4
4
0
In my almost 12 years in the Army, I've seen way too many situations where Soldiers, regardless of rank, are sitting back watching what wrong looks like. I think that every Soldier, Airman, Sailor, Marine, Coastie, Reservist, Guardsman, and whoever else should know that you always have a voice. You don't need a title to be a leader. Just because you're not the "squad leader", does that mean that you can't help square away and look out for other members of the squad? If you're not the "first sergeant", can you not look out for Soldiers in another platoon to help your battle buddies out? I'm sure everyone on this forum has seen situations where this is an issue, or an opportunity. What say you??
Professional Development
Training
Warrior Ethos
Posted 10 y ago
Responses: 3
2
2
0
On the flip side, I think you should be a Leader before you get a title. The Army really needs to find a different evaluation system of it's Soldiers. The check the block and blanket evaluation reports that the Army has always used just don't cut it.
Get input from the Soldiers he is Leading. Or somehow track their progress and evaluate him from that.
Get input from the Soldiers he is Leading. Or somehow track their progress and evaluate him from that.
(2)
(0)
SFC (Join to see)
I can agree with that. Too many times I've seen someone get put in to a leadership position "just because"
(0)
(0)
1
1
0
1
1
0
Agreed! Furthermore, the best leaders start out by being the best followers, following directions, and paying attention to detail. They then begin the mentoring process by sharing what they learned with the junior experienced troops.
(1)
(0)
Read This Next
Continue with Facebook 
Continue with Google