Do you think Kyle Rittenhouse will be found innocent or guilty?

SPC Daniel Dresen - You didn't read or listen to a single thing about this case did you? He did not acquire the AR-15, his friend bought it for him in anticipation of him turning 18 in the near future and regardless, everything was done legally according to WI law. Also, he never "crossed state lines" (you all say that like he's a foreign Solider crossing into another country), he met up with his friend in WI who handed it to him. It is also legal for him to carry the weapon, to which the Prosecutor had to agree as the law as written was ambiguous for 17 year olds. Read it for yourself. ALL of it, including the subsections and note the use of the word "AND" which is significant in legal documents.

As for the video (which I find interesting folks here who criticize Kyle also say the histories of the people he shot do not matter... Except for Kyle right?). This is what the unconfirmed video said in the video the Prosecutor wanted to use:

“It looks like one of them has a weapon,” says the person prosecutors identify as Rittenhouse, but who was not actually seen in the video.

“Brah, I wish I had my f—ing AR. l’d start shooting rounds at them,” says the same person in the video used in the filing.

People can read a lot into that. Was he concerned they were using their weapons? Maybe, maybe not... The records and prior actions unrelated to the night in question were deemed inadmissible as they lack context and relevance. Kyle did not simply shoot into a crowd of looters on the night he initially shot Rosenbaum. The jury agreed. His Facebook post showed nothing about Kyle other than him holding an AR-15 in a picture. There was nothing about Trump, nothing about white supremacy, nothing about politics what-so-ever.

As for the "trumptard" judge... You mean the one appointed by a Democrat and the one who continued to win re-election as a Democrat? Hmmm... I guess he's been playing the long con just to free a Trump supporter. Only, until after this trial, there hasn't been a shred of evidence Kyle even had a single thought about Trump? What the hell does Trump have to do with this case anyway? Trump didn't write WI law or the 2nd Amendment. None of this has anything to do with Trump. Next, how did the judge "block" the gun? The prosecutor had the gun at the trial and even flagged the courtroom with his finger on the trigger.

People here do care about the rule of law, and it doesn't take a Trump supporter to see this kid is innocent. I am by no means a Trump fan and I clearly saw Kyle defend himself. Furthermore, a jury of his peers agreed. Not guilty.

SSgt Christophe Murphy - Not entirely true. There are a very few states that do allow felons to own firearms in a very few circumstances.

SrA John Monette that isn’t applicable in this case though.

SPC Daniel Dresen libtards only believe what they want to believe. A few seconds with Google would confirm how many of your statements above are flat out lies.

As to being RULED, that's much more a Liberal trait, than a conservative one.

Meanwhile, there's only one answer for people like you and the meme covers it.

MSG Clyde Mills - By the way, to clarify where my thinking comes from: I'm 69. I adhere to the values of my father, his co-horts in the "Great Generation," and those who fought WWII in service of their country's most important, cherished values. That should clarify my answer.

Jud Newborn - Then if you go by the morals and values of your Father, then you should know (ALL) the facts before making such a remark on the Situation. It was not against the law for him to carry the weapon and defend himself, cleared by Jury of his peers in Court. Secondly, he did not transport the rifle across State lines, his friend who owns the gun did and perfectly legal as well. He didn't need to learn anything, his Mother has taught him well enough that when people need help. He jumped at the chance to go and help defend his Grandparents Place of Business and also to help the Car Lot owner protect his as well. So with your 69 years of knowledge, you need to learn to know the facts before spouting off about what you think is the law, cause you certainty don't know the law well enough to be a PC posting Lawyer. Where as in my case, I have a son and D-I-L who are Police Officer's and my oldest son is an Attorney. So I got the facts of the case and know that this young man did nothing wrong at all. Just like if it had been myself or anyone else that might have been in his shoes that night. 100% Self Defense from 3 criminals who were breaking the law and got stopped by the young man. 2 of them received a dirt blanket permanently and the other was shot after he pointed his gun at the young man. All 3 were career criminals and the one who lived, told the Jury that he did indeed, point his gun at Rittenhouse first. So get all your facts straight and know what your talking about before you spout off on the subject without the (FACTS).

Innocent is Innocent not a trade and pick a crime to convict an innocent young man on, He was tried and found innocent by a jury of his peers, it never should have gone to court but politics and agenda have their say. I can see you didn't watch the trial or actually see the evidence from what you posted. Bot to love folks who don't invest the time too watch what they comment on. Blaming everyone but the criminals that got shot shows you what stage this Nation is in and its a sad thing.

After seeing the footage, I saw why he was acquitted. In the scuffle one of the persons had a handgun. That's probably what led to the decision.

SrA Michael Dowd if she didn't wear that dress she wouldnt have been forced to fornicate with that man. If that family wasn't out driving their car the drunk driver wouldn't have killed them.

SrA Michael Dowd - The young man had every reason to be there 100%, just like I would have been. Thing is, he was there to help protect his Grandparents place as well as the car Lot. Go back to the left with your babble....

MSG Clyde Mills - So why did he run back to IL afterwards? I guess that shit didn't need anymore protecting huh?

Duh, he lived across the line 20 miles from his Grandparents place of Business, don't you pay attention to the facts of the case. He went home to his mom's house after he got attacked and reported the shootings to the Police. Are people going to have to inform every person on this board of all th3e facts of the case, so that they get the knowledge a little bit of reading could supply them with. Or are you just ignorant of the Law and all the facts.
BTW: the definition of the word Ignorant - Means a person who does not know the TRUTH.