matter how hard you try.

Response by SFC Kenneth Hunnell made Sep 8 at 2021 7:52 PM

2021-09-08T19:52:38-04:00

For better or worse each of these people served their state, to say otherwise is like saying that everything that happened while serving was a representation of ourselves.

Response by SFC Kenneth Hunnell made Sep 8 at 2021 8:05 PM

2021-09-08T20:05:05-04:00

Has anyone noticed the Pentagon said they were changing the names of military bases. Every place on the list is a Fort, take a look at the list and tell me I'm wrong, I'm sure someone will say that's not what they meant to say

Response by SSG Roger Ayscue made Sep 8 at 2021 8:48 PM

2021-09-08T20:48:57-04:00

While I am one of those that would not change anything and have some choice words for those that want them changed, here are my suggestions.

- Fort Bragg: Fort Donlon, in honor of COL Roger HC Donlon, Special Forces, 1st MoH in Vietnam
- Fort Rucker: Fort Crandall, in honor of COL Bruce Crandall, Army Aviator, MoH Ia Drang, Vietnam
- Fort Benning: Fort Moore, in honor of LTG Hal Moore, Commander 1-7 Cav in the Ia Drang, from
"We were Soldier once and Young"
- Fort Gordon: Fort York, in honor of Alvin C York, MoH World War I, ,initial military training at Fort
Gordon, service as a Signal Corps Officer in World War II
- Fort Hood: Fort Murphy, in honor of MAJ Audie L Murphy, MoH World War Two, Native Born Texan
- Fort Polk: Fort Poolaw, in honor of 1SG Pascal Poolaw, 3 CIBs Most Highly Decorated Native
American, served in WWII, Korea and Vietnam
- Fort A.P. Hill: Fort Miyamura, in honor of SSG Hiroshi Miyamura, MoH Korea, POW Korea, served
with the 442 Infantry in WWII
- Fort Belvoir: Rename to it's original name, Fort Humphries in honor of Union Army General A.A.
Humphries, it was renamed in 1930 to honor a local Virginian
- Fort Lee: Fort Doss, in honor of Army Medic Desmond Doss, MoH Hacksaw Ridge, Okinawa saved up
to 100 wounded men by lowering them down a cliff, despite being wounded four times
himself.
- Fort Pickett: Fort Gregory, in honor of SGT Earle Davis Gregory, VAARNG, MoH World War I.

These men are all Heroes and are deserving of recognition.

Response by MSgt Marvin Kinderknecht made Sep 8 at 2021 8:57 PM

2021-09-08T20:57:36-04:00

THE ONLY WAY WITH OUT PISSING SOMEBODY OFF IS TO GIVE EACH BASE/ POST A NUMBER!! LOL

Response by Lt Col Timothy Cassidy-Curtis made Sep 8 at 2021 9:11 PM

2021-09-08T21:11:05-04:00

Let's start with this: Fort Tillman

Response by Lt Col Timothy Cassidy-Curtis made Sep 8 at 2021 9:11 PM

2021-09-08T21:11:59-04:00

Fort Lee could be rededicated to Francis Lightfoot Lee

Response by SSG Laurie Mullen made Sep 8 at 2021 9:27 PM

2021-09-08T21:27:59-04:00

FT Gordon: Ft Myer has already been taken so I'm going to go with Ft Wig-Wag (the crossed signal flags).

Response by SSG James Arlington made Sep 8 at 2021 9:31 PM

2021-09-08T21:31:28-04:00

WW Two heroes.

Response by CPL James S. made Sep 8 at 2021 10:42 PM

2021-09-08T22:42:41-04:00

if they're going to erase names from history due to the perceived negative connection then the safest bet is to name them after Latin-based flora and fauna, like Fort T-Rex, or Fort Taraxacum, etc... or is that too aggressive for a military base? anyone?

I mean, if we choose someone's actual *name* then we're bound to end up full circle deleting that name from history in some future politically correct battle because maybe they didn't pick their nose correctly, or perhaps they said something that got tweeted when they were 5 that becomes insanely offensive. Yay cancel culture /sarc/ /satire/ /hyperbole/

Response by PFC Andrew "Tommy" M. made Sep 9 at 2021 2:30 AM

2021-09-09T02:30:18-04:00

Just think of what a huge waste of money goes into these name changes, neverminded the fact that it still will not appease the whinners

But if they must, lets go with stuff like Ft. Trump , Ft. Reagan , Ft. Eisenhower, Ft. Bush, you get the idea.

Response by MSgt Private RallyPoint Member made Sep 9 at 2021 3:15 AM

2021-09-09T03:15:16-04:00

I believe since it is going to happen regardless how one thinks. They should rename them after our Iraq and Afghanistan fallen MOH heroes. It would be an excellent way of showing our respect and showing we really do mean Never Forgotten.

Response by CW3 Private RallyPoint Member made Sep 9 at 2021 9:25 AM

2021-09-09T09:25:05-04:00

Fort Rucker to Fort Novosel (or after one on of the other aviators or enlisted aviation soldiers awarded the MoH).

Response by 1LT William Clardy made Sep 9 at 2021 10:40 AM

2021-09-09T10:40:24-04:00

Here's my list of suggestons:
* Fort Bragg ==> Fort Braggart
* Fort Rucker ==> Fort Rucksack
* Fort Benning ==> Fort Beginning
* Fort Gordon ==> Fort Peachtree
* Fort Hood ==> Fort Hot
* Fort Polk ==> Fort Puke
* Fort A.P. Hill ==> Fort Downhill
* Fort Belvoir ==> Fort Voyeur
* Fort Lee ==> Fort Least
* Fort Pickett ==> Fort Pocket

Response by LTC Larry Burks Sr made Sep 9 at 2021 10:49 AM

2021-09-09T10:49:09-04:00

I support this move. I would like to hear more about this from the DoD and/or whatever committee is officially working this matter.

Response by CWO3 Private RallyPoint Member made Sep 9 at 2021 11:40 AM

2021-09-09T11:40:03-04:00

Fort's Braggart, Crossroad Trucker, Bend and Thrusting, Lightfoot, Hoodie, Eye Poke, etc etc.

Response by MSG Jim Ballinger made Sep 9 at 2021 12:41 PM

2021-09-09T12:41:03-04:00

I see a dilemma in renaming bases. First, I don't think we should honor Civil War notables with this distinction. They were basically traitors to the United States, at the time, regardless of their military prowess. Second, how do you disconnect from the name you have used, for some of us, for an entire career and beyond. I have been stationed an several of those bases. If, for example, Fort Hood is renamed, how do I refer to it in conversations, correspondence, etc. In my mind it will always be Fort Hood. Other bases have such a firm tradition in Army history for example, Fort Bragg.

Response by CPL Adam Schoenwald made Sep 9 at 2021 2:13 PM

2021-09-09T14:13:44-04:00

perhaps we could name them after the environment they are in. lol Fort Hood is now Fort F*uck it's Hot" and Fort Polk could be "Fort Swamp but Good Food" Fort Bragg could be "Fort Sh*t I didn't Know sand could get down there" just a thought.

Response by SFC Hank Gilmore made Sep 9 at 2021 2:31 PM

2021-09-09T14:31:54-04:00

Camp Cluster Phuck

Response by SFC Hank Gilmore made Sep 9 at 2021 2:33 PM

2021-09-09T14:33:16-04:00

Rename Benning to Bragg, Polk to Hood etc… confuse the woke, go back to
Sleep

Response by SSG John Jensen made Sep 9 at 2021 2:33 PM

2021-09-09T14:33:46-04:00

Cp Roberts CA named after MOH Cpl Roberts WW1, a camp named after an enlisted man ? How is this possible?

Response by MSgt Jeff Bailey made Sep 9 at 2021 3:11 PM

2021-09-09T15:11:30-04:00

I'm sure we can find heroes local suitable for such honors, but here's a couple of names just to switch things up a bit. I wonder how many would follow the logic of naming a couple of military locations after Gen James Longstreet and Col John Mosby of the CSA?

Response by MSgt Jeff Bailey made Sep 9 at 2021 3:13 PM

2021-09-09T15:13:58-04:00

I'm sure there are many local heroes from the States where these bases are, but here an idea to just to shake things up a bit. If some want places named after Confederates, how about Gen Longstreet and Col Mosby?

Response by SMSgt Lisa S. made Sep 9 at 2021 4:23 PM

2021-09-09T16:23:59-04:00

Name some of them after women veterans or code talker veterans.

Response by SFC Joe Ping made Sep 9 at 2021 4:32 PM

2021-09-09T16:32:12-04:00

Leave them as is. Stop screwing around. Costing taxpayers money.

Response by SPC Andrew Murray made Sep 9 at 2021 8:52 PM

2021-09-09T20:52:32-04:00

I have no problem with changing the names and I really don't understand why anyone would. I can't imagine any other country naming things after traitors and losers. Each of these men waged war on the United States for the express purpose of keeping the right to enslave their fellow men. Naming a base after a confederate general is like naming a base herman goering airbase. Not only were they horrible human beings, not only were they traitors, they also lost the war so why would we ever honor them?

Response by SPC Lyle Montgomery made Sep 14 at 2021 11:38 AM

2021-09-14T11:38:05-04:00

I think renameing Army forts and other established military military institutions is wrong. Also the taking down of statues of famous militaey people such as Robert E. Lee wrong. This is history. Why should we Americans cow tow to a portion of the population who has their sensetive feelings hurt. I'm not a southerner, but believe history should be preserved. Im tired of a few trying to controul the rest to get their way. The Civil war has been over for a long time, and history should be preserved, not changed

Response by CSM John Mead made Sep 17 at 2021 7:03 PM

2021-09-17T19:03:27-04:00

I'm sorry to say that I'm tired of kowtowing to the political left, catering to the hurt feelings of a precious few, and fixing what isn't broke. These Army posts have had their names for a very long time, and why haven't these cupcakes bitched years ago? However, that's my opinion, for whatever it's worth.

Response by 1SG Cj Grisham made Sep 23 at 2021 1:09 PM

2021-09-23T13:09:57-04:00

My suggestion is the snowflakes buck the fuck up and nothing changes!

Response by 1SG Brian Holt made Sep 23 at 2021 1:10 PM

2021-09-23T13:10:33-04:00

I think "Camp Snowflake" would be appropriate to represent our current time in history.

Response by SN John Dilley made Sep 23 at 2021 1:13 PM

2021-09-23T13:13:09-04:00

Leave the base names alone!

Response by PO2 Adolph Spitta made Sep 23 at 2021 1:19 PM

2021-09-23T13:19:14-04:00

fort pussyfication

Response by SR George Lowery made Sep 23 at 2021 1:20 PM

2021-09-23T13:20:04-04:00

First of all people should appreciate the remembrance and the honor in which they have added to our history . Why is it that people want to destroy our history so as to rewrite the wrongs all peoples have done all over the world. If you are going to rewrite American History you best get ready to rewrite world history, because if you don't change it you will never erase American history. The bottom line is learn from history or destroy your future. Leave well enough alone and learn from our past.

Response by SGT Private RallyPoint Member made Sep 23 at 2021 1:20 PM

2021-09-23T13:20:23-04:00

Ft Patton deserves a look

Response by MSG Private RallyPoint Member made Sep 23 at 2021 1:20 PM

2021-09-23T13:20:31-04:00

I would leave the names alone. These bases are part of our history.

Response by SR George Lowery made Sep 23 at 2021 1:21 PM

2021-09-23T13:21:01-04:00

Leave well enough alone.

Response by SGT Private RallyPoint Member made Sep 23 at 2021 1:21 PM

2021-09-23T13:21:12-04:00

Benning should be named for The Godfather of the US Army infantryman, to Ft Washington. Any armor installation deserves a look at Ft Patton.

Response by LTC Dan Jurchenko made Sep 23 at 2021 1:23 PM

2021-09-23T13:23:26-04:00

Changing these names won't change history and the heroic behavior of their namesakes EVEN IF WE DON'T AGREE WITH THE CAUSE! Leave the damn names alone!

Response by 2ndLt Private RallyPoint Member made Sep 23 at 2021 1:25 PM

2021-09-23T13:25:01-04:00

Fort Walsh, Fort Bray, Fort Leavitt, Fort Tubman, Fort Williams, Fort Walker, Fort Hallaren

Response by SGT Greg Roeder made Sep 23 at 2021 1:25 PM

2021-09-23T13:25:18-04:00

Fort Benning should be renamed Fort Tillman.
Fort Bragg... Duh! Fort Gavin!

Response by SrA Mark Cheney made Sep 23 at 2021 1:25 PM

2021-09-23T13:25:24-04:00

Fort Ragg, Fort Trucker, Fort Bending, Fort Gorgon, Fort Criminal, Fork Poke and so on. Oh those poor harmed adult children this is ridiculous.

Response by SFC Byron Perry made Sep 23 at 2021 1:26 PM

2021-09-23T13:26:44-04:00

Rename them "Politically Correct Crap I, Politically Correct Crap II, Politically Correct Crap III, ect.

Response by SFC Keith O Auspland made Sep 23 at 2021 1:27 PM

2021-09-23T13:27:56-04:00

Anyone of these bases should be named Fort Floyd!!

Response by 1stSgt Deborah J Anderson made Sep 23 at 2021 1:28 PM

2021-09-23T13:28:20-04:00

Good or bad history is history. Leave them as such.

Response by PO2 Nick Barber made Sep 23 at 2021 1:31 PM

2021-09-23T13:31:08-04:00

Name them after WW2 Generals. Fort Patton, Etc.

Response by LTC Nate Giles made Sep 23 at 2021 1:31 PM

2021-09-23T13:31:22-04:00

Ft Bragg should have already been renamed Fort Gavin. There is no one more fitting of having that installation named after home than LTG James Gavin, the founder of airborne operations and tactics.

Response by SFC Private RallyPoint Member made Sep 23 at 2021 1:31 PM

2021-09-23T13:31:34-04:00

21 years in the Army and I never knew these bases were named after confederate generals except the obvious ones. Someone was hurt enough to check.

Response by SrA Allan Yates made Sep 23 at 2021 1:32 PM

2021-09-23T13:32:17-04:00

Here you go: Let's rename Fort Pickett, VA in honor of Democrat Senator extraordinaire Robert Byrd. Let's not stop there, though - let's do it right. Put a life size statue at the front gate, featuring Robert Byrd and Pretendident Joe Biden standing arm in arm, waving. Byrd should be wearing his Ku Klux Klan uniform and Biden should be wearing Depends on the outside of his suit pants.

Response by PVT Michele Bowman made Sep 23 at 2021 1:32 PM

2021-09-23T13:32:22-04:00

I think they should be named after purple heart recipeints

Response by LTC Private RallyPoint Member made Sep 23 at 2021 1:32 PM

2021-09-23T13:32:41-04:00

Change Bragg to Fort Beauregard

Response by Maj Louis Russo made Sep 23 at 2021 1:33 PM

2021-09-23T13:33:40-04:00

Rename them all for Medal of Honor winners from the South

Response by SGT Richard Eberhart made Sep 23 at 2021 1:33 PM

2021-09-23T13:33:55-04:00

At what point do we rebuke this so called “woke culture “ attempt to destroy our great country ?

Response by SSG Stephen Wondercheck made Sep 23 at 2021 1:34 PM

2021-09-23T13:34:41-04:00

Keep them named the same we need to stop changing history

Response by PO1 BrendaLee Lennick made Sep 23 at 2021 1:34 PM

2021-09-23T13:34:55-04:00

I would love to see one (or two) named after women: Since the United States military was established, many women have accomplished unimaginable feats of courage and fortitude that have distinguished them within the ranks, ranging from saving lives as battlefield nurses to defending fellow soldiers in armed combat. The eight women highlighted below were able to not only achieve success within their respective branches of the military but they also positively impacted the U.S. military as a whole. https://online.norwich.edu/academic-programs/resources/eight-women-in-the-military-who-have-made-history

Eight Women in the Military Who Have Made History

Since the United States military was established, many women have accomplished unimaginable feats of courage and fortitude that have distinguished them within the ranks, ranging from saving lives as battlefield nurses to defending fellow soldiers in armed combat. The eight women highlighted below were able to not only achieve success within their respective branches of the

Response by Debby Deal Warthen made Sep 23 at 2021 1:35 PM

2021-09-23T13:35:09-04:00

Fort Alwyn Cashe
Fort Audi Murphy
Fort Roosevelt
Fort boyington
Fort Williams

Response by SFC Sfc Darwin Maring, USA Ret made Sep 23 at 2021 1:35 PM

2021-09-23T13:35:55-04:00

Fort Gordon change to Fort Sherman

Response by PO2 Private RallyPoint Member made Sep 23 at 2021 1:36 PM

2021-09-23T13:36:42-04:00

Fort Gordon -> Fort Magnolia

Response by Debby Deal Warthen made Sep 23 at 2021 1:37 PM

2021-09-23T13:37:15-04:00

Fort Sherman
Fort Sheridan
Fort Stanton
Fort Tillman

Response by SSG Stephen Wondercheck made Sep 23 at 2021 1:37 PM

2021-09-23T13:37:49-04:00

We need to keep them the same name... We need to stop changing history its what makes the USA.. for the good and the bad!! Should we just go and start changing all of the UN history they are just as guilty to fault with Slavery....

Response by SPC David Roberts made Sep 23 at 2021 1:38 PM

2021-09-23T13:38:43-04:00

All political correctness considerations aside (as far aside as possible!), it always seemed wrong to me to name bases after officers who took arms against the United States of America, and I'm saying this as a person who had several ancestors fight for the losing side in the Civil War (and on the winning side too).

Response by MAJ Charles Mangels made Sep 23 at 2021 1:40 PM

2021-09-23T13:40:27-04:00

Name all for its hsot - Home of XYZ - (82nd airborne, Airborne Rangers, Army Aviation, Army Signal corps etc

Response by PO2 Private RallyPoint Member made Sep 23 at 2021 1:40 PM

2021-09-23T13:40:39-04:00

Fort Arnold was stripped of its name and referred to by its location in West Point, NY cause it was considered bad luck to rename it. Perhaps that should be done here.

Response by SSgt Patrick Wahrer made Sep 23 at 2021 1:41 PM

2021-09-23T13:41:01-04:00

How about numbering them then no one can get the butt hurt!!

Response by SPC Gary Hayek made Sep 23 at 2021 1:41 PM

2021-09-23T13:41:54-04:00

Rename them after Congressional Medal of Honor recipients (if possible the highest ranking one that earned while assigned to that base, Ex: FT Bragg - figure out the highest ranking CMH person that earned it while either SF or 82nd Airborne). If the base had no CMH recipients, just take them from the runners-up from other bases.

Response by Sgt Charles Bickhart made Sep 23 at 2021 1:42 PM

2021-09-23T13:42:09-04:00

Medal of Honor recipients.

Response by SSgt Elliot Sartin made Sep 23 at 2021 1:42 PM

2021-09-23T13:42:33-04:00

do not rename any of them . why is the military going woke. i'm retired military and the military has gone crazy since i retired.

Response by GySgt Micheal Boyd made Sep 23 at 2021 1:43 PM

2021-09-23T13:43:21-04:00

Leave them be. Learn from our past rather than rewrite it. Grow a spine "Leaders". Stop caving to the will of these children.

Response by PO2 Cecil Redway made Sep 23 at 2021 1:44 PM

2021-09-23T13:44:02-04:00

Keep them as they are!!

Response by SFC Bradley Lechner made Sep 23 at 2021 1:44 PM

2021-09-23T13:44:09-04:00

I don't have specific suggestions other than perhaps name them after Medal of Honor recipients.

Response by MSgt John Randall made Sep 23 at 2021 1:44 PM

2021-09-23T13:44:15-04:00

Name them after WW1, 2 K, VN, DS hero's

Response by SFC Rick Williams made Sep 23 at 2021 1:44 PM

2021-09-23T13:44:24-04:00

This is getting ridiculous. Why does FT Belvoir need to be renamed? It was named Belvoir because, at the time, the French word meant "beautiful to see." Lord Fairfax built a mansion on a high bluff overlooking the Potomac, and named the mansion accordingly. Today's translation is "lookout."

To my knowledge there was never a General Belvoir, General Lookout, or General Beautiful to See.

Response by PO2 Rob Waldrop made Sep 23 at 2021 1:44 PM

2021-09-23T13:44:33-04:00

This is an insult to those who died protecting the Constitutional rights of the states that seceded. But what else would we expect from traitors in the White House and in Congress and the Senate.

Response by SPC Timothy Rayba made Sep 23 at 2021 1:44 PM

2021-09-23T13:44:36-04:00

Why is this even an argument? These were named for losers who were TRAITORS. End of story.

Response by Cpl Charles Smith made Sep 23 at 2021 1:44 PM

2021-09-23T13:44:49-04:00

Rename after Congressional Medal of Honor recipients, preferably after a service member that was once stationed at that base. If none came from that base then one from the state that the base is in.

Response by SSG Private RallyPoint Member made Sep 23 at 2021 1:45 PM

2021-09-23T13:45:31-04:00

I served on half those installations, not once did I care on who they were. My focus was to do my job, support the mission, support the officers and nco's above me, and take care of the soldiers below me.
Changing the name serves what purpose? Because someone/activist is "offended" on who they were? This adminicircus is a joke!

I'm glad I retired! Since they are going to be renamed, name them after CMH recipients like Audie Murphy or MSG Benavidez.

Response by SPC James Hampton made Sep 23 at 2021 1:45 PM

2021-09-23T13:45:37-04:00

I would love to see AP hill or fort Lee renamed to honor Audie Murphy who died here in Virginia(specifically in plane crash near Roanoke in Catawba). The Roanoke National Guard use both of these installations for training and deployment and would be honor for them to host the name of the most decorated soldier! the 29th division has lots of history and would be the perfect honor for to bear the name "Audie Murphy"!!!
thoughts?

Response by MAJ Private RallyPoint Member made Sep 23 at 2021 1:45 PM

2021-09-23T13:45:40-04:00

Despite the just and appropriate abhorrence we feel at the Confederate cause, these men (mostly GOs and Colonels under the CSA) were in almost every case honorable MEN, upright Soldiers, and in some cases, even vigorously anti-slavery in their own lives & practices, as has been well-documented of Robert E. Lee. Leave them as they are.

Even if there's no good reason to honor the man-- one major base on that list is said to have been named for a deep-pocketed local donor of the Jim Crow era and party, rather than a war hero from either side-- relabeling the bases will cost money the Army doesn't need to spend, on a mission with no connection at all to our principle purpose: to fight and WIN the nation's wars.

Or have we forgotten that that's what an Army exists for?

Response by SPC Curtis Cobb made Sep 23 at 2021 1:46 PM

2021-09-23T13:46:23-04:00

Ft. Rucker to Ft. Eagle
Ft. Benning to Ft. Intrepid
Ft. Bragg to Ft. Vanguard
Ft. Hood to Ft. Alliance
Ft. Gordon to Ft. Defiance
Ft. Polk to Ft. valiant

Response by SPC Elijah Nichols made Sep 23 at 2021 1:46 PM

2021-09-23T13:46:28-04:00

Ft. Benning - Ft. Patrick Daniel Tillman JR.

Response by CPT John Rist made Sep 23 at 2021 1:49 PM

2021-09-23T13:49:13-04:00

- Fort Bragg - Fort US Grant
- Fort Rucker - Fort Sam Prestipino
- Fort Benning - Fort Audie Murphy
- Fort Gordon - Fort William T. Sherman
- Fort Hood - Fort G.S. Patton
- Fort Polk -Fort Joseph B. Adkison
- Fort A.P. Hill - Fort John J. Pershing
- Fort Belvoir - Fort Roscoe Robinson Jr.
- Fort Lee - Fort Joseph Stillwell
- Fort Pickett - Fort Victor Espinoza

Response by CMSgt Frank Dailey made Sep 23 at 2021 1:49 PM

2021-09-23T13:49:52-04:00

Ft Gordon Should be Named now for SFC Gary I. Gordon USA, MOH, no need to change the Name
Ft Bragg could be Named for SFC Randy D. Shugart USA, MOH.
I would suggest we consider All Posthumously Awarded MOH recipients to be honored with the renaming!

Response by Cpl John Mathews made Sep 23 at 2021 1:50 PM

2021-09-23T13:50:16-04:00

I realize that some of these men were great military minds. Still, it does seem wrong to name US military installations after people who took up arms against their country. Yes it is all very complicated and we can’t understand all the motivations and divided loyalties of these men 150 years after the fact. It doesn’t change the fact that their behavior violated the oath we all took when we served.

If I could make the change, I would rename ALL bases using the same criteria: the name of a local military hero. In many cases it would be the name of a CMOH recipient. In some cases it might be someone who didn’t receive such a high award, but is renowned for their bravery or leadership. I would avoid anyone who later became a politician. The person should be deceased, having died at least 50 years ago (hopefully no unknown skeletons in the closet)

Why not, Fort Alvin C. York; Fort Audie L. Murphy; Fort Desmond S. Doss; and so on.

If you wanted to retain some connection to the Civil War, maybe use the names of battles?

Response by SPC James Fleming made Sep 23 at 2021 1:50 PM

2021-09-23T13:50:47-04:00

Jim Fleming Vietnam vet . Leave the names the way they are. I was at fort Polk and Benning . They will all ways be that to me. It seems the left in this country want to change our history , if this is done we will be doomed to repeat our mistakes again.

Response by MSgt Thomas O'Rourke made Sep 23 at 2021 1:50 PM

2021-09-23T13:50:57-04:00

MoH recipients, or Generals Eisenhower, Patton, Bradley, Grant, Sherman, Pershing, and Schwarzkopf.

Response by 1SG Private RallyPoint Member made Sep 23 at 2021 1:51 PM

2021-09-23T13:51:56-04:00

Fort Donald Trump…all of them…

Response by PVT Carl Hockett made Sep 23 at 2021 1:52 PM

2021-09-23T13:52:14-04:00

I object to renaming these military facilities. Don't care if you and/or your higher-ups OR the failed Biden administration care or not. REGISTERING MY OBJECTION!!

Response by SGT Aaron Tollman made Sep 23 at 2021 1:52 PM

2021-09-23T13:52:20-04:00

I agree, they should be renamed for the best of us. Medal of honor recipients from our most recent wars.

Response by Mrs Darryl Coleman made Sep 23 at 2021 1:52 PM

2021-09-23T13:52:29-04:00

LEAVE THEM THE HELL ALONE... THE LEFTISTS DON'T GET TO WIN THIS ONE

Response by Sgt A. Smith made Sep 23 at 2021 1:53 PM

2021-09-23T13:53:43-04:00

Fort Floyd

Response by CCMSgt Charles Breedlove made Sep 23 at 2021 1:54 PM

2021-09-23T13:54:42-04:00

Rename Fort John B. Hood to Fort Audi Murphy....

Response by PO1 Ardith Dressler made Sep 23 at 2021 1:55 PM

2021-09-23T13:55:21-04:00

As a Gold Star Father, Veteran, son of a WWII veteran, father of two marines and one army soldier who died in Bagdad by an Iranian supplied EFP, most would consider me, my immediate family, and my heritage to be one of patriotism. In the spirit of patriotism, I say, "Leave the names of military bases alone"! Bases were named after great patriots who had the fighting spirit in battle that we need to win wars. Do not cave in to social justice warriors and their wonk philosophy. If they had their way, bases would likely all be named after black criminals who were killed by police trying to make a lawful arrest. Your premise to this question is correct - I do not agree with renaming these bases. I will not prostrate myself to this liberal nonsense by participating in these exercise. Have a nice day.

Response by CPO Eugene Gillam made Sep 23 at 2021 1:55 PM

2021-09-23T13:55:33-04:00

Rename Fort Bragg to Fort Rucker, Fort Rucker to Fort Benning, etc., etc…

And tell General Millie to go suck an egg!

Response by PFC John Roscoe made Sep 23 at 2021 1:55 PM

2021-09-23T13:55:40-04:00

Ft. Rommel
Ft. Cornwallis
Ft. Yamamoto
Ft. Koresh
Ft. McVeigh
Ft. Trump
Ft. Putin
Ft. Noriega
Ft. Santa Ana
Ft. Hussein

Response by SFC Rick Williams made Sep 23 at 2021 1:55 PM

2021-09-23T13:55:59-04:00

Regardless what they are renamed, someone, somewhere is going to get butt hurt.

Response by 1st Lt Private RallyPoint Member made Sep 23 at 2021 1:56 PM

2021-09-23T13:56:51-04:00

Forty McFortface NC
Forty McFortface GA
Etc.

Response by SFC Harry (Billy) Tison made Sep 23 at 2021 1:57 PM

2021-09-23T13:57:04-04:00

They shouldn't be renaming the posts, just because someone is upset over it. Many soldiers, of all races, went through these posts, and served proudly, with no questions asked about where they were

Response by CPL Gary Morse made Sep 23 at 2021 1:57 PM

2021-09-23T13:57:13-04:00

Fort Hood ~> Fort (Ann) Richards, former TX governor

Response by SSgt W. Aaron Gregory made Sep 23 at 2021 1:57 PM

2021-09-23T13:57:19-04:00

Doesn't matter what we decide to name them. At the rate we're going with all of this, the Chinese or Russians are going to change the name to whatever THEY want it to be. Chances are, back when most of you were in Basic or OCS, you didn't give a rodent's rump who it was named after years before, or years after. Til now. Ask yourself why.

Response by LTC Martin Glynn made Sep 23 at 2021 1:58 PM

2021-09-23T13:58:52-04:00

Here's some ideas:

Change Fort Bragg to Fort (James) Gavin or Fort (Matthew) Ridgway (WWII Paratrooper Generals)
Change Fort Rucker to Fort (Hamilton) Howze (the father of helicopter-focused Army Aviation)
Change Fort Benning to Fort (Omar) Bradley (WWII 5-star General of the Army)
Change Fort Gordon to Fort (William O.) Wooldridge (first Sergeant Major of the Army)
Change Fort Hood to Fort (Roy) Benavidez (there's already a big movement for this here in Texas)
Change Fort Polk to Fort (George S.) Patton (I could also see Fort Irwin renamed as Fort Patton)
Change Fort A.P. Hill to Fort (Douglas) MacArthur (WWII 5-star General of the Army)
Change Fort Belvoir to Fort (George C.) Marshall (WWII 5-star General of the Army)
Change Fort Lee to Fort (Dwight D.) Eisenhower (WWII 5-star General of the Army)
Change Fort Pickett to Fort (John J.) Pershing (WWI General of the Armies)

Our 5-Star Generals (except for Hap Arnold, who transferred to the Air Force), any Medal of Honor recipients, or other historically significant Generals or senior NCOs from the 20th century would be good options.

Response by LTC Rick Cobb made Sep 23 at 2021 1:59 PM

2021-09-23T13:59:36-04:00

Here’s my suggestions:
Change the name to Fort:
-Bragg
-Rucker
-Benning
-Gordon
-Hood
-Polk
-A.P.Hill
-Belvoir
-Lee
-Pickett
That way you SAVE THE TAXPAYER $ by not changing signs, paper products and whatever else would have to be changed for no reason whatsoever.

Response by SP5 William Burgess made Sep 23 at 2021 1:59 PM

2021-09-23T13:59:48-04:00

Quit changing history. This is not right!

Response by Sgt Edward Allen made Sep 23 at 2021 2:02 PM

2021-09-23T14:02:52-04:00

In a world of political correctness, comma this should be stopped percould be stopped. While I'm a Yankee by birth, having been born in Michigan, I disagree with this renamed things because of politics.
Having said that, if they must be renamed then name them is named them after metal bonnet recipients, or the general or Union officer whofficer who was opposite them.

Response by CPT Kathleen Taborn made Sep 23 at 2021 2:03 PM

2021-09-23T14:03:07-04:00

Fort Belvoir = Fort Virginia

Response by SPC Private RallyPoint Member made Sep 23 at 2021 2:03 PM

2021-09-23T14:03:37-04:00

No Changes. We should not be giving in to these terrorists, and thats what they are is terrorists. History is history and if u do not like it tough get over yourself. It's time to say no to these idiots. If they do not like it then they can do one of two things 1- And this is most preferred, LEAVE the Country and any American citizenship behind and go live on an island that has nothing but rocks or trees and no humans so u have no way of finding out any history on it. 2- Keep ur trap shut and go find something else to do cause we do not care if u like it or not, those are the names. And the fact is that we could find something on each and everyone of these terrorist to rename them or jail them.

Response by SFC Frank DeJulius made Sep 23 at 2021 2:04 PM

2021-09-23T14:04:06-04:00

MOH recipients, as others have mentioned. I try to be positive, but I was born at Fort Belvoir. Will I have to get my birth certificate changed? What will I say when asked "where were you born?"

Response by SSG Paul Carrier made Sep 23 at 2021 2:04 PM

2021-09-23T14:04:23-04:00

MOH Awardees who served at those bases or came from that state.

NO politicians.

Response by SGT Tim Tobin made Sep 23 at 2021 2:04 PM

2021-09-23T14:04:24-04:00

If this is a real thing I am embarrassed for our military. You can't erase history! It is in the past, learn from mistakes and move on

Response by SFC Edward Sneed made Sep 23 at 2021 2:05 PM

2021-09-23T14:05:31-04:00

I'm not really concerned how the military installations acquired their names, but since it's been directed, I would have each installation renamed in honor of a prominent soldier, rather enlisted or officer, who made a big impression on an activity that occurred on that installation, during any given time period. I'm retired, and the posts names occurred before my time, but it's still something that should not be overlooked in this country, to help reduce any form of racism or hate.

Response by BG Edward Burley made Sep 23 at 2021 2:07 PM

2021-09-23T14:07:00-04:00

- Fort Bragg: Fort James M. Gavin - Gavin commanded the 505 PIR, the 82d Airborne Division, and XVIII Airborne Corps (the latter the two largest formations on post); he jumped into Sicily, Normandy, and Market Garden; be began the racial integration of the military by incorporating the "Triple Nickel" 555th Parachute Infantry into the 82d prior to the order to integrate; and served as ambassador to France.
- Fort Rucker - Fort Ed Freeman - "Too Tall" Freeman received the Medal of Honor for repeatedly flying in to support troops at the Landing Zone X-Ray in the Ia Drang Valley, Republic of Vietnam. Appropriate for our "helicopter base."
- Fort Benning: Fort George C. Marshall - the man who planned our victory in WW2 laid the groundwork for all success in both the European and Asian theaters. Appropriate to name the "groundwork" base for Infantry and Armor after Marshall, who also served as Secretary of State and was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize.
- Fort Hood: Fort George S. Patton Jr. - appropriate for our top tank commander to be the namesake of our primary tank base.

How's that for a start?

Response by Maj Sar P made Sep 23 at 2021 2:07 PM

2021-09-23T14:07:23-04:00

I love this idea and to match the reason this is being done, I think it would be great to consider military minorities of note (black, hispanic, women, asian, etc.)

Examples:

Ft Davis -- Benjamin Davis, first black man in the military (reached Brig Gen rank)
Ft Serna or Ft Martinez -- Marcelino Serna, first hispanic american to receive Distinguished Service Cross, Joe Martinez is the first hispanic american Medal of Honor recipient
Ft Calugas -- Jose Calugas looks to be the first asian american Medal of Honor recipient
Ft Bradley -- Ruby Bradley was a member of the Army Nurse Corps and retired as one of the most decorated military women in history according to an article from the USO.

Just a few submissions on my end. Best of luck finding great names!

A few sources so you can potentially consider other listed individuals on these sites:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Benjamin_O._Davis_Jr.
https://www.uso.org/stories/2459-heroic-women-of-world-war-ii
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Asian_Pacific_American_Medal_of_Honor_recipients
https://www.uso.org/stories/2469-hispanic-american-military-heroes

Benjamin_O._Davis_Jr.

Response by PO1 Robert Black made Sep 23 at 2021 2:07 PM

2021-09-23T14:07:43-04:00

We need to look at how they do it in Africa and the middle east. They often destroy and rename institutions and landmarks when a new regime comes into power. Every country that has done this is economically devastated so there are probably a lot of under employed historians and social anthropologists available for hire as consultants.

Response by Sgt A. Smith made Sep 23 at 2021 2:08 PM

2021-09-23T14:08:54-04:00

Ft. Zogbot
Ft. TrannyFace
Ft. Get Dead For Israel
Ft. Fuck Our Own Borders
Ft. We Drone Kids

Response by PO1 Mark Koenig made Sep 23 at 2021 2:08 PM

2021-09-23T14:08:57-04:00

I put allot of thought into what I feel the Army is striving for now.

-Fort Bragg Fort John Rambo
- Fort Rucker Fort Chelsea Manning
- Fort Benning Fort Jessica Lynch
- Fort Gordon Fort John Walker Lindh
- Fort Hood Fort Nidal Hassan
- Fort Polk Fort Woke-ee
- Fort A.P. Hill Fort Lee Harvey Oswald
- Fort Belvoir Fort Jane Fonda
- Fort Lee Fort John Warnock Hinckley Jr.
- Fort Pickett Fort Runamuck

Response by LCpl Thomas Leigh-Kendall made Sep 23 at 2021 2:10 PM

2021-09-23T14:10:19-04:00

Fort Picket to new name John Paul Jones, General Isenhower, Gen Mc Arthur Admiral Burke. WE HAVE MANY USA HEROS AND MANY MEDAL OF HONOR HEROS, WHICH SHOULD BE A NO-BRAINER. CHESTY PULLER, OR THOSE FINE MEN AND WOMEN FROM THIS LAST 20 YEAR CONFLICT

Response by PO3 Grant Skiles made Sep 23 at 2021 2:11 PM

2021-09-23T14:11:30-04:00

Name them after the signers of the Declaration of Independence. Without them and this document along with the Bill of Rights and Constitution we would not be the nation that everyone wants to move to throughout the world.

