Posted on Dec 31, 2020
How Taiwan Won 2020: By Trusting Its Citizens, and Distrusting the Chinese Communist Party |...
1.18K
19
10
3
3
0
I just can't figure out why the MSM cannot distinguish the PRC-CCP as a malevolent actor. Any review of its History and goals will tell you what their objective is: Regional Hegemony in the short term (10 years) and global hegemony in the long term (25 -50 years).
How Taiwan Won 2020: By Trusting Its Citizens, and Distrusting the Chinese Communist Party |...
Posted from nationalreview.com
Posted >1 y ago
Responses: 3
Edited >1 y ago
Posted >1 y ago
The bigger concern is how MAGA supporters overlook outgoing President Trump's major financial ties to PRC-CCP
https://foreignpolicy.com/2020/10/21/why-trump-chinese-bank-account-beijing-business-tax-returns-joe-hunter-biden/
https://foreignpolicy.com/2020/10/21/why-trump-chinese-bank-account-beijing-business-tax-returns-joe-hunter-biden/
Why Does Trump Have a Chinese Bank Account?
The U.S. president has attacked Democratic nominee Joe Biden for his son’s dealings in China. But it appears Trump was himself pursuing business interests there.
(5)
Comment
(0)
SGT (Join to see)
>1 y
You can't expect a Trumpie to believe anything that Trump himself has not told them. They don't believe in facts and are quite happy to participate in the destruction of out democracy by believing in these conspiracy theories.
(3)
Reply
(0)
Col Joseph Lenertz
>1 y
False. Not a bigger concern than CCP goals and objectives. Trump is gone in 3 weeks and the CCP goals and objectives will remain the same. No amount of Trump vilification will address the real problem of Chinese aspirations. Stay focused on the strategic picture. Presidents come and go, and all have ties to China, as does Biden, but that doesn't make for a US strategy to counter China.
(0)
Reply
(0)
Posted >1 y ago
It doesn't fit the narrative. The media is owned by Democrats who are in bed with the Chinese
(1)
Comment
(0)
Col Joseph Lenertz
>1 y
Yes, and the NARRATIVE is more important than the IMPACT of policy, to the MSM.
(0)
Reply
(0)
Read This Next