Posted on Nov 17, 2015
SGT Nia Chiaraluce
2.91K
13
5
3
3
0
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/11/17/world/europe/obama-says-paris-attacks-have-stiffened-resolve-to-crush-isis.html?_r=0

We all know that complaining changes little. When faced with an obstacle we can’t change the only thing we can really do is change our perspective to the obstacle. Being fortunate enough to watch the POTUS address yesterday I feel like I am about to go out on a limb here. I am appalled at the lack of support our Commander in Chief is receiving across social media, the news and on military forums. It is far easier to ostracize and criticize the approach he adopted and has stood by ever since the draw down in Iraq during his first administration, then understand the larger picture.
“Let’s assume that we were to send 50,000 troops into Syria,” he said. “What happens when there’s a terrorist attack generated from Yemen? Do we then send more troops into there? Or Libya perhaps? Or if there’s a terrorist network that’s operating anywhere else in North Africa or in Southeast Asia?”
After listening to that part of speech yesterday and now reading it again, what I honestly see here is a lack of higher perspective and understanding by our military force and a country. I truly believe he understands what we are capable of as his fighting force, but more importantly now understands what we sacrifice for this great country where during his first administration I was unsure. I was unsure because I watched soldiers be transported from Iraq to support the fight in Afghanistan with no rest time in between.
I am not trying to say that we as a nation or military force does not have need for concern. What I am trying to convey is that as our Country’s first line of defense it is our job to understand where our Commander in Chief is coming from regarding his diplomatic stance on how to respond to terrorist groups like ISIS/ISIL. If we are unable to do so I think it would be wise to mind our tongues until we achieve that level of understanding.
Edited >1 y ago
Avatar feed
Responses: 4
PO3 Electrician's Mate
4
4
0
There is a willing ground force there to fight ISIS. The Kurd!!! we just need to bomb the heck out of ISIS and arming the Kurd, they will finish them off for us. The most on the ground thing is we just concentrate on special op.
(4)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
1stSgt Sergeant Major/First Sergeant
2
2
0
I believe that our prospective will change after the next election. POTUS is trying to not get us over involved in a conflict that will continue into perpetuity. I say all out air campaign to destroy them, then allow non US led coalition forces to clear the ground.
(2)
Comment
(0)
1stSgt Sergeant Major/First Sergeant
1stSgt (Join to see)
8 y
CPL Glynnda White , yes, you caught my typo. Thank you for pointing it out. Semper Fidelis.
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
SSG Program Control Manager
1
1
0
There is some honest disagreement about the role the US should be playing on the world stage and the degree to which we should be engaged in the struggle against extremist groups like Daesh. There is also a lot of pure partisan hatred that has nothing to do with reason.

You are absolutely correct that those of us who are invested in this nations defense, should make an effort to fully understand the President strategy before we attack it.
(1)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small

Join nearly 2 million former and current members of the US military, just like you.

close