Response by LCDR John Tempesco made Sep 23 at 2021 2:11 PM

2021-09-23T14:11:37-04:00

This is an absolute waste of taxpayer money and a continuing sign of how WOKE our government and military are becoming. We cannot erase history.

Response by SFC Jeff Orlowski made Sep 23 at 2021 2:12 PM

2021-09-23T14:12:53-04:00

Possible name after Flag Officers and Past Presidents who are only accepted by today's PC society. Which, by the way, I gave up over half of my life to protecting their freedom of speech. T

Response by SGT Nate O made Sep 23 at 2021 2:13 PM

2021-09-23T14:13:29-04:00

Why not just call them Social Justice Warrior Bases 1-10. I’m so glad I’m out. Never thought the military I served in for almost 12 years would become a circus.

Response by PO3 Steven Shetzline made Sep 23 at 2021 2:14 PM

2021-09-23T14:14:37-04:00

Name them after Modern heroes.

Response by CPT B R made Sep 23 at 2021 2:14 PM

2021-09-23T14:14:49-04:00

Every time I went back to Iraq of AFG all the bases had been renamed, I don't know why this is such a big deal and why people are holding onto names of bases that were a mistake from the beginning. The name is not what made Bragg of Hood or Rucker a great place to be stationed, it was the units and the people. Changing the name will not change that, the base, or magically clean out the strip clubs and pawn shops that line the gate roads, but it can recognize some amazing, and more modern badass heroes! And move the focus from failed generals to more decorated NCOs

- Fort Bragg - Ft. Payne (Sgt. Maj. Thomas “Patrick” Payne)
- Fort Rucker - Ft. Crandall (Bruce Perry Crandall)
- Fort Benning - Ft Plumley (CSM Basil L. Plumley)
- Fort Gordon - Ft Bellavia (Army Staff Sgt. David Bellavia)
- Fort Hood - Ft. Benevidez (Master Sergeant Roy Benavidez)

Response by SSG Thomas Roberson made Sep 23 at 2021 2:15 PM

2021-09-23T14:15:00-04:00

FT Bragg...Ft Ft Emerson
Ft Benning...Ft Westmorland
Ft. Hood ....Ft. Patton
Ft Lee.... Ft. Sites
FT Rucker...FT Moore
FT Gordon...FT. Hartman
FT. Polk...Ft. Price
Ft, Belvoir....Ft. Franklin

Response by MSG Victor Soto made Sep 23 at 2021 2:15 PM

2021-09-23T14:15:43-04:00

Renaming of bases should not be for another person. Everyone has some garbage attached to it.
Fort Bragg - Army Forces Center
Fort Rucker - Army Aviation Center
Fort Benning - Army Training Center
Fort Gordon - Army Signal Center
Fort Hood - Army International Center
Fort Polk - Army Special Center
Fort A.P. Hill - Army Security Center
Fort Belvoir - Army Support Center
Fort Lee - Army Quartermaster Center
Fort Pickett - Army Reserves Center

Response by LCDR John Tempesco made Sep 23 at 2021 2:15 PM

2021-09-23T14:15:59-04:00

This is an absolute waste of taxpayer dollars and shows just how WOKE the government and the military are getting. I'd love to see the price tag on this renaming process.

Response by SFC Jeff Orlowski made Sep 23 at 2021 2:16 PM

2021-09-23T14:16:42-04:00

Maybe name after the city/state (Washington Football Team) Fayetteville Stratocratic Base

Response by PFC Private RallyPoint Member made Sep 23 at 2021 2:16 PM

2021-09-23T14:16:57-04:00

Well Fort Lee was named after revolutionary general Charles Lee so I’d say we should rename it to Fort Lee.

Response by CPO James Harrison made Sep 23 at 2021 2:23 PM

2021-09-23T14:23:05-04:00

"Doesn't matter if you agree with this move or not..." Sounds just like something a libtard would say. It ALWAYS MATTERS if I agree or disagree with something. It's my OPINION! EVERYONE has a RIGHT TO THEIR OPINION.

Jackass statements like that show how liberals have no respect for the First Amendment.

As for that fool and his whore in office, I wouldn't piss of them if they were on fire.

Dominion servers and democRAT poll "watchers" determined the 11/2020 election and EVERYONE KNOWS IT.

These "Confederate officers" are just as American as you and me.

Screw your PC BS!

Response by Amn Jack Disraeli made Sep 23 at 2021 2:23 PM

2021-09-23T14:23:39-04:00

Name them Fort Peace

Response by PO3 Carl Denbow made Sep 23 at 2021 2:25 PM

2021-09-23T14:25:18-04:00

Rename Fort Lee as Ft. Milton Howard, Sgt of Company C, of the 5th United States Colored Infantry, who received the MOH for his gallantry in the Battle of New Market Heights (Chaffins Farm). His regiment was also involved in several actions in and around Petersburg.

Response by MSgt Phil "PIMP" Freeman made Sep 23 at 2021 2:25 PM

2021-09-23T14:25:35-04:00

Since it doesn’t matter whether I agree or not which is how RP admin idiots put it, I don’t care what name they end up with. I’ll call it what I want.
RP is as woke as the weak left.
Oh sure, MOH recipients would be great but those MOH recipients better not have any skeletons in their closet or have conservative views because that won’t fly.
If I were China, I’d be in Taiwan tonight.

Response by MSgt Phil "PIMP" Freeman made Sep 23 at 2021 2:38 PM

2021-09-23T14:38:19-04:00

Fort Biden, Fort Obama, Camp Benedict Arnold, Camp Pelosi, Fort AOC… yeah!! Let’s also leave 100s of millions $$ of gear in terrorist hands do they can use that against us. Let’s leave Americans and those that supported us high and dry.
Let’s try Fort No-Backbone. Camp Coward.

Response by MSG Raymond Davis made Sep 23 at 2021 2:46 PM

2021-09-23T14:46:41-04:00

I agree with SSG Carlos Madden that this is a "done deal". We need to make our feelings known on how the bases should be renamed. So by making a suggestion as to who should be considered for this honor, we can some how resolve this and make the transition as painless as possible. But be clear, I am not a supporter of the base name changing!

Response by William Drummond made Sep 23 at 2021 2:53 PM

2021-09-23T14:53:43-04:00

While my sentiments are to leave things as they are, after a lifetime (literally - born in an Army hospital, was an Army brat during college, and retired as a DoD civilian.) around the US military, I know that there are two constants: 1) Hurry up and wait and 2) everything changes.

After looking through a list of MOH awardees and thinking that since we must change, we should choose names of people who served in our lifetimes. With that in mind, here are my suggestions and one alternate.

- Fort Benning, GA → MOH - Vernon Baker, born in 1919, attended OCS at Ft Benning. For his actions in WWII, he was one of seven black soldiers to receive the MOH in 1996.

- Fort Belvoir, VA → MOH - Charles Seymour Kettles entered the service in 1951 via the draft. He served tours in Korea and Vietnam and rose to the rank of Major. Kettles was awarded the Medal of Honor for his service on 05/05/1967 near the Song Tra Cau riverbed in Vietnam. When he learned that members of a 101st Airborne Division unit had suffered casualties during an intense firefight with the enemy, he volunteered to lead a flight of six UH-1D helicopters to carry reinforcements to the embattled force and to evacuate wounded personnel. He returned repeatedly to evacuate personnel under fire.

- Fort Bragg, NC → MOH - Bennie G. Adkins rose to the ranks, becoming a CSM after being drafted in 1951. Adkins earned the Medal of Honor for his service during combat at Camp A Shau, Vietnam, from 03/1966. Adkins served on Fort Bragg.

- Fort Rucker, AL → MOH - Patrick Henry Brady, awarded the Medal of Honor for rescuing wounded men in an enemy-held territory by helicopter near Chu Lai on 01/06/1968. He served at Fort Rucker, as did most Army aviators of his day.

- Fort Gordon, GA → MOH - Leonard B. Kelley was drafted into the Army in 1966. SP4 Kelley received the Medal of Honor for his service during combat in the Ap Bac Zone on 05/02/1967.

- Fort Hood, TX → MOH - Joseph C. Rodriguez was drafted into the Army shortly before his 22nd birthday in October 1950. On May 21st, 1951, Rodriguez singlehandedly charged and eliminated a North Korean hilltop defensive position that had defied three previous assaults. Rodriquez retired after 30 years as a Colonel.

- Fort A.P. Hill, VA → MOH - Ernest Childers was born in Broken Arrow, Oklahoma, in 1918 and was a member of the Muscogee (Creek) Nation and the first Native American to receive the MOH in WWII. He received a battlefield commission in 1945 while in Sicily and retired in 1965 as an LTC.

- Fort Lee, VA → MOH - George Taro Sakato, a PV1, served in WWII and earned the Medal of Honor for his service at Hill 617 near Biffontaine, France, on 10/29/1944. He was hit by shrapnel when his unit was trying to rescue the "Lost Battalion" (1st Battalion, 141st Infantry Regiment, 36th Infantry Division) on Hill 617.

- Fort Pickett, VA → MOH - Rodolfo Pérez Hernandez served in the Korean War. Cpl Hernandez received the MOH for his service near Wonton-ni on 08/27/1950.

- Fort Polk, LA → MOH - Charles Chris Hagemeister earned the Medal of Honor for his service on 03/20/1967 in the Binh Dinh Province. He served on Fort Polk.

Alternate:

- MOH - SFC Melvin Morris was awarded the MOH for his service on 09/17/1969 while commanding the 3rd Company, 3rd Battalion, IV Mobile Strike Force near Chi Lang, Vietnam.

Although there are two black soldiers in my suggestions, I only identified one. The list includes two Hispanics and an Asian. If we are renaming Army posts with an eye toward diversity, then the names should reflect that. I tried to pick people from all ranks (E-1, CSM, 1LT, and BG). I chose troops from WWII, Korean War, and Vietnam. The list includes voluntary enlistments, draftees, career military, and three-and-out troops.

Military historians should fill out the details behind the MOH awards. I went with the minimal descriptions available on the websites I used. (If I need to provide the sources, I will.)

Response by SSG Donald H "Don" Bates made Sep 23 at 2021 2:55 PM

2021-09-23T14:55:31-04:00

My suggestion is to leave them alone, they are part of our history and we have erased too much of our history already.

Response by SP5 Ed McCoy made Sep 23 at 2021 2:57 PM

2021-09-23T14:57:05-04:00

My suggestion is the pansy asses just leave them alone n not change their names unless the all become Fort General Lee

Response by SCPO Rick Hunter made Sep 23 at 2021 2:57 PM

2021-09-23T14:57:52-04:00

I say leave the names the Hell alone. They've been named whatever they are longer than all but a tiny minority of Americans have been alive.
The names weren't "offensive" even five years ago. QUIT coddling a small, albeit very vocal, MINORITY of socialists, commies and America haters.

Response by SGT Private RallyPoint Member made Sep 23 at 2021 2:59 PM

2021-09-23T14:59:03-04:00

Okay, I really need someone to explain this to me, and break it down to me like I'm five: how is it any sort of acceptable to celebrate people who, at the end of the day, fought a war to be honest-to-god not-Americans?

For the purposes and contexts of this discussion, I don't care how you feel about the causes behind the Civil War, the personal stances of the men the bases were named after, their accomplishments, any of it. At the end of the day, they went to war for the sole purpose of creating their own sovereign nation that was no longer subject to the Constitution of the United States, the document each and every person on this forum swears an oath to uphold. Why are we still trying to honor these *LITERAL TRAITORS* in 2021?

Response by PO2 Mark Slay made Sep 23 at 2021 2:59 PM

2021-09-23T14:59:46-04:00

LEAVE AMERICAN HISTORY INTACT !

Response by SSG Shawn Mcfadden made Sep 23 at 2021 3:00 PM

2021-09-23T15:00:52-04:00

Start by looking at African Americans, Hispanic Americans, Asian Americans, that served in the same wars as these Confederates the bases are named after.

Response by SPC James Drury made Sep 23 at 2021 3:02 PM

2021-09-23T15:02:05-04:00

1. Fort AOC 6. Fort Epstein
2. Fort Pelosi 7. Fort Cuomo
3. Fort Obama 8. Fort Putin
4. Fort Hillary 9. Fort Schiff
5. Fort Comey 10. Fort Taliban

That'll make the all the "Woke" folks real happy and we won't hear about changing historical names ever again.

Response by LCDR Margaret Jacobsen made Sep 23 at 2021 3:05 PM

2021-09-23T15:05:11-04:00

Don't do it. It's a stupid and expensive move. Don't cave to the move erase history. When you don"t learn from it. For instance, leaving Iraq gave us Isis. Leaving Afghanistan the saway gave us the Taliban

Response by PO2 Mike Keyes made Sep 23 at 2021 3:14 PM

2021-09-23T15:14:02-04:00

MOH recipients is a good idea.
Maybe they could be rotated at some interval too- 5yrs, 10 yrs, 25yrs...whatever. Of course there's probably a lot of expense in that; changing letterheads and stuff.
As someone that served aboard the USS Stonewall Jackson I can tell you it does suck to see them tearing down a part of you.
I'll survive though- I just have to get used saying in certain company " I served on the USS (Redacted for your protection) , SSBN (Redacted so you don't accidently google it and injure your feelings, if Google hasn't already obliterated all references to this part of our history).

Response by MSG Private RallyPoint Member made Sep 23 at 2021 3:17 PM

2021-09-23T15:17:34-04:00

I am an advid follower of the American Civil War. This topic gets me hot under the collar however i believe at the minimum they should be reviewed. I feel and argument can be made to consider changing a few. Example Ft Benning, he never served the US Army same with John Gordon and Edmund Rucker. Now an argument can be made that Gordon was a US Senator and GA governor thats why the Fort is named after him. Benning on the other hand was a lawyer and Rucker a railroad businessman. All the rest Lee, Hood, Beauregard, Bragg, Hill, Polk, and Pickett all served in the US Army some with distinction prior to the Civil War. I think u have to take that into consideration when trying to change a name. Now if u want to name after MOH recipient's I am ok with that. I would prefer an MOH recipient fron that era but naming a southern Army base after a Northern MOH recipient may stir the pot a little some folks still hold a grudge. I don't think there is an answer that will make everyone happy here.

Response by MSgt Billy Gorham made Sep 23 at 2021 3:21 PM

2021-09-23T15:21:44-04:00

This is a sad state of affairs for the Army, capitulating to whining morons, however, if it has to be, then I agree with naming them after MoH recipients.

Response by SP6 Chris Cox made Sep 23 at 2021 3:26 PM

2021-09-23T15:26:28-04:00

I am suggesting that renaming the DOD and other government buildings after Medal of Honor recipients from the Viet Nam, Desert Storm, Iraq Freedom, and Afghanistan Armed Conflicts. Those great leaders will be replaced by those who gave all that we may be free.
[login to see]

Response by Sgt David Derrickson made Sep 23 at 2021 3:28 PM

2021-09-23T15:28:48-04:00

from: Fort Bragg
to: Fort Griffin
Sgt. First Class Jeremy W. Griffin, September 16, 2019, 1st SFG(A)-Combat-K.I.A. or a medal of honor recipient from that base.

Response by LTC Eugene Chu made Sep 23 at 2021 3:30 PM

2021-09-23T15:30:58-04:00

Late suggestions, find other distinguished military members with same last names. One Wisconsin state senator proposed renaming Fort Bragg based on Confederate Braxton having a Union cousin named Edward

https://legis.wisconsin.gov/senate/05/kooyenga/press-releases/resolution-urges-renaming-base-for-edward-s-bragg-wisconsin-hero/

Resolution Urges Renaming Base for Edward S. Bragg, Wisconsin Hero

A resolution circulated in the Wisconsin State Senate today by Sen. Dale Kooyenga (R-Brookfield) urges a federal commission to rename Fort Bragg, a U.S. military base in North Carolina—to Fort Bragg.

Response by LCpl Dylan Burkley made Sep 23 at 2021 3:34 PM

2021-09-23T15:34:39-04:00

Name them after famous chinamen, Biden will approve of that.

Response by SPC(P) Craig Kupras made Sep 23 at 2021 3:36 PM

2021-09-23T15:36:46-04:00

Fort Woke
Fort Diversity
Fort Affirmative Action
Fort Biden
Fort Obama
Fort Kabul

Response by SPC Will Thorson made Sep 23 at 2021 3:39 PM

2021-09-23T15:39:06-04:00

I have a couple...Ft Benning- Audie Murphy. Ft Bragg- Gavin . Ft Stewart- sherman

Response by SSgt Jim Gilmore made Sep 23 at 2021 3:39 PM

2021-09-23T15:39:19-04:00

Stick political correctness where the sun doesn't shine.

Response by PFC Robert Avants made Sep 23 at 2021 3:40 PM

2021-09-23T15:40:19-04:00

Change Ft Hood, to Ft Benavidez, after CSM Roy Benavidez, MOH RECEPIANT

Response by CDR John Spencer made Sep 23 at 2021 3:44 PM

2021-09-23T15:44:31-04:00

JESUS CHRIST! Do you want to discount every service member in the United States that has served in these great installations. This has got to stop! I can't believe that people and Rally Point want to discard our great history and the great men and Women that have fought and died to create it. It is a disgrace to remove history and the people that in MODERN times have fought and died to protect our way of life and the freedoms that we enjoy. Quit trying to destroy what our children need to understand, to avoid the mistakes of the past and educate the youth of the contributions that these great people have done to promote their freedoms. This is history, let's not repeat it by burying the mistake but bring the mistakes forward and present improvements that have occurred that promote a better way of life for all " We The People " of the Unitdes States. Thanks, Gage spencer

Response by CPO James McGachey made Sep 23 at 2021 3:47 PM

2021-09-23T15:47:33-04:00

How about....nothing. It's a part of history. Teach that.

Response by PO1 Private RallyPoint Member made Sep 23 at 2021 3:47 PM

2021-09-23T15:47:46-04:00

About renaming bases, I think anyone supporting this has lost there minds.
Have you not heard the saying "those who erase history is dome to repeat it?" I'm just saying!

Response by SPC(P) Timothy Adkins made Sep 23 at 2021 3:48 PM

2021-09-23T15:48:55-04:00

They should name it for corporate sponsors. Fort Raytheon, Fort Sig, Boeing Air Force Base. You can replace those silly unit patches with ads too! Auction of sponsorship rights. Might help us trim the debt.

Response by SFC Louis Willhauck, MSM, JSCM, and ARCOM made Sep 23 at 2021 3:52 PM

2021-09-23T15:52:02-04:00

Fort Floyd needs to be in there somewhere!

Response by SSG Tim Lutz made Sep 23 at 2021 3:55 PM

2021-09-23T15:55:41-04:00

Ft Benning to Ft. Patton

Response by MSG(P) Private RallyPoint Member made Sep 23 at 2021 3:57 PM

2021-09-23T15:57:55-04:00

Name them after battlefields, and past wars besides the Civil War....NO names of generals or soldiers...

Response by MSG Robert Adams made Sep 23 at 2021 4:00 PM

2021-09-23T16:00:30-04:00

Leave the names alone. There is no reason to change them.

Response by Randall Nagy made Sep 23 at 2021 4:00 PM

2021-09-23T16:00:52-04:00

Rename each for a battle WON by the Union?
--Randall Nagy

Response by LCpl Kevin Bryson made Sep 23 at 2021 4:07 PM

2021-09-23T16:07:47-04:00

If they MUST be renamed (although I do NOT agree with trying to re-write history; good or bad), then I agree with LTC Kevin B.. Name them after Medal of Honor recipients. But I believe in my heart that they should be left as is.

Response by LCDR Rich Bilskis made Sep 23 at 2021 4:10 PM

2021-09-23T16:10:55-04:00

Fort Bragg Fort W.M. Bryant CMH Vietnam
Fort Benning Fort T.M. Carter CMH Afghanistan
Fort Hood Fort J.M. Lopez CMH WW2
Fort A.P. Hill Fort A.C. York CMH WW1
Fort Lee Fort A.L. Murphy CMH WW2
Fort Rucker Fort Thomas Payne CMH Iraq
Fort Gordon Fort Ernest Childers CMH WW2
Fort Polk Fort R.P. Benavides CMH Vietnam
Fort Belvoir Fort J.C. Monti CMH Afghanistan
Fort Pickett Fort L.L. Millett CMH Korea
Camp Beauregard Camp M.E. Walker CMH Civil War

Response by SMSgt Bob Wilson made Sep 23 at 2021 4:15 PM

2021-09-23T16:15:40-04:00

- Fort Bragg--Franklin D. Roosevelt
- Fort Rucker--Abraham Lincoln
- Fort Benning--WEB Du Bois
- Fort Gordon--Benjamin O. Davis, Sr.
- Fort Hood--Richard Edward Cavazos
- Fort Polk--Clarence Leonard Tinker
- Fort A.P. Hill-Albert Lyman
- Fort Belvoir--Ann Elizabeth Dunwoody
- Fort Lee--Ronald W. Reagan
- Fort Pickett--Barack Obama

NOW, piss on this. All the forts are named after a president or a general who distinguished themselves in the U.S. Army. I have Red, Yellow, Black, and White generals. For the "politically correct representatives" in the House of Representatives and the Senate, you can't beat this list. It honors or offends everyone.

Response by PO3 Kathy Getchey made Sep 23 at 2021 4:19 PM

2021-09-23T16:19:06-04:00

Naming anything after someone will always have a blowback of some sort. Even naming a fort or base after a city will fire someone up in 100 years. I'm thinking of Columbus, Ohio. Naming it after Christopher had a blowback.

Response by SGT Anna Tyler made Sep 23 at 2021 4:19 PM

2021-09-23T16:19:30-04:00

You could name them after the town, county, city, state etc that they’re in. Or possibly a DoD themed name. There’s way too many great people to suggest just not enough forts.

Response by LT Alex Corsi made Sep 23 at 2021 4:20 PM

2021-09-23T16:20:01-04:00

This is a tough question because the answer, if any, concerns more than a name change. These facilities are not disposable or forgettable objects. These bases are intertwined with American history and represent the USA in times of great challenge and conflict, forging the country into pre-eminence in the post-war period and helping to forge its culture socially, in entertainment and the popular imagination. Part of their mythology is in the name and to change it is nothing but cheap sticker slapped onto a well known, polished chrome nameplate. It negates the tragedies and triumphs of the USA in the past century.
For a name change to work and become permanent it would have to be attached to a serious event, like war or a challenge where the base, with the new name, becomes noteworthy.
It seems best, in this context, to let the names be.

Response by COL Michael Elliott made Sep 23 at 2021 4:21 PM

2021-09-23T16:21:32-04:00

BG Joshua Chamberlain, who was awarded the Medal of Honor for his actions at Little Round Top during Pickett's charge in the battle of Gettysburg during the Civil War

Response by CMSgt Private RallyPoint Member made Sep 23 at 2021 4:23 PM

2021-09-23T16:23:14-04:00

I do not agree with changing the name of the bases. I just hope this strings out until we get real leadership in the legislative branch and white house that will respect the the wishes of the majority.

Response by SGM Timothy Streb made Sep 23 at 2021 4:24 PM

2021-09-23T16:24:12-04:00

DON'T CHANGED THE NAMES! Undirect the directive. Do not let it happen. The cancel crowd can go suck a rotten egg.

Response by Laura Meadows made Sep 23 at 2021 4:26 PM

2021-09-23T16:26:49-04:00

Rename Fort Benning to Fort Moore, in honor of Lt. Gen. Hal Moore and Julie Moore.

Response by SFC Mark Perkins made Sep 23 at 2021 4:30 PM

2021-09-23T16:30:44-04:00

I have a suggestion, LEAVE HISTORY ALONE. What is wrong with this country? Why don’t you just take the civil war out of all our history books and classes. I suggest we name these bases after camps in Afghanistan or Vietnam to honor the fallen soldiers who lost their lives during these wars.

Response by Lt Col Brendan Bonner made Sep 23 at 2021 4:33 PM

2021-09-23T16:33:14-04:00

Don't change my name, don't change history

Response by CPT Eireanne Russ made Sep 23 at 2021 4:34 PM

2021-09-23T16:34:53-04:00

Medal of Honor winners get my vote, or Buffalo Soldiers or Code Talkers. Their valor is certainly greater than Generals anyway. Audie Murphy for one. Maybe 1LT Vernon Baker (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vernon_Baker) could be the new name for Ft Benning, his citation certainly reads like the epitome of the Infantry soldier. How about we rename ALL posts after small unit leaders, they are the real leaders in the Army anyway

Vernon_Baker)

Response by Maj Donald Parnell made Sep 23 at 2021 4:36 PM

2021-09-23T16:36:51-04:00

Rename them after Medal of Honor recipients

Response by 1LT David Wood made Sep 23 at 2021 4:38 PM

2021-09-23T16:38:52-04:00

I'm not going to pick names. The point is that the existing names don't reflect values that reflect the military now (if they ever did). So what are the modern values we want our modern military to embrace? Diversity? The names should be of people of color, women, and maybe someone of an alternate gender. The value of everyone's contribution? Focus on enlisted personnel. Sacrifice? Names from those who volunteered in the Middle East, or came home from Viet Nam to a hostile nation. Don't ask us for names, first ask us what our key values are.

Response by MSG Nick C. made Sep 23 at 2021 4:40 PM

2021-09-23T16:40:20-04:00

Leave everything alone. Most people forget that almost ALL of them served with distinction in the military prior to the war between the States. A nation that forgets it's history is doomed to repeat it (sic).

Response by SFC Mark Perkins made Sep 23 at 2021 4:40 PM

2021-09-23T16:40:49-04:00

Replace Fort Polk with Fort Russell Honore. One great general (LTG) who is still proudly serving our nation long after retirement. And he is from Louisiana.

Response by SPC Ronald Preskitt made Sep 23 at 2021 4:49 PM

2021-09-23T16:49:35-04:00

fort benning should be rename (and i dont agree with re nameing). fort mcgarity for kennth mcgairty . look up his ordeal on google?

Response by 1SG David Glover made Sep 23 at 2021 4:50 PM

2021-09-23T16:50:05-04:00

HOW ABOUT YOU LEAVE THE BASE NAMES ALONE! THAT'S THE ONLY RESPONSE.

Response by SGT Private RallyPoint Member made Sep 23 at 2021 4:51 PM

2021-09-23T16:51:00-04:00

Just call it,
US Army Base, (Post) (Fort), A,B,C or 1,2,3, it don't matter what the name is, we all know what it is. I think the Navy got it right in WWII, Task Force A, B, or C.

Response by Lt Col Timothy Cassidy-Curtis made Sep 23 at 2021 4:51 PM

2021-09-23T16:51:51-04:00

Fort Lee and Fort Bragg could be even easier:

Fort Lee could be rededicated to Francis Lightfoot Lee. From Wikipedia: "...he signed both the Declaration of Independence and the Articles of Confederation..."

Fort Bragg could be rededicated to Edward Stuyvesant Bragg, who (among other things) was a BGen for the Union during the Civil War.

Response by CPT Barb Cosenza made Sep 23 at 2021 4:52 PM

2021-09-23T16:52:36-04:00

How about using some of the past Presidents? Like Roosevelt, Carter, Jefferson, Etc.

Response by Lt Col Timothy Cassidy-Curtis made Sep 23 at 2021 4:54 PM

2021-09-23T16:54:05-04:00

Fort Polk could be rededicated to James Hilliard Polk, a 4-star General who was a USAFE Commander.

Response by Lt Col Timothy Cassidy-Curtis made Sep 23 at 2021 5:01 PM

2021-09-23T17:01:36-04:00

For Fort Gordon: Henry Charles Gordon, Col. Selected for the Astronaut program. Was to fly the Dyna Soar.

Response by SFC Private RallyPoint Member made Sep 23 at 2021 5:02 PM

2021-09-23T17:02:37-04:00

ONly a fool participates in this exercise and only a fool suggests that the names be changed. This is something right out of the book 1984. Count me out and count me as opposing anyone in government who demands this.

Response by CPL Michael Braley made Sep 23 at 2021 5:04 PM

2021-09-23T17:04:35-04:00

Leave them alone, these are historical camps and bases. To fall too these left wing jerks who are communists is wrong!!!

Response by Kenneth Bishop made Sep 23 at 2021 5:13 PM

2021-09-23T17:13:45-04:00

Fort Bragg to become Fort Arthur “Bull” Simons.
Fort Benning to become Fort William Yarborough.
Fort Rucker to become Fort Harold Moore.

Response by SP6 Nearoffutt Nebraska made Sep 23 at 2021 5:17 PM

2021-09-23T17:17:40-04:00

Name them for the state or big city near them. That would eliminate the concern. This inspires pride in the citizens so honored. That was why the Navy named many battleships and submarines after states. The Navy installations already have the location in the name in Virginia. Fort Hood becomes Ft. Texas. Offutt Air Force base becomes Omaha AFB. Fort Polk becomes Ft. Louisiana. Etc. March AFB becomes Los Angeles AFB.

Response by SSG Bill Zopff made Sep 23 at 2021 5:21 PM

2021-09-23T17:21:20-04:00

Fort Bragg — Fort D.C Buell
Fort Rucker — Fort General G.H.Thomas
Fort Benning — Fort A. Burnside
Fort Gordon — Fort Wilson
Fort Hood — Fort J. Chamberlain
Fort Polk — Fort Sooy Smith
Fort A.P. Hill — Fort G. Warren
Fort Belvoir — Fort Douge (native indians)in the area of Belvoir plantation

Most Confederate Generals being replaced with one of their Union Officer opponents.
Fort Lee — either Fort Gen Halleck or U.S. Grant
Fort Pickett — Fort W.S. Hancock

Response by PO2 Paul Dempsey made Sep 23 at 2021 5:23 PM

2021-09-23T17:23:12-04:00

Fort Defiant. Fort Courage. Fort Pride. Fort Heritage.

Response by 1SG Michael Bonnett made Sep 23 at 2021 5:23 PM

2021-09-23T17:23:20-04:00

Sophistry and political warfare entrenches the nation while military officers successfully take control of the nuclear keys without arrest and someone thinks the renaming of military posts for some social justice pyrrhic victory is important?

Most of those posts were named from men from the last civil war. I suspect the renaming will not be finished before the next one...

Probably not a good time for erasing lessons from history...but for a little bit of levity before the war..

Fort Miley - For showing us an oath to the Constitution is not binding if keeping it hinders your political ambitions. Who needs to be in the command chain for 1/2 the worlds nuclear weapons if you can find 13 cowards like you in uniform who will deal you in in secret and suborn the civilian control of government?

Fort Biden - For showing us any crime, like sedition, is OK as long as you like each other and as long as you order the evacuation of an alleys country it does not mater what order you do it in as long as it is dated for political reasons and not military timelines and for showing up as dead American soldiers arrived back in country while watching you watch waiting for it to be over...

Fort Fauci - For designing a way to get most of the ethical soldiers forced out of the military with a virus he helped pay for while lying to Congress about and then getting caught and still not getting arrested...Seeing a pattern here?

The rest of the post could be named for American hostages that President Biden, Secretory Austin and General Miley lest behind...oh wait we would need a few hundred more military posts... or we could punt and use that general who made sure he was the last person on the ramp of the last plane out, except for the photographer...think on the hubris of that...

Response by SGT Dc Townes made Sep 23 at 2021 5:25 PM

2021-09-23T17:25:36-04:00

Ft. Feedom

Response by SGT Dc Townes made Sep 23 at 2021 5:26 PM

2021-09-23T17:26:07-04:00

Ft. Freedom

Response by 1LT Private RallyPoint Member made Sep 23 at 2021 5:26 PM

2021-09-23T17:26:48-04:00

Fort John J. Pershing
Fort George S. Patton
Fort Omar Bradley
Fort George Marshall

Response by SSG Bill Zopff made Sep 23 at 2021 5:28 PM

2021-09-23T17:28:38-04:00

Most of these Confederate Generals were Americans before the Civil War and after. Having military posts named after these great men, not great for their beliefs, great for their stand and service to their country. We don’t just remember them as great men, but as former slave owner's who were defeated. Their cause was defeated and their slaves freed; we must remember the past to keep from being repeated, not allowing anyone from America to be enslaved ever again. We need to be reminded and have real history taught at all levels of education.

Response by Col Javier Abreu made Sep 23 at 2021 5:36 PM

2021-09-23T17:36:04-04:00

Leave it like it is.

Response by MAJ Marc Yergin made Sep 23 at 2021 5:36 PM

2021-09-23T17:36:31-04:00

I believe it is time to demote confederate officers who fought against the United States. To me, renaming these bases for MOH awardees would be m most appropriate. It its going to happen, but let's do it right for once, being careful to use a curated list of white and people of color.

Response by CSM Private RallyPoint Member made Sep 23 at 2021 5:38 PM

2021-09-23T17:38:08-04:00

Our history will always be with us, both good and bad. The names of the bases should not be changed.

Response by MAJ Sean Fay made Sep 23 at 2021 5:39 PM

2021-09-23T17:39:55-04:00

We should affirm their names are:
- Fort Bragg
- Fort Rucker
- Fort Benning
- Fort Gordon
- Fort Hood
- Fort Polk
- Fort A.P. Hill
- Fort Belvoir
- Fort Lee
- Fort Picket

Response by PO1 Ronald Fisher made Sep 23 at 2021 5:43 PM

2021-09-23T17:43:37-04:00

Leave the names of the bases alone. The DOD needs to stop caving to cancel culture. Our enemies (China, N. Korea, Russia, Taliban, ISIS, etc) is where our focus should be. Not renaming bases because it hurts someone's feelings.

Response by Dieudonne Magloire Kamga made Sep 23 at 2021 5:43 PM

2021-09-23T17:43:38-04:00

I suggest that these names remain the same to clearly bear the original names of the military bases so it is

Response by SP5 Gerald Santomassimo made Sep 23 at 2021 5:44 PM

2021-09-23T17:44:45-04:00

Leave them all alone! FFS, no one has the right to erase history. Period.
The military is rapidly losing its effectiveness with this systematic purge of patriotic Americans and anti-white propaganda programs like CRT. The top staff officers are all Obama-approved sycophants to the communist-democrats. The recent CF in Afghanistan is proof-positive of this. Now, they're going along with the known- and self-described communist BLM to remove our American heritage. Enough!

Response by SPC Gregory Whaley made Sep 23 at 2021 5:46 PM

2021-09-23T17:46:21-04:00

Naming them after medal of honor recipients was the best idea I read here, as long as they are not recipients of the medal for action that occurred during the Civil War. That wouldn't hardly be right since many of these bases are named after men/officers that did their best to serve their country, which was the Confederate States of America in that same war. These states and men decided to secede from a union that had become overbearing and self aggrandizing and fought to protect their right to do so. Maybe its time we recognize and execute those same rights and withdraw from a union that has become a laughing stock to our enemies and allies alike.

Response by CPT Jo Heisterman made Sep 23 at 2021 5:49 PM

2021-09-23T17:49:31-04:00

Look at Medal
Of Honor recipient Cleto Rodriguez for Ft Hood. He is a Texan who fought on Luzon in WWII. See nationalww2museum.org.

Response by AA Brett Pruitt made Sep 23 at 2021 5:52 PM

2021-09-23T17:52:46-04:00

I can not in good conscience give a serious reply to this childish and selfish nonsense. I considered making fun of this with unrealistic comedic responses but thought this situation was really too serious to make light of. I agree with LTC Kevin B. that they should be named after great people such as MOH recipients. Unfortunately, I am quite sure our suggestions will not be considered. I believe the current admin already has chosen people to come up with suggestions. And unfortunately they will not be the names of people who have done great things for this nation and have made the ultimate sacrifice to allow people such as myself to write this response. ( Fort Hood - Fort Kyle )

Response by SGT Michael Hutchinson made Sep 23 at 2021 5:57 PM

2021-09-23T17:57:28-04:00

They are all names of failed officers, and traitors

Response by CPT Pedro Acosta made Sep 23 at 2021 6:01 PM

2021-09-23T18:01:20-04:00

Name the bases after Metal of Honor winners and / or United States military leaders that returned those particular states, where the bases are located, back to our glorious Union and to victory!

Response by AA Loreen Silvarahawk made Sep 23 at 2021 6:02 PM

2021-09-23T18:02:59-04:00

Some of them should be named after Native Americans. Many answered the call even before "citizenship."

Response by CPT Pedro Acosta made Sep 23 at 2021 6:04 PM

2021-09-23T18:04:11-04:00

Name the bases after the Umited States military leaders that defeated rebellion and brought those states - where the bases are located - back to the Union and brought us Victory.

