Posted on Jul 1, 2016
Why do retiree ID cards look so fake? Is it time for an update? I say maybe, so long as it is cost effective. Any ideas?
Suspended Profile
3.82K
33
13
Posted >1 y ago
Responses: 8
It goes back to Pre-CAC days. All the ID's had a similar design. Active Duty were Green, Retirees were blue, Reservists were Red/Pink, Dependents were Brown. When the CAC were introduced, not all ID Card Holders needed "Common Access" therefore, not everyone got Common Access Cards.
The old ID card is CHEAP. The CAC is "inexpensive" in bulk, but not as cheap as the old cards.
Additionally, why change cards when you can leave ALL retirees on ONE format, and Active/Reservists will naturally phase out, and Retirees don't expire anyways? Multiple formats create confusion and logistical burden.
The old ID card is CHEAP. The CAC is "inexpensive" in bulk, but not as cheap as the old cards.
Additionally, why change cards when you can leave ALL retirees on ONE format, and Active/Reservists will naturally phase out, and Retirees don't expire anyways? Multiple formats create confusion and logistical burden.
LTC Stephen C.
I agree, Capt (Join to see), I like blue. Also, I don't care that it looks fake as long as it works, and it hasn't failed me yet! PO1 Dave Martin
Read This Next
*True, as opposed to TDRL (Temporary Disability Retired List). TDRL is capped at 5 years (unless they changed that in the 15 or so years since I learned the ID stuff)... PDRL (Permanent Disability Retired List) is the same as a normal retiree's card - basically.