Response by MAJ Bill Whitman made Sep 23 at 2021 6:04 PM

2021-09-23T18:04:53-04:00

- Fort Bragg - Fort Ridgeway
- Fort Rucker - Fort Rickenbacker
- Fort Benning - Fort Sherman
- Fort Gordon - Fort Walker (Dr. Mary Edwards Walker - only female to receive MoH)
- Fort Hood - Fort Pershing
- Fort Polk - Fort Patton
- Fort A.P. Hill - Fort Decker (Gen George Decker, ROTC commission to 4 stars)
- Fort Belvoir - Fort Lucien Truscott
- Fort Lee - Fort Robinson (Gen Roscoe Robinson Jr. - look it up)
- Fort Pickett - Fort George Thomas

Response by MCPO Joseph Wright made Sep 23 at 2021 6:05 PM

2021-09-23T18:05:39-04:00

Leave them with thier historical names. Forget changing our history.

Response by Maj Chuck Peterson made Sep 23 at 2021 6:06 PM

2021-09-23T18:06:18-04:00

- Fort Bragg
- Fort Rucker
- Fort Benning
- Fort Gordon
- Fort Hood
- Fort Polk
- Fort A.P. Hill
- Fort Belvoir
- Fort Lee
- Fort Pickett
Best I got.

Response by SPC Roy Martin made Sep 23 at 2021 6:10 PM

2021-09-23T18:10:43-04:00

Soldiers are not snowflakes, respect those that came before you and leave the names alone.

Response by PFC Eduardo Lastra made Sep 23 at 2021 6:30 PM

2021-09-23T18:30:58-04:00

Fort Hood to Fort Roy Benavidez

Response by PFC Ron Britt made Sep 23 at 2021 6:36 PM

2021-09-23T18:36:00-04:00

Leave them alone. All installations that were named after Confederate soldiers are a part of history. If people don’t learn that history, then we are doomed to repeat it. Look at what the way our country is divided, Afro Americans, Latino or Hispanic, and White people are against each other again. Everyone needs to learn history.

Response by SSG James Summers made Sep 23 at 2021 6:49 PM

2021-09-23T18:49:39-04:00

The radical Left Socialist needs to leave USA history and where we were trained and lived. I am so sick of Biden and his Mafia I am considering moving to another country more supportive of their .military and vets and citizens. Enough of this BS. SSGT James Edward Summers MACV

Response by PO2 Gary Riedl made Sep 23 at 2021 6:54 PM

2021-09-23T18:54:03-04:00

What a waste of time. How about changing all the Fort names to the same name.

Response by CW4 Private RallyPoint Member made Sep 23 at 2021 6:55 PM

2021-09-23T18:55:09-04:00

As someone who enlisted in 1983 and is still serving to this day; it amazes me how the Democrat Party preys on the ignorant to further their agendas. If the left still thinks having these names is racist and offensive; just like right-wing protesters have now become extremists and domestic terrorists, the Democrat Party should lead the way by renaming their party as well. Remember that party never voted for the 13th Amendment and implemented Jim Crow. As a Puerto Rican who attended public school in Harlem in the 70s, I saw this game up close and personal when the first Black representatives in the US Congress were on display but the school deliberately omitted they were Republicans. My suggestion is to swap the Confederate named posts with the posts that were closed under BRAC. There are some posts named under Union Generals such as General McClellan and this way, you keep the effort partisan, keep it's legacy and also provide a museum and other memorial of sort.

Response by MSG Michael Gay made Sep 23 at 2021 6:58 PM

2021-09-23T18:58:04-04:00

Ft. Bragg could best be renamed in honor of MG Robert T Fredrick. He Formed and commanded the First Special Service Force (The Devil’s Brigade). He earned every valor award except the MOH and eight Purple Hearts as a Colonel, Brigadier General and Major General. Promoted to BH at age 36 and MG at age 37. He was America’s last fighting General. He was an advisor to the forming of the Special Forces.

Response by SFC Ralph Koch made Sep 23 at 2021 7:07 PM

2021-09-23T19:07:14-04:00

As before, the bases should be named for a significant figure born there. For example, GEN Eisenhower was born in Denison, Texas, therefore, Fort Hood could be renamed Fort Eisenhower. Considering he also was the US President to integrate the US military, I am sure each post in each state could easily find a similar naming convention.

Response by SFC Kayla Sondrol made Sep 23 at 2021 7:16 PM

2021-09-23T19:16:54-04:00

No. Cancel culture is a serious problem these days. No bases need or should be renamed.

Response by SPC Private RallyPoint Member made Sep 23 at 2021 7:49 PM

2021-09-23T19:49:17-04:00

FORT ARAGORN, FORT FARAMIR, FORT BOROMIR, FORT DUNADAIN, FORT HARALBRAD

If you're going to rename the Headquarters of the 75th - then it has to be the name of a Ranger. But since MOST real people are assholes, I went to the next obvious place; Lord of the Rings. These are the names of all of the Rangers in the Lord of the Rings that I can remember, and I'm sure that there are plenty more. The Dunadain were actually the people, but their biggest presence were the Rangers of the North.
But I truly think the Army should give Aragorn a posthumous MOH.

for the other bases -

FORT SKYWALKER, FORT SOLO, FORT ACHILIES, FORT PROMETHEUS

Response by SrA Joe Martin made Sep 23 at 2021 7:56 PM

2021-09-23T19:56:15-04:00

Fort Hood should be renamed to honor General Patton.

Response by SGT Don Hollis made Sep 23 at 2021 8:11 PM

2021-09-23T20:11:09-04:00

LEAVE THEN AS THEY ARE. QUIT TRYING TO ERASE HISTORY ALREADY.

Response by SFC Arthur Jones made Sep 23 at 2021 8:15 PM

2021-09-23T20:15:00-04:00

Rename Fort Bragg to Fort Aaron Bank, the founder of Special Forces and the first commander of the 10th Special Forces Group.

Response by Cpl Brian Ruby made Sep 23 at 2021 8:22 PM

2021-09-23T20:22:22-04:00

I will not participate in dishonoring Confederate veterans!

Response by SFC Terry Stinnett made Sep 23 at 2021 8:30 PM

2021-09-23T20:30:21-04:00

Clearly, from the comments, there is great variability in the understanding of our history, and also the honorific of having a facility (of any type civilian or military) named after someone. It's pretty easy in the civilian world ...pay enough $$ and you get naming rights (Invesco Field at Mike High Stadium comes to mind).

Response by SPC Chris Aliviado made Sep 23 at 2021 8:31 PM

2021-09-23T20:31:53-04:00

The navy names ships after heroes and Medal of Honor recipients. So We should honor in the same way.

Name them after army heroes.

Response by SPC Chris Aliviado made Sep 23 at 2021 8:36 PM

2021-09-23T20:36:33-04:00

Ft. Hood should be renamed for SGT Roy Benavidez

NUFF SAID

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roy_Benavidez

Roy_Benavidez

Response by SPC John Waisman made Sep 23 at 2021 8:37 PM

2021-09-23T20:37:10-04:00

Give them all numbers. That way no one can protest the person they were named after. But skip the number 666. And maybe 13.

Response by 1LT John Neil Jednoralski made Sep 23 at 2021 8:44 PM

2021-09-23T20:44:58-04:00

I suggest keep the Original names

Response by SSG David Stifle made Sep 23 at 2021 9:07 PM

2021-09-23T21:07:54-04:00

Name the forts after the men and women who have died in combat, the sons and daughters of Gold Star families.

Response by SSG David Stifle made Sep 23 at 2021 9:12 PM

2021-09-23T21:12:01-04:00

Name each Fort after the men and women who have died in combat, the son's and daughter's of Gold Star Families. It should be easy enough to select a man or woman from each State each post is located in. Reserve one Fort for the hero's of the flight that plowed into a field in Pa. This need not be a sad or bad thing, but an opportunity to honor our son's and daughter's who have kept us safe for 20+ years.

Response by CPO James Walker made Sep 23 at 2021 9:12 PM

2021-09-23T21:12:27-04:00

I agree with naming them after Medal of Honor recipients. Buy this move should not have been made. We should teach history not try to erase it. Because when you forget your past your doomed to make the same mistakes.

Response by SSG David Kaelin made Sep 23 at 2021 9:19 PM

2021-09-23T21:19:49-04:00

- Fort Bragg - Fort James M. Gavin
- Fort Rucker - Fort Harold G. Moore
- Fort Benning - Fort Lightning Victory or Fort David Hackworth or Fort Alvin C. York
- Fort Gordon - Fort Nathan Hale
- Fort Hood - Fort George S. Patton
- Fort Polk - Fort Sill
- Then change Fort Sill to Fort Knox
- Then change Fort Knox to Fort Daniel Boone
- Fort A.P. Hill - Fort Sheridan
- Fort Belvoir - Fort Andrew A. Humphreys
- Fort Lee - Fort Montgomery C. Meigs
- Fort Pickett - Fort Winfield Scott Hancock

I've always hated that Fort Bragg was named after the BIGGEST LOSER general from the losing side of the American Civil War.

Lunacy

Response by 1SG Ken Bedwell made Sep 23 at 2021 9:25 PM

2021-09-23T21:25:33-04:00

Since keeping the name isn't an option. Medal of Honor recipient from the state of the Fort. Example, Ft Hood = Ft. Murphy

Response by 1SG Michael Farrell made Sep 23 at 2021 9:33 PM

2021-09-23T21:33:16-04:00

Where possible, name for MOH winner with connection to the location. For example, rename Bragg Fort Alvin York and Hood, Fort Audie Murphy. Fort Belvoir could easily be renamed "Fort Lafayette" since he has some identity with the area.

Response by PO1 Jd Lawrence made Sep 23 at 2021 9:37 PM

2021-09-23T21:37:17-04:00

Fort Hood - Fort Quanah Parker

Response by CDR Chuck Wolfe made Sep 23 at 2021 9:47 PM

2021-09-23T21:47:47-04:00

-Fort Bragg to Fort Bragg
- Fort Rucker to Fort Rucker
- Fort Benning to Fort Benning
- Fort Gordon to Fort Gordon
- Fort Hood to Fort Hood
- Fort Polk to Fort Polk
- Fort A.P. Hill to Fort A. P. Hill
- Fort Belvoir to Fort Belvoir
- Fort Lee to Fort Lee
- Fort Pickett to Fort Pickett

They were West Point graduates and officers in the Spanish American war before the Civil War. Learn your own damn history, DOD.

Response by SP5 Derick Johnsohne made Sep 23 at 2021 9:51 PM

2021-09-23T21:51:04-04:00

ft Hood into ft Peter H. Bell, 3d governor of Texas . or ft Creighton W. Abrams Jr. where the M1 was assigned .

Response by SGT Daniel Merriman made Sep 23 at 2021 9:59 PM

2021-09-23T21:59:29-04:00

Bragg will be Bragg till I die !!!!

Response by Cpl Ross Curtis made Sep 23 at 2021 10:09 PM

2021-09-23T22:09:18-04:00

Fort Bragg should be renamed one of the following:
1) Fort Victory
2) Fort Spearhead
3) Fort Shield
4) Fort Dagger
5) Fort Eagle Feather
6) Fort Freedom
7) Fort Rebirth

These forts should be reflective of what is done there.

Response by TSgt Oliver Ewing made Sep 23 at 2021 10:09 PM

2021-09-23T22:09:56-04:00

Just leave the names the same. You can't change the past. Why bring names up from over100 plus years ago. Who cares if these installations are named for Confederate Officers. Someday if your family name is the same as one of these bases, by law they'll make you change it.

Response by Col Len Blasiol made Sep 23 at 2021 10:15 PM

2021-09-23T22:15:55-04:00

Fort MacArthur
Fort Eisenhower
Fort Omar Bradley
Fort Marshall

Response by MAJ Louis Giamo made Sep 23 at 2021 10:16 PM

2021-09-23T22:16:27-04:00

Fort Pershing
Fort Patton
Fort Omar Bradley
Fort Murphy (MOH)
Fort Grant
Fort York (MOH)
Fort Benavidez (MOH)
Fort Lawrence Joel (MOH)
Fort Melvin Morris (MOH)
Fort Daniel K. Inouye (MOH)

Response by PVT Mark Whitcomb made Sep 23 at 2021 10:24 PM

2021-09-23T22:24:40-04:00

This is a Political issue. It should have no bearing on the military. Politicians keep trying to bring their views into the Military. It should not be allowed. Without soldiers on both sides in the Civil war, this nation does not exist. When you start bringing race, religion, and all other points of view into this, you diminish the soldiers. I have stated before. the Military should not be run by politicians. People must remember people of many races fought on both sides during the civil war. northerners could have slaves go to war in their stead for a fee. sorry but the whole thing is a crock.

Response by LTC Private RallyPoint Member made Sep 23 at 2021 10:37 PM

2021-09-23T22:37:26-04:00

I recommend renaming them

Ft Bragg
Ft Rucker
Ft Benning
Ft Gordon
Ft Hood
Fr Polk
Ft AP Hill
Fr Belvoir and
Fr Pickett

Response by SGT Stephen Alder, MsED, BA, AA made Sep 23 at 2021 10:49 PM

2021-09-23T22:49:28-04:00

Fort Hood - Fort Benavidez
Fort Benning - Fort Murphy
Fort Lee - Fort Sherman
Fort Rucker - Fort Yeager

Response by Capt Edward Egan made Sep 23 at 2021 10:57 PM

2021-09-23T22:57:03-04:00

Well, if we're "mandated" by the mindless and milquetoast left to change the names of all of the Confederate-named bases, here's my suggestion. Put the ones to be renamed in alphabetical order, then name them " Fort Too Stupid To Understand History #1", then just follow in numerical order.

Response by SR Scott Anderson made Sep 23 at 2021 10:59 PM

2021-09-23T22:59:43-04:00

Fort hood = Fort Audie murphy

Response by SGT(P) Private RallyPoint Member made Sep 23 at 2021 11:07 PM

2021-09-23T23:07:15-04:00

I think we should name one base after MG Friedrich Wilhelm von Steuben. He was instrumental in the Revolutionary War victory and professionalizing the Army.

We should also rename one of the posts for General of the Armies John J. Pershing.

Also for Sergeant William Henry Johnson of the Harlem Hellfighters

Dr. Mary Walker, the only woman to have earned the Medal of Honor

There are so many people that are deserving of the honor to have a base named for them... these are a few that came to mind.

Response by Capt Raymond Parks made Sep 23 at 2021 11:09 PM

2021-09-23T23:09:21-04:00

Fort Bragg - Fort NUTS - the most famous word said by a member of the 101st Airborne.
Fort Rucker - Fort Frederick E. Humphreys - the first US Army Aviator
Fort Benning - Fort George C. Marshall, assistant Commandant and champion of the Benning Revolution. He did other things you might have heard of, later.
Fort Gordon - Fort Albert James Meyer, first and only Signal Corps Officer for three years
Fort Hood - Fort Robert L. Howze, Medal of Honor recipient and first commander of the "First Team"
Fort Polk - Fort Mark Wayne Clark - second in command of the Louisiana Maneuvers which founded Fort Polk
Fort A. P. Hill - Fort William Crozier - 11th Chief of Ordnance, oversaw the introduction of the M1911 pistol, M1903 rifle, M1918 BAR, and M1917 machine gun.
Fort Belvoir - Fort Andrew A. Humphreys - the original name of the facility (Union Civil War general and Chief Engineer)
Fort Lee - Fort Thomas Mifflin - first Quartermaster General, member of Continental Congress, signer of Constitution
Fort Pickett - Fort Lafayette - the name National Guard arises from the Frenchman who fought in the Revolutionary War when he toured the US after serving as commander of the Garde National de Paris during the French Revolution.

Response by Capt George Wolf made Sep 23 at 2021 11:17 PM

2021-09-23T23:17:06-04:00

Since no human being is without vice or sin, eventually all will be found lacking in the eyes of some group in the US. Therefore, I suggest we rename these installations after admirable characters in fiction. Fort Tom Sawyer would do nicely. Fort Sam Damon would be perfect: he was the perfect soldier in Once An Eagle. Fort Natty Bumppo or Fort Chingachgook! Who could quibble with Fort Charlotte, our favorite spider? I would personally love to serve at Fort Rambo, although that is definitely a flawed character. Fort Yossarian would be a good place for...wait, he's another flawed character. Maybe it's not such a good solution, after all.

Response by SPC Keith Lindsey made Sep 23 at 2021 11:20 PM

2021-09-23T23:20:49-04:00

I say we rename Fort Bragg to Fort Bragg
Fort Rucker to Fort Rucker
Fort Benning to Fort Benning
Fort Gordon to Fort Gordon
Fort Hood to Fort Hood
Fort Polk to Fort Polk
Fort A.P. Hill to Fort A.P. Hill
Fort Belvoir to Fort Belvoir
Fort Lee to Fort Lee
Fort Pickett to Fort Pickett.

There. Problem solved.

Response by SSG Gregg Mourizen made Sep 23 at 2021 11:41 PM

2021-09-23T23:41:31-04:00

LEAVE THE NAMES ALONE.
Just find a new patron with the same name.
I am sure there are plenty out there with the same last name.

Response by PO2 Kim Spear made Sep 24 at 2021 12:00 AM

2021-09-24T00:00:45-04:00

Leave it alone.

Response by SSG Deron Santiny made Sep 24 at 2021 12:13 AM

2021-09-24T00:13:20-04:00

In my opinion, if you are easily offended by a name that has been around fora very long time, you have bigger issues that you need to be dealing with. No one was offended by these names until someone said to be offended. Before then, it was ok, lets make our rotations at NTC, JRTC or where ever else they may be going to train or get stationed. The problem we have today is, no matter what, someone is going to be "Offended" by something, doesn't matter what it is. If you paint something red, people will complain because it's not blue. Get the F**K over it, be a Soldier, Sailor, Airman, Marine, Coastie or Space Force and quit thinking everything is offensive. There are lots of things that I don't like, I don't complain about it, I just move on about my business. Unless it directly affects me (physically), who gives a shit what name is on a sign or billboard. I honestly don't care if anyone agrees with me or not, that is what makes America so great, we are all entitled to our own opinions.

Response by SFC Paul Rhoten made Sep 24 at 2021 1:03 AM

2021-09-24T01:03:31-04:00

They are not honoring confederate officers they are honoring solders do not make solders political
Renaming post is just political When I say I went Jump school at Ft Binning No one will know
Where that Post is The Army is not , Military is not Political THEY ARE BOTHERS and SISTERS
IN A FAMILY. WE AS A FAMILY DO NOT NEED TO BE ON THE WRONG SIDE OR SPLIT
I WAS ALWAYS TOLD THAT I WAS NOT BLACK OR WHITE I WAS GREEN

Response by SPC Jasen E. made Sep 24 at 2021 1:07 AM

2021-09-24T01:07:51-04:00

I think it's a slippery slope to judge people in history by modern standards. Regardless of how you feel about them, those people believed in their hearts they were doing the right thing whether we do or not and they acted on those beliefs. Right or wrong, their actions are responsible in part for what our country has become today. While I believe it was going to happen eventually, their actions most likely accelerated the freeing of the slaves. If you feel positively about our country in any way, and why would join the military if you didn't have some good feeling for the country you are serving, then you have to accept that the country is a result of countless events and actions that have been happening for centuries. Whitewashing our history is only going to lead to ignorance on the topic and and ignorance of history, as we've all heard throughout our lives, dooms us to repeat it. So, by today's standards those people were traitors. But their actions are a part of this country. We would not be who we are now if not for them. I know there are those out there that think our country is horrible, and to them I grabbing a globe to pick the next place they want to try living. Make sure you look closely at their history to make sure they don't have any atrocities to account for. Airplanes can reach every point on the planet. And if the country is so bad, why are countless millions trying to get into it every year? Can't be that bad. I love my country--warts and all.

Response by SFC Paul Rhoten made Sep 24 at 2021 1:28 AM

2021-09-24T01:28:21-04:00

They are not honoring Confederate officers they are honoring soldiers, good ones They are my BROTHERS.The army is not political . We are not black or white we are Green we are Brothers and
Sisters in a big family If the army is not then It is losers and i am ashamed to let people know that I was part of the failure. I went their this same thing when I came back from Vet Nam. Get out of the politic-it and stay out

Response by Capt Bill Gaumer made Sep 24 at 2021 1:28 AM

2021-09-24T01:28:29-04:00

None. I've never related an installation's name with its namesake's service during the Civil War.

Response by CPL Phillip Neal made Sep 24 at 2021 1:30 AM

2021-09-24T01:30:53-04:00

Leave them as they are .

Response by Sgt Robert Tygart made Sep 24 at 2021 2:11 AM

2021-09-24T02:11:13-04:00

Name them after MOH recipients.

Response by SSG Leon Laprade made Sep 24 at 2021 3:02 AM

2021-09-24T03:02:40-04:00

Keep them for another sixty years until that generation complains that we committed some atrocity/s because our culture is different from theirs. Was what they did wrong for the time they lived in? In today's society it is wrong, but how did we come to that conclusion? Because of decisions and battles along the way. Now people are trying to erase that history.

If all of these people were on the losing side then why are there so many statues, streets, and buildings named after them? Usually the victor gets the spoils, but that's not the case with these naming conventions. Whether it was done for hero worship or history doesn't matter.

What matters is that every time we see one of these we remember what not to do. Once all of these names have been erased from our country and books, how many generations before something like this happens again? Considering that the US is quickly going down the path that Argentina did it may not even be that long.

Response by SGT Ralph McClain made Sep 24 at 2021 5:09 AM

2021-09-24T05:09:57-04:00

Why change their names what's wrong with the ones they have now. I tell you what you can change fort Hood to the hood because it's all the hell it turned into. Fort polka that's a good one you change his name to fort puke. Fort Bragg that like to brag a lot so you just go ahead and leave that one alone. Then why don't you just change the name of the United States army to the United States transgender. Are the United States gay brigade. Come on I'm sure you can find some liberal bastard and name everything after. It's nothing but a damn laughing stock NOW of the world see this is what happens when you have politicians that want to play generals and generals who wants to be politicians people get killed battles are lost and everything is done and over with.

Response by SGT Private RallyPoint Member made Sep 24 at 2021 5:12 AM

2021-09-24T05:12:42-04:00

Need to leave them along and stop catering to the whining liberals that keep tearing down AMERICA!

Response by A1C William Geoghegan made Sep 24 at 2021 6:12 AM

2021-09-24T06:12:56-04:00

Leave the names the same DON'T CHANGE THEM

Response by MSG Pat Calahan made Sep 24 at 2021 6:17 AM

2021-09-24T06:17:51-04:00

I agree leave well enough alone, but if not MOH recipients, perhaps name posts after major military victories / battles?

Response by LCpl Brett Rinker made Sep 24 at 2021 7:23 AM

2021-09-24T07:23:52-04:00

Honor NEVER changes. Unfortunately our "present" leaders no longer possess any. They either are part of, or have been literally purchased by the treasonous trash that has bought their own office.

Response by TSgt Private RallyPoint Member made Sep 24 at 2021 7:50 AM

2021-09-24T07:50:14-04:00

Name these installations in honor of Medal of Honor recipients!

Response by SPC Ronald Walters made Sep 24 at 2021 7:57 AM

2021-09-24T07:57:07-04:00

Fort Bragg

Response by CPT Private RallyPoint Member made Sep 24 at 2021 8:22 AM

2021-09-24T08:22:13-04:00

Fort Bragg= Fort Joe Biden
Fort Rucker= Fort Lloyd Austin
Fort Benning= Fort Harvey Milk
Fort Gordon = Fort Berghdal
Fort Hood = Fort Pelosi
Fort Polk= everyone hates polk anyway, so it's name can stay

Response by CMSgt Randy Beck made Sep 24 at 2021 8:24 AM

2021-09-24T08:24:29-04:00

It is part of our countries history, like it or not. You can't just cancel the past by trying to wipe away a name! Leave it alone and get on with something more important like helping your fellow man if they need help.

Response by SrA Manny Diaz made Sep 24 at 2021 8:43 AM

2021-09-24T08:43:24-04:00

Keep the names the same.

Response by SGT Robert Bowers made Sep 24 at 2021 8:48 AM

2021-09-24T08:48:58-04:00

NO CHANGES

Response by SGT Robert Bowers made Sep 24 at 2021 8:49 AM

2021-09-24T08:49:58-04:00

NO CHANGE. They were all heroic American Officers.

Response by CDR John Spencer made Sep 24 at 2021 9:00 AM

2021-09-24T09:00:27-04:00

How can we disrespect the men and women that have fought and died to obtain and retain the freedoms that we enjoy today. It is our heritage for better or worse we can't change what has occurred in the past, but we can learn from it and move forward. Leave the Base names in place!

Response by SPC Laura Mitchell made Sep 24 at 2021 9:02 AM

2021-09-24T09:02:46-04:00

I'll give it a try. In no particular order:

Fort (Clara) Barton-Founder of the American Red Cross

Fort (Mary Ann) Bickerdyke-US Sanitary Commission and made Union generals pay attention

Fort (Juliet Gordon) Lowe-Founder of the Girl Scouts, born in Savannah

Fort (Mary Edwards) Walker-US Army Surgeon, Union Army

Fort (Harriet) Tubman-Union spy, underground railroad conductor

Fort (Sharon Ann) Lane-1LT, Army Nurse Corps, KIA Chu Lai, 1969

Fort (Dan) Bullock-Okay, he was a Marine but he was the youngest KIA (15 years old) in Vietnam, and African American

Fort (Oveta Culp) Hobby-First Director of the Women's Auxillary Army Corps (1942)

Fort (Frances) Stanger-LT, Army Nurse Corps, KIA. 1944. One of 4 ANC officers to come ashore on D-Day and ONLY ANC officer to die in the European Theater

Fort (Frances Olive) Chesley-2LT, Army Nurse Corps-KIA (Kamikaze attack) while assigned to the USS Comfort. Okinawa, April, 1945

Fort (Ashley) White-LT, Medical Service Corps. KIA, Kandahar Province, 2011

How did I do?

Response by PO1 Robbie Bell made Sep 24 at 2021 9:10 AM

2021-09-24T09:10:09-04:00

Randomly pick a recipient of the MOH from WW2 or after for each one. Prior to that a lot of MOH’s were politically issued.

Response by CPL Larry Monkus made Sep 24 at 2021 9:12 AM

2021-09-24T09:12:39-04:00

fort lee fort lee

Response by SP5 John Petrasek made Sep 24 at 2021 9:17 AM

2021-09-24T09:17:27-04:00

"One cannot and must not try to erase the past merely because it does not fit the present."
Golda Meir, Israeli prime minister (1898-1978)

Response by SPC Laura Mitchell made Sep 24 at 2021 9:17 AM

2021-09-24T09:17:49-04:00

I'll give it a try. If this is a duplicate, I apologize. the cat thinks she can type.
In no particular order:

Fort (Clara) Barton-Founder of the American Red Cross

Fort (Mary Ann) Bickerdyke-US Sanitary Commission and made Union generals pay attention

Fort (Juliet Gordon) Lowe-Founder of the Girl Scouts, born in Savannah

Fort (Mary Edwards) Walker-US Army Surgeon

Fort (Harriet) Tubman-Union spy, underground railroad conductor

Fort (Sharon Ann) Lane-1LT, Army Nurse Corps, KIA Chu Lai, 1969

Fort (Dan) Bullock-Okay, he was a Marine but he was the youngest KIA (15 years old) in Vietnam, and African American

Fort (Oveta Culp) Hobby-First Director of the Women's Auxillary Army Corps (1942)

Fort (Frances) Stanger-LT, Army Nurse Corps, KIA. 1944. One of 4 ANC officers to come ashore on D-Day and ONLY ANC officer to die in the European Theater

Fort (Frances Olive) Chesley-2LT, Army Nurse Corps-KIA (Kamikaze attack) while assigned to the USS Comfort. Okinawa, April, 1944

Fort (Ashley) White-1LT, Medical Service Corps. KIA, Kandahar Province, 2011.

Fort (Anna Mae) Hays-Army Nurse Corps, first woman to be promoted to Brigadier General. Died in 2018

How did I do?

Response by PO2 Corey Cooper made Sep 24 at 2021 9:40 AM

2021-09-24T09:40:10-04:00

Leave them alone. Changing a name does not change what some are linked to. If you open this door then we will start changing our money (Jackson), schools, streets, processes etc. Yes men and women are linked to horrible things, and if we look in the mirror we are all guilty of association to something. We can not fix historical issues, but learn by them.

Response by SPC Richard Rauenhorst made Sep 24 at 2021 9:49 AM

2021-09-24T09:49:26-04:00

I would remove the "Fort" from the name as they really are not Forts and give them a name that corresponds to the state and training.
Fort Bragg could become North Carolina Pain Endurance.
Fort Hood could become Texas Commode of the Continent.
This is how I remember them.

Response by CPT Michael Martin made Sep 24 at 2021 10:08 AM

2021-09-24T10:08:36-04:00

'Fort Trump', Posts 1-10

Response by SGM Private RallyPoint Member made Sep 24 at 2021 11:17 AM

2021-09-24T11:17:29-04:00

Fort Benedict Arnold
Fort Chelsea Manning
Fort Bowe Bergdahl
Fort Robert Hanssen
Fort Aldrich Ames
Fort Julius Rosenberg
Fort Noshir Gowadia
Fort Ana Montes
Fort Edward Snowden
Fort John Anthony Walker (Probably should be the name for a Navy base)
Fort George Trofimoff
Fort Antifa (Why does the name have to be of a single person?)
Fort Black Lives Matter
Fort NAMBLA
Fort Reparations (Maybe political proposals are just as good as a person's name)

Why not? These are names which should appease those who hate America, rather than support those who defend America.

Response by SP5 Dave Holloway made Sep 24 at 2021 11:24 AM

2021-09-24T11:24:42-04:00

Leave them alone!

Response by SP5 John Burleson made Sep 24 at 2021 11:25 AM

2021-09-24T11:25:58-04:00

If the idiots at the DoD have a big enough staff to worry about base names, they have too many idiots on the payroll. Leave the names alone. I don't want to tell my grandkids I served at Fort Bragg only to get a bunch of blank stares until I remember to use the new name: camp Panty Hose.

Response by SGT Aaron Atwood made Sep 24 at 2021 11:50 AM

2021-09-24T11:50:00-04:00

I personally think the bases' names should be left alone. Almost none of them were named after Confederate generals with the motive of promoting what that confederacy stood for. Not to mention Robert E. Lee still stands as the most beloved general in our history; to the point of being respected by both sides of the war. Nobody with such charisma and level of admiration came into existence again until Erwin Rommel began making a name for himself in both world wars, and I'm sure there's at least one military installation in Germany named after him.

Here are some rules of thumb I'd use for changing the names...

1) Someone else mentioned MoH winners. I like that idea, but equally good would be anyone who literally made military history while serving in a unit attached to said base, or better yet be the base that person came from. I'd be ok changing Fort Bragg to Fort Plumley, for instance.

Another thing one can do is rename the main headquarters of each base after a relevant MoH winner or someone else who made a huge positive impact.

Response by Capt Harry Engel made Sep 24 at 2021 12:03 PM

2021-09-24T12:03:17-04:00

Fort Bragg - Bennie Adkins. Army Sergeant First Class, receive the Medal of Honor March 9, 1966
Fort Rucker - Dr. Mary Walker. The only woman to ever receive the Medal of Honor. November 1865
Fort Benning - Ty Carter. Army Specialist, receive the Medal of Honor October 3, 2009
Fort Gordon - Florent Groberg. Army Captain receive the Medal of Honor August 8, 2012
Fort Hood - Gary Ivan Gordon. Army Master sergeant receive the Medal of Honor October 3, 1993
Fort Polk - Lewis Albanese. Army Private First Class, receive the Medal of Honor December 1, 1966
Fort A.P. Hill - Ross A. McGinnis. Army Specialist receive the Medal of Honor December 4, 2006
Fort Belvoir - Thomas Payne. Army Sergeant First Class receive the Medal of Honor October 22, 2015
Fort Lee - William E. Adams. Army Major, receive the Medal of Honor May 25, 1971
Fort Pickett - Randall David Shughart. Army Sergeant first class receive the Medal of Honor October 3, 1993

Response by LTC Clayton Edens made Sep 24 at 2021 12:25 PM

2021-09-24T12:25:24-04:00

Fort WOKE 1 through 10

Response by Capt Keith Kimmerle made Sep 24 at 2021 12:26 PM

2021-09-24T12:26:36-04:00

Fort Stalin and Fort Mao will take time, due to the clumsy word association they create, but Fort Lenin works well.

I think boot camp bases should be renamed Big Brother's Boot Camp,

Fort Bragg > Fort Kabul

Fort Polk > Fort Ho Chi Minh (due to Polk's reputation for the stifling humidity)

Response by SPC Barry Oneil made Sep 24 at 2021 1:39 PM

2021-09-24T13:39:38-04:00

Change the name of Fort Benning to] Fort Barry (first commissioned officer in US Navy - Commodore Barry).1) It would be a great boost for cross service relations 2) It also starts with a "B", and 3) Its was my birthplace in 1939, lol.

Response by SPC George Allen made Sep 24 at 2021 3:04 PM

2021-09-24T15:04:37-04:00

Let's name Fort Hood for Thomas Custer. Anyone that wins 2 MOHs in a week should have something named after him.

Response by LCpl Robert Burke made Sep 24 at 2021 3:08 PM

2021-09-24T15:08:35-04:00

Leave them as is. Whether you change the name or not is not going to change history. Why do people think by changing names, tearing down statues etc that this will change the past. Doesn't matter if you agree with things that have been done or not the fact is it happened!! Get over it and move on. Don't try to change history, make history.

Response by Capt Bruce Bitterman made Sep 24 at 2021 3:10 PM

2021-09-24T15:10:14-04:00

Fort Bragg - Fort Brag, Fort Rucker - Fort Mucker, Fort Benning - Fort Benny, Fort Gordon - Fort Warden, Fort Hood- Fort Shmood, Fort Polk - Fort Yok, Fort AP Hill - Fort AG Swill, Fort Belvoir - Fort Belvedere, Fort Lee - Fort Lean, Fort Picket- Fort Widget

Response by CPT Tío Rusty made Sep 24 at 2021 3:36 PM

2021-09-24T15:36:07-04:00

Ft Lee should keep its name. GEN Lee may have been a Confederate leader, but prior to the war he was also a USMA graduate and a Mexican War Officer of the US Army.

Response by Private RallyPoint Member made Sep 24 at 2021 3:44 PM

2021-09-24T15:44:23-04:00

I nominate Ft. Rucker to become officially name Ft. "Mommy I don't know what bathroom to use"

Response by SrA Lawrence Baiocco made Sep 24 at 2021 4:05 PM

2021-09-24T16:05:08-04:00

It’s BS. Leave it as is.

Response by SrA Lawrence Baiocco made Sep 24 at 2021 4:13 PM

2021-09-24T16:13:37-04:00

Response by 1SG Private RallyPoint Member made Sep 24 at 2021 4:41 PM

2021-09-24T16:41:34-04:00

Easy choices. I looked up a few MOH recipients from each state, black, white and Hispanic. For example, Fort Hood could be changed to Fort Benavidez after MSG Roy Benavidez, a badass who got the MOH in Vietnam. The change is inevitable. Us old timers will still call it Bragg or Bennington or AP Hill or whatever. Those names will always be in our memories.

Response by CPT Chase Boardman made Sep 24 at 2021 6:19 PM

2021-09-24T18:19:50-04:00

Keeping with the Civil War theme, Fort Benning becomes Forth W.T. Sherman; Fort A.P. Hill or Fort Hood becomes Fort George Thomas; Fort Bragg becomes Fort Rosecrans. Since Fort Meade is already in use, Fort Lee becomes Fort U.S. Grant.

The rest can be renamed for people from other wars. Fort Benning could be Fort Gavin, for instance.

Response by SPC David Dougherty made Sep 24 at 2021 7:01 PM

2021-09-24T19:01:09-04:00

Leave well enough alone! Fuck it, anyway. Our Country has been overran by a fked administration of ass licking commies. Sorry, not sorry for the profanities. GOD HELP US! KRUSHEV WAS RIGHT, "We will bury America without firing a shot." It's coming to frution.

Response by SGT Peter Wilisch made Sep 24 at 2021 9:35 PM

2021-09-24T21:35:26-04:00

Fort Bragg becomes Fort Trump.

Response by Sgt Frank Staples made Sep 24 at 2021 11:51 PM

2021-09-24T23:51:04-04:00

I'd be willing to bet that five years ago there were probably only one or two percent of Americans that knew who Braxton Bragg was. Destroying history is one of the most ignorant things we can do. Leave the names alone and quit acting like spoiled children.

Response by CDR Jan Kuester made Sep 25 at 2021 2:21 AM

2021-09-25T02:21:59-04:00

1) Quit the PC posturing and rewriting of history and leave them alone!

2) Of course my first suggestion is a moot point so name them after Medal of Honor recipients.

Response by SP5 Larry Stueck made Sep 25 at 2021 9:54 AM

2021-09-25T09:54:03-04:00

I did my AIT at Fort Belvoir. The base is uniquely Virginian. If it is to be renamed, I suggest calling it Ford Virginia.

Response by SPC Richard Levine made Sep 25 at 2021 10:10 AM

2021-09-25T10:10:50-04:00

Eisenhower, Schwartzendruber, any Roosevelt(especially Elinor, for service to the US & women), Lincoln, Washington & Truman.

Response by Sgt Bob Buster Adcock made Sep 25 at 2021 12:37 PM

2021-09-25T12:37:47-04:00

Don't do it!

Response by SGT Private RallyPoint Member made Sep 25 at 2021 12:53 PM

2021-09-25T12:53:20-04:00

Leave them alone. Chances are the confederate officers have just as many skeletons as anyone else and it's just a political move to pander to a group who likely hates the military anyway.

Response by LT Roberta Niche made Sep 25 at 2021 5:43 PM

2021-09-25T17:43:02-04:00

Don't name them after people. But if it must be people Richard Winters and Joshua Lawrence Chamberlain come to mind.

Response by MAJ Fred Zacher made Sep 25 at 2021 8:12 PM

2021-09-25T20:12:44-04:00

Ft Bragg should be named Ft Soft Landing
Ft Benning should be named Ft Follow Me.
Any name selected must be vetted to not offend anyone.
PC run amuck.

Response by SSG Kenneth Ponder made Sep 25 at 2021 9:00 PM

2021-09-25T21:00:16-04:00

Ft. Stymie, Ft Farina, Ft Buckwheat,
Ft Step 'n' Fetchit, Ft Ben, Ft Jemima, Ft F'FFeet don't F'F'Fail Me Now, Ft We Don't F_ _king Care!

Response by TSgt David Whitmore made Sep 25 at 2021 10:56 PM

2021-09-25T22:56:05-04:00

Leave the names as they are. At the end of that Uncivil War Between the Various States the federal government made all that fought on the Confederate side US Army soldiers.
Therefore the names of US military bases that bear the names of the South's generals in right and proper.

Response by SSG Michael D. made Sep 26 at 2021 12:40 AM

2021-09-26T00:40:07-04:00

The Woke Generation has NO RIGHT to tell us to erase history. Without our past there would be no present. Get over it! Renaming military installations does nothing except appeasing to some ungrateful people that have no respect for sacrifices made by our servicemen and women on either side of the fence!

Response by SSG Michael D. made Sep 26 at 2021 12:45 AM

2021-09-26T00:45:39-04:00

Appeasing to anti-American Patriots does nothing but cause more conflict. Get over it people. Our government is supposed to serve Americans , we don't serve them!

Response by SSG Michael D. made Sep 26 at 2021 1:18 AM

2021-09-26T01:18:36-04:00

American Service members and Veterans should be the ONLY people allowed to make a decision on this vote. I VOTE NO CHANGE! I AM A RETIRED ARMY VETERAN OF IRAQ I, IRAQ II, OIF/OEF 87-07.

Response by SPC Matt Ovaska made Sep 26 at 2021 7:12 AM

2021-09-26T07:12:01-04:00

I wonder why our leaders never object to Seattle's Lenin statue. I find that offensive...

Response by PVT John Maloney made Sep 26 at 2021 9:42 AM

2021-09-26T09:42:49-04:00

Fort Patton.

Response by SSG Nicholas Wetherington made Sep 26 at 2021 10:50 AM

2021-09-26T10:50:55-04:00

Name them in order (historically) after Medal of honor recipients.

Response by LTC Dave Leppanen made Sep 26 at 2021 3:47 PM

2021-09-26T15:47:22-04:00

Satire alert.

How about renaming Fort Bragg to Fort Hendrix? While Jimi Hendrix was stationed at Fort Campbell, he was airborne qualified which makes him a good fit for Fort Bragg. Admittedly. he wasn't a very stellar soldier.

How about renaming Fort Hood to Fort Presley? Elvis Presley did his Basic Training and AIT there. He was also a tanker and a sergeant.

Response by MAJ Private RallyPoint Member made Sep 26 at 2021 9:25 PM

2021-09-26T21:25:23-04:00

Longstreet was a good officer. His post war activities are not lauded enough. Eugene Bullard was a black man from Columbus GA who would up flying in the World War 1 French air force. He should have at least an air base honoring him. I would also consider naming posts after local Indian tribes or atheletes (amateur Olympic or professional) from the state.

Response by SSG Gary R Peek made Sep 26 at 2021 10:23 PM

2021-09-26T22:23:13-04:00

Leave the names alone!

Response by SSG Gary R Peek made Sep 26 at 2021 10:25 PM

2021-09-26T22:25:08-04:00

There is a reason why they were named in Honor of an individual. Maybe if they did a bit of research it would explain everything! Just my thought.

Response by PO1 Don Uhrig made Sep 26 at 2021 11:07 PM

2021-09-26T23:07:41-04:00

In the interest of Political Correctness, perhaps they should be renamed for historically significant LGBTQI+ Icons? (bring on the bigoted responses)

Response by SN Richard Mueller made Sep 27 at 2021 2:04 AM

2021-09-27T02:04:27-04:00

Fort Bragg ... Fort Basil Plumley
Fort Hood ... Fort Bucky O'Neil
Fort A.P. Hill ... Fort Dwight Eisenhower
Fort Benning ... Fort Audie Murphy
Fort Pickett ... Fort Bill Mauldin
Fort Polk ... Fort Pedro de la Valle
Fort Rucker ... Fort Mike Edson
Fort Belvoir ... Fort Jonathan Wainright

Response by SSG Private RallyPoint Member made Sep 27 at 2021 8:53 AM

2021-09-27T08:53:47-04:00

Ft. Pershing
Ft. Patton
Ft. Thorne
Ft. Bradley
Ft. Grant
Ft. McArthur

Response by SPC Stiv ChenRobbins made Sep 28 at 2021 2:00 AM

2021-09-28T02:00:09-04:00

Since we are going with the idea that it is happening no matter what and we shouldn't question that, let's go with
- Fort Submission
- Fort Surrender
- Fort Fear
- Fort Politically Correct
- Fort Amnesia
et cetera..

Response by SrA John Whitfield made Sep 28 at 2021 9:58 PM

2021-09-28T21:58:23-04:00

This is the most moronic shit I have ever heard. There are few real men left. If they are offended by a name at home just wait when the real battles start. America is deceived and the population is being run by a minority who are lead by their emotions. Just like the Roman Empire we are signing our own death warrant. Call the bases what you want but for this old veteran.. I will NEVER comply.

Response by Capt Thomas Orlando made Sep 30 at 2021 8:45 PM

2021-09-30T20:45:13-04:00

Fort Un-named Democrat #1 through #10.

Response by Capt Thomas Orlando made Sep 30 at 2021 8:47 PM

2021-09-30T20:47:14-04:00

Fort Un-named Democrat #1 through #10.

Response by SFC Private RallyPoint Member made Oct 2 at 2021 1:27 PM

2021-10-02T13:27:35-04:00

The communities and service populations of those bases should be the source of their naming conventions. The affected bases should select for approval from a range of appropriate candidates based on Soldiers of significant service who either served at the location, or hailed from communities nearby that duty station.

For example, I've seen recommendations of Fort Benavidez as a replacement for both Fort Bragg, where Benavidez served in the 82nd and also for Fort Hood, due it's relative proximity to Benavidez's hometown.

Response by SPC John Coleman made Oct 3 at 2021 4:25 PM

2021-10-03T16:25:13-04:00

None leave well enough alone

Response by LTC Tom Jones made Oct 4 at 2021 12:49 PM

2021-10-04T12:49:21-04:00

SSG Carlos Madden How about we rename them after our contemporary heroes--Camp Kaepernick or Post Pelosi. There are several military installations in the NYC area. We could honor a number of Kardashians there. Instead of Camp Hunter-Liggett in California, we could call it Camp Hunter-Biden. Wait! Wait! How about we follow the lead of the NFL and seek out corporate sponsors. Camp Citibank would be a good start. At least it would save DoD dollars for beans, bullets and bombs as opposed to new signage and letterhead. Let the corporations pay for it. Nice talk. Thanks.

Response by LTC Tom Jones made Oct 6 at 2021 6:42 AM

2021-10-06T06:42:51-04:00

SSG Carlos Madden Rename Fort Benning, home of the Infantry Center and School, Fort Fonda. After all, all of us Vietnam vets need to "get over it." This is exactly the point that those favoring this lunacy is, of course. I understand their perspective but there is much in our National past that is regrettable. We need to shift our focus on today and beyond. This is not just about installations but about ships, boats, etc, all the way down to street names. This is one expensive, divisive and distracting initiative that needs to be squashed by someone with enough authority and common sense to redirect these would-be millions of dollars in expenditures into areas of much greater need such as beans, bullets and bombs. We have some real enemies out there. Do you think the Chinese, Russians, Iranians, etc., are wasting resources on projects like this. It's a fool's errand. LTC Kevin B. Cpl Vic Burk

Response by PO2 Jay Stotler made Oct 9 at 2021 8:22 AM

2021-10-09T08:22:03-04:00

Fort Brag to Marine Hill or

Response by Cpl Private RallyPoint Member made Oct 21 at 2021 8:43 AM

2021-10-21T08:43:07-04:00

Fort Patton, Fort Eisenhower if it isn't already taken

Response by Sgt Phillip Galbach made Oct 21 at 2021 7:26 PM

2021-10-21T19:26:47-04:00

Here are some suggestions. You will notice they are towns or cities around each of the forts. These have history too and are probably Politically charged in their own way. It doesn't matter what you rename them to they will always be politically charged in some fashion. Most people don't know the history of each of these facilities till they look on Google. That's when they get upset. Someone is always offended no matter what is done.
- Fort Bragg – Fort Fayette or Fayetteville
- Fort Rucker – Fort Newton
- Fort Benning – Fort Columbus
- Fort Gordon – Fort Augusta
- Fort Hood – Fort Temple
- Fort Polk – Fort Alexandria
- Fort A.P. Hill – Fort Bowling Green
- Fort Belvoir – Fort Newington
- Fort Lee – Fort Petersburg
- Fort Pickett – Fort Blackstone

Response by MSgt Allen Chandler made Oct 27 at 2021 3:22 PM

2021-10-27T15:22:08-04:00

This question has nothing to do with confederate army officers. It has to do with why would you want to name a military base after somebody? I hope the answer is because he or she did something “really” great that I'd like to honor them for, or they did something really great that I have a Lot of respect for.
Say there was this guy who did three great things that I highly respect, but he also did three bad things. These bad things were something I do not respect and I’m disappointed that he did.
I propose that one is the things he did that I'm proud of, and respect him for got him the Congressional medal of honor. One of the bad things he did was getting a bar fight and end up spending a week in jail. For me personally I would certainly consider naming a military base after this person. But suppose the bad thing he did, was rape somebody or murder somebody. Would that be bad enough to say I don’t want to honor him even though he has the Congressional medal of honor? To me it would be.
Now, back to the original question why did we need these bases after these generals? What is it that I am proud of they for? Even if they did many good things but one bad thing (that is rebelling against the law for government of the United States of America) does it outweigh all their good things? To me yes it does. What to name the bases, is a completely separate question from taking their name off of the base. At least that’s my opinion.

Response by CPT Gary Gracyas made Oct 28 at 2021 10:06 PM

2021-10-28T22:06:32-04:00

Doesn't matter if it's directed or not. Keep your damned Communist, ANTIFA, history rewriting, American Culture destroying hands off of the names of our military installations.

Directives can be countermanded.

Response by 1SG Dave Kling made Oct 29 at 2021 7:50 PM

2021-10-29T19:50:09-04:00

Leave it alone

Response by SFC Bryan Clark made Oct 31 at 2021 10:56 PM

2021-10-31T22:56:08-04:00

Leave well enough alone...our military has long rich tradition of using generals names for bases, vehicles ....

Response by CPL Louie Stanfield made Nov 1 at 2021 6:10 AM

2021-11-01T06:10:57-04:00

If it isn’t broke, fix it until it is.

Response by CH (CPT) Jerry McGowin made Nov 1 at 2021 8:04 AM

2021-11-01T08:04:41-04:00

My suggestion is to delay delay delay and hope this policy changes.

Response by SP5 Richard Unice made Nov 1 at 2021 10:14 AM

2021-11-01T10:14:05-04:00

Why nit leave the name Fort Lee remain and reference a different general, General Charles Lee.
Charles Lee for whom Fort Lee, NJ was named, was a general in the American Revolutionary War and aided in the defense of New York City.

Response by SFC Clark Adams made Nov 1 at 2021 12:38 PM

2021-11-01T12:38:21-04:00

Rededicate Fort Lee, VA to either General "Light-Horse Harry" Lee a Revolutionary War General, but preferably LTG John C. H. Lee the WWII commander of the COMZ in Europe(J-4 in today's vernacular), commanding 800,000 Soldiers, supporting operations from Iceland to Africa, a strong advocate for ending racial segregation and "Jim Crow" policies in the US Army, allowing Black Soldiers to serve with Whites in combat arms battalions.

Response by SMSgt Archie Hickerson made Nov 1 at 2021 1:03 PM

2021-11-01T13:03:00-04:00

Sorry, but it "doesn't matter"; well, I disagree with your comment. It does matter, because it is happening does not mean that it does not matter....changing history does matter. Airborne! HN

Response by Capt Gregory Prickett made Nov 3 at 2021 2:44 AM

2021-11-03T02:44:40-04:00

- Fort Bragg - Fort Yarborough, after Lt Gen William P Yarborough.
- Fort Rucker - Fort Howze, after Lt Gen Hamilton H Howze.
- Fort Benning - Fort Bradley, after Gen of Army Omar Bradley, also a former CG of the Infantry School.
- Fort Gordon - Fort York, CMH holder Alvin York, who trained there.
- Fort Hood - Fort Roosevelt, CMH holder and President Teddy Roosevelt.
- Fort Lee - Fort Lee, just change the person from Robert E Lee to Maj Gen William "Light-Horse" Lee from the American Revolution.

Response by SSG Gary R Peek made Nov 3 at 2021 9:50 AM

2021-11-03T09:50:24-04:00

My “suggestion?” Don’t fix what isn’t broken. Give into the “woke” mob; you lose more then just renaming Army Installations.

Response by PVT Mark Whitcomb made Nov 3 at 2021 10:56 AM

2021-11-03T10:56:37-04:00

If it must be done then name them after Medal of Honor recipients.

Response by LTC Stephen F. made Nov 4 at 2021 3:30 AM

2021-11-04T03:30:35-04:00

Well my friend SSG Carlos Madden I have spent some time pondering this and in this heightened tension period [as in many previous heightened tension period] sadly many seem to want to reinvent history without counting the economic cost and personal tension created by renaming Federal property.
1. Congress seems to be too divided on thorny issues to actually get serious about trying to rename military posts [before the 2022 mid-terms] which would impact businesses, street signs, local history museums, and so much more. Renaming posts would be an unfunded mandate or limited funding - such as changing all web pages, post signs, etc.
2. I think it makes a lot of sense to think long and hard before renaming federal property including Federal bases and especially state national guard bases [Fort Pickett and Fort A.P. Hill in Virginia and Camp Beauregard which is a Louisiana National Guard installation] since they are state property.
3. Politics makes strange bedfellows. In light of the election results in Virginia and New Jersey on November 2, renaming something at this point may well result in revenge those with influence now are thrust down in influence.
4. If there is wide concurrence in the states affected, Congress members, etc, I concur with renaming the post to a Medal of Honor recipient form that state in the modern era. [The standards for award in the Civil War were biased and political in many cases. True heroism was more common on both sides and among civilians. I concur with SSG Private RallyPoint Member PVT Mark Whitcomb

I concur with my friend Cpl Vic Burk that it would be wise to pause long and hard before renaming military installations based on current sentiments -especially by a loud minority.
The local communities should be consulted - especially businesses, places of worship, school boards, etc. Renaming may well impact the local economy.

If we have to rename anything...
A. I would concur with recommending renaming Fort Polk to Fort Wallar for Medal of Honor awardee 'corporal, Francis Asbury Wallar'
B. I would consider renaming Fort Hood to Fort Crockett in honor of Davy Crockett since he died in Texas.
C. I would consider renaming Pope Army Airfield (Joint Base Bragg) to honor B-24 flight engineer Jerome Levin who flew 35 missions in France and other parts of Europe and was awarded the Legion of Honor medals — France’s highest military and civilian merit for service to the country by French Consul General Louis de Corail on November 28, 2018

D.since Braxton Bragg success in the Mexican-American War made him a national hero. However 'his weaknesses as a military leader were exposed and exploited by the Union during the Civil War. He was also a slave owner before the start of the Civil War and owned a sugar plantation in Louisiana.'

E. I would consider leaving Fort Gordon along since John Gordon Brown since he served as a US Senator, leader of the Senate and Governor of Georgia antebellum. He 'was elected to the US Senate in 1873, and in 1879, he became the first ex-Confederate to preside over the Senate. He was a strong supporter of the "New South" and industrialization and he was a part of the Bourbon Triumvirate. Gordon resigned as senator on May 19, 1880. He was elected Governor of Georgia in 1886 and returned to the U.S. Senate from 1891 to 1897.

F. I recommend leaving Fort Lee alone, Robert E. Lee served with distinction as a US Army officer and as Superintendent of USMA. He was an is admired by many especially military historians and those informed.

G. The following are National Guard facilities and bases.
(1) Since Camp Beauregard near Pineville, Louisiana, is a Louisiana National Guard installation named for Louisiana native and Confederate General Pierre Gustave Toutant Beauregard
(2) Since Fort A.P. Hill (1941), near Bowling Green, Virginia, named for Virginia native and Confederate Lieutenant General A. P. Hill is a Virginia Army National Guard base
(3) Since Fort Pickett (1942), near Blackstone, Virginia, a Virginia National Guard installation is named for Confederate General George Pickett
As a USMA cadet [July 1976 - May 1980] and for years prior I studied the US Civil War - east and western theaters.

1. Congressional Medal of Honor awardee 22-year-old corporal, Francis Asbury Wallar [6th Wisconsin Infantry] "Color-bearer, Corporal W.B. Murphy of the 2nd Mississippi in Maj. Gen. Henry Heth’s Division of Lt. Gen. A.P. Hill’s Corps, later said that the Federals “kept rushing for my flag and there were over a dozen shot down like sheep in the mad rush for the colors.”
Murphy admitted, however, that “a large burly man made a mad rush for me and the flag. As I tore the flag from the staff he took hold of me and the colors.” That soldier was Corporal Wallar.
“I did take the flag out of the color bearer’s hands,” Wallar later revealed. “I thought about moving to the rear, but then I thought I would stay, and I threw it down and loaded and fired twice on it.” Wallar and the 6th had captured 230 Confederates, and Waller received the Medal of Honor in December 1864.'

2. Ft Benning is named for CSA Brigadier General Henry Lewis Benning. I support that name for the Columbus, Georgia base.
Per Gettysburg guide #110 Garry Adelman
1. One who fought there without distinction was CSA Brigadier General Henry Lewis Benning, who led Benning’s Brigade, Hood’s Division, Longstreet’s Corps [in the CSA Brigade CDRs were Brigadier Generals while in the USA they tended to be Colonel. Yet '“Old Rock” Benning and his four regiments of Georgians at Gettysburg are underappreciated. After all, Benning skillfully advanced his brigade over the most difficult terrain Gettysburg had to offer. He inspired his men during their deadly advance, kept his units together (even accepting some Texans into his ranks), and tipped the scales for the Confederates in capturing Devil’s Den for the second time. When his own men tried to claim capture of some cannons at Devil’s Den, Benning gave credit to the other units that deserved it. During a Union countercharge, Benning displayed his ferocity on combat: “[H]old your fire until they come right up. Then pour a volley into them, and if they don’t stop, run your bayonets into their bellies.”

Fighting savagely in areas of the battlefield now known as the Slaughter Pen, the Valley of Death, and Devil’s Den, it is not surprising that Benning’s men suffered the highest percentage of loss among the brigades in Hood’s Division. Benning lost two of his colonels, killed in the Slaughter Pen and in the Triangular Field. Also, on July 3, his brigade bore the greatest part of the Union advance after the conclusion of Pickett’s Charge.
Ten weeks after fighting in the Civil War’s bloodiest engagement, Benning and his men fought in the war’s second costliest battle at Chickamauga. In between these terrible battles, 600 miles apart, Benning managed to secure official reports from the commanders of all four of his Gettysburg regiments and submitted a detailed one of his own. That all-too-rarely accomplished feat allows us to better understand America’s greatest battle, which warms this historian’s heart and earns Benning a coveted spot among Gettysburg’s “unsung” heroes."

Update;
Image: 1863-07-14 The lynching of a negro in the New York Draft Riots
C. Tuesday, July 14, 1863: Draft Riots continued in NY City. African Americans were murdered in the streets and city law enforcement agencies were unable to cope. Men from the Army of the Potomac were ordered to the city to restore law and order. After a night of heavy rain, rioters returned to the streets early on Tuesday, July 14, looting and destroying businesses in the downtown area, including a large Brooks Brothers’ store, which as a contractor for the U.S. government, had been churning out thousands of pieces of military garb for more than two years. The mob also began constructing barricades around the city that proved difficult for police to overcome. The targeted attacks on blacks intensified and included the lynching of at least two African-American men: a young sailor who had been attacked after speaking to a young white boy and a man who had been captured and killed while attempting to escape to Brooklyn (reportedly disguised in his wife’s clothing). Among the dead that day was Col. Henry O’Brien, the commander of a local regiment who had come to the aid of beleaguered policemen and been attacked and killed by the angry mob. As the violence continued to spread, New York politicians squabbled amongst themselves about how to bring order to the city. The Democratic governor, who had openly opposed the draft law before it went into effect, seemed reluctant to move forcefully against the demonstrators. The city’s Republican mayor, well aware of the shortage of available police officers, formally asked the War Department to send federal troops, but stopped short of declaring martial law and turning over control of the situation to federal officials.

NY City calls out the National Guard to confront the increasing wantonness and murders in the draft riot of 1863: Wednesday, July 15, 1863: “New York City draft riots: Attack on the Arch: A group of black-occupied tenements on Thompson and Sullivan streets, between Grand and Broome, was set ablaze at 1:30 am.
Rewarding rioters? The City Council voted $2.5 million to pay the $300 commutation fee for any poor New Yorkers who were drafted.
West Side atrocities: At 6:30 a.m., James Costello was beaten and hanged on W. 32nd St. Neighboring black families were driven out of their homes. A crippled coachman, Abraham Franklin, was lynched at 27th St. and 7th Ave. His body was cut down, and he was dragged through the streets … .
Out-of-town news: Reports arrived of draft riots in Boston, Hartford, Newark, Jersey City, Hastings, Tarrytown, and Rye.
Red Hook fires: Two huge grain elevators at Erie Basin in Brooklyn were destroyed by arsonists.”

I concur with my friends SSG Byron Hewett 1SG Dan Capri SSG Willis Baker SPC Lyle Montgomery
I concur with Capt Gregory Prickett's well-reasoned response
I appreciate the humor of my friends LTC Tom Jones CSM Bob Stanek

The better sources for researching history are primary documents letters, newspaper articles [Harper's Weekly, Richmond Daily Dispatch], and official documents of the CSA and USA from the time.
A. There are many factors which together which resulted in the revolution of the American colonies and 70 years later the Civil War.
(1) Federalist anti-federalist supporters debated states right.
(2) the British Slavery Abolition Act, (1833) abolished slavery in most British colonies, freeing more than 800,000 enslaved Africans in the Caribbean and South Africa as well as a small number in Canada. It received Royal Assent on August 28, 1833, and took effect on August 1, 1834. This act cut off the supply of slaves to the USA and resulted in slave auctions to redistribute slaves
(3) political and economic power struggles - Democratic-party dominated states insisted slavery was a state issue. Their influence was so extensive it lasted until 1864.
(4) Military officers wrestled with the decision to support separating form the union of states. Robert E. Lee was offered command of the Federal forces and turned it down as he resigned. His personal letters as well as those of Thomas Stonewall Jackson are great background.

B. Slavery was supported by most northern states as well as southern states. This was the impetus for the 1854 Kansas-Nebraska act which allowed settlers to choose slavery or no-slavery within their states borders [al each subsequent state admitted to the union]. The democrat party supported slavery and was anti-choice on that issue.
Here is a section of the 1856 National Democratic Party platform. You will note that slavery was supported by the national democratic party in 1856 my friend MAJ Dale E. Wilson, Ph.D.
"Resolved, That we reiterate with renewed energy of purpose the well considered declarations of former Conventions upon the sectional issue of Domestic slavery, and concerning the reserved rights of the States.
1. That Congress has no power under the Constitution, to interfere with or control the domestic institutions of the several States, and that such States are the sole and proper judges of everything appertaining to their own affairs, not prohibited by the Constitution; that all efforts of the abolitionists, or others, made to induce Congress to interfere with questions of slavery, or to take incipient steps in relation thereto, are calculated to lead to the most alarming and dangerous consequences; and that all such efforts have an inevitable tendency to diminish the happiness of the people and endanger the stability and permanency of the Union, and ought not to be countenanced by any friend of our political institutions.

2. That the foregoing proposition covers, and was intended to embrace the whole subject of slavery agitation in Congress; and therefore, the Democratic party of the Union, standing on this national platform, will abide by and adhere to a faithful execution of the acts known as the compromise measures, settled by the Congress of 1850; "the act for reclaiming fugitives from service or labor," included; which act being designed to carry out an express provision of the Constitution, cannot, with fidelity thereto, be repealed, or so changed as to destroy or impair its efficiency.

3. That the Democratic party will resist all attempts at renewing, in Congress or out of it, the agitation of the slavery question under whatever shape or color the attempt may be made.

4. That the Democratic party will faithfully abide by and uphold, the principles laid down in the Kentucky and Virginia resolutions of 1798, and in the report of Mr. Madison to the Virginia Legislature in 1799; that it adopts those principles as constituting one of the main foundations of its political creed, and is resolved to carry them out in their obvious meaning and import.

And that we may more distinctly meet the issue on which a sectional party, subsisting exclusively on slavery agitation, now relies to test the fidelity of the people, North and South, to the Constitution and the Union—

1. Resolved, That claiming fellowship with, and desiring the co-operation of all who regard the preservation of the Union under the Constitution as the paramount issue—and repudiating all sectional parties and platforms concerning domestic slavery, which seek to embroil the States and incite to treason and armed resistance to law in the Territories; and whose avowed purposes, if consummated, must end in civil war and disunion, the American Democracy recognize and adopt the principles contained in the organic laws establishing the Territories of Kansas and Nebraska as embodying the only sound and safe solution of the "slavery question" upon which the great national idea of the people of this whole country can repose in its determined conservatism of the Union—NON-INTERFERENCE BY CONGRESS WITH SLAVERY IN STATE AND TERRITORY, OR IN THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA.

2. That this was the basis of the compromises of 1850 confirmed by both the Democratic and Whig parties in national Conventions—ratified by the people in the election of 1852, and rightly applied to the organization of Territories in 1854.

3. That by the uniform application of this Democratic principle to the organization of territories, and to the admission of new States, with or without domestic slavery, as they may elect—the equal rights, of all the States will be preserved intact; the original compacts of the Constitution maintained inviolate; and the perpetuity and expansion of this Union insured to its utmost capacity of embracing, in peace and harmony, every future American State that may be constituted or annexed, with a republican form of government.

Resolved, That we recognize the right of the people of all the Territories, including Kansas and Nebraska, acting through the legally and fairly expressed will of a majority of actual residents, and whenever the number of their inhabitants justifies it, to form a Constitution, with or without domestic slavery, and be admitted into the Union upon terms of perfect equality with the other States."

C. Federalism and anti-federalism factions debated vigorously throughout that period from 1760s to 1860's and beyond. The Federalist papers are well worth reading if you have not. the collection known as the anti-federalist papers is more loosely linked.
a. Federalism is a system of government in which the same territory is controlled by two levels of government. l[aw.cornell.edu/wex/federalism] [Federal and state]
b. Anti-Federalists, in early U.S. history, a loose political coalition of popular politicians, such as Patrick Henry, who unsuccessfully opposed the strong central government envisioned in the U.S. Constitution of 1787 and whose agitations led to the addition of a Bill of Rights. [Britannica]
2. Slavery was an economic system [and still is in parts of the world] which also included indentured servants [early on]. Slavery flourished in Maryland and many other southern states through 1863.
a. 'the Kansas Nebraska act Officially titled "An Act to Organize the Territories of Nebraska and Kansas," this act repealed the Missouri Compromise, which had outlawed slavery above the 36º30' latitude in the Louisiana territories, and reopened the national struggle over slavery in the western territories. In January 1854, Senator Stephen Douglas of Illinois introduced a bill that divided the land immediately west of Missouri into two territories, Kansas and Nebraska. He argued in favor of popular sovereignty, or the idea that the settlers of the new territories should decide if slavery would be legal there. Anti-slavery supporters were outraged because, under the terms of the Missouri Compromise of 1820, slavery would have been outlawed in both territories since they were both north of the 36º30' N dividing line between "slave" and "free" states. [Background from milestone-documents/kansas-nebraska-act]
b. the Dred Scott case decision essentially was once a slave always a slave. No freemen or freewomen. Dred Scott v. Sandford case of 1857, popularly known as the "Dred Scott decision".
c. the Republican party was formed on March 20, 1854 in Ripon, Wisconsin to expand federal authority in order to oppose slavery and polygamy.

FYI SSgt Robert Marx SSG Leo Bell Maj Bill Smith, Ph.D. Maj William W. 'Bill' Price COL Lisandro Murphy LTC Greg Henning LTC Tom Jones

Response by MGySgt Bob Willis made Nov 5 at 2021 6:18 PM

2021-11-05T18:18:26-04:00

I would suggest they be renamed for enlisted Medal of Honor recipients.
Many current bases are named after General Officers and I think enlisted MOH recipients should be recognized.

Response by CW4 Jim Shelburn made Nov 5 at 2021 8:15 PM

2021-11-05T20:15:39-04:00

LEAVE THEM ALONE! Who cares? They’re dead, I was stationed at three of those posts and I never once thought about the name. Get over it. Move on and focus on making this a better place for everyone.

Response by PO2 Fidel Santiago made Nov 5 at 2021 9:28 PM

2021-11-05T21:28:14-04:00

I say leave the names alone.

Response by MCPON Art Freed made Nov 6 at 2021 12:26 PM

2021-11-06T12:26:17-04:00

They were and still all a part of this great country's history. I'd bet most of them graduated from West Point.

Response by SSG Dave Johnston made Nov 6 at 2021 6:57 PM

2021-11-06T18:57:02-04:00

Ok, so stupidity reigns supreme 'We's 'Woke', yes we is" as they bend over backwards, _________ Here's my 2cents worth: every military installation has a nickname, or the major command has a nickname... Let's use them for the "Official" name of the post

Response by CPO Cory Cook made Nov 7 at 2021 2:27 AM

2021-11-07T02:27:41-05:00

Agreed, get'r done and over with.

Response by CPL M Miller made Nov 7 at 2021 11:29 AM

2021-11-07T11:29:10-05:00

re naming is immaterial, Just like the SEARS tower in Chicago... will still be called the SEARS tower by the people.

Response by LT Greg O'Keefe made Nov 7 at 2021 1:12 PM

2021-11-07T13:12:15-05:00

Don't rename them.

Response by SGT Keith Smith made Nov 7 at 2021 4:41 PM

2021-11-07T16:41:22-05:00

In my opinion they should be changed to Generals of World War 2. Patton, Eisenhower, Bradly, MacArthur, Chanult, and many more. If one desired one could choose a General from that state to name the bases in those states.
I understand why they named those bases after those generals but I do not believe that it holds today. Make no mistake these people were traitors. They took up arms against the legitimate government and killed fellow Americans. They did not agree with the decision of the people and rebelled. By any measure they were and are traitors and set a bad example.

Response by PO2 Joel Warthen made Nov 7 at 2021 6:36 PM

2021-11-07T18:36:02-05:00

Enough of the woke nonsense!

Response by PO2 Joel Warthen made Nov 7 at 2021 6:36 PM

2021-11-07T18:36:38-05:00

Enough of this woke nonsense!

Response by SGT E Mendoza made Nov 7 at 2021 11:39 PM

2021-11-07T23:39:44-05:00

If any of you so-called veterans are ok with keeping FORTS named after CONFEDERATE GENERALS then you do not get your service to this country!! Progress is being made here by renaming these bases but you have a problem with it because in your mind change is bad. Learn your history and try not to whitewash it in your head.

Response by SFC William Linnell made Nov 8 at 2021 8:04 AM

2021-11-08T08:04:59-05:00

Why is the Army caving to the Cancel Culture? Renaming them isn't going to erase hurt feelings. All this does is make the hate and discontent people emboldened to push for more and larger targets. What's next? The Battlefield of Gettysburg? They have to take out ALL and everything that mentions the CSM Army?

Yes. It's going to happen. And the waste of taxpayers money to change every thing on each post taking down the old names and adding the new names. Brilliant. Just brilliant. Durka durka.

Response by SGT Richard Domenden made Nov 8 at 2021 8:42 AM

2021-11-08T08:42:33-05:00

Keep the names as they are. Stop giving in to these snowflakes

Response by Lt Col Timothy Cassidy-Curtis made Nov 8 at 2021 11:38 AM

2021-11-08T11:38:07-05:00

I would like to make one note on all of this. President Lincoln was very clear on his intentions regarding post-war activities. In concluding his second inaugural address, he said "With malice toward none with charity for all with firmness in the right as God gives us to see the right let us strive on to finish the work we are in to bind up the nation's wounds, to care for him who shall have borne the battle and for his widow and his orphan ~ to do all which may achieve and cherish a just and lasting peace among ourselves and with all nations." Lincoln would have been adamant in the fair treatment of all soldiers who formerly were in combat with each other. He wanted one country, not two, with one being "punished" for its past crimes. Lincoln was a unifier, and it was the intent of Booth to destroy this unity. Andrew Johnson did what he could, but Johnson lacked Lincoln's skills.

While the principles for which the Confederate Generals fought were certainly questionable, I believe that it would have been Lincoln's wish that they, too, be honored for the dedication they showed to their duties. Lincoln would have wanted to welcome them back as fellow Americans, with malice towards none of them.

I think we might be forgetting that. Again, this is no justification for the principles they wanted to defend. It is, however, in recognition of the principles that President Abraham Lincoln would have. When people tear down Lincoln's statue, I would like to remember the greatness he represented.

Our great and almighty God forgives us, not because we merit forgiveness (we don't) but, out of God's overwhelming love for us, He allows Himself to be moved to forgiveness, and He invites us all to do the same. President Lincoln followed God's path of forgiveness, and it is a good model for us all.

Response by CPO Jack De Merit made Nov 8 at 2021 4:14 PM

2021-11-08T16:14:20-05:00

I would suggest that they be left alone. These people are part of history. Naming places or things after them does not mean that you are honoring them. It means that you should not forget them and what they did. Most of them made enormous contributions to this country during its birth. That should be why we named things after them.

Response by 1SG Alan Boggs made Nov 8 at 2021 6:11 PM

2021-11-08T18:11:01-05:00

Camp Snowflake, Woke center of excellence? Now that I think of it, we should let cooperations buy naming rights. Ft. Microsoft, Citi Bank naval base, Amazon Air Base.

Response by SPC Lyle Montgomery made Nov 8 at 2021 6:31 PM

2021-11-08T18:31:44-05:00

I think that this renaming is crap. Why are cow towing to a few? I'm not a southerner, but history is a fact. We should not change history for a few crybabys. Leave History alone and get over it. It is what it is.

Response by SA V B made Nov 8 at 2021 7:05 PM

2021-11-08T19:05:03-05:00

I'd like to know why we ever honored these anti-american liberal ("confederate") flag waving separatists in the first place.

Response by SFC Steve Ouellette made Nov 8 at 2021 8:09 PM

2021-11-08T20:09:09-05:00

Fort snowflakitis. Funny now even the armed forces are succumbing to the "woke" cancel culture crowd....

Response by SSG Private RallyPoint Member made Nov 9 at 2021 8:15 AM

2021-11-09T08:15:42-05:00

Leave our history and heritage alone. If the names offend you research the history and see if you are offended by true actions or peer pressure. We are supposed to be adults who swore an oath to protect and defend this nation against ALL enemies foreign and DOMESTIC. Don't destroy our past, our heritage because of the whimpers of a few. Learn from their mistakes and achievements. They were, are Americans. Do we really want to rename Ft Bragg to Ft Rainbow or Ft Unicorn so the offended can have warm fuzzy feelings and our enemies can laugh. Think about it.

Response by PO3 Dan Wagoner made Nov 9 at 2021 1:34 PM

2021-11-09T13:34:24-05:00

I dont get the reasoning for any and all changes that have been rumored or are actually happening... first it was decided to take down statues of American history over some bs about racism, then the thought of changing the american flag to something that made no sense and now as of recently are now deciding to change names to places that were around since before anyone of us probably were born... this whole race and discrimination crap is getting out of hand... people now adays have gotten so easily butthurt over a stupid comment or stupid idea... This country is going into a crapper fast due to such thinking... a sad day...

Response by CPL LeChonne Wright made Nov 9 at 2021 2:02 PM

2021-11-09T14:02:52-05:00

Name them for Black/African Americans who died in pursuit of justice and equality. Tubman, King, etc. Also, I think one should be named after Colin Powell,

Response by Cpl Paul Shanaman made Nov 9 at 2021 4:03 PM

2021-11-09T16:03:41-05:00

Leave it alone. It hasn't been a problem for decades. Now all of a sudden it's a problem because of woke mobs and weak military leadership caving to demands?

Leave the military alone. We have one job to fight and win wars.

Response by PO1 Don Uhrig made Nov 9 at 2021 8:44 PM

2021-11-09T20:44:48-05:00

OMG - I see this going to the far left with bases named after LGBT historical heros. Now, before anyone accuses me of being homophobic, I will proudly out myself as a gay combat veteran who is also a gun totin' log cabin republican - and who has a great sense of humor. History should not be overwritten. It must stand and be studied so that hopefully we can grow toward peace.

Response by SSG Willis Baker made Nov 10 at 2021 1:51 AM

2021-11-10T01:51:47-05:00

Doesn't the DOD have more pressing matters to consider then paying attention to the Woke Culture? I'm just saying..

Response by SSG Willis Baker made Nov 10 at 2021 1:58 AM

2021-11-10T01:58:39-05:00

Can you imagine what it would cost to change the names? Everything that had, let us say, Ft. Hood written on it, would have to be changed to Ft. Audie Murphy.

Response by Lt Col Private RallyPoint Member made Nov 10 at 2021 12:02 PM

2021-11-10T12:02:26-05:00

Ft. Alwyn Cash
Ft. Audie Murphy
Ft. Patton
Ft. Sherman
Ft. Eisenhower
Ft. Grant
Ft. Nathaniel Greene

Response by CPT James Burkholder made Nov 10 at 2021 1:04 PM

2021-11-10T13:04:58-05:00

Fort Opra, Fort Pelosi, Fort Ocosta, Fort Obama and Biden, I can go on and on. . . [SARC]

Response by SFC Michael Lindenbusch made Nov 10 at 2021 7:50 PM

2021-11-10T19:50:15-05:00

The unfortunate truth is that no matter what they end up named there will be detractors. It does seem wrong to name US military installations after people who took up arms against the US. On the other hand, how many of those who have served at any of these really understand anything about the people behind the names? Honestly, I think all of the stateside postings I had only included two where I could explain who the installation was named after (Leonard Wood and Carson) and those were places where some effort went into that kind of education.

Response by Sgt Judy Leonard made Nov 10 at 2021 8:41 PM

2021-11-10T20:41:53-05:00

Fort Hillary
Fort Pelosi
Fort Condoleeza
Fort Kamala
Fort Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez
Fort Warren
Fort Alma Adams
Fort Martha McSally
Fort Nikki Haley
Fort Hattie Wyatt Caraway

Response by MAJ Russ Hanson made Nov 10 at 2021 10:26 PM

2021-11-10T22:26:46-05:00

History has both good and bad legacies. I think that leaving the posts as they are already named is appropriate. It remembers the good and the bad, as it should. If we only remember the good the then the bad will continue to repeat itself!!!

Response by SPC Daniel Dresen made Nov 11 at 2021 12:51 AM

2021-11-11T00:51:39-05:00

Name them after any soldier who has fallen during ww2, Vietnam, or heck, even GWOT.

Response by SMSgt Private RallyPoint Member made Nov 11 at 2021 11:57 AM

2021-11-11T11:57:52-05:00

The most brutally fair thing to do in my opinion would be to take a bulldozer and knock down the sign and then reopen them as Training Base One, Two, Three etc.,. Just do it, in the middle of the night, without announcement or fan-fare. The next day everyone shows up to work directed to change all the signs and letter heads. Tear down what you can't change in a day and fix it later but get it done.... It's either this or hold out until all these bases are renamed after some LBGTQ-XYZ, BLM or ANTIFA street thug who gave their lives for blah, blah, blah....

Response by PO3 John Fahrer made Nov 11 at 2021 12:02 PM

2021-11-11T12:02:23-05:00

Lets face they have had these names a very long time. However I don't care. There is a valid point that these names of these forts are enemies and they should have thought of that a long time ago.

However I HATE THE CONFEDERATE FLAG! ban the damn thing.

Response by SPC Charles McFate made Nov 11 at 2021 12:42 PM

2021-11-11T12:42:01-05:00

These are my suggestions...
Fort Bragg - Fort Pickett
Fort Rucker - Fort Lee
Fort Benning- Fort Belvoir
Fort Gordon - Fort A.P. Hill
Fort Hood - Fort Polk
Fort Polk - Fort Hood
Fort A.P. Hill - Fort Gordon
Fort Belvoir- Fort Benning
Fort Lee- Fort Rucker
Fort Pickett - Fort Bragg

The Nation that forgets it's past...

Response by SP5 Geoffrey Vannerson made Nov 11 at 2021 12:54 PM

2021-11-11T12:54:46-05:00

Response by SP5 Geoffrey Vannerson made Nov 11 at 2021 12:57 PM

2021-11-11T12:57:26-05:00

If you didn't serve then you have no voice, if you don't have a DD-214 you have no vote. You can't lie you way out of history, nor can you hide from it by changing a name. Suit up or shut up!!! If you don't like it the boarder has a second side to it, go find it.

Response by CPT Jay Ward made Nov 11 at 2021 1:30 PM

2021-11-11T13:30:23-05:00

Fort Alpha, Fort Bravo, etc.

Response by SGT Private RallyPoint Member made Nov 11 at 2021 5:54 PM

2021-11-11T17:54:49-05:00

My suggestion is to leave them alone. People have a lot of history for better or worse with those installations and I’m pretty sure most of them think it’s ridiculous they are being renamed

Response by PFC David Tomlinson made Nov 11 at 2021 7:57 PM

2021-11-11T19:57:14-05:00

The Confederates were traitors. Their names should be stricken from history.

Response by LCpl Jeff Moore made Nov 12 at 2021 8:44 AM

2021-11-12T08:44:55-05:00

Alvin York, Eisenhower, Audie Murphy Desmond doss, after the local Native American tribe if they approve and bless it, after a MOH awarded that came from that base,

Response by CPL Joe Zaucha made Nov 12 at 2021 1:30 PM

2021-11-12T13:30:56-05:00

Fort Zaucha is available.

Response by 1stSgt Nelson Kerr made Nov 12 at 2021 3:55 PM

2021-11-12T15:55:15-05:00

Bragg should be Robert Smalls.
Fort Lee should be named after George Thomas Virgins for fought to save the Union.

Response by Sgt Russ Brayton made Nov 12 at 2021 7:20 PM

2021-11-12T19:20:19-05:00

Leave them alone. Teach about hoe they were good officers in the US Army. Robert E. Lee led a detachment of Marines in retaking the Harper’s Ferry armory from John Brown. I am sure the rest did other such things for their country and should be remembered for the good things they did.

Response by CPL Nathan Hollingsworth made Nov 12 at 2021 10:57 PM

2021-11-12T22:57:20-05:00

If we’re going go along with “stupid is as stupid does “ … name them after MOH recipients from the local area … otherwise to My the bases are always going to be as I learned them to be .. and it really annoys Me that my son doesn’t know the skills of spit polishing some boots …

Response by SSgt James Harvey made Nov 13 at 2021 9:08 AM

2021-11-13T09:08:04-05:00

One mans traitor is another mans hero. I'd almost be willing to bet that over 90% of the people stationed at these installations had absolutely no idea who they were named after until someone told them unless they were a major military history buff. I'm going to leave the slavery part out of this for the moment because we all know that was wrong and needed to be ended, or at least I hope we do and was historically a very small part of the reason the war started. "States Rights" federal power versus sovereign state power, Different commercial interests in the North and South, Culture Clash - Different lifestyles of the North and South, city life versus farm life, Growth - Rapid entrepreneurial path in the North, slower rate in the south, Social Reformation - Sparked by the Christian revivalist movement referred to as the Second Great Awakening, Political Parties - The emergence of new political parties, such as the Republican Party, and Reform Movements - The emergence of reformist societies such as the Abolitionist Movement calling for the Emancipation of slaves all lead up to the outbreak of the war. Were they traitors by definition yes, absolutely. Were they great military minds worth studying, especially in the case of Lee, there's no doubt about it. And while they were indeed traitors at the time, On December 25, 1868, President Andrew Johnson issued Proclamation 179 which was a final proclamation granting full pardon and amnesty for the offense of treason “to every person who, directly or indirectly, participated in the late insurrection or rebellion.” So I guess the question that should be asked is why rename installations all of the sudden? Johnson with his pardon has taken treason off the table, have we suddenly found new facts that made what they did so bad that Johnson's proclamation should be ignored? Or because some have suddenly have had their feelers hurt because someone told them they should be offended by the installation names?

Response by SSgt James Harvey made Nov 13 at 2021 9:12 AM

2021-11-13T09:12:36-05:00

There are plenty of military members who have been awarded the MoH. Throw their names in a hat and start picking.

Response by SSG James Stodola made Nov 13 at 2021 12:23 PM

2021-11-13T12:23:55-05:00

That is a hard question Some of the names are of some of the most mediocre people they could find, but on the other hand maybe we need to come into at least the 20th century and find some of those examples, Like Patton, Bradley, Eisenhower, Swarztkoff, Mattis. Maybe not the best in some eyes but you asked for suggestions, not necessarily good ones....

Response by SGT Ronald Audas made Nov 13 at 2021 12:37 PM

2021-11-13T12:37:45-05:00

Ft.BS 1,2 3... and so on.

Response by Sgt Jake Middlebrook made Nov 13 at 2021 7:21 PM

2021-11-13T19:21:15-05:00

Take the names on the Valley Forge Muster Roll, write them on slips of paper, place them in a container positioned so they are invisible to those choosing and let 10 Army Brats aged 6 to 10 pick a name each. Then let's get a little pool going on how many seconds will elapse before someone is offended by one of those names.

Response by MSgt Nancy Wilson made Nov 13 at 2021 10:17 PM

2021-11-13T22:17:29-05:00

How about naming them after plants/flowers...
Fort Daffodil
Fort Pansy
Fort Succulent
Etc. This way, we could boost psy ops simultaneously...

Response by SFC Kenneth Kreps made Nov 14 at 2021 7:49 AM

2021-11-14T07:49:43-05:00

I agree, changing the names will not change the history. Leave things alone. These whiny cry baby wimps seem to forget where their freedom to protest and complain comes from. Soon, when these freedoms are slowly removed, then “Who you gonna call?”

Response by PO3 Vernon Carpenter made Nov 14 at 2021 10:29 AM

2021-11-14T10:29:14-05:00

Leave our history alone. We can learn from both the good and the bad from the battles. Case in point.
Once upon a time one party controlled the Congress (both parties) and the Executive offices decided to put out of a country we were trying to support. They surrendered the country to their enemies leaving behind thousands to be executed. That was in Vietnam leaving behind children of American servicemen. Fortunately none of those rescued were North Vietnan agents.
The same party didn't learn from their mistakes when it came to Afghanistan.

Response by CPT Brad Wilson made Nov 15 at 2021 10:55 AM

2021-11-15T10:55:29-05:00

I would say Medal of Honor recipients from the states those bases are in

Response by SN Benjamin Sabala made Nov 15 at 2021 3:39 PM

2021-11-15T15:39:58-05:00

None what so ever

Response by SN William Golden made Nov 16 at 2021 10:53 AM

2021-11-16T10:53:32-05:00

Leave them alone. We honor those that served. We may have been divided but they served for what they believed in. It was not just about slavery.

Response by SN William Golden made Nov 16 at 2021 10:59 AM

2021-11-16T10:59:10-05:00

And while you are Renaming the Forts .... try renaming cities and towns with English names ... Rename the ones that carry the same name as those in England. Several Naval installations along the East Coast were property of the King.

Response by Barry Stein made Nov 17 at 2021 4:00 PM

2021-11-17T16:00:23-05:00

They should be named after deceased MOH winners

Response by CW4 Jj Lacasse made Nov 18 at 2021 4:00 PM

2021-11-18T16:00:25-05:00

I agree, leave it alone, it has such historical value.

Response by CDR Teresa McFarland made Nov 21 at 2021 10:33 PM

2021-11-21T22:33:01-05:00

Fort Hood should be renamed for Medal of Honor recipient, Master Sargent Roy Benevidez a Texan who proudly and honorably served in Vietnam with distinction.

Response by CPT Richard Trione made Nov 23 at 2021 1:47 PM

2021-11-23T13:47:23-05:00

It just don't matter to me anymore! The haters are always going to hate.

Response by Maj Martin Smith made Nov 23 at 2021 5:57 PM

2021-11-23T17:57:08-05:00

Audie Murphy, a Texan who fought for this country should be honored not Hood!

Response by SGT Evan McIntire made Dec 11 at 2021 5:31 AM

2021-12-11T05:31:37-05:00

Don't

Response by PO2 John Driskill made Dec 13 at 2021 1:06 PM

2021-12-13T13:06:19-05:00

There was one General who served in both the CSA and Union Armies, General Joe Wheeler. He served in the Civil War on the side of the South and then in the US Army in the Spanish American War in Cuba. After the Spanish American War, he was quite proud of his blue General's uniform and went to his West Point Class reunion. Two former Confederate class mates were seated at a table outside of the meeting place. One looked at Joe Wheeler and said "I want to be at the Gates of Hell when you show up in that blue uniform." Rename one of those Forts after him.

Response by SSG Private RallyPoint Member made Dec 18 at 2021 4:05 PM

2021-12-18T16:05:12-05:00

Just being honest Ima black male to me it doesn’t matter with the bases. I mean I’d like to see more do one for Audie Murphy, Colin Powell, Henry Flipper. renaming army installations is a no go for me, but you can rename my sister services installations tho lol.

Response by SGT James Hunsinger made Dec 20 at 2021 6:14 PM

2021-12-20T18:14:03-05:00

Change them from their current name to their current name. Otherwise, leave them alone.

No matter what they change them to I will always refer to them by the names they have carried for literally generations of all ethnic backgrounds of soldiers.

If they really must change then change them to the name of the MoH recipients as has been suggested before.

After we honor those brave souls by renaming a base after them, we should hang our heads in shame for allowing our heritage and history to be erased by an ignorant, super minority of politically correct crusaders that have no clue of the true history of the American Civil War.

They will simply continue to hunt for more things to be offended by and to force change simply because they want it, not because it accomplishes anything beyond trying to bury our history.

Response by CPO Private RallyPoint Member made Dec 21 at 2021 12:58 PM

2021-12-21T12:58:58-05:00

None, Some of them were not bad people, they were people defending their homes against a government that was taxing them to death. (Freeing the Slaves was not the reason for the Civil war though it was a good outcome) Technically Lincoln broke the law by declaring war with out congress's approval and violated law by ignoring sovereign state rights. All this is a moot point. This rename and erase history is BS.

Response by CSM Bob Stanek made Dec 26 at 2021 10:49 PM

2021-12-26T22:49:13-05:00

Easy Solution...

OLD NAME New Name
- Fort Bragg Fort Cragg
- Fort Rucker Fort Tucker
- Fort Benning Fort Henning
- Fort Gordon Fort Mordon
- Fort Hood Fort Food
- Fort Polk Fort Wolk
- Fort A.P. Hill Fort B E Jill
- Fort Belvoir Fort Telvoir
- Fort Lee Fort Hee
- Fort Pickett Fort Lickett

Saves expensives too!

Response by CW3 Chuck Huddleston made Dec 30 at 2021 9:22 AM

2021-12-30T09:22:35-05:00

Don’t do it!!! There is nothing wrong with the names! Quit letting ignorant, racist whining dictate removing the historical names!!!

Response by 1LT Michael Contos made Dec 30 at 2021 9:30 AM

2021-12-30T09:30:52-05:00

Please see my blog post about changing the names:

https://contoveros.com/2020/06/19/confederate-generals-names-should-change/

Change Confederate generals’ names now

As a veteran of several military bases, I would vote to change the names of all the facilities named for generals who fought for the Confederate army during our nation’s Civil War. I offer such act…

Response by SPC Jennifer Clever made Jan 2 at 2022 1:18 PM

2022-01-02T13:18:13-05:00

Umm leave them as they are. It is all American History. The good, bad and ugly.

Response by SP5 William Jones made Jan 3 at 2022 8:02 PM

2022-01-03T20:02:37-05:00

Follow the example of General Sherman, burn them to the ground!

Response by MSgt Joseph Townsend made Jan 9 at 2022 11:40 PM

2022-01-09T23:40:35-05:00

This whole thing is nothing but BS. The was an honor bestowed on the general's for there service long before the BLM started demanding changes. If names changes are to be , the name them after Medal of Honor recipients.

Response by SPC Jasen E. made Jan 15 at 2022 1:51 AM

2022-01-15T01:51:26-05:00

Imagine if we deleted every person from history who had skeletons in their closet. History books would be blank.

Response by SSG Private RallyPoint Member made Jan 19 at 2022 10:58 AM

2022-01-19T10:58:48-05:00

How about medal of Honor people.

Response by SSG Carlos Madden made Jan 19 at 2022 11:04 AM

2022-01-19T11:04:39-05:00

Medal of Honor recipients seems to be the popular choice.

Response by CW5 Private RallyPoint Member made Jan 19 at 2022 1:51 PM

2022-01-19T13:51:35-05:00

It has been directed but it hasn't been funded yet. So no idea when anything will change.
I agree with what GEN Brooks said at an AUSA mentorship session.
Name them after the location they are at. Public perception of people changes all the time and anyone can fall victim of judgement over time.

Response by Lt Col Charlie Brown made Jan 19 at 2022 6:49 PM

2022-01-19T18:49:15-05:00

Medal of Honor awardees

Response by SGT Juan Robledo made Jan 31 at 2022 9:32 AM

2022-01-31T09:32:18-05:00

It's a mistake to change the names of Military Bases just to Satisfy a few Sore Heads, it should NEVER HAPPEN, but what I know, it's a travesty to rename the Military Bases, but if it should happen, it should be put up for a VOTE of those MOH soldiers, Eddie Murphy, for an example Eddie was probably the youngest MOH to have earned the MOH and it would be a HONOR for his name be included and there countless of others who should be named and considered Past and Present

Response by 1SG Dave Kling made Feb 11 at 2022 11:58 AM

2022-02-11T11:58:09-05:00

Name them all after metal all the honor recipients. For example Fort Bragg would be Fort Benavidez.

Response by TSgt David Whitmore made Feb 26 at 2022 7:41 PM

2022-02-26T19:41:13-05:00

A total waste of money.
But then, it's not like the money will be misspent. Right?

Response by SPC Bob Ridley made Mar 4 at 2022 9:51 AM

2022-03-04T09:51:08-05:00

How about Fort CarpetBagger?

Response by LTC Ray Buenteo made Mar 4 at 2022 12:00 PM

2022-03-04T12:00:21-05:00

Sam Houston owned slaves will they change the name of fort Sam Houston? George Washington owned slaves. Will the nations capital be renamed as well as the state? Louisiana was a hub for slavery shipping into the americas. Will we rename the state? Will George Washington university be renamed? Will the the democrat party be renamed because as you well know they supported segregation and slavery. It can go on forever.

Response by SPC David S. made Mar 4 at 2022 2:49 PM

2022-03-04T14:49:04-05:00

I have no horse in this race but I'd love to see one renamed to Fort Russian Ship Go F' Yourself.
Its got a nice ring to it.

Response by PO2 Mark Slay made Mar 4 at 2022 3:08 PM

2022-03-04T15:08:25-05:00

LEAVE HISTORY ALONE !!!

Response by MAJ Ken Landgren made Mar 4 at 2022 4:19 PM

2022-03-04T16:19:16-05:00

Fort Beat Your Face.
Fort KP.
Fort Mop the Motor Pools.
Fort We are deploying soon.
Fort Toxic Leadership.
Fort MRE.
Fort Lost in the Woods.

Response by LT Alex Corsi made Mar 4 at 2022 8:00 PM

2022-03-04T20:00:10-05:00

Honestly, if it's going tnis route then place names, objects, etc., not people. Another source is Greco-Roman deities or the county where the base is located.

Response by SGT Richard Domenden made Mar 5 at 2022 5:13 PM

2022-03-05T17:13:01-05:00

Keep the Names. If you give to these stupid demands from these oxygen thieves, what's next? We outnumber these thieves. Thier"butt hurtin is irrelevant.

Response by SFC Robert Walton made Mar 6 at 2022 12:05 PM

2022-03-06T12:05:11-05:00

So You are asking a question that has NO sensible or correct answer with out spewing hate. GOOOOOOOOD Job. Congress can't even pass a budget much less come up with fair and just names for Military Posts. Maybe we should call them Fort and the name of the state they are in. Lets name the white house the Presidents office. Then Congress. Want to office. Then Senate. I don't think so office.

Response by SSG Byron Hewett made Mar 6 at 2022 8:14 PM

2022-03-06T20:14:08-05:00

leave it the way it stands you can't change the past just by getting rid of or changing a name, history is history what's done is done best thing to do is learn from it, if you change it does change what happened? nope because it still happened, the names are fine why is such a big deal that the names have to be changed are you trying to punish the dead by removing theirs names off of history? sorry that's not how it works, just leave names and places alone its not hurting a thing except those who need a cause to be angry at such things because they can't find anything else to be angry about. the only thing I gotta say is stop and quit needing a reason to wanna be angry and hating on everything you don't agree with, knowing, learning, and understanding the past is how we make things better for the future not changing everything and discarding the past, what are we all going to learn from if we toss out the past and history, I'll tell you we repeat the past in new and worse ways than before. think about it.

Response by PO3 Vernon Carpenter made Mar 7 at 2022 11:08 AM

2022-03-07T11:08:50-05:00

All of the above look good to me

Response by SMSgt Anil Heendeniya made Mar 9 at 2022 3:41 PM

2022-03-09T15:41:14-05:00

Rename them after MOH winners from later conflicts (those who are from the respective states):
https://mohmuseum.org/recipient-database/

Recipient Database - The National Medal of Honor Museum

READ MEDAL OF HONOR RECIPIENT STORIES OF HEROISM, BRAVERY, AND VALOR IN ACTION. Browse our interactive database to view recipients of the prestigious...

Response by MSG Private RallyPoint Member made Mar 12 at 2022 12:45 PM

2022-03-12T12:45:29-05:00

I don't believe anything is gained by trying to erase the past.
Changing the names of Forts based solely on current social views can be a mistake, particularly when social views change over time.
Today, you change the name of a Fort such as Ft Bragg to something else.
What happens when a later generation finds fault with that person such as anti-gay/pro-gay, anti-abortion/pro-abortion, etc.
One Country's hero is another Country's war criminal. As people immigrate to this Country, they bring their concepts of heroes/villains with them.
You will always offend someone.

Response by COL Rich McKinney made Mar 15 at 2022 7:55 AM

2022-03-15T07:55:15-04:00

If they do decide to change names, Congress must FULLY fund it. The present funding is JUST for a commission to study it. It will be an outrageous cost that BaseOps funding can never meet. Think about it - every post regulation, form, flyer, web site, topo map, etc. One California city changed the name of it's City Hall building -- one building -- and cost almost a million dollars. It will completely kill operating budget if Congress makes them do it without funding.

Response by SFC Darwin Maring made Apr 16 at 2022 11:51 AM

2022-04-16T11:51:32-04:00

I suggested Fort Gordon be renamed Fort Sherman.
My real suggestion is: Put all Army Metal Of Honor recipients names in a hat and pull them out one by one to rename ALL Army Forts. Dont leave the decision to politicians.

Response by SSgt Mathew Cummings made Apr 16 at 2022 12:08 PM

2022-04-16T12:08:52-04:00

"Those who fail to learn from history are condemned to repeat it" -Santayana. Leave it. This concept of wiping history from the earth because someone has hurt feelings is the same as blaming forks for obesity.

Response by SSG Douglas Gerard made Apr 19 at 2022 3:54 PM

2022-04-19T15:54:01-04:00

At the rate the WOKE leftists are destroying the history of the US it really doesn't matter what names they erase. We won't have a nation, we won't have a history and we WILL be reliving the past because we will have forgotten our history if we ever learned it the first place.

Response by SMSgt Bob Wilson made May 2 at 2022 1:01 AM

2022-05-02T01:01:05-04:00

Why worry about it; the panel is picking names now.

Response by SMSgt Bob Wilson made May 2 at 2022 1:05 AM

2022-05-02T01:05:09-04:00

They want to represent the makeup of America. So...check your military history. If they pick anyone from 1950 to present, the panel wasted tax money.

Response by A1C Medrick "Rick" DeVaney made May 2 at 2022 8:05 PM

2022-05-02T20:05:54-04:00

Southern Civil War Military Veterans Deserve The Same Respect As The Northern Vets;
We BOTH Believed In Our Causes & Fought To Defend Them.
What's The Frigg'en Difference?
Respect Goes In Both Directions

Response by SFC Rich Bright made May 3 at 2022 1:42 AM

2022-05-03T01:42:49-04:00

Like the two Statues each state elects to place with-in the Capitol, So it is in the naming of the Base. The Name of the bases were at the behest of the state leaders from which the bases reside. Each state could hold a committee give three names for voter consideration, and let the people decide.
Or better yet;
LEAVE THEM THE WAY THEY ARE!
If their name offend you- move to a Northern state and leave these decisions to the adults who live and work and can read a history book with-in their own states. Besides, this issue whats next? Rename every Street names, there is a jackson, Lee and a Bragg in almost every base. Hey- while we are at it- there are Chapels on the end of every company street, we better tear em down and discharge all the military Chaplains- Seperation of Church and State Ya'll... Please, don't we have better things to worry about- like our failed imigration system or $7 dollar gas?

Response by SSG Robert Vernon made May 3 at 2022 3:43 PM

2022-05-03T15:43:20-04:00

I would like to see the names of some of the Past units / Post that were involved in conflicts ex. Like the screaming eagles, or for like Ft. Polk name it after one of the famous Battleships, its going to be hard to come up with a way to make everyone satisfied but this is something that needs to be done.

Response by MAJ Ken Landgren made May 3 at 2022 6:48 PM

2022-05-03T18:48:43-04:00

- AWOL
- Hot Urinalysis
- DUI
- Chapter

Response by SPC David Willis made May 3 at 2022 9:10 PM

2022-05-03T21:10:08-04:00

To take a less serious approach name them after famous action hero characters. Fort Rambo, Fort Bourne, Fort Bauer.

Response by SFC Darwin Maring made May 9 at 2022 1:47 PM

2022-05-09T13:47:13-04:00

Fort Gordon to Fort Sherman

Response by SPC Jay Peltier made May 15 at 2022 8:39 PM

2022-05-15T20:39:51-04:00

I have always been a student of History, I revere it, and believe as the old saying goes, "paraphrased", those who forget the past are condemned to repeat it.

All that said, I agree 100% these forts SHOULD be renamed. The history we NEED to remember in this moment is, the names of those leaders "honored" were in fact TRAITORS to our country (later pardoned). They took up arms against their country to defend (among other things) the institution of slavery. At the time that may have been acceptable, but NOT today. They were given this honor by ex confederates that did a damn good job trying to REWRITE history. In no other country on Earth is the "defeated" traitors honered by the country they rebelled against.

I see some of the same "mistakes today". Apparently some are not willing to learn from the past.

Response by 1SG James Kelly made May 19 at 2022 8:19 PM

2022-05-19T20:19:53-04:00

Don't.

Response by MGySgt Rick Tyrrell made May 19 at 2022 8:32 PM

2022-05-19T20:32:13-04:00

Leave them be. We have destroyed our history already by tearing down statues, kneeling for the National Anthem, rushing capital buildings. I feel no one will stop the momentum that has already begun. I for one believe as I always have and history should teach the future and many people from all cultures created our great country. All should be remembered.

Response by SSG Carl Gamel made May 31 at 2022 3:45 PM

2022-05-31T15:45:04-04:00

To rename Camp A P Hill, after Mary Walker us especially horrid. Mary Walker was a contract surgeon in the Civil War, she did nothing heroic, to deserve the Medal of Honor. When she was GIVEN ( that is given, not earned), the Medal did not have the honor it has now, it was given for anything, a entire Regiment was given to every single soldier, just for extending their enlistment by three months. Walker was given hers, because she had constantly badgered the War Department for some kind of recognition for her services, they gave it to her, to shut her up. Her Medal, along with thousands of others ( including that one Regiment) was revoked, around 1890, when it was decided that the Medal would be given only as reward for Valor. She was rewarded the Medal by President Clinton for Political Correctness, only because a women had never recieved it for a REAL REASON before. She was not and still not a real awarded of that prestigious Medal.

Response by SPC Lyle Montgomery made Jun 16 at 2022 8:56 AM

2022-06-16T08:56:09-04:00

Leave the names of these military instalations alone. Why do some want to change history to benefit their view? History is real, it did happen. Just because it hurts some idiots feelings dosen't mean we should change and forget history to please the few. What is happening to this great country? We need to get it back on the track and preserve history, and not destroy it.

Response by SFC Private RallyPoint Member made Jun 16 at 2022 9:26 AM

2022-06-16T09:26:57-04:00

It's already been decided, your opinion will not count at all, all they need is to agree on the budget needed to implement such changes...Fort Gordon will be Fort Eisenhower...

Response by SA Joe Demski made Jun 20 at 2022 12:27 AM

2022-06-20T00:27:34-04:00

Leve the posts alone

Response by CPT John Scott made Jun 21 at 2022 5:51 PM

2022-06-21T17:51:30-04:00

Leave our statues, bases and history alone. The people behind this nonsense and the bums tearing down statues, more than likely, never served. Who needs any of them?

Response by PO3 David Keck made Jun 22 at 2022 9:54 AM

2022-06-22T09:54:33-04:00

Maybe we could name them after the brave young men that ran off to Canada during Vietnam.

Response by Sgt Mike Croke made Jun 22 at 2022 7:37 PM

2022-06-22T19:37:20-04:00

Why stop there? Let's rename New Mexico and New Jersey. Jersey is a place in the British Empire they enslaved and colonized more then half of the world. How come nobody is changing that name. And of course we have to change Washington State and Washington D.C.
Are we really trying to live in a world in which we deny history. The reason these bases were named after these men is to reconcile and rebuild a nation through respect of others beliefs. Right or wrong, they fought for what they thought was right at the time. Slavery was one issue. It was the intrusion of the federal government on the states rights that was the cornerstone of the Civil War.

Response by PO2 Dean Wilder made Jun 23 at 2022 4:44 PM

2022-06-23T16:44:20-04:00

LEAVE THEM THE FUCK ALONE .............................

Response by SGT Dave Hamilton made Jun 24 at 2022 10:28 PM

2022-06-24T22:28:29-04:00

Don't do it, it's tradition now. Those if us that served will never acknowledge anything but Ft Bragg get over it losers. Your a bunch of soft Nancy's with no intestinal fortitude. Bunch of poags

Response by MSG Justin S. made Jun 25 at 2022 6:57 PM

2022-06-25T18:57:23-04:00

Discharge all woke people from DOD.

Response by TSgt David McLellan made Jun 26 at 2022 8:01 AM

2022-06-26T08:01:23-04:00

Leave the names the same. No change. Our military needs to focus on war training…not “government sanctioned social change”.

Response by CPL Raul Perez Jr made Jun 26 at 2022 11:42 AM

2022-06-26T11:42:07-04:00

Leave them be. So any hero’s have trained and have left their mark their.

Response by Sgt Randall Dunkley made Jun 26 at 2022 12:13 PM

2022-06-26T12:13:52-04:00

IMO if we use the names of closed forts from the 19th century we would have Custer, Reno, C.F.Smith, Kearney, Apache, Lowell , Funston, etc. If we used the names of MOH recipients (there are no winners of the MOH) we have an all inclusive choice of personnel. I would go with that.

Response by SGT Tami Ramos made Jun 26 at 2022 1:11 PM

2022-06-26T13:11:12-04:00

ABSOLUTELY AGREE! NOTHING NEEDS CHANGED. SAVE THE MONEY. MOVE ON. STOP WHINING ABOUT RIDICULOUSNESS.

Response by SFC Kenneth Hunnell made Jun 26 at 2022 1:48 PM

2022-06-26T13:48:31-04:00

How many of the people that are looking for the name changes actually served this country. I'm sure not to many people that served thought about the name of the base or post. Someone needs something to complain about

Response by MSG Jeremy Jiron made Jun 26 at 2022 11:50 PM

2022-06-26T23:50:05-04:00

My suggestion: fire the generals and vote out the privileged congress who made this move. Changing names doesn’t change history. We all embrace the good the bad and the ugly. My
Family
Is Native American and Hispanic. My 2 great great uncles: one joined the union one joined the confederate army. They were brown people. Not white people. So my vote: don’t change a thing!!!

Response by SGT George Gilpin made Jun 27 at 2022 10:32 AM

2022-06-27T10:32:13-04:00

Leave as is waste of time and money

Response by SPC Julio R. made Jun 27 at 2022 12:12 PM

2022-06-27T12:12:38-04:00

GET RID OF THEM, THEY ARE TRAITORS.
Just like all those racist reich wing yal'qaeda insurrectionists on Jan 6th. There are alot of Active duty and Veterans that hide their bigoted hate behind their rank and uniform.
Take your klanfederate klanservative jim crow bullsht somewhere else.
Always the backwards mother sisters and father brothers that cry "buh buh muh freedumb, muh hairytage".
Only folks good with keeping these racist genocidal maniacs is thee same trash that caters to the nazi gop party, like those pieces of trash in the racist hateful bigoted red states or Supreme supremist court.

Response by SCPO Rick Hunter made Jun 27 at 2022 12:32 PM

2022-06-27T12:32:22-04:00

Leave them the f**k ALONE. They've had those names more than 100 years and the crybabies, whining about the name don't matter as much as a zit on a goat's ass

Response by SGT Juan Robledo made Jun 27 at 2022 1:27 PM

2022-06-27T13:27:42-04:00

Ft Hood to Audie Murphy

Response by SGT Nelson Stahl made Jun 27 at 2022 2:23 PM

2022-06-27T14:23:12-04:00

I suggest you name all bases their zip code ! That way the only people who can be offended is the mathematicians.

Response by SGT Private RallyPoint Member made Jun 27 at 2022 6:34 PM

2022-06-27T18:34:33-04:00

Rename Fort Bragg to Fort "in honor of the Worst General of the Confederacy".

Response by PFC John Roscoe made Jun 28 at 2022 11:23 AM

2022-06-28T11:23:26-04:00

This post has been up a long while- and who is it that want's to keep the names of Confederate Traitors whom defended the institution of slavery based on racial superiority? Look at the comments below- how many service people of color? What region of the country do the majority of them come from. They all talk about protecting history- but these are the same folks terrified about Critical Race Theory, and are making laws and punishing people for even mentioning a history of 4 hundred years of discrimination, genocide against Native Americans, Jim Crow and Slavery, Concentration Camps for Japanese Americans, Race Riots against Chinatowns, discrimination against Jews and other minorities in housing, financing, education and employment. They don't care about history. What they care about is cultural dominance

Response by CWO4 Miles Weaver made Jun 28 at 2022 1:21 PM

2022-06-28T13:21:35-04:00

This revisionist history crap is wearing thin. People who are offended by the smallest things, including base names are showing just how weak and sensitive Americans have become. It's a sad day when pretty much anything is a reason to be offended and have your feelings hurt. Grow up, people.

Response by SP5 Clifford Harris made Jun 28 at 2022 1:48 PM

2022-06-28T13:48:51-04:00

Ft. Biden
Ft. Harris
LMAO!

Response by SFC Private RallyPoint Member made Jun 28 at 2022 4:57 PM

2022-06-28T16:57:09-04:00

I would suggest and recommend to reconsider the entire Bad Idea and Leave the original Post Names as they currently are. I AM Sick to Death of the Liberal Agenda crowd tearing down all of our historical monuments because of WHO they were and WHAT they did, just because that's what Liberals do best. Too bad that it hurt your feelings, or "Triggered" you to have uneasy feelings and bad dreams. These Names and Monuments REPRESENT OUR History AND OUR Heritage! WE, The Real People and Citizens of the U.S.A. want those things left alone, UNCHANGED!! Let the Liberal crowd deal with it. Not only those wacko's, but the 'alphabet' crowd too with their unethical demands and ramming their way of life down OUR Throats, with the sex changes and the drag Queen shows, and teaching & showing children dirty-rotten things that their virgin eyes should Not be viewing. I'm Tired and Sickened that WE have to change OUR ways around them and for them! That Rainbow Flag doesn't belong and should NEVER be flown on the same flagpole with OUR American Flag!! If you call this HateSpeech, I really don't give a damn, Too Bad! I Served My Country - Faithfully, and am Sick of being pushed around by the crowd that is Ruining and Damaging Our Country!!

Response by Sgt Mike Croke made Jun 28 at 2022 6:21 PM

2022-06-28T18:21:15-04:00

Why not persons awarded the MOH?

Response by SN Walt Boyer made Jun 28 at 2022 6:33 PM

2022-06-28T18:33:11-04:00

My suggestion would be to change the administration and get away from the appeasement of wokeness. Changing the name of those installations WILL NOT improve our military.

Response by Sgt Ivan Boatwright made Jun 28 at 2022 7:18 PM

2022-06-28T19:18:56-04:00

History is the past done and over. I understand the grievance it causes. I was in Nam for my 21, 22, and 23rd birthdays. I believed in what I did. Unfortunately, I was wrong, and there is not a damn thing I can do about it. There is no way to change it, nor can I forget it. I must move on.

Response by SPC Laura Mitchell made Jun 29 at 2022 8:26 AM

2022-06-29T08:26:25-04:00

I'll give it a try. If this is a duplicate, I apologize. the cat thinks she can type.
In no particular order:

Fort (Clara) Barton-Founder of the American Red Cross

Fort (Mary Ann) Bickerdyke-US Sanitary Commission and made Union generals pay attention

Fort (Juliet Gordon) Lowe-Founder of the Girl Scouts, born in Savannah

Fort (Mary Edwards) Walker-Union Army Surgeon

Fort (Harriet) Tubman-Union spy, underground railroad conductor

Fort (Sharon Ann) Lane-1LT, Army Nurse Corps, KIA Chu Lai, 1969

Fort (Dan) Bullock-Okay, he was a Marine but he was the youngest KIA (15 years old) in Vietnam, and African American

Fort (Oveta Culp) Hobby-First Director of the Women's Auxillary Army Corps (1942)

Fort (Frances) Stanger-LT, Army Nurse Corps, KIA. 1944. One of 4 ANC officers to come ashore on D-Day and ONLY ANC officer to die in the European Theater

Fort (Frances Olive) Chesley-2LT, Army Nurse Corps-KIA (Kamikaze attack) while assigned to the USS Comfort. Okinawa, April, 1944

Fort (Ashley) White-1LT, Medical Service Corps. KIA, Kandahar Province, 2011.

Fort (Anna Mae) Hays-Army Nurse Corps, first woman to be promoted to Brigadier General. Died in 2018

You guys spotting a trend?

Response by CAPT Steve Remmenga made Jun 29 at 2022 10:40 AM

2022-06-29T10:40:48-04:00

Leave them be

Response by MSgt James Flowers made Jun 29 at 2022 10:53 AM

2022-06-29T10:53:16-04:00

Leave history alone and do away with the radicals who want to change history to their likes.

Response by SPC Mike Stevens made Jun 29 at 2022 1:27 PM

2022-06-29T13:27:00-04:00

Leave the names alone! If it's not broke, don't fix it! It is political correctness and it sux!

Response by SFC Jim Freshour made Jun 29 at 2022 6:28 PM

2022-06-29T18:28:11-04:00

Since we're going full woketard the obvious names would St. George Floyd, St. Michael Brown etc.. and let's not forget appeasement of the Rainbow Mafia either.

Response by SFC James High made Jun 30 at 2022 12:38 PM

2022-06-30T12:38:56-04:00

Name Them After Famous Army Battles that we won. Such as: Gettysburg, Ardennes; or maybe for some of our more modern generals: such as GEN Powell and GEN Schwarzkopf.

Response by SPC Roger D. Pemberton Jr. made Jun 30 at 2022 4:39 PM

2022-06-30T16:39:35-04:00

It's part of history, leave them the hell alone and stop being such a sensitive candya*s baby. I'd bet some of these bases have been named long before you had the chance to end up as a brown stain on the mattress.

Response by TSgt Alex Barkey made Jun 30 at 2022 7:29 PM

2022-06-30T19:29:51-04:00

I like the suggestion of naming all of them to Medal of Honor recipients. But personally I have no skin in this as a retired Air Force.

Response by MAJ Bill Cooper made Jul 1 at 2022 12:35 AM

2022-07-01T00:35:39-04:00

Ft Bennng > Benning School for Boys or just School for Boys

Response by CN Mykle Bradley made Jul 1 at 2022 8:50 AM

2022-07-01T08:50:42-04:00

Why change the name

Response by SSG Russell D. made Jul 1 at 2022 4:17 PM

2022-07-01T16:17:55-04:00

Leave them as they are, the are American Soldiers. Just as left wing politically correct idiots tear down & desecrate memorials dedicated to American Soldiers who fought in War WWII, Vietnam, Civil War. Bottom line, they were American Soldiers. They deserve the respect, to never forget them as they fought for their State the same as in the American Revolution.

Response by SSG Russell D. made Jul 1 at 2022 4:30 PM

2022-07-01T16:30:59-04:00

You don't rename bases because of political correctness. They are American Soldiers, they have American War Memorials, this is our history. The Constitution was based off of states rights, they served their states. The Confederacy was born off the same principle as the USA, they did exactly what the 13 colonies did to Great Britain 100 years later, they succeeded. When everyone went crazy two years ago with political correctness, people were trying to tear down statues of Lincoln, Generals from the Union, statues of Lewis & Clark, desecrating the WWII Memorial & Memorials from WWI & the Civil War. This is all nonsense. Political Correctness is a cancer that weakens & destroy from within. Should we also change the delete & omit the names of Washington, Jefferson, Adams etc.... take them off our currency, delete their names from our cities, rivers, counties all for political correctness? If you think we should change the names of the Army Bases, you are part of the problem that we need to get rid of, do not omit, delete, cover up our history based on political correctness & what you think is favorable at the moment. How man Confederate Soldiers do you think owned slaves? Almost none, only wealthy land owners did, the Confederate Soldier were mostly poor farmers fighting for their state.

Response by MSG Ronnie Snider made Jul 1 at 2022 5:09 PM

2022-07-01T17:09:11-04:00

Leave them alone do notchange them. I served at 5 of those bases. Woke is ot military history. We are the military veterans not the stiffs in DC. These are soldier's we are all one or not at all.

Response by MSgt Ronnie Locke made Jul 2 at 2022 11:47 AM

2022-07-02T11:47:48-04:00

Name them for the city they are located near. Forget individuals for you never know when they might fall out of favor or someone or group might find them offensive.

Response by TSgt Private RallyPoint Member made Jul 2 at 2022 11:41 PM

2022-07-02T23:41:20-04:00

just call the US ARMY BASE!! nice and generic

Response by SMSgt Bob Wilson made Jul 3 at 2022 1:22 AM

2022-07-03T01:22:15-04:00

Name each location after a Supreme Court Justice and the last location after the 44th President.

Response by A1C Medrick "Rick" DeVaney made Jul 3 at 2022 3:05 AM

2022-07-03T03:05:56-04:00

What The Hell, The gods KNOW, We Must Be Politically Correct,
So Let's Just Number Them....
Fort 1... Bitch
Fort 2...Bitch
Fort 3...Bitch
Fort 4...Bitch

"Sound Off 1, 2, 3 , 4, SOUND OFF!, 1 2 3 4 .
"This Political Correct SHI* Is Exactly That ""SHI*"
And That's On A GOOD Day.

AZHOLES !!

Response by Sgt Ronald Burcham made Jul 3 at 2022 3:20 AM

2022-07-03T03:20:24-04:00

Why don't we rename them all after Negro Americans in support of Antifa and the BLM. After all if it hadn't been for the pressure from BLM, Antifa, and associated organizations such as the NAACP there wouldn't have been the rioting and destruction in our cities that encouraged the Democrats and Company to succumb to the savagery of the rioters and "peaceful" (YEAH, SURE) "protestors" in the streets.

The uncivilized savages who are tearing down Confederate statutes are the real criminals and traitors. And if the Democrats were civilized and devoted to America they would have arrested the PIGS and thrown them in JAIL for sedition, rioting, and destruction of property, but the Democrats hate America as much as BLM and Antifa.

Response by CW2 William Melton made Jul 4 at 2022 1:09 PM

2022-07-04T13:09:12-04:00

the question should be why do we want to change names of these bases? why do we want to change history? guess the answer is we want to repeat history so lets forget what we have learned and do it again. rather a stupid idea but for the sake of WOW, NOW , WOKE, BLM and lets not for get the WLM also and all the others we need to destroy these men, names and symbols. as we re-name all the Bases need to rename them after our great Black leaders in this country. i am not racist but really getting pissed at please me because i am minority and your god knows how many greats in the grand daddy field were slave owners. we have to be rectified and justified with destroying history. as we rename all the Bases, lets destroy all the history books also and of course we are doing a good job destroying monuments. Washington and Lincoln and Jefferson monuments must go also. if we are going down this path then we must not stop at nothing to completely destroy history in America. our children can start a new history lesson every day. no old history to see so lets do new history . does any one who reads this really see what i am trying to say or am i way out in left field. just a thought for the 4th but then again why do we celebrate the 4th or any other holiday. HISTORY?? .

Response by TSgt Robert Holmes made Jul 7 at 2022 4:09 PM

2022-07-07T16:09:45-04:00

When I see these installations, there is no connection to any part of the Confederates; But what they have become by themselves. Fort Bragg - Special Forces, Fort Rucker - Amry Aviation, Fort Benning - Airborne, Fort Hood - The Cav, etc. Take Woke out the Armed Forces. This starts at the Top.

Response by MSgt Mike P. made Jul 12 at 2022 2:15 AM

2022-07-12T02:15:16-04:00

Stop!!! Good grief, what else are they going to waste time & money on?!?

Response by Cpl George Matousek made Jul 15 at 2022 6:22 PM

2022-07-15T18:22:58-04:00

Leave them alone fine as they are.

Response by Sgt Greg Nowark made Jul 18 at 2022 6:41 AM

2022-07-18T06:41:06-04:00

"The Base Formerly Known As Fort Bragg"
"The Base Formerly Known As - Fort Rucker"
-"The Base Formerly Known As Fort Benning"
-"The Base Formerly Known As Fort Gordon"
- "The Base Formerly Known As Fort Hood"
- "The Base Formerly Known As Fort Polk"
- "The Base Formerly Known As Fort A.P. Hill"
- "The Base Formerly Known As Fort Belvoir"
- "The Base Formerly Known As Fort Lee"
- "The Base Formerly Known As Fort Pickett"

Response by Lt Col Timothy Cassidy-Curtis made Jul 19 at 2022 12:17 AM

2022-07-19T00:17:30-04:00

I have made a similar recommendation for statues. I present it, here, for installations.

Every installation named after a Confederate General should be hyphenated to include the Union General (or other person, see A. P. Hill) who defeated him. Thus, the list would be as follows:
Fort Bragg-Slocum
Fort Rucker-Howard
Fort Benning-Custer
Fort Gordon-Wilson
Fort Hood-Thomas
Fort Polk-Howard
Fort A.P. Hill-Mauck
Fort Belvoir: Belvoir was not a Confederate General, it was a plantation name
Fort Lee-Grant
Fort Pickett-Meade

Response by SSgt Private RallyPoint Member made Jul 19 at 2022 6:10 PM

2022-07-19T18:10:07-04:00

NO! PC is for wimps.

Response by PO1 Sam Deel made Jul 20 at 2022 11:15 AM

2022-07-20T11:15:34-04:00

Leave them be. Those are US Veterans, by Law. If people are "offended", they need to learn the real History of the conflict, beginning with the French and Indian War. Unresolved issues tend to fester up over time. Slavery played a minor role till Lincoln made it the sole issue to cover up the True reasons why Brother fought Brother. Should the US Army also stop learning the Military tactics employed by these Generals, like that of Lt. General Nathan Bedford Forrest?

Response by SrA Private RallyPoint Member made Jul 20 at 2022 9:59 PM

2022-07-20T21:59:41-04:00

You should look into each of the people you are criticizing for their part in the history of our nation, in my opinion. After the war, many continued to serve the country in various capacities. https://flagle.onl

Flagle

Flagle is an exciting guessing game with the theme of flags and based on Wordle, you need to make an effort to guess the country's name correctly within 6 tries.

Response by SSgt Jeanne Wallace made Jul 20 at 2022 11:18 PM

2022-07-20T23:18:19-04:00

the "powers that be" will not listen to us..so this is pointless. .they are hell bent on erasing OUR history...so that they can benefit when it cycles around again..

Response by SSgt Jeanne Wallace made Jul 20 at 2022 11:26 PM

2022-07-20T23:26:19-04:00

leave them alone...congress made all confederate soldiers and sailors
US veterans along time ago,,they were far closer to that war than we are ...if they can get passed it, who the hell are we to judge?!

Response by CW3 Kevin Storm made Jul 21 at 2022 2:10 PM

2022-07-21T14:10:58-04:00

Should of been done years ago.

Response by Maj R Descar made Jul 21 at 2022 3:40 PM

2022-07-21T15:40:28-04:00

this is bs. the confederacy is part of American history & is just as important as honest Abe who had slaves himself. this woke military is not one i am proud of! it is an embarrassment to those who lived, breathed and died for this nation!!!

if you really want to rename them, why don't start with Stalingrad, which is what this country is becoming!!!

Response by PO2 Joan MacNeill made Jul 21 at 2022 7:49 PM

2022-07-21T19:49:09-04:00

The key word is "honoring". If they deserved it in the first place, they still do. It's honorable to respect an enemy, especially if that enemy acted honorably, consistent with the demands of warfare. Wouldn't you expect respect from an enemy if you were defeated, if you acted honorably, unless the enemy was a despicable person who could not respect anyone (even himself)?. I enjoyed the Spanish novel "El Abencerraje", in which the famous Spanish hero El Cid, and the Moorish enemy commander were excruciatingly polite and gracious whenever they met. Don't we now honor some of the vanquished Indian leaders we fought with so bitterly? Didn't we open our arms to Werner von Braun after World War II, even though he conscientiously worked to invent rockets for the Nazis? I am especially saddened by any sentiment toward dishonoring Robert E. Lee, who was loved and revered by those on both sides in the Civil War. He was well known as a respectable, respecting gentleman, as well as being an inspired warrior! As soon as he finally recognized that the Confederate side would fail, he surrendered to avoid further bloodshed, on BOTH sides.

Of course, if the namesakes were later found to have tarnished their names, that's different. And I don't mean about slavery or some racial bias; that was commonplace and an attitude of the times, as long as it was not extreme or cruel. Even the beloved Jimmy Carter admitted to being an unconscious racist in his younger days, until he realized it.

Response by SGT Nickolas Ortiz made Jul 29 at 2022 10:23 PM

2022-07-29T22:23:10-04:00

It’s a waste of racist me and money. I’m done not care. If we’re more focused on training our Warriors to fight instead of this clearly BS identity political move, maybe we’ll actually win the next war that Pedo Joe gets us in. Imagine, BECAUSE OF PEDO JOE, we LOST the war in Afghanistan! ANYONE that wishes to “rename” these places hates America, hates Americans, and needs to shut up.

Response by LTC George Morgan made Jul 31 at 2022 4:46 PM

2022-07-31T16:46:07-04:00

Suggest the Posts be named for personnel at strategic level. Such as Powell, Ike, Patton. Buildings and next tactical level. Missed in most of the social complaint is WHY the bases were named the way they were. Did not deal with the social issues. Dealt with the individual had contributed (no matter what their side) at that level. Medal of Honor Winners had buildings, sections of bases named after them most often. There is the Strategic, Over all Tactical, and the lower level (Field) Tactical. Most contributions at that level should be a factor in the decision. Bases were often used as a moral boost in earlier Wars to put the idea into soldiers heads they were being that fighting spirit. Had little to with social ideas. Had to do with giving them the fighting spirit. Have always felt you could plan for honing troops for what you want them to do. NOT what you wish would have happened in the past. Bad Strategy otherwise. In fact when done otherwise, usually turns out to be a mistake.

Response by SGT Ted Reed made Aug 18 at 2022 6:26 AM

2022-08-18T06:26:43-04:00

stop caving in to the my feelings are hurt crowd.

Response by 1SG James Kelly made Aug 21 at 2022 11:09 AM

2022-08-21T11:09:18-04:00

Don't.

Response by 1SG James Kelly made Aug 21 at 2022 11:12 AM

2022-08-21T11:12:02-04:00

Fire the stupid people who came up with this idea.

Response by SPC Mike Schredl made Aug 29 at 2022 1:50 AM

2022-08-29T01:50:05-04:00

With apologies to Orwell, but since we are rewriting history by removing unperson's names, i think Fort Ogilvie would be doubleplusgood.

Response by SGT Walt Pozgay made Sep 16 at 2022 9:22 AM

2022-09-16T09:22:14-04:00

We should not have bases named after traitors. How about we find some significant leaders from modern history to honor? Fort Powell, for example....

Response by SGT(P) Private RallyPoint Member made Oct 3 at 2022 5:12 AM

2022-10-03T05:12:27-04:00

Leave them alone.

Response by PVT Ted Rodosovich made Oct 7 at 2022 8:22 PM

2022-10-07T20:22:14-04:00

Leave religimum figures out a it.

Response by PVT Ted Rodosovich made Oct 7 at 2022 8:39 PM

2022-10-07T20:39:04-04:00

Re the "It costs money; taxpayer money; etc etc etc
What lame LAME thinking...

Response by SGT Ray Puffenbarger made Oct 7 at 2022 10:36 PM

2022-10-07T22:36:32-04:00

Don’t bow to the Pansy-ass woke agenda.

Response by SGT Ray Puffenbarger made Oct 7 at 2022 10:41 PM

2022-10-07T22:41:44-04:00

My argument is not to keep a Confederate namesake for these parts, but rather that the blood, sweat and tears that fellow servicemen and women have baptized these places with over the years has given them life and legend well beyond the people for whom they were named. We are doing a disservice to those service members who served at those places by erasing the history of their names.

Response by PVT Ted Rodosovich made Oct 14 at 2022 2:27 AM

2022-10-14T02:27:29-04:00

IMO, shud be directly USA military. But must break "military" up into each component. Maybe put defined components into a totem pole list, top to bottom. Then decide from which (again) component a name is drawn. May need to adopt a weighting system. Am I being vague enuf..? $ : ^ )

Response by SSgt Russell Stevens made Oct 15 at 2022 7:29 PM

2022-10-15T19:29:31-04:00

Leave them alone. They were named for American soldiers who participated in war according to their patriotism. Don't lecture me about supporting slavery, that wasn't part of the question.

Response by MSG Nick C. made Oct 15 at 2022 7:58 PM

2022-10-15T19:58:23-04:00

Leave them the hell alone!

Response by Sgt Al Chacon made Oct 19 at 2022 10:49 PM

2022-10-19T22:49:33-04:00

I think they should name them after Medal of Honor recipients.

Response by 1LT Bill Dickert made Oct 23 at 2022 12:46 PM

2022-10-23T12:46:56-04:00

Renaming these Posts just to humor the “woke” crowd is just wrong. Those honored by having the Posts named after them, were American Soldiers, whether they they fought for The Confederate States or the Union. Erasing American History is an incredible Wrong.

Response by SSG Gregg Mouritzen made Oct 31 at 2022 1:39 AM

2022-10-31T01:39:44-04:00

I suggest we rename all those bases:
- Fort Bragg
- Fort Rucker
- Fort Benning
- Fort Gordon
- Fort Hood
- Fort Polk
- Fort A.P. Hill
- Fort Belvoir
- Fort Lee
- Fort Pickett

Response by SSG William Zopff III made Nov 1 at 2022 2:05 PM

2022-11-01T14:05:28-04:00

I don’t think we should wipe away the history lessons learned, by changing the names of these bases. Americans died defeating the Confederacy, and most of these men chose a side during a pivotal moment in history, the side of their home state. The defeat of the Confederacy also defeated the ugly institution of slavery; hiding these names are wiping away the historical reminders that ensure we don’t regress back to a time of division and the enslavement of a population. Otherwise, the State where their located should decide!

Response by PO1 Edward Speary made Nov 9 at 2022 5:24 PM

2022-11-09T17:24:49-05:00

It is history,leave it alone.

Response by SGT John Overby made Nov 17 at 2022 7:00 PM

2022-11-17T19:00:47-05:00

- Fort Bragg to Ft. Jackson
- Fort Rucker to Ft. A.P. Hill
- Fort Benning - Ft. Bragg
- Fort Gordon - Ft. Polk
- Fort Hood Ft. Belvoir
- Fort Polk - Ft. Lee
- Fort A.P. Hill - Ft. Pickett
- Fort Belvoir - Ft. Rucker
- Fort Lee Ft. Benning
- Fort Pickett to Ft. Gordon

Response by SGT Dc Townes made Nov 19 at 2022 1:43 AM

2022-11-19T01:43:40-05:00

I love the move.

Response by LTC Private RallyPoint Member made Nov 21 at 2022 12:30 AM

2022-11-21T00:30:35-05:00

None. Leave the names alone. You can't erase history and expect to learn from it.

Response by SP5 Michael Barczykowski made Nov 29 at 2022 7:55 AM

2022-11-29T07:55:15-05:00

Leave them the F**k alone. Bragg will always be Bragg in my heart. Don't care what the woke feel or say. AATW.

Response by SFC Private RallyPoint Member made Nov 29 at 2022 8:18 PM

2022-11-29T20:18:25-05:00

None.

Response by Maj John Bell made Nov 30 at 2022 8:20 AM

2022-11-30T08:20:10-05:00

Save money on signage. Get a bucket of paint
- Fort Bragg = Fort Br
- Fort Rucker = Fort R
- Fort Benning = Fort Be
- Fort Gordon = Fort G
- Fort Hood = Fort H
- Fort Polk = Fort Po
- Fort A.P. Hill = Fort A
- Fort Belvoir = Fort Bel
- Fort Lee = Fort L
- Fort Pickett = Fort Pi

Response by CPL Raul Perez Jr made Nov 30 at 2022 12:43 PM

2022-11-30T12:43:16-05:00

None. You should not erase the men/ women that came thru those gates.

Response by SSgt Lynndriette Rome made Dec 2 at 2022 3:27 PM

2022-12-02T15:27:38-05:00

Name them after the cities that they reside near

Response by SGT Private RallyPoint Member made Dec 2 at 2022 3:33 PM

2022-12-02T15:33:35-05:00

Erasing history does not undo history. While history does have a checkered past (to put it mildly), it is learning from that history that helps society to progress.

Response by SFC Howard Holmes made Dec 2 at 2022 4:06 PM

2022-12-02T16:06:44-05:00

Fort Snowflake, Fort Woke, Fort Tranny, Fort Hurt Feelings, Fort Rainbow, Fort Xanadu, Fort Ruby Slippers, Fort PC Forever, Fort Peace and Love, Fort Hunter Biden.

Response by SSG James N. made Dec 3 at 2022 8:43 AM

2022-12-03T08:43:14-05:00

Take the WOKE out of the military, and since these are simply US Veteran's by law, LEAVE IT TH F ALONE
Only woke college grads and indoctrinated children cry about this stuff

Response by PO2 Private RallyPoint Member made Dec 3 at 2022 10:38 AM

2022-12-03T10:38:50-05:00

I haven’t even a single care in the matter.

Response by SGT Joseph Dutton made Dec 4 at 2022 1:00 AM

2022-12-04T01:00:46-05:00

Renaming a Base, Fort or Post cost millions of dollars to each when renaming a base, fort or a post. Just like Obama did combining Bases, Forts or Post under one name in a region of operation. For example Fort Sam Houston and Lackland Air Force Base became Joint Base San Antonio which caused the USPS a headache to reissue new zip codes for each. I say if it ain't broken, don't fix it. They all have a part in our history wither good, bad or ugly. It seems we are in an era to erase our past and eventually forgotten. Oh! it will also cause a bordon on the states and cities to change signage as well which will probably cost 10's of thousands of tax payer dollars.

Response by TSgt D Newman made Dec 4 at 2022 9:47 AM

2022-12-04T09:47:34-05:00

Fort Tupac
Fort C Bee
Fort Eminem (remember the diversity)
Fort Levin (Make Our Trannies Happy Again)
Fort Dogg
Fort LilWayne
Fort Too Short

Response by PO1 William Van Syckle made Dec 4 at 2022 12:26 PM

2022-12-04T12:26:12-05:00

Fort Bragg
Fort Rucker
Fort Benning
Fort Gordon
Fort Hood
Fort Polk
Fort A.P.Hill
Fort Belvoir
Fort Lee
Fort Pickett
That’s my suggestion for name changes. I’m not going to change it…..

Response by SPC Private RallyPoint Member made Dec 4 at 2022 10:40 PM

2022-12-04T22:40:30-05:00

I will Not call them anything but what they are and have always been called! Piss Off Woke Jackwagons!

Response by A1C Medrick "Rick" DeVaney made Dec 5 at 2022 6:08 AM

2022-12-05T06:08:59-05:00

Ever Wonder
"When Will Our Government Ever
STOP Doing DUMB SH*T"?

Response by SGT Stephen Tuckier made Dec 5 at 2022 10:27 AM

2022-12-05T10:27:50-05:00

I think we should search long and hard for someone worthy of having a base named after them that has the exact same last name as the post already has. That way, it would still be Fort Bragg, but named after a different Bragg for example!

Response by SFC Howard Holmes made Dec 10 at 2022 11:53 PM

2022-12-10T23:53:11-05:00

Fort Liberace
Fort Pinky Lee
Fort Margaret Sanger
Fort Kind and Gentle
Fort Politically Correct
Fort Where's my Skirt
Fort Conscientious Objector
Fort Hop Scotch
Fort Hunter Biden
Fort I Want Mommy

Response by SGT George Edward Brown made Dec 12 at 2022 9:54 AM

2022-12-12T09:54:55-05:00

IF FOR NO OTHER REASON, THINK OF THE COSTS, IN THESE DAYS OF EVER TIGHTING BUDGETS, OF CHANGING SIGNS, STREET SIGNS, UPDATEING MAPS DOWN TO EVERY LETTERHEAD THAT WOULD HAVE TO BE SCRAPPED AND NEW ONES PRODUCED AND THE LIST GOES ON. AS WELL AS ALL THE OTHER FEEL GOOD NAME CHANGES BEING PUSHED BY THE PRESENT ADMINISTRATION !

Response by CPO Kurt Baschab made Dec 14 at 2022 8:59 PM

2022-12-14T20:59:27-05:00

My suggestion, is to get back to Training are Soldiers, Sailors, Airmen , Marines on how to defend this nation from both Foreign and Domestic Threats to are Constitution and Sovereignty, to stop this WOKE Bullshit.

Response by PFC Edward Krinsky made Dec 16 at 2022 3:00 PM

2022-12-16T15:00:31-05:00

How about renaming all of them Fort Biden?

Response by SPC David Buttrey made Dec 17 at 2022 10:18 AM

2022-12-17T10:18:30-05:00

Leave them alone because it won’t really matter at all. Veterans who served at these installations will still call them Bennington, Bragg, etc.

Response by SGT David Bower made Dec 19 at 2022 8:54 PM

2022-12-19T20:54:20-05:00

Fort Bragg- Fort All American
Fort Rucker - Fort Shelby

Response by PO1 Robert Ryan made Dec 21 at 2022 11:10 PM

2022-12-21T23:10:59-05:00

I can't understand any of this political correct stuff. Took Basic at Fort Jackson, March 1967 AIT at Fort Polk. June 1967. Like it or not the Civil War is part of our country's history.

Response by CWO3 Robert Fong made Dec 22 at 2022 11:44 AM

2022-12-22T11:44:27-05:00

SGT, to begin with ALL Confederate soldiers and officers are now considered US veterans by an Act of Congress on two separate occasions. Therefore, it would seem appropriate that an individual who had shown outstanding leadership and military proficiency or heroism should be nominated. Leadership and heroism on the field of battle should be recognized because it sets an example for others to follow. Regardless of whether one sides with the North or South an outstanding soldier is an outstanding soldier. To me Fort Benning will always be Benning.

Response by Amn Dale Preisach made Dec 23 at 2022 6:07 PM

2022-12-23T18:07:56-05:00

Name some after the Code Talkers, First Woman General, Truman for Desegregation of the Military, first Person of Color to make the Joint Chiefs of Staff. , First Medal of Honor Recipient ,...

Response by SSG Michael Schneider made Jan 15 at 2023 4:19 PM

2023-01-15T16:19:36-05:00

Personally I wouldn't submit to the Leftist Woke idiots that are attempting to destroy our history! As a former Paratrooper; Ranger and, Special Forces troop Ft. Benning and Ft. Bragg will NEVER be referred to by any other name!
John F. Kennedy and family were criminals yet, I will always call the JFKSWC&S JFK!

Response by SSG Robert Stokes made Jan 15 at 2023 6:31 PM

2023-01-15T18:31:12-05:00

How about the woke loser's now leading the military should all resign because they have no courage to stand for honor.

Response by SPC Tim Mitcham made Jan 15 at 2023 9:02 PM

2023-01-15T21:02:34-05:00

Those bases were given those names at a time when the raw feelings of those names were more fresh. If they could "stomach" the names back then, certainly we should be able to live with them now. The whole idea seems hypocritical. A certain faction of our citizenry wants to change names they feel are offensive, but totally ignore the one name that represents the "glue" that held all of that hate together - Democrat, as in the Democratic Party. The naysayers will claim the Democratic Party is NOT the same because of change. True! But the soldiers, whose names are regarded as offensive, have actually died! I tend to think "dying" trumps "change" every time!

Response by SSG Charlie Barnwell made Jan 16 at 2023 5:47 PM

2023-01-16T17:47:19-05:00

Thinking about the other bases but Fort Polk should be renamed ...... Fort Polk, for James Knox Polk, the 11th President of the United States who served from 1845 - 1849. He died in 1849, three months after leaving office, thus having no connection to the Confederacy.

Response by SPC Glen Hill made Jan 17 at 2023 6:31 AM

2023-01-17T06:31:18-05:00

While it will always be Ft. Bragg to me, if they decide they must change the name, then name it after an Airborne or Special Forces Hero. Ft. Bragg IS the home of Airborne, and Special Forces after all. I was personally with the 82nd Airborne Division.

Response by SPC Glen Hill made Jan 17 at 2023 6:33 AM

2023-01-17T06:33:10-05:00

Maybe do the same at Ft. Benning, as it is the home of Jump School.

Response by CDR Gerald Nordland made Jan 17 at 2023 8:36 AM

2023-01-17T08:36:35-05:00

Get rid of those 'Woke' officers who think this is a good idea - save Million$

Response by Maj Tom E made Jan 17 at 2023 11:57 AM

2023-01-17T11:57:59-05:00

These names represent heroes for those who live in the states they exist. I am a transplanted Yankee in N. Carolina and an Air Force Vet, yet I can almost tell you where most of these Forts are located just by their name. Yes, leave it alone, but if you have to change the names, name them after modern day war heroes from the states these Forts exist.

Response by CW2 Ernest Krutzsch made Jan 17 at 2023 12:22 PM

2023-01-17T12:22:41-05:00

To save some money, there are 2 Forts that could remain the same. Fort Polk could remain Fort Look if they started it is being named after James K Polk, 11th President and Edward S. Bragg a Union General who was Braxton Bragg's (Confederate General) cousin

Response by CAPT Frank Nice made Jan 17 at 2023 5:22 PM

2023-01-17T17:22:01-05:00

Sorry; it does matter deeply what is happening to our nation's history and heritage. Keep the current names.

Response by SFC Fernando Campos made Jan 17 at 2023 9:02 PM

2023-01-17T21:02:56-05:00

I can only hope we get a decent President that revokes this crap of renaming history once he gets into office. I served at Benning, Bragg, Lee, and I will never call them anything else. Only communists want to erase a country's history.

Response by SPC David Elzinga made Jan 18 at 2023 5:18 AM

2023-01-18T05:18:53-05:00

None, wouldn’t change any of them

Response by SPC Frank Niederkorn made Jan 18 at 2023 8:39 AM

2023-01-18T08:39:15-05:00

As usual the answer is to compromise:

- Fort the North Can't Bragg Anymore
- Fort Darius Rucker
- Fort Benning the Knee
- Fort Gordon Lightfoot
- Fort this is our Hood now
- Fort Polk-a-dot Camo
- Fort Against Pt on the Hill
- Fort Whatever, because Belvoir was a place not person and no one really knows how to pronounce it anyway.
- Fort hard-Lee any PT
- Fort if you got a wedgie, Pickett

Response by Sgt Ed Bowers made Jan 18 at 2023 8:39 AM

2023-01-18T08:39:33-05:00

The bases were named for a reason, these people did something that the namer's believed provided a valuable service to the country. None of the bases should have their names changed to satisfy the idiotic culture of the progressive left.

Response by SP5 Ed McCoy made Jan 18 at 2023 3:22 PM

2023-01-18T15:22:52-05:00

Camp Bragg
Camp Rucker
Camp Benning
Camp Gordon
Camp Hood
CampPolk
Camp A.P. Hill
Camp Belvoir
Camp General E Lee
Camp Pickett

Response by LTC Reginald Brown made Jan 18 at 2023 5:35 PM

2023-01-18T17:35:09-05:00

Current living Medal of Honor awardees born on that post or that city or that state. This ensures ownership by current warriors and several hundred years of honor for that family of the United States Army.

Response by SPC Gary D. made Jan 18 at 2023 11:33 PM

2023-01-18T23:33:41-05:00

DON'T!!!

Response by SFC Larry Jones made Jan 19 at 2023 12:39 AM

2023-01-19T00:39:02-05:00

I am going to back in to this, and I know I will probably take some flak for it, but that's ok. I don't agree with the overall concept. That being said, in my readings, I have learned that Braxton Bragg was generally thought of as incompetent. That makes me wonder who thought he was worthy of having an installation named after him.

Response by Capt Graciela Tiscareño-Sato made Jan 19 at 2023 4:03 AM

2023-01-19T04:03:24-05:00

It's 2023. We need MANY, MANY more women to serve in uniform.

We need women veterans to be HONORED in society as often as men.

Soooooo.... let's name more bases after WOMEN! The iconic Navy pilot Rosemary Mariner immediately comes to mind!

Response by MAJ John Eckholm made Jan 19 at 2023 10:00 AM

2023-01-19T10:00:37-05:00

Not to name them after any individual since the next woke generation might be offended and we have to go through this again wasting taxpayers money.

Response by CPL Taja Brower made Jan 19 at 2023 11:51 AM

2023-01-19T11:51:27-05:00

Why do people feel that our history needs to be wiped out? This is ridiculous. Leave the names of these military installation alone. I am from the Killeen-Fort Hood area and it will always be FORT HOOD regardless.

Response by SPC Harry Hintsala made Jan 19 at 2023 1:28 PM

2023-01-19T13:28:38-05:00

Rename all of them!

Response by PO3 Phillip Ollis made Jan 20 at 2023 8:53 PM

2023-01-20T20:53:09-05:00

I was born at Fort Benning, GA, nearly 74 years ago. I wish they wouldn't rename it. How am I to answer when asked where I was born?

Response by SP5 James Filhart made Jan 21 at 2023 5:39 AM

2023-01-21T05:39:57-05:00

Leave it alone. Who is causing all this crap anyways.

Response by SPC Tim Mitcham made Jan 21 at 2023 10:27 AM

2023-01-21T10:27:51-05:00

My suggestion is to trash can the whole idea! The move is completely political and certainly hypocritical. The "offensive" Confederate names HAVE to be changed because they are supposedly racist, while doing NOTHING about the name of the racist organization that was the glue holding all of the racism together - Democratic Party. There are some that will say the Democratic Party has changed and does not represent what it did in the past. The same thing can be said for Ft. Bragg, Ft. Benning, etc...

Response by SMSgt Charles Tritt made Jan 21 at 2023 4:35 PM

2023-01-21T16:35:00-05:00

It’s disgrace…Confederate veterans should not be dishonored by the Woke agenda. What is next? Washington and Jefferson were slave owners. Should we rename or destroy their monuments? We should honor our past…not erase it!

Response by MAJ Montgomery Granger made Jan 22 at 2023 8:16 AM

2023-01-22T08:16:01-05:00

I think leaving them tells a story about American history that we cannot afford to lose. All my ancestors who fought in the war were Union, not Rebel. Even so, the words of General Grant to his troops after accepting the surrender of General Lee at the end of the Civil War should inform all of us: "Refrain from celebrations in the field," Grant told his men. And, "The Rebels are our countrymen again." The Rebels are our countrymen again. Profound. This thought is completely lost on those who would hide, ignore, change history, and for what? Who is really harmed by the names? Those who don't understand or appreciate American history and how it should inform how and why we do what we do today.

Response by PO2 Scott M. made Jan 22 at 2023 1:19 PM

2023-01-22T13:19:38-05:00

I have a suggestion... Leave it alone and stop trying to obliterate history lest we forget!

Response by SPC John Tsutsui made Jan 22 at 2023 1:23 PM

2023-01-22T13:23:08-05:00

Fort Flower Fort Pansy Fort Karen Fort Spineless Fort I’ll Learn Nothing From History Fort We’ll You Get The Idea.

Response by TSgt Baran Anthony Andrew K. made Jan 22 at 2023 6:14 PM

2023-01-22T18:14:44-05:00

I am troubled by all of this. The fact I always remember about our common history as Americans is that the highest casualty count, and rate happened when we were fighting each other during the Civil War. Ft. Lee, Ft. Pickett and Ft. Hood should not be renamed. Of course they are going to be, but gallantry and personal sacrifice should not be forgotten. Hood lost his arm, and his division was left in tatters; Pickett lost nearly an entire corps, and never recovered from the sight of it; and Lee sacrificed everything for his idea of what the Republic really stood for.

Response by SGT Richard Hanson SSP/CGS made Jan 22 at 2023 7:42 PM

2023-01-22T19:42:13-05:00

If this is the most pressing issue in the United States right now then I must have missed something. We are teetering on the brink of WW III and everybody has their ass in a knot over the names of Army Posts. Lets solve the real problems facing this nation and then we can knit pick over the names of our Army Posts.

Response by LTC Terry Markle made Jan 22 at 2023 10:54 PM

2023-01-22T22:54:14-05:00

They can rename them all they want but I will continue to call them by their current correct names. These bases honor leadership abilities not political ideologies.

Response by SFC Michael Clevenger made Jan 22 at 2023 11:44 PM

2023-01-22T23:44:03-05:00

Take a page from our history, WW2 heroes, https://allthatsinteresting.com/war-heroes. WW1 Heroes, https://www.history.com/news/6-american-heroes-of-wwi.

22 War Heroes And The Superhuman Stories That Put Them In The History Books

From pilots to spies to nurses, these war heroes epitomized the meaning of bravery and selflessness.

Response by MAJ William Walker made Jan 23 at 2023 6:44 AM

2023-01-23T06:44:46-05:00

Name them after Medal of Honor awardees and not after people who attacked the United States. I understand nostalgia, but we have had thousands of Soldiers that are worthy of that honor that bore true faith and allehiance to our country.

Response by 1SG Paul Ayotte made Jan 23 at 2023 10:51 AM

2023-01-23T10:51:41-05:00

The "PC" way to attempt to erase history. My learned knowledge of this. I still don't agree with it.

Response by GySgt Kenneth Pepper made Jan 23 at 2023 11:00 AM

2023-01-23T11:00:57-05:00

Instead of renaming them, just have them identify as something more acceptable to modern culture. Fort Benning becomes "A Place of Acceptance", Fort Polk becomes "A Camp of Equity for the Underserved", etc.,
Just add neon, glow in the dark stickers to all the signs. That way we could save all the money and use it for sexual identity misalignment therapy for the school kids.
Or, just ignore the idiots demanding that they be changed.
Yes, that means you Mr. Milley.

Response by Sgt Bob Corridan made Jan 23 at 2023 3:22 PM

2023-01-23T15:22:11-05:00

Very simple...leave well enough alone...the historic environment then versus now has no relevance in the prior naming the bases. They were named based on a recommendation and selection process that honored those gentlemen for their prior service rendered at that time of an action or actions honorably carried out by them...end of conversation. If prior slave ownership was or is an issue it is a moot point today and if someone wants to make an issue of slavery then address the issue of native born slavery on native born slavery or African tribe slavery on African tribe slavery or middle eastern slavery on middle eastern slavery...the point is "slavery" as abhorrent as it is was not invented in the United States...it has been around in one form or another since King Tut...next time a group of Antifa or BLM folks try to tear down a statue or attempt to force a name change to a facility I suggest windage of 2 clicks up and 3 to the right.

Response by Lt Col Bill Fletcher made Jan 23 at 2023 4:40 PM

2023-01-23T16:40:19-05:00

Forty McFort as this isn’t a serious resolution of any existing problem.

Response by SP5 David Dragon made Jan 23 at 2023 8:13 PM

2023-01-23T20:13:19-05:00

No one's even attempting to change or erase history, just to stop celebrating the Traitors that the posts are named after.

Response by MAJ Thomas Weeks made Jan 23 at 2023 11:04 PM

2023-01-23T23:04:57-05:00

Leave them alone.

Response by SFC Edna Madison made Jan 24 at 2023 3:25 AM

2023-01-24T03:25:27-05:00

History cannot be undone and if they were terrible leaders the American people need to know that and understand that there have been terrible things that have happened under bad leadership as well as good things under good leadership. We can't deny the bad because we don't want the stigma it carries with it. Everything that happens is for our learning, enrichment, and improvement.

Response by SFC Private RallyPoint Member made Jan 24 at 2023 8:43 AM

2023-01-24T08:43:18-05:00

Personally in my opinion it’s long time for a change. I believe the treasonous behavior of those that were involved in trying to over turn our government should have never been glorified. We should have never named anything after that institution of hate. Normally when you lose a conflict. Everything about you, or it is remembered but not magnified. Because, of that time and the people that were involved “DOC” Daughters of the Confederacy We’re they remembered. The confederacy lost the war but they won the outcome. These Military installations should never had been named after confederate Generals so I am welcoming that it’s time for a change to do away with this hateful remembrance of ignorance.

Response by SSgt Steve Thrower made Jan 24 at 2023 1:12 PM

2023-01-24T13:12:35-05:00

If you erase history it will repeat itself in TWO(2) GENERATIONS.

Response by PO2 Jack LaBarge made Jan 24 at 2023 9:01 PM

2023-01-24T21:01:35-05:00

Keep all of the NAMES! Going WOKE will never change anything! But, remembering MIGHT!

Response by SPC Lisa Worley-Kincaid made Jan 26 at 2023 5:22 PM

2023-01-26T17:22:56-05:00

Why not name after Indian Chief's since the land was actually all theirs.

Response by SGM Private RallyPoint Member made Jan 27 at 2023 10:52 AM

2023-01-27T10:52:35-05:00

Many military installations in Southern states were named after Confederate veterans to get Southerners to fight in World War 1. It just goes to show you, if you want gratitude, get a dog.

Response by SP5 Sheldon Behensky made Jan 27 at 2023 9:19 PM

2023-01-27T21:19:25-05:00

Our country (or any other country for that matter) isn’t perfect. Mistakes were made from the beginning and are still being made. There is a choice, remove parts of our history or learn from past experiences. Take the chance of making the same mistakes again or preventing them from happening again. If we keep this up (renaming, removing statues, etc.) we won’t have a history. We’ll be no better than the Taliban or ISIS destroying ancient monuments or scared sites because they don’t fit our current philosophy. Do you want to completely erase our history? Or do you want to keep getting better?

Response by PO1 Stanley King made Jan 28 at 2023 11:09 AM

2023-01-28T11:09:57-05:00

I suggest naming them after MOH awardees.

Response by CW4 Jay Ossiander made Jan 28 at 2023 4:50 PM

2023-01-28T16:50:24-05:00

These forts should have never been named after Confederate generals many of whom were incompetent or proponents of slavery and hardly someone for service members to look up to. Imagine Germany naming kasernes after Nazi generals. There are plenty of true American heroes to name forts after starting with the most decorated, Alvin York, Audie Murphy, Daniel Daly, Edward Rickenbacker, Lewis "Chesty" Puller, and James Williams. We could also name the forts after Medal of Honor winners.

Response by A1C Medrick "Rick" DeVaney made Jan 29 at 2023 6:54 AM

2023-01-29T06:54:32-05:00

100% ~ ALL In The Name Of Political Correctness...
What A Pile Of SH*T This Turned Out To Be,
"Only In America"
Fa-King Stupidity

Response by CPT Keith Hood made Feb 6 at 2023 5:57 PM

2023-02-06T17:57:15-05:00

No one is trying to erase history. We are trying to redress a wrong - the wrong of naming military bases for criminals. Rename all of them. No matter how much glory paint you try to splash on the men whose names are on that list of forts, the inescapable fact remains that they were traitors. They violated their oaths of service and waged war against the government they had sworn to serve. That is the very Constitutional definition of treason. They do not deserve to have military installations named for them and the sooner those forts are renamed, the better. Hell, Fort Hood is named after my ancestor, and I say he was a traitor and the installation should be renamed NOW.

Response by SPC Gary Symons made Feb 12 at 2023 11:18 PM

2023-02-12T23:18:40-05:00

I went to Vietnam with many from Fort Bragg and some were KIA, you can call it Fort Sally or what ever you want,,
they came from Fort Bragg 82nd Airborne and it will always be Fort Bragg to me.

I tell McConnell about this when I go to the other side. We will both have a good laugh.

Response by MSG Private RallyPoint Member made Feb 16 at 2023 8:13 AM

2023-02-16T08:13:25-05:00

This one is near and dear to my heart. I was a major opponent of changing names but recently listened to a podcast and have been swayed. One crime is listed in Constitution that's Treason. By definition they committed treason against the United States of America. The CSA attacked the US and in the end lost the war. So a simple question would it be ok for Japan to place monuments at Pearl Harbor? No and u may say that's a different country your right but four years so we're the Confederate States. I understand tradition I know in the end Ft Bragg will always be Bragg but they attacked the US and lost we shouldn't really honor that. Now I'm ok with street names staying the same halls and buildings not be changed. Another issue with this topic if it's completely about slavery and its impact on the war a lot more things have to change example me.orials is DC have to come down college names need changed names of States ect. Where do we draw the line? Change base names and move on that's my suggestion.

Response by SFC Terry Bryant made Feb 16 at 2023 10:57 AM

2023-02-16T10:57:05-05:00

Good or bad this country's history is just that. History! You can't move forward by continuing looking back. We have the greatest nation in the history of the world. We are not now defined by the mistakes of our nations mistakes. However we are building a better future for ALL of Americans. The only obstacle right now to that goal is people believing we must become different than we are. We only need to be better tomorrow than we were yesterday. That can only happen if we all come together as one nation. Because what you are suggesting do is divisional and destructive. Leave our past where it is. In the past.

Response by Sgt Daniel Latch made Feb 16 at 2023 12:10 PM

2023-02-16T12:10:33-05:00

History need not be changed by the change of a name. Honor is another issue. There is no sense in honoring traitors. Change the names to honor heroism and leadership and sacrifice for our great nation not against it. Better yet, name them for the county or city that hosts them.

Response by SSG Keith Brewer Sr made Feb 16 at 2023 6:58 PM

2023-02-16T18:58:39-05:00

None! Keep our Heraldry intact! This woke crap is destroying our espre de corps!

Response by PO3 James Czerniak made Feb 16 at 2023 7:24 PM

2023-02-16T19:24:31-05:00

Quit with the social experiment bullshyt and get back to the reason the military is there for.

Response by SSG Bob Robertson made Feb 17 at 2023 4:39 AM

2023-02-17T04:39:58-05:00

I wrote a letter to my congressman telling him to stop this. He wrote me back saying it's going to happen. I wrote him back saying he lost my vote in the next election. Told him no matter what that me voting for his opponent is going to happen.

Response by 1SG Timothy Trewin made Feb 17 at 2023 9:58 AM

2023-02-17T09:58:10-05:00

I would name them after MOH winners. Those are people worthy of such an honor.

Response by GySgt Private RallyPoint Member made Feb 17 at 2023 10:06 AM

2023-02-17T10:06:52-05:00

You cant change History by giving it a shiny new name. It is what it is. We just need to learn from it and go on.

Response by PO1 Ray Werner made Feb 17 at 2023 12:09 PM

2023-02-17T12:09:31-05:00

All these woke SOB's need to leave the history of this country along and start acting like Americans, and not like our current communist president and family. Hire real people to the government and get rid of these woke government employes which are making our country the laughingstock throughout the world.

Response by SPC Paul Gooch made Feb 17 at 2023 5:44 PM

2023-02-17T17:44:39-05:00

I have to agree with Vic and Jake. Why, some might ask. I am apolitical, true believing, GOD fearing man. For very secret reasons

Response by MSgt Elie Karam made Feb 18 at 2023 9:03 AM

2023-02-18T09:03:59-05:00

Nothing wrong with using the city’s name that the camps are located in, or the follow on civilian leaders who put the country first over ideology.

Response by CW4 Tim Claus made Feb 18 at 2023 6:01 PM

2023-02-18T18:01:36-05:00

Leave them alone. Thousands of soldiers have deployed with pride and honor from those bases. That is the heritage behind those names, not officers from the Civil War. Stop trying to rewrite history.

Response by CPL T.A. Nelson made Feb 19 at 2023 9:28 AM

2023-02-19T09:28:52-05:00

It's not about erasing history. Each base had a person who actually had an American Hero that should be honored, we should name the bases for them. Bases should not be named for people who were around before the formation of the United States. Children have to learn about the base when they are in school and soldiers should understand the base has heroes that set the standard for service...

Response by 1SG Clifford Barnes made Feb 19 at 2023 11:06 AM

2023-02-19T11:06:51-05:00

Leave them all alone. It’s history don’t destroy it

Response by PO2 Thomas Herlacher made Feb 19 at 2023 12:33 PM

2023-02-19T12:33:01-05:00

Leave the names alone. Everyone already knows the forts by these names. No sense confusing everyone with new and different names.

Response by SGT Paul Harman made Feb 19 at 2023 1:49 PM

2023-02-19T13:49:59-05:00

Its too bad our armed forces have gone woke. The base names have been around for over a hundred years. Part of our history even though it isn’t a part to celebrate. Leave them as they are.

Response by CN Dennis Stender made Feb 19 at 2023 11:13 PM

2023-02-19T23:13:31-05:00

There will be controversy over any name so perhaps MOH recipients that way true American Heroes are honored from the entire country ?

Response by SSgt Jon Hall made Feb 20 at 2023 11:49 AM

2023-02-20T11:49:33-05:00

NO CHANGE! The installations were named after AMERICAN military leaders that demonstrated leadership, devotion to their troops, battlefield strategy and braveness in the face of an overwhelming foe. In an attempt to unite the country, President Lincoln reportedly declared ALL to be Americans. They should continue to be honored and their histories studied, especially by new officers, for those examples of devotion to duty. All great officers' study past military leaders. Most demonstrated that same devotion to the union after the war. This is exampled by the study of contributions to the US by officers from both sides. General Lee and his officer Corp were respected by President Lincoln as well as his officers for the same reasons. If the objecting folks aren't taught to appreciate the leadership attributes of the military leaders on both sides and the real history of the US the military is not training them as to why they are there. New military members, especially officers, just can't grasp the concept and come in with a very limited, not to mention skewed, appreciation of military history they gained from public schools or from questionable sources.

Response by PO3 David Davis made Feb 20 at 2023 1:21 PM

2023-02-20T13:21:01-05:00

Some of them were Union solders and West point Graduates.
This is part of our Military's History.
Sad time we live in.
Sad Generation doin this.

Response by Sgt Nicolas Schockett made Feb 21 at 2023 11:19 AM

2023-02-21T11:19:33-05:00

Fort Snowflake

Response by SGM Private RallyPoint Member made Feb 21 at 2023 4:29 PM

2023-02-21T16:29:55-05:00

Ft. Woke, GA
Ft. Woke, LA
Ft. Woke, AL
JFC..Stop naming them after people. That's causing itchy taints everywhere. How about naming them for a battle name or title. Ft Nomandy, etc.

Response by CPL Anthony Chase made Feb 21 at 2023 4:54 PM

2023-02-21T16:54:45-05:00

Just another Democrat inspired boondoggle, can you imagine the upgrades to equipment our troops could have had for the many, many millions wasted to change historic goodwill to the south? Over a hundred fifty years worth tossed in the name of wokeness. History cannot be changed regardless of this incompetent and blatantly un-American order. What’s next? will they ban the American flag? It would certainly
Fit with the pentagons rush to destroy our fighting forces in the name of stupidity.

Response by SPC Tim Phillips made Feb 21 at 2023 10:06 PM

2023-02-21T22:06:53-05:00

It going to cost millions of unnecessary dollars to change all those names. People just need to get over it.

Response by SSG Private RallyPoint Member made Feb 22 at 2023 8:38 AM

2023-02-22T08:38:11-05:00

Leave them as they are

Response by SSG Emilio Hernandez made Feb 22 at 2023 9:08 AM

2023-02-22T09:08:35-05:00

Why not rename them from metal of honor recep recipients

Response by SSG Emilio Hernandez made Feb 22 at 2023 9:12 AM

2023-02-22T09:12:22-05:00

Renaming them from Medal of Honor recipients

Response by SFC Jeff Reed made Feb 22 at 2023 12:52 PM

2023-02-22T12:52:21-05:00

After they are done eliminating history I'm we should eliminate any help/handup programs and when they complain say, "what the heck, you haven't got any problems!"

Response by MSG Private RallyPoint Member made Feb 22 at 2023 2:01 PM

2023-02-22T14:01:50-05:00

Name them after their largest tenant unit or organization. Leave naming them after people out of it. Less chance of controversy.

Response by SGT Wayne Grindstaff made Feb 22 at 2023 2:44 PM

2023-02-22T14:44:21-05:00

Just the Woke Govt. slapping the ancestors of Confederate soldiers. My 2nd great grandfather fought for the Union in the CW and just like me I'm sure he would give credit to those that he fought if they were worthy.

Response by PO1 Joseph Glennon made Feb 22 at 2023 9:19 PM

2023-02-22T21:19:56-05:00

Congress determined in the 1950s that the Confederate veterans were, in fact, American veterans. These bases and monuments *are* named for American veterans.

My suggestions? Cancel the cancel culture.

The vast majority, overwhelming majority, fought against the Union because of the Union's tactics. Scorched Earth was their strategy. They raped, pillaged, plundered and burns, leaving swaths of destruction behind them. Slavery was not the reason that the majority of the Southerners fought - including their generals.

Had the Union left the fighting and destruction on the battlefields, they would have had a far easier win. The bases whose names are going to be changed are all in the South - where those generals were fighting for the very lives and livelihoods of the people who lived there (or were killed there by the Union).

History is not black and white. If learning history offends you, then perhaps you won't make the same mistakes people made in the past, nor order your charges to do so.

Response by PO2 Rich Adams made Feb 22 at 2023 9:37 PM

2023-02-22T21:37:23-05:00

I don’t think they should be renamed. Instead they could be turned into a learning moment. Gen. Braxton Bragg served with honor in the US Army but chose to fight with the military attempting (and failing) to protect a heinous system of slavery.

Response by CPL Brian Parker made Feb 23 at 2023 2:24 AM

2023-02-23T02:24:23-05:00

Either leave them as they are or rename them after Medal of Honor winners. There is no other acceptable solution.

Response by CW3 Kevin Storm made Feb 23 at 2023 2:16 PM

2023-02-23T14:16:42-05:00

As someone who has an ancestor on a memorial in my Parents' hometown for those who didn't come back from the Civil War, I am all for seeing those bases names changed. Over 1523 Medals of Honor were given in the Civil War. Any reason we can't pick some of those recipients to have a base named after? Also there are some Founding Fathers who I can think of who could meet the criteria.

Response by Sgt Stephen Chiles made Feb 23 at 2023 5:20 PM

2023-02-23T17:20:25-05:00

Despite what some of the young people want to think, history is history and it cannot be erased. While I do not support Confederate values I am descendent of Irish slaves), let me remind everyone the Confederates ARE American; then and now. We had enough sense back when these great military bases were named to recognize that fact.

I am personally getting sick of the "cancel culture". It reminds me of the two year old sticking their fingers in their ears because they do not want to hear the truth.

Response by LCDR Tom Wootton made Feb 23 at 2023 5:23 PM

2023-02-23T17:23:02-05:00

Ft. Brackish
Ft. (Replace the "R" with an "F")
Ft. Funning
Ft. Gordo
Ft. Hoody
Ft. Polkadot (Of the Teeny Weenie and Yellow bikini designations)
Ft. Up Hill
Ft. Belview (for the nuts)
Ft. Windward (Hey, this isn't a Navy question!)
Ft. Pickey (for snobbish soldiers)

Response by SSG Eric Blue made Feb 26 at 2023 4:18 PM

2023-02-26T16:18:49-05:00

I have no suggestions. Guaran-damn-teed that even if the bases get renamed, there are veterans and family alive NOW that won't let these names go away.

Response by PO1 Robert Ryan made Mar 21 at 2023 1:13 PM

2023-03-21T13:13:33-04:00

I have an idea lets name them after Greek Gods and Goddesses.. Fort Zeus, Fort Ares, Fort Hercules, Fort Apollo, Fort Atlas, Fort Hades (Good m one for Fort P9lk). Naval Base Poseidon. Fort Aphrodite, Fort Herra , Fort Medusa (Everyone gets turned to stone), Fort Cronos (The Big Daddy of them all).

Response by CW4 Private RallyPoint Member made Mar 29 at 2023 1:12 PM

2023-03-29T13:12:06-04:00

You can’t or shouldn’t try to rewrite History. No matter which side the person in question was on, they were all Americans. These bases were named to Honor their name and their part in the history of the United States. “Those that fail to learn from history are doomed to repeat It”. You can erase history and expect the world to be better for it. As the quote says You have to learn from it! All the bases mentioned will always be the same to me no matter what some politicians or special interest groups want them to be.

Response by CPT Larry Hudson made Mar 31 at 2023 1:44 PM

2023-03-31T13:44:23-04:00

Don't mess with what is not broken. Problem with government, always justifying reason for higher budget means doing what does not need to be done.

Response by CW3 Michael Hess made Apr 1 at 2023 8:49 PM

2023-04-01T20:49:42-04:00

How ignorant! DOD is not staffed with a bunch of knot-heads who have no sense of history. In you idiots did not know(look this up) ALL confederate soldiers were decreed, by Congress, to be AMERICAN veterans. So, why are you renaming these posts?????

Response by MAJ Dennis Foote made Apr 23 at 2023 6:24 PM

2023-04-23T18:24:00-04:00

It's not about remembering history or historical figures. It was about placating racists. It makes as much sense as renaming Pearl Harbor to Tojo Naval Base.

Response by CWO3 Robert Fong made Apr 24 at 2023 2:08 PM

2023-04-24T14:08:53-04:00

The WOKE leadership can do as they please but as far as I am concerned these bases will always be referred to by me and my family as they have always been named. Confederate soldiers and sailors have been declared US Veterans by an Act of Congress and therefore, the names should not be changed. Another way for the WOKE leadership to divide the nation. SAD, but reversable when a new leadership takes office in 2024 and the wokesters in DoD are gone.

Response by Cpl George Matousek made Apr 28 at 2023 1:00 PM

2023-04-28T13:00:27-04:00

L:eave named as they are. Semper Fi

Response by SGT Debra McDonough Travis made Apr 29 at 2023 11:00 AM

2023-04-29T11:00:27-04:00

The States because United States after the Civil War. If we erase the past, how will our future generations learn and grow. Leave the statues alone, the Forts alone, The Cities alone. Because when you start changing one item. You have to change others and no one will learn from the mistakes that were made.

Response by LCDR Ed Etzkorn made Apr 29 at 2023 12:11 PM

2023-04-29T12:11:57-04:00

Happening but shouldn't

Response by SFC Ernest Thurston made Apr 29 at 2023 8:18 PM

2023-04-29T20:18:29-04:00

No matter what you name them, some group is going to get offended. Why not just call them US Army base #1 and Air Force Base #1 or Joint Base Alpha. Or just give them a Zip Code designator. That's the only way you can really keep it neutral. Because nowadays the move is to name things after Civil Rights leaders or Presidents. Who is that going to piss off?

Response by CPL Vicki Bender made May 12 at 2023 3:48 PM

2023-05-12T15:48:59-04:00

Strange the same generation in the name of being woke spend all this money to go overseas to see the Roman coliseum. Yet they want to tear down our history because it offends them.

Response by LTC David Howard made May 20 at 2023 8:26 AM

2023-05-20T08:26:48-04:00

This entire exercise seems right out of George Orwell's "1984", written in 1949, warning us about the dangers of authoritarianism. The rewriting of history to suit current political fashion is likely emblematic of our decline as a nation. Of course it doesn't matter whether I agree with this policy or not, or what names I would suggest. I will not be surprised if every name selected is one which will honor Black, Hispanic, Native American of female notables of the past, maybe with a gay or lesbian figure thrown into the mix. Or possibly we will end up with Fort Karl Marx, Fort Vladimir Lenin, or Fort Barack Hussein Obama.

Response by CW3 James Ives made May 25 at 2023 12:28 AM

2023-05-25T00:28:13-04:00

Leave it alone as many of us Americans had Ancestors who served on both sides. Mother's side where Yankees and my father's side Southern. One lost a Leg who fought for the North and the other lost an arm From the Confederate side. LEAVE IT ALONE!!!!!

Response by Sgt Gary Wilson made Jun 1 at 2023 9:42 PM

2023-06-01T21:42:09-04:00

What can you say. What will a name change do? Why do some people ( mostly non-military ) think that this matter needs all this attention? We talk about waste and the country having such a large deficit and we take on this issue. It's time the government starts to be productive on solving real problems!

Response by SGT Daniel Merriman made Jun 4 at 2023 4:33 PM

2023-06-04T16:33:25-04:00

Fuck em ,Bragg was and always will be Bragg !

Response by Amn James Clark made Jun 5 at 2023 7:27 PM

2023-06-05T19:27:50-04:00

I would like to see them renamed after African American Union soldiers.

Response by SPC Alexander Rivier made Jun 5 at 2023 10:10 PM

2023-06-05T22:10:46-04:00

I agree, we should not change history. We need to understand and learn from our past. And hope that are future generations correct our future. We should not give in too groups of people that want to change history.

Response by SSgt Jon Hall made Jun 6 at 2023 7:42 AM

2023-06-06T07:42:40-04:00

Doesnt matter if its been directed or not citizens still have a right to their opinion. The Confederates were Americans (also by goovernment edict) and the bases were named in honor of their leadership, dedication and knowledge of battlefield tactics. Modern militery commanders could only dream of having their troops respect them enough to follow them into battle against a far superior force and certain death.

Response by SSgt Jon Hall made Jun 6 at 2023 11:44 AM

2023-06-06T11:44:29-04:00

It's amazing and sad how easily the new generation tends to roll over and readily excepts changes thinking objections wouldn't be heard and mandates changed. News flash - they can

Response by LCDR Private RallyPoint Member made Jun 6 at 2023 4:03 PM

2023-06-06T16:03:11-04:00

- Fort Bragg --> Fort Bragg
- Fort Rucker --> Fort Rucker
- Fort Benning --> Fort Benning
- Fort Gordon --> Fort Gordon
- Fort Hood --> Fort Hood
- Fort Polk --> Fort Polk
- Fort A.P. Hill --> Fort A.P. Hill
- Fort Belvoir --> Fort Belvoir
- Fort Lee --> Fort Lee
- Fort Pickett --> Fort Pickett

In other words, leave this crap to Stalin. We don't erase the memory of the past.

Response by PO3 William Larson made Jun 8 at 2023 8:55 AM

2023-06-08T08:55:30-04:00

None. They'll be renaming the states, maybe the country next.

Response by SSgt Dennis Watkins made Jun 8 at 2023 9:22 AM

2023-06-08T09:22:43-04:00

Leave the base names alone we are not the Soviet Union and shouldn't change Bases and Building names just because they fell out of political favor. Do we want to leave a legacy like Stalin and purge anyone and everyone we don't agree with that came before US. Aim High they're riding Clydesdales.

Response by 1LT Private RallyPoint Member made Jun 8 at 2023 9:29 AM

2023-06-08T09:29:05-04:00

It might be really late to the conversation but what the DoD has done is fine with me. I'm from a former Confederate state (Texas) and fine with the renaming of these posts. I do believe that they could have found someone significant enough to rename Fort Bragg after. "Fort Liberty" is just... well it leaves a lot on the table, especially when you look at the other names (i.e. "Fort Moore" "Fort Novosel" and "Fort Eisenhower") that found badasses to honor.
Those on here that are saying "You can't erase/rewrite history." Actually, you can. It is called "historical revisionism" and it is something that happens constantly as history is better understood. It is just finally correcting the problem the American South has with Confederate history.

Response by CPL Kenneth Pealock made Jun 8 at 2023 12:51 PM

2023-06-08T12:51:59-04:00

Aside from the false premise that the War for Southern Independence was about slavery, and aside from the fact that the United States was itself a "confederacy" of independent states from 1776 to 1789, and considering the slow destruction of the military with wokeism, I have a few suggestions for new Fort names: Fort Pride, Fort Elton, Fort Gay, Fort Lesbian, Fort Queer, Fort Bi, Fort Trans, Fort Anal, Fort Bendover, Fort Sodomy, Fort Rainbow, Fort STD. These should meet the approval of those in charge of changing the names.

Response by CPL Kenneth Pealock made Jun 8 at 2023 1:17 PM

2023-06-08T13:17:48-04:00

Since the War for Southern Independence WASN'T about slavery, and since the United States of America was a "confederacy" of sovereign states between 1776 to 1789, and since "wokeism" is now in vogue, I submit the following names: Fort Rainbow, Fort Pride, Fort Elton, Fort Hudson, Fort Karine Jean-Pierre, Fort Lesbian, Fort Gay, Fort Bi, Fort Trans, Fort Queer, Fort Bendover, Fort Anal, Fort STD. These names might satisfy the pegging, queening, scissoring, figging, felching, fisting and pearl necklace loving politicos in charge of these changes.

Response by SFC Katrina Robinson made Jun 8 at 2023 4:43 PM

2023-06-08T16:43:35-04:00

I have always wondered if the Union won the war why were DOD I statallations names after the loosing opponent? If the confederate Soldier's had won, we would still have slavery. Free labor. The south was making $$$$$$$$$ from slavery. Slaves were free labor just imagine how much money was saved $$$$$$$$ by having slavery. Free labor wow. Follow the $$$$$$ and you will get the answer.

Response by 1SG Jason Almond made Jun 8 at 2023 7:16 PM

2023-06-08T19:16:56-04:00

It’s quite fascinating how many patriots support keeping the names of people who led open and violent art rebellion against the constitution of the United States

Whitewashing history? No one saying not to teach it in schools. But to honor active duty military service installations with the last names of the people who caused over 1 million US casualties, I think you need to check where your priorities are.

And no, I’m not a Democrat. No, I’m not from the north. Yes I am White, yes, I’m male and no I didn’t vote for Joe Biden.

How about we honor heroes who fought for the United States of America? Just a thought.

Response by 1LT James Garrett made Jun 8 at 2023 8:00 PM

2023-06-08T20:00:35-04:00

As former military who spent time at several of those above mentioned bases I just asking who are we trying to placate by renaming them. They are a part of our history as a nation and try to erase their name from such sites will never change that, nor should we ever forget the civil war and the sacrifice that Americans made on both sides.

Response by 1LT James Garrett made Jun 8 at 2023 8:04 PM

2023-06-08T20:04:57-04:00

As a former military I spent time at several of the sites listed above. Who are we trying to placate and remove history from our past? Brave Americans on both sides sacrificed during the Civil War, which will remain forever a part of our becoming the great nation that we are today.

Response by SFC James (JD) Flemal made Jun 9 at 2023 12:54 AM

2023-06-09T00:54:41-04:00

Leave them alone. They will always be the original names for me

Response by SPC Kenneth Roberts made Jun 9 at 2023 8:30 AM

2023-06-09T08:30:40-04:00

They should just rename them the nicknames the service members gave to each. But it's just sad to see even the DOD buckle under the pressure from those wishing to erase the parts history we don't agree with. These names should instead be talking points to educate people and learn from past mistakes.

Response by SSG Brian Pyle made Jun 9 at 2023 12:48 PM

2023-06-09T12:48:30-04:00

I agree with Cpl Burk, leave it alone. Just because they were born south of the mason Dixon line! We follow our commander and chief without question and they followed their leader. If we do that, then get rid of union and confederate. Lets just pretend it never happened. Like he said, we can't erase history and if we just close our eyes we will never learn from it.

Response by CW3 Dan Mackey made Jun 9 at 2023 2:21 PM

2023-06-09T14:21:11-04:00

Name them all after Medal of Honor winners

Response by SGT Ralph Chichester made Jun 10 at 2023 8:54 AM

2023-06-10T08:54:03-04:00

I say leave well enough alone I;m sick of Political Correct BS

Response by PO2 Robin Hall made Jun 10 at 2023 3:02 PM

2023-06-10T15:02:19-04:00

Name some of them after Vienam War Heros.

Response by PO2 Robin Hall made Jun 10 at 2023 3:04 PM

2023-06-10T15:04:25-04:00

Name some of them after Vietnam War Heros. Include the enlisted men and women.

Response by PO2 Robin Hall made Jun 10 at 2023 3:08 PM

2023-06-10T15:08:18-04:00

Name them after all the wars since. War Heros, include the enlisted Men and Women.

Response by PO2 Robin Hall made Jun 10 at 2023 3:11 PM

2023-06-10T15:11:28-04:00

Name them after heros of wars since that gave the ultimate sacrafice, include the enlisted.

Response by PVT Tony Notimportant made Jun 11 at 2023 1:32 AM

2023-06-11T01:32:03-04:00

As an American and a proud combat veteran, I'm nether a radical nor a communist. But, I know my countries history isn't nether, it's based actual facts of two sides believing in what they thought was right at that time, and they went to war over other factors that was not based solely on slavery. That is a fact, many of these bases are named after Generals that went to West Point is that a racist institution of higher learning now? This is our history and we have distorted it to the point that we have tought oneside of it. Point proven...the confederate flag is not the confederate flag. It's the Virginia battle field flag. Cotton and other products made more money for the south then what the north could generate at the time. So it was based also on economics, destroying statues and renaming bases is also another distorted way of excepting what happened happened and teaching the whole truth no longer excepable as well. So, left will be left and right will be right. I'll stay a proud combat vet and a patriotic American who believes in his rights and the rest of this once strong nation can fought over history and destroy itself. SMH...I'm still proud of my country just about sick of certain people who live in it.

Response by SGT Nickolas Ortiz made Jun 11 at 2023 2:18 AM

2023-06-11T02:18:39-04:00

I won’t waste my time. When President Trump takes office in 2025, he’ll put a stop to all this insanity

Response by SFC Howard Holmes made Jun 11 at 2023 3:54 AM

2023-06-11T03:54:26-04:00

Fort Snowflake
Fort Erase History
Fort Paddy Cakes
Fort Rainbow
Fort Everlasting Gobstopper
Fort Emasculation
Fort Fee Fee
Fort Fluff N' Stuff
Fort Hunter Biden
Fort Apology

Response by CSM Thomas Ray made Jun 11 at 2023 10:05 AM

2023-06-11T10:05:46-04:00

Probably 99% never even knew they were Confederate Generals. The money that it will take to rename could have been spent on better conditions on those base for the troops. Maybe make a list of exactly who was offended by the name, and it would probably not be those in the military

Response by PO2 Randy Cook made Jun 11 at 2023 12:19 PM

2023-06-11T12:19:54-04:00

I say BS, they earned honor by fighting for their country after succession. They deserve the deserve the right that was granted to bring about a united country. It’s not a good idea to rewrite History, it will always bite you in the ass!

Response by LTC Ernest Edge made Jun 11 at 2023 3:56 PM

2023-06-11T15:56:33-04:00

Those bases were named after Confederate generals to appease the South. It was an act of conciliation. However, ALL of those generals were traitors. I took an oath to support and defend the Constitution - not to support a rebellion. Those bases should absolutely NOT be named after traitors who violated their oath. To rename them is to correct a wrong.

Response by LT Jon Jewett made Jun 12 at 2023 10:21 AM

2023-06-12T10:21:50-04:00

"With malice toward none; with charity for all; ..... to bind up the nation's wounds;" (A Lincoln, 2nd inaugeral)
Past time to let it go. However, if we are going to flog dead horses, remember "confederates" were ultimately Democrats who took up arms to destroy our Republic. (A statement of fact; not a political statement. It DOES NOT speak to their motives, only what they did.) I believe that constitutes treason.

Response by SGT Jonathan H. made Jun 12 at 2023 11:05 AM

2023-06-12T11:05:01-04:00

If we're sticking with names, then maybe the names of officers who were actually good tacticians and not poor decision-makers like almost all on this list, with Lee as an exception. Politics aside, we should use this change as an opportunity to put names with values IAW Army values & exceptional leadership, not handing out installation names to the confederates as a consolation prize.

Response by SSG Roger Ayscue made Jun 12 at 2023 4:51 PM

2023-06-12T16:51:04-04:00

I despise that the names of these Forts have been changed. Not because of the change of the names, but because of the motivation of those that pushed for the change. The left, led by Senator Elizabeth Warren (A truly stellar individual to be sure) pushed for this move that would NEVER have been considered otherwise, in the aftermath of the George Floyd murder. It was done to pander to the Social Justice Warriors at the cost of REAL Warriors.
The Millions upon millions of dollars that have and will be spent to rename Fort Bragg, demanded by people that do not even know, and had never heard of who Braxton Bragg was, simply because they want to force upon the rest of us their vision of the world. Those funds should be used to repair and upgrade living quarters inhabited by our troops and their families. BUT NO.... It is more important to spend installation funds to rename a base than to make that base livable for the troops. Call it what you want, justify it how you may, but it was from it's inception a flawed, politically motivated, and wasteful attempt by the left to use yet more public funds to buy votes.

Response by Sgt Susan Cimon made Jun 12 at 2023 6:19 PM

2023-06-12T18:19:30-04:00

Ulysses S. Grant

Response by CPT Aaron Kletzing made Jun 12 at 2023 7:51 PM

2023-06-12T19:51:25-04:00

Wait, did Bragg and Benning get renamed? I don’t read about this stuff as closely as I used to. Which bases actually got renamed?

Response by SFC Private RallyPoint Member made Jun 13 at 2023 11:05 PM

2023-06-13T23:05:46-04:00

It DOES matter if we agree or not, despite it being directed. Keep in mind that a future name change back to what they are now could also be directed by a future administration.

My question is this: why are we (apparently the American public) so concerned about the naming of military installations all of a sudden? What is the purpose of this directed renaming? What will it actually accomplish? Because simply renaming (for example) Fort Lee, to something else, and ONLY doing that (and not changing anything else regarding it's history, other than referring to it as "formerly known as Ft. Lee") would accomplish.....what exactly? How would it improve anyone's life materially? Where does this "renaming" of things end? Are we to rename every street in the country that has a name that can be traced back to something "dark" in American history? What happened, happened. Nothing that happened 200 years ago directly affects any of us now. The names of things has no material affect on anyone. I'm not saying that maybe it doesn't "offend" some people, but so what? Are people so thin-skinned that they cannot tolerate being "offended"? (Spoiler alert: if you are, stay away from me, as I will likely offend you at some point by something I say or do, perhaps even intentionally, and I also won't give two !@#%$).

I served for 30 years. Those bases had those names that entire time. They will continue to have those names, in my mind, for the rest of my life. Not because I think those names are necessarily "appropriate", but rather, because that's what I know them as. I see no justifiable reason to spend (my) taxpayer dollars to rename them. Personally I don't really care what they are named; I see no reason to be upset, or offended, or whatever, regardless of what they are named, or whether I agree or disagree with the names given. I don't live in the past. I try to understand the past so it's lessons can guide me in the future.

Now, for some enlightenment on this "naming of military bases" debacle, go read this report and educate yourself on the history of it: https://history.army.mil/faq/naming-of-us-army-posts.htm#Section02

Oh, too much reading for you and you want the TL:DR version? Well then, for a good summary from Task & Purpose, read here: https://taskandpurpose.com/news/army-confederate-post-study/

naming-of-us-army-posts.htm%23Section02

Response by LTC Robert Howard made Jun 14 at 2023 4:21 AM

2023-06-14T04:21:23-04:00

Rename all the Forts, ships, and installations with Confederation related names. Name them for winners like Grant, Sherman, and Sheridan. We need to reject white supremacy once and for all.

Response by MAJ Steve Daugherty made Jun 14 at 2023 8:07 AM

2023-06-14T08:07:44-04:00

Welcome to the Idiocracy! Most of those gentlemen were also heroes of the Mexican War. Back then your citizenship was primarily focused locally and your identity so when a “foreign power “ ie the federal government was trying to oppress the folks in your community the patriotic thing was to protect your homeland. It turned out better for history and our nation that we remained united and that brought about a change in how we perceived ourselves as Americans and not just Ohioans or Virginians. , etc,

Response by SPC John Swann made Jun 14 at 2023 3:23 PM

2023-06-14T15:23:25-04:00

As for me I am thinking our nation has nothing but a bunch of idiots running things. Leave the fort’s names as they are because changing them is not going to change history and will serve no purpose.

Response by CPT Endre Barath made Jun 15 at 2023 12:20 AM

2023-06-15T00:20:45-04:00

I have lived in Communist Hungary and the game was erase history Stalin was erasing Lenin, Khruschev was erasing Stalin... rewriting history with statues and history books.... we should be ashamed of ourselves for following the communist game book... my father came to this country to escape all that... I became an Airborne Ranger Infantry CPT to protect our democracy.... shame on the politicians and shame on the media and shame on the teachers... so the short answer is leave things alone...

Response by Sgt Luis Bonilla made Jun 15 at 2023 9:46 AM

2023-06-15T09:46:53-04:00

Change is change we will always call those bases by there latter name it doesn’t matter

Response by CSM Todd Smith made Jun 15 at 2023 4:01 PM

2023-06-15T16:01:22-04:00

I think it's plain stupid to rename the installations. They're just trying to erase history. I am not a racist or anything like that so don't go down that road. I have an ancestor who fought on the Union side. I'm a born and bred Connecticut Yankee.

Response by A1C Medrick "Rick" DeVaney made Jun 16 at 2023 1:29 AM

2023-06-16T01:29:38-04:00

HERE'S The BEST IDEA Ever..... "
And It's EASY To Remember.
"DON'T"

Response by 1SG Bernhard Mattulat made Jun 17 at 2023 4:21 PM

2023-06-17T16:21:22-04:00

As for "Ft Rucker", I can't think of a better "re-naming" than "Fort Novosel"! He was a gallant,
fearless, "modern era" aviator who brought great credit to Army Aviation. So tell me again, what did "Rucker" bring to the table? I agree with another contributor, rename all the posts in contention with the names of MOH recipients, aligned with branch where ever possible. How about Audy Murphy for Bragg?

Response by GySgt Jack Wallace made Jun 18 at 2023 8:27 AM

2023-06-18T08:27:08-04:00

They got mostly what they wanted. Now, just leave well enough alone!

Response by Amn Dale Preisach made Jun 18 at 2023 11:41 AM

2023-06-18T11:41:30-04:00

Just have the Forts and such named after Native Sons to the state the Fort is in that have served with unquestionable distinction.
As well as Served after the Civil War. With these two conditions, and proper vetting, the State can take Pride in the Fort being renamed after either a Native born or a person that had lived in the state from their youth.
The Vetting is to ensure the Vet kept on the up-and-up as it were. Many times through no fault of their own these honorable persons fall on hard times/ gain a criminal record(s) or such. Sad to say, in today's world , all one needs to do to be thought a criminal/ hater is have said a word or name in the Past that is now something to fully vilify a person .

Response by SPC Lyle Montgomery made Jun 18 at 2023 1:11 PM

2023-06-18T13:11:17-04:00

Leave the names of these military instalations alone. Keep the names as they are. Don't mess with real history. Why change the name to please a few crybabys abd boogerlipers when the masses want the names to stay. I'm sick of people ignoring history and wanting to change it because it hurts their fragile feelings. None of us were around durring the civil war. Let sleeping dogs lie.

Response by Rory Schultz made Jun 18 at 2023 5:05 PM

2023-06-18T17:05:41-04:00

Here is a piece of History concerning the majority of the attitudes as to the " Why " Southerners fought in the Civil War. Back in that time period most people viewed their state they were born as their country. They had not personally come to embrace the concept of a United States and that was not really very heavily discussed by individuals living in those Southern States since the Louisiana Purchase of 1803. During that previous period the 13 Colonies were adopting names for their Statehoods and more territory was being added under a concept called Manifest Destiny. But it was originally called the United Colonies. Though the Founding Fathers had this concept of a United States in mind using it in building the U.S. Constitution for its future it had not spread as of yet to those living in throughout the colonies. It was only beginning to "clearly" take shape in Congress after the annexation of Texas in 1845 through to the Western Coast of California, Oregon and Washington State. This was what Abraham Lincoln saw, this same vision as the founding fathers had for this Country and pressed for others to follow suit. But many in Congress of Southern States did not want this, they wanted their states to stay independent of one another. (Western lands were considered just territories most being called Indian Territories) There wasn't any true United States in existence until after the Civil War. I look at it as three early periods 13 Colonies, United Colonies, early United States...then finally Modern United States. The majority of the Southerners were fighting out of loyalty to their state as being their own country. As aforementioned they had not come to comprehend this concept of a United States yet. Very few were fighting for keeping Slavery, you also had FREE BLACKS who chose to fight in the Confederacy as well as ex slaves fighting in the Northern Army to abolish Slavery. Sourced from Thomas Sowell.

Response by SPC Manfred Lloyd Fredendall made Jun 18 at 2023 10:30 PM

2023-06-18T22:30:21-04:00

I don't have a problem with it. We were and are American military. There were a lot of damn good men on both sides who fought bravely.

Response by MSG Private RallyPoint Member made Jun 19 at 2023 12:02 AM

2023-06-19T00:02:07-04:00

They need to leave them alone.

Response by MSgt Carl Newton made Jun 22 at 2023 10:32 AM

2023-06-22T10:32:37-04:00

Use recent medal of honor recipients.

Response by MAJ Lyle Monson Sr made Jun 24 at 2023 12:33 AM

2023-06-24T00:33:16-04:00

So I guess the Civil War didnt happen. We rationalize this is because of slavery. We (americans or colonists etc.) did not bring the slaves to America. The African Chiefs Actually sold their people to Potuguise, Dutch, etc. who in turn brought them to America. My question is why are we renaming militaty bases. What has this crazy world come to?

Response by SrA Alvin Cook made Jul 3 at 2023 2:01 PM

2023-07-03T14:01:23-04:00

Here's a fact check. Undeniable. Congress NEVER designated Confederate veterans as US veterans.

Response by SrA Alvin Cook made Jul 3 at 2023 2:01 PM

2023-07-03T14:01:41-04:00

Response by SrA Alvin Cook made Jul 3 at 2023 2:16 PM

2023-07-03T14:16:05-04:00

Fact check: Congress did not designate Confederate veterans as U.S. veterans
Sarah Lynch
USA TODAY

A statue of Confederate General Robert E. Lee is removed from Lee Circle Friday, May 19, 2017, in New Orleans. Lee's was the last of four monuments to Confederate-era figures to be removed under a 2015 City Council vote on a proposal by Mayor Mitch Landrieu.
The claim: In 1958, Congress passed a law giving Confederate veterans the same legal status as U.S. veterans. Thus, damaging Confederate monuments defiles U.S. veterans.
In the wake of George Floyd’s death, protestors toppled a statue of Confederate President Jefferson Davis in Richmond, Virginia. Cities from Jacksonville, Florida, to Louisville, Kentucky, removed statues of Confederate soldiers. This is not the first push to remove these monuments –– after a white nationalist rally in Charlottesville, Virginia, turned deadly in 2017, a number of Confederate monuments came down.

ADVERTISEMENTSCROLL TO CONTINUE WITH CONTENT
Floyd’s killing at the hands of police reinvigorated the movement to remove certain statues and monuments, and inspired debate, resulting in an executive order from President Donald Trump on Friday aimed at protecting such monuments from violence and vandalism.

A Facebook post from Donnie Johnson on June 11 claims that with U.S. Public Law 85-425, Section 410, in 1958, Congress gave Confederate veterans the same legal status as U.S. veterans. “Those desecrating

U.S. Public Law 85-425, Section 410, actually provided pensions to Confederate widows
The law that the Facebook post cites –– U.S. Public Law 85-425, Section 410 –– amended Section 432 of the Veterans’ Benefit Act of 1957 (Public Law 85-56), which grants pensions to

This amendment to the Veterans’ Benefit Act does indeed expand the definition of “veteran” to include “a person who served in the military or naval forces of the Confederate States of America during the Civil War.” However, the act also clearly specifies that this inclusion applies “for the purpose of this section, and section 433,” which Jessica Owley, professor of law at the University of Miami, interpreted as a limited extension.

“This language indicates that this definition of veteran only applies for this specific reason. Congress specifically chose to state that this definition was for the purposes of the pensions,” Owley said.

While Confederate veterans receive some benefits, they are still not recognized as U.S. veterans
This Facebook post specifically mentions Confederate graves and monuments, likely in reference to a decision from Congress that provided for “headstones or markers at the expense of the United States for the unmarked graves” of Confederate soldiers in the Civil War. While this act did grant Confederate veterans some benefits also allotted to U.S. war veterans, it does not confer on Confederate veterans equal status as U.S. veterans.

When President Andrew Johnson granted pardon and amnesty to all Confederate soldiers in 1868, this restored to them “all rights, privileges, and immunities under the Constitution and the laws which have been made in pursuance thereof;” however, this did not grant them veteran status.

A large group of protesters gather around the statue of Confederate General Robert E. Lee on Monument Avenue near downtown in Richmond, Virginia on Tuesday, June 2, 2020.
The definition of “veteran,” as specified by the U.S. Department of Veteran Affairs, does not include Confederate armed forces. Les' A. Melnyk, chief of public affairs and outreach for the National Cemetery Administration, part of the Department of Veterans Affairs, provided further clarification:

“While federal law authorizes some benefits for former Confederates, such as the marking of unmarked graves of Confederate service members outside VA national cemeteries, this does not confer U.S. Veteran status for other VA benefits to those affected,” Melnyk

False
The claim that Confederate veterans maintain the same legal status as U.S. veterans is FALSE. Confederate veterans' widows and children received pensions after congressional action, but that action in itself did not declare those soldiers to be full U.S. veterans. The very definition of a U.S. veteran never expanded to include Confederate soldiers –– even when they were granted amnesty by President Andrew Johnson.

fact-checked sources:
Donnie Johnson, Facebook post
BBC News, June 11, 2020 - Confederate and Columbus statues toppled by US protesters
Business Insider, June 10, 2020 - 10 Confederate leaders who still have monuments and places named after them all over the US
New York Times, Aug. 28, 2017 - From 2017: Confederate Monuments Are Coming Down Across the United States. Here’s a List.
The White House, Executive Order on Protecting American Monuments, Memorials, and Statues and Combating Recent Criminal Violence
U.S. Public Law 85-425, Section 410
Veterans’ Benefit Act of 1957
Veterans’ Benefits, §2306
Library of Congress, December 25, 1868, proclamation
U.S. Department of Veteran Affairs, Determining Veteran Status
U.S. Department of Justice, 1666. DESTRUCTION OF GOVERNMENT PROPERTY -- 18 U.S.C. § 1361
Veterans’ Memorial Preservation and Recognition Act of 2003
North Carolina General Assembly, § 100-2.1.
Sarah Lynch is an intern for the Asbury Park Press and the editor-in-chief for the Marist Circle at Marist College. Reach her at [login to see] or via Twitter at @sarahdlynch.

Response by LTC Anthony Monroe made Jul 7 at 2023 9:32 AM

2023-07-07T09:32:15-04:00

I think it sucks

Response by SGT David Fuzie made Jul 10 at 2023 3:32 PM

2023-07-10T15:32:16-04:00

I stand by my suggestion that we leave history alone, which includes renaming bases in the name of “political correctness."

Response by CW2 Donald Loughrey made Jul 10 at 2023 4:26 PM

2023-07-10T16:26:04-04:00

Well....I honestly don't have any. Just because its happening doesn't mean its right. Acceptance doesn't mean approval. That's all.

Response by SPC Julio R. made Jul 11 at 2023 6:31 PM

2023-07-11T18:31:23-04:00

And here come all the racist insurrectionists and jan. 6 fan boys. Active and Veterans in uniform or used to wear the uniform chiming in about their trash heros being picked on.

Those bases need those trash names gone. Only klanservative Reich Wing magabots and replacement theory ding backs are hurt.
Only hateful blue falcons fight and protest about garbage officers and generals from the traitorous states in the civil war. Alot of yall still think that way too hence the amger towards them renaming thoe posts. Leave those pieces of garbage in theo history books oh wait thats right yall want them banned. Or at least real history because yall love that revisionist history.

Served with alot of racist trash that hid their hate behind the uniform, disgrace and cowardly abuse of power too. That privilege I tell ya....

Response by SrA Larry Joslin made Jul 12 at 2023 3:50 AM

2023-07-12T03:50:09-04:00

How about we continue to Honor these men and leave the names of these Bases alone. People need to quit this PC bullshit. Times were different then.

Response by SGT Cy Sturgis made Jul 12 at 2023 4:14 PM

2023-07-12T16:14:11-04:00

In 1929 the United States government recognized soldiers of the Confederacy as American veterans. The current woke trend toward re-writing, erasing or distaining any part of American history that wouldn't be popular in the Berkley faculty lounge is disgraceful. They should leave well enough alone.

Response by SFC Tameka B. made Jul 12 at 2023 6:16 PM

2023-07-12T18:16:48-04:00

What is the purpose of this grand gesture with no real change? Who even asked for this? This is time and money wasted. Changing the names will not change what is ingrained in the fabric of this nation.

Response by PO2 Stephen Brownell made Jul 12 at 2023 10:50 PM

2023-07-12T22:50:11-04:00

Who are you trying to please with renaming the the Military Base

Response by PFC Tim Arnett made Jul 12 at 2023 11:17 PM

2023-07-12T23:17:07-04:00

NAME THEM FOR AMERICAN MILITARY HEROES RELATIVE TO OUR TIME, FROM VIETNAM FORWARD. WOULD BE NICE THAT CONTEMPORARY PERSONS HAVE THEIR NAMES MEMORIALIZED. HOW ABOUT CHRIS KYLE?

Response by MSgt David Brainard made Jul 13 at 2023 12:34 PM

2023-07-13T12:34:57-04:00

Hello, Although its plausible, with all due respect I feel in todays struggles with PTSD and the abuse of disability funding, considering the actual cost of renaming anything already established is astounding which makes the idea of such irresponsible. Have a look at the cost of changing the label/branding of the the United States Air Force to the United States Space Force. Nothing but ridicules. Truly legislation should be developed to restructure allocation funding to resin and channel it toward the real brass tacks bottomline heath and healthy focused rehabilitation for our struggling disabled and homeless veterans and to stop the irresponsible programs now in place such as medicating the issues in place of healing programs.

Response by SPC Paul Guerrero made Jul 13 at 2023 1:36 PM

2023-07-13T13:36:18-04:00

The democrats want re-write history but when it comes to their ass backward policies they want to shove it down the throats of every American.
I suggest they start by cleaning up their history of the racism that they have pushed from slavery to killing the Indians to steal their land.

Response by SPC Salvatore R LaRosa made Jul 13 at 2023 3:52 PM

2023-07-13T15:52:54-04:00

None ! They were Americans too!

Response by MAJ John Eckholm made Jul 13 at 2023 7:02 PM

2023-07-13T19:02:40-04:00

Change all the names to be like the Navy. Fort Watertown instead of Ft Drum, Ft Fayetteville instead of Ft Liberty. This will prevent anyone in the future from being offended because they do not like something in the namesake of a base.

Response by PO3 Troy R made Jul 13 at 2023 8:59 PM

2023-07-13T20:59:33-04:00

I'm not wasting my time, it's our government and they don't listen to anyone anyway

Response by PO3 Hugh Horton made Jul 13 at 2023 11:24 PM

2023-07-13T23:24:36-04:00

Quite wasting time and money renaming based!!

Response by MSgt Janice Trojan made Jul 14 at 2023 12:53 AM

2023-07-14T00:53:51-04:00

So.....I am for the Northern army. I do not agree with slavery. That said, history is history good or bad. Good leaders are good leaders rewriting history allows us to repeat the same mistakes. No do not rename bases, just enlighten folks the facts. I think the Clintons were bad. But I do not intend to erase them.

Response by SGT Private RallyPoint Member made Jul 14 at 2023 12:31 PM

2023-07-14T12:31:17-04:00

This is total bull. We need to rember true history. Not destroy it.

Response by SA Stephanie Scott made Jul 14 at 2023 12:55 PM

2023-07-14T12:55:21-04:00

If we earse our past history we are doomed to forget it. Our past reminds of what we did wrong and what we got right. In order to go forward we must remember and not repeat what we got wrong. This nation is not perfect but it's my nation. I will defend it until my last day. I do not run and hide from my past, I look back and see where I needed to change to better myself. This country should do the same. Don't run, don't try to change, and never forget the past for you are doomed to repeat it.

Response by SPC Private RallyPoint Member made Jul 14 at 2023 10:22 PM

2023-07-14T22:22:48-04:00

Seceding from the Union was a traitorous thing to do. Seceding from the Union was an act of treason. For me, celebrating an act of traitorous treason is not in keeping with the United States Constitution. . . .

Response by MAJ Montgomery Granger made Jul 15 at 2023 10:20 AM

2023-07-15T10:20:34-04:00

The attack on American military bases named for Americans is bizarre to me. It is born of ignorance and a complete misunderstanding of history, especially about our Civil War. When Lee surrendered to Grant, ending the war, Grant told his troops to, "Refrain from celebrations in the field," and that "The Rebels are our countrymen again." The Rebels are our countrymen again. Profound. The surrender immediately began the process of healing a wound ON THE SAME BODY, the United States of America. One can change the name of a place, even change their own name, but it doesn't change the thing or person for which the name was changed. It is a foolish, WOKE, superficial activity. And I have no known relatives who fought on the Confederate side of the war. All known ancestors who were in the Civil War fought with the Union. Americans who can't see that after the war was over, we were once again ONE people, ONE nation, under God, with liberty and justice for all, are blinded by special interests and WOKE ideology that has no basis in reality. Names on military bases are INSTRUCTIVE, INFORMATIVE, TEACHABLE MOMENTS. However, with that said, our democracy demands majority rule, protection of rights for the minority, and for the individual to be heard. For that reason, if the majority of those affected by local names of installations vote and decide to change the name of a base, I am all for it. God bless them and their choices and exercise of their freedom, liberty and pursuit of happiness. What I cannot approve of is a small group of WOKE politicians, pundits, bureaucrats and misguided decision-makers deciding for a local populace or entire military, what's in our best interest.

Response by MSgt Danny Derden made Jul 15 at 2023 11:33 AM

2023-07-15T11:33:26-04:00

In some cases (Bragg, Pickett, Hood, along with some on the Northern side) the generals hardly met the criteria for being a good military commander much less a great one...so using those to name a military installation made no sense from the very beginning. Why did anyone feel the need to honor a man who got so many of his men killed in losing battle after battle and even turned a winning fight into a loss on multiple occasions??? That is utter nonsense. The ONLY thing that makes sense is that this was done intentionally to promote either a sense of unity or sheer Southern Pride...which unfortunately does smell a bit like racist sentiment in many if not most circles (argue if you want but it is true). As for UNITY half a century after the Civil War seems a long time to wait to try and establish unity through such a measure, so that leaves me with SOUTHERN PRIDE...I am a proud TEXAN so I absolutely "get it"...but unless you are from the South you probably don't...and today many Southerners don't. I've known men who flew the Confederate Battle Flag proudly and I am absolutely certain they didn't have a racist bone in their bodies...but many others didn't know them and didn't see it that way and probably never will...that is wrong...but I think also pushing your symbol and in this case names that are synonymous with a cause that, let's be honest, fought to maintain a way of life for all practical purposes founded on slavery of other human beings is questionable at best. Many of the ideals of the Antebellum South were highly commendable...but the glaring truth is that choosing to profit off other people's abject misery negates that in a terrible way. The fact that the South was completely mismatched economically, militarily, and especially industrially and yet they carried the war in early stages and even brought it to a tipping point...well militarily speaking they were awe inspiring...a fight against great odds...what speaks more to the American Spirit? But this was American vs American and only some Americans see that fight as "inspiring" due to the odds... others just see outlaw rebels who deserved to be put down hard...and hard it was. Sherman was a brute and a racist himself...why name a tank after such a man? But he did achieve great things militarily...many of the generals we've names installations for did not and again that begs the question why? If we can change a wrong then CHANGE IT. However I do not see all Confederate Generals in the same light...militarily speaking some were absolutely superior commanders and as such certainly do deserve remembrance by our military...but the cause they fought for cannot simply be overlooked either.

Response by SGT Walter Drumm made Jul 15 at 2023 1:20 PM

2023-07-15T13:20:55-04:00

Ft. Liberty? Are you serious? I know bases are typically named after officers, especially general-rank officers. However Ft. Bragg has a rich and extensive history of exceptional soldiers and NCOs, many who are/were MoH recipients who IMHO are no less deserving of said honor. How about Ft. Benevidez, or Ft. Howard?

Response by TSgt C Estes made Jul 16 at 2023 9:49 AM

2023-07-16T09:49:31-04:00

History is history, let it go!

Response by SPC Martin Meyer made Jul 16 at 2023 3:01 PM

2023-07-16T15:01:31-04:00

Benning has already been designate as far as I know. Going to be Fort Moore from what I have heard after General Hal Moore.
They can name the forts anything they want but to us veterans we will always remember them as they were. Fort Benning will always be Fort Benning to me too much history there to be anything else. Same with all the others I will remember them as they were when I served.

Response by SPC Anna Larson made Jul 16 at 2023 6:00 PM

2023-07-16T18:00:27-04:00

Leave them be.

Response by LTC Tom Hartley made Jul 17 at 2023 7:55 AM

2023-07-17T07:55:16-04:00

Hopefully this idiocy will be undone after next election!

Response by SP5 Don Becker made Jul 17 at 2023 11:12 AM

2023-07-17T11:12:23-04:00

Hand off! History is what it is!

Response by CPL Larry Frias Jr made Jul 17 at 2023 11:47 AM

2023-07-17T11:47:21-04:00

What’s wrong with Confederate Officers…didn’t they attend West Point no different than Union Officers….plus I think they were more tenacious in the trenches!!!!!!!

Response by SSgt Ron Breier made Jul 17 at 2023 1:54 PM

2023-07-17T13:54:48-04:00

Stop with the insanity!
This is getting completely ridiculous!!!!

Response by SPC Daniel Killam made Jul 19 at 2023 5:31 AM

2023-07-19T05:31:19-04:00

Ft. Sedition
Ft. Failure
Ft. Slavery

Response by SGT Erick Holmes made Jul 20 at 2023 11:21 AM

2023-07-20T11:21:21-04:00

I personally don't understand what the big deal is and why do you want to change the names of some of these bases. I get what is going on in the world but however the names of these bases were created and occupied for hundreds of years before me you and another person went on those bases. I get what the names represent on one side but you also have to understand and take into consideration that those Generals were also apart of history. Good, right or ugly that is still history. I feel as though by changing the name you are taking away history and leaving out the other side of history in which you need both sides to in order to understand the meaning. There has to be a way to take both sides and combine them together and at least 1% of the people would be happy. What happened in the past is the past. Myself or you ca not change that. what we can go is change for the future and come together, work together, laugh and cry together and show that whatever the name is on a bases we are still family at the end of the day

Response by SFC Janice Haskins made Aug 15 at 2023 8:36 AM

2023-08-15T08:36:57-04:00

They still have to use the “real” name because using the replacement name, people don’t know where they are talking about. I have read a couple of articles and had no clue what post they were taking about until I saw (Benning).

Response by CWO3 Robert Fong made Aug 29 at 2023 12:55 PM

2023-08-29T12:55:02-04:00

The left wing woke government can name the bases and forts whatever they want, and we can refer to them whatever we want. I believe as soon as this left-wing government is replaced in 2024 it will reinstate their original names. Now for the uninformed yahoos, the Congress declared all Confederate soldiers and sailors as US Veterans. So, what's the issue? These Confederate were not selected based on politics or race, but on military performance and to allow the South to honor its heroes (part of President Lincoln's reconciliation and reconstruction policy). New installations can be named for current folks who deserve the honor based on their military performance.

Response by SP5 Paul Tucker made Sep 1 at 2023 6:27 PM

2023-09-01T18:27:52-04:00

It’s a great thing

Response by PVT Ted Rodosovich made Sep 13 at 2023 1:20 PM

2023-09-13T13:20:30-04:00

IMO, names should bubble up from the demographics of the country that represent military people.

Response by SGT Jimmy Moon made Sep 22 at 2023 6:30 AM

2023-09-22T06:30:22-04:00

I think the snowflakes should be sent to Iran for a year or ten and find out what freedom really means. Those bases offended no one. Suck it up buttercup.

Response by LT William Pellegrini made Sep 25 at 2023 1:01 PM

2023-09-25T13:01:19-04:00

Those who fought on the Confederate side in the Civil War were traitors, and should be treated accordingly. They made the choice to commit treason, they deserve all the rights such a decision requires. Having a United States military base being named after you, a traitor, is not one of them.

Response by CPO Kurt Baschab made Sep 27 at 2023 12:16 PM

2023-09-27T12:16:34-04:00

MY Honest Opinion, no one gave a Rats Ass about the Military base name, or the Democratic party Civil War Hero Statues, though out the south, until someone in the Democratic party, & the Democratic party Propaganda machine, (the American News Media) decide these Southern Democratic war heroes names was a Threat to the Democratic party pollical power & wealth. somehow. why are these names a threat to the Democratic party? lets see here what I believe, K-12 Gov Run Schools no longer teach American history, & it no longer required in many colleges & Universities, some of the Democratic pollical elites feared someone might stop and read the names on these Statues, then take the time to use there smart phones, to look up there history and find out they were all Registered Democratic pollical elites, then the citizen might take it one step further and found out not one single registered Republican party member every own a slave, and that the Republican party was started as the Anti Slavery party, and it was the Democratic party upon Abraham Lincoln election, that attempted to Assassinate a newly elected President, before he was able to take office , when that failed the Democratic party Seceded from the UNION, IN ORDER TO FIGHT A CIVAL WAR in the name of states rights, TO KEEP SLAVERY ! the number of American citizens that do not know there own American history, or the History and Evil acts that the Democratic party is Astounding. the evil acts that the Dem party has committed though out the American history to keep power, wealth, and slavery, is just pure evil, when the Dem party lost the Civil war, they started the KKK TO IMPOSE VERBAL AND PHYSICAL Violence AGANIST ANY AMERICAN CITIZEN WHO OPENLY DISAGREED WITH THE DEM PARTY POLTICAL POLICYS & AGENDA OR DEM CANADATES , it was the Dem party that passed the 1st Gun Control Laws to prevent newly freed slaves from defending themselves from the Dem Party KKK Members, Imposed Segregation throughout the South, packed the courts to ensure Segregation was found constitutional with the judges justifying it by saying equal but separate was just fine, in the early 1900 it was Dem President Woodrow Wilson, who restarted the KKK, Imposed Segregation though out the Federal Gov, opposed civil rights, imposed Jim crow laws though out the south, opposed the woman's right to vote, the list is long, etc etc, etc, the Dem party is the Oldest Bigoted, sexist, Racist pollical party in American History, this is why the Dem Leadership are demanding these name changes, no one cared about any of this, Until the Dem Party Propaganda machine ie:( American News Media) told there supporters to care to get angry, tear them down. !

Response by Sgt Randy Shupert made Sep 28 at 2023 2:25 AM

2023-09-28T02:25:08-04:00

If you do not know your history your are damned to repeat it.

Response by PO2 Marlon Blount made Oct 2 at 2023 4:20 PM

2023-10-02T16:20:38-04:00

I find it interesting that military members especially keep making the ignorant claim that it's an attempt to erase history. They were named for enemies and traitors. It's not "erasing history" nobody's trying to say those losers didn't exist they just don't deserve installations to be named in their honor so quit crying.

Response by MSG Private RallyPoint Member made Oct 9 at 2023 10:41 AM

2023-10-09T10:41:52-04:00

Heaven forbid we make somebody uncomfortable. Oh wait we were trying to make the south feel better after the war with the naming. History repeats itself over and over and rewriting it won't change anything. I have an idea, let's call the numbers except start with 100 so nobody gets upset about who is 1.

Response by LCpl Sandy Moran made Oct 12 at 2023 10:32 AM

2023-10-12T10:32:17-04:00

well how about naming bases/forts after states or cities. exp fort albany, fort north carolina, there's enough states and cities too go around and no conflcts. But I agree leave well enough alone.

Response by SFC Michael Barnett made Oct 14 at 2023 5:37 PM

2023-10-14T17:37:52-04:00

My suggestion is do nothing! F the woke people in this country!

Response by Sgt Robert Elliott made Nov 3 at 2023 9:45 AM

2023-11-03T09:45:27-04:00

Soldiers are going to be saying, "I'm stationed at Fort Liberty formerly fort Bragg". I'm stationed at fort Novosel formerly Fort Rucker". I'm on X formerly Twitter!!! You may call it by its new name but you will always refer to its former name. It's going to take at least a generation or two for that to change! After the changes, all those involved can sit around and talk about "Remember that time when we voted for Joe?" Just more foolish liberal thinking!

Response by SGM Ronald Cheatom made Nov 4 at 2023 3:49 PM

2023-11-04T15:49:18-04:00

For me, I have no idea the reasons for naming these post the way they did. Nor did I give thought to why they all were in the south. The prestige for those post came from the training being conducted, and the units stationed there. Leave it alone.

Response by SGM Major Stroupe made Nov 26 at 2023 1:08 PM

2023-11-26T13:08:00-05:00

I suggest that those people in charge read history and leave the names alone. We are sending the wrong message to our future generations by changing them and eliminating things that remind us that our nation's history is rich and sometimes not what we would have liked reading about. But it is our nation's history and we should not destroy it.

Response by A1C Medrick "Rick" DeVaney made Nov 26 at 2023 7:00 PM

2023-11-26T19:00:30-05:00

Here's MY Suggestion:
"'3y34uy6;[*...;".
And I DAM*ED Well Meant Every Word Of It

Response by Cpl Kevin Davis made Dec 17 at 2023 11:34 AM

2023-12-17T11:34:25-05:00

The bases I was stationed at had historical information pamphlets so loosing the history, good or bad, shouldn’t be a concern. As to renaming bases why aren’t all bases renamed after 100 years? New bases are rarely built and heroes are born every war. Added to that I t would give those REMFs something to make them feel important that isn’t writing new bs regulations or debating tattoo policy lol.

Response by SGT Private RallyPoint Member made Jan 8 at 2024 6:26 AM

2024-01-08T06:26:16-05:00

HOW ABOUT LEAVING THEM AS THE FUCK THEY WERE. I DON'T GIVE A FUCK WHAT THE WOKE ASS BASTARDS SAY, FORT BENNING WILL ALWAYS STAY FORT BENNING!!!

Response by Cpl George Matousek made Jan 13 at 2024 3:04 PM

2024-01-13T15:04:55-05:00

Leave the names alone, they were and are Americans and fought for what they believed in. Semper Fi

Response by SP5 Thomas Boden made Jan 17 at 2024 1:46 PM

2024-01-17T13:46:02-05:00

You can't change History leave well enough alone. We don't have to bend over Backwards changing names it's not going to change anything.

Response by SGM Robert Winstead made Jan 17 at 2024 8:46 PM

2024-01-17T20:46:37-05:00

Stop rewriting history! Stop naming things after people. Someone will come along and claim that person is a racist or something else. All the money wasted in renaming things could be put to better use in helping veterans.

Response by Sgt Frank Staples made Jan 22 at 2024 7:48 PM

2024-01-22T19:48:40-05:00

Since it is simply a case of liberal politics I suggest leaving the names as they were...Ft. Bragg is known throughout the country and very few people around here ( Southern Pines, N.C. ) call it anything but Bragg, the home of the 82nd Airborne.

Response by SP5 Shauna Berntsen made Jan 24 at 2024 2:25 PM

2024-01-24T14:25:47-05:00

You can not change the past you can only learn from it.

Response by PO2 Christopher Foss made Jan 26 at 2024 10:12 AM

2024-01-26T10:12:55-05:00

(Disclaimer - I am from Minnesota)
38 U.S. Code § 1501
Section 3 applies to the Civil War, and declares Confederate military as U.S. Veterans.
The sort of need to find guilt for the past is ridiculous.

Response by CPO Melvin Miller made Feb 24 at 2024 3:45 PM

2024-02-24T15:45:26-05:00

In twenty years or so there be those who will want to change the new names also. History is what it is. Leave it alone. We have been too eager to try to erase it. Its not going anywhere. Each generation has its prejudices. Bases, ships, streets etc have been renamed. Statues torn down or removed. Sports teams renamed. Will we be removing George Washington, and Thomas Jeffersons name and face because they owned slaves.

Response by SGT Glenn E Moody made Feb 25 at 2024 7:52 AM

2024-02-25T07:52:06-05:00

its our history leave it alone. FT BENNING will always be Benning to me. but now they call it FT Moore. I was there 22. SEPTEMBER. 2023. for my neice's turn blue ceremony from Basic to AIT. it was still SANDHILL ROUSH BERRECK'S ware I became 11-B INFANTRYMAN on 17. JUNE. 1982. when it was FT Benning ARMY INFANTRY SCHOOL. C-6-1 pisted that the liberals are changing everything. my great grand-pa came here from Nole Nova Scotis. early 1900's operated A Boatyard at the ft of River st. Quincy MA. my grand pa & farther brother & my self worked in shipbuilding. we worked our asses off all of our lifes. dad was NAVY FA KOREA. I was & still serving as A VETERAN 26th (YANKEE) INFANTRY DIVISION. SGT AT ARMS MA ARMY NATIONAL GUARD BOSTON CHAPTER. my 1st born nephew USMC IRAQ. just A little of history of why this LEFTY LIBERAL CRAP OF CHANGING EVERYTHING ABOUT OUR HISTORY REALLY PISSES ME OFF SO MUCH. don't even get me going about the gender crap. their is ONLY TWO GENDERS (MALE & FEMALE) (BOY & GIRL) (MAN & WOMAN) PERIOD. STOP teaching that CRAP TO THE CHILDREN IS JUST SO WRONG. IT IS NOT OK TO BE GAY & TEACHING IT TO SCHOOL AGE CHILDREN IS WRONG PERIOD IF YOU WANT TO GRO UP AND BE GAY its your choice KEEP IT TO YOUR SELF"S PERIOD BRAINWASHING OUR CHILDREN IN SCHOOL DOSEN'T GIVE THEM THE CHOICE AND OR CHANCE TO BE NORMAL PERIOD. (GOD MADE ADAM & EVE NOT ADAM & STEVE) PERIOD

Response by SP6 Greg Jetter made Mar 6 at 2024 7:22 PM

2024-03-06T19:22:10-05:00

How about we re name them to woke names
Fort Bragg = Fort pro noun
Fort Rucker = Fort Bottoms Surgery
Fort Benning = Fort inclusive
Fort Gordon = Fort Feelings Matter
Fort Hood = Fort Gay Pride
Fort Polk = Fort Non binary
Fort A.P.Hill = Fort harmones rage
Fort Belvoir = Fort Safe Spaces
Fort Lee = Fort Clinton oh no wait , wasn't Clinton a confederat slave holder , so no go there....
Fort Picket = Fort we give up don't hurt us please.

Name them any thing you want , at this point in time most veterans are sick and tired of the woke bullshit , and command wonders why folks will not re -up and no one will join up .
have fun trying to fight and win a war with the crap you are promoting .

Response by MAJ Kenneth McGovern made Apr 25 at 2024 7:17 PM

2024-04-25T19:17:35-04:00

Commie